Skip to main content

Couscous, dry

Grains Per 100 g · Per 100g serving
Contains: 🌾 Wheat

Couscous, dry is a grain, containing 376 calories per 100g. It is an excellent source of Carbohydrate, providing 77.43 g (60% of the Daily Value) per 100g serving. This grain is a moderate protein source, a useful source of fiber, virtually fat-free. Grains are a primary source of carbohydrates, B vitamins, and minerals. Whole grains retain the bran and germ, providing substantially more fiber and micronutrients than refined grains. Our database tracks 60 nutrients for this food, plus glycemic index, environmental footprint data.

376
Calories
kcal
12.8
Protein
g
0.64
Fat
g
77.4
Carbs
g
5.0
Fiber
g

Top Nutrients

💪
Carbohydrate
77.4 g
60% DV
💎
Manganese
0.78 mg
34% DV
💎
Copper
0.25 mg
27% DV

Data for 60 of 150 tracked nutrients

Nutrient Fingerprint

How this food scores across key nutrient categories, as a percentage of the daily recommended value per 100 g. Based on USDA DRIs for adults.

Complete Nutrient Profile

Macronutrients 8
NutrientPer 100gUnitPer Serving% DV
Water SR8.6g
0%
Calories SR376kcal
Energy (kJ) SR1,573kj
Protein SR12.8g
23%
Total Fat SR0.64g
Carbohydrate SR77.4g
60%
Fiber SR5.0g
13%
Ash SR0.62g
Minerals 9
NutrientPer 100gUnitPer Serving% DV
Calcium SR24.0mg
2%
Iron SR1.1mg
14%
Magnesium SR44.0mg
11%
Phosphorus SR170mg
24%
Potassium SR166mg
5%
Sodium SR10.0mg
1%
Zinc SR0.83mg
8%
Copper SR0.25mg
27%
Manganese SR0.78mg
34%
Vitamins 16
NutrientPer 100gUnitPer Serving% DV
Vitamin A (RAE) SR0µg
Vitamin A (IU) SR0IU
Retinol SR0µg
Vitamin C SR0mg
Vitamin D SR0µg
Vitamin D (IU) SR0IU
Thiamin (B1) SR0.16mg
14%
Riboflavin (B2) SR0.08mg
6%
Niacin (B3) SR3.5mg
22%
Pantothenic Acid (B5) SR1.2mg
25%
Vitamin B6 SR0.11mg
8%
Folate SR20.0µg
5%
Folic Acid SR0µg
Folate (food) SR20.0µg
Folate (DFE) SR20.0µg
Vitamin B12 SR0µg
Fatty Acids 4
NutrientPer 100gUnitPer Serving% DV
Saturated Fat SR0.12g
Monounsaturated Fat SR0.09g
Polyunsaturated Fat SR0.25g
Cholesterol SR0mg
Individual Fatty Acids 5
NutrientPer 100gUnitPer Serving% DV
Myristic Acid (14:0) SR0.001g
Palmitic Acid (16:0) SR0.11g
Stearic Acid (18:0) SR0.006g
Linoleic Acid (18:2) SR0.24g
1%
Linolenic Acid (18:3) SR0.01g
Amino Acids 18
NutrientPer 100gUnitPer Serving% DV
Tryptophan SR0.16g
Threonine SR0.34g
Isoleucine SR0.49g
Leucine SR0.87g
Lysine SR0.24g
Methionine SR0.20g
Cystine SR0.36g
Phenylalanine SR0.62g
Tyrosine SR0.34g
Valine SR0.54g
Arginine SR0.47g
Histidine SR0.26g
Alanine SR0.37g
Aspartic Acid SR0.52g
Glutamic Acid SR4.6g
Glycine SR0.40g
Proline SR1.4g
Serine SR0.60g

Nutrient Density Score

The NRF9.3 score measures overall nutritional quality per 100 kcal. It rewards 9 nutrients to encourage (protein, fiber, vitamins A, C, E, calcium, iron, magnesium, potassium) and penalizes 3 to limit (saturated fat, added sugars, sodium). Higher is better; negative scores indicate the food is high in limit nutrients relative to its beneficial content.

17
NRF9.3 Score
Moderate · per 100 kcal
Poor (<0) Moderate Good Excellent (100+)

NRF9.3 index: Fulgoni et al. (2009), J Nutr 139(8). DVs based on FDA 2020 reference values.

Nutrient Interactions in This Food

Nutrients in this food that enhance or compete with each other during absorption.

✔ Synergies — nutrients that help each other

Vitamin B6 + Magnesium●●

Vitamin B6 may enhance intracellular magnesium accumulation. Combined supplementation has shown greater benefits for stress and anxiety than magnesium alone.

Pouteau et al., PLoS One, 2018

Vitamin B6 + Folate●●

Vitamin B6 is a cofactor in folate-dependent one-carbon metabolism. Together with B12, these three nutrients regulate homocysteine levels.

Selhub, J Nutr Health Aging, 2002

⚠ Antagonisms — nutrients that compete

Zinc vs Copper●●●

High zinc intake induces metallothionein in enterocytes, which traps copper and blocks its absorption. Prolonged high-dose zinc can cause copper deficiency.

Prasad et al., JAMA, 1978; Fosmire, Am J Clin Nutr, 1990

Zinc vs Iron●●

Zinc and non-heme iron compete for the same intestinal transporter (DMT1). High doses of one can reduce absorption of the other when taken simultaneously.

Rossander-Hulten et al., Am J Clin Nutr, 1991

Fiber vs Iron●●

Phytates in high-fibre foods (whole grains, legumes) bind non-heme iron and reduce its bioavailability. Soaking, sprouting, and fermentation reduce phytate content.

Hurrell & Egli, Int J Vitam Nutr Res, 2010

Fiber vs Zinc●●

Phytates in fibre-rich foods chelate zinc, reducing its bioavailability by up to 50% in high-phytate diets. This is a major concern in plant-based diets.

Sandstrom, Food Nutr Res, 1997

Manganese vs Iron●●

Manganese and iron share the DMT1 transporter and compete for absorption. High iron status reduces manganese absorption and vice versa.

Erikson et al., Pharmacol Ther, 2007

Amino Acid Profile

Essential amino acid composition compared to the WHO/FAO adult reference pattern. The Amino Acid Score indicates protein quality — 100 means all essential amino acid requirements are met.

43
Amino Acid Score
Low
Lysine
Limiting Amino Acid
18
Amino Acids Tracked

Tip: The limiting amino acid is Lysine. Pair with legumes, dairy, and soy for a complete amino acid profile.

All Amino Acids (18)
Amino Acidg / 100gmg / g protein
Tryptophan0.1612.8
Threonine0.3426.4
Isoleucine0.4938.6
Leucine0.8768.3
Lysine0.2419.2
Methionine0.2015.6
Cystine0.3628.2
Phenylalanine0.6248.6
Tyrosine0.3426.3
Valine0.5442.6
Arginine0.4736.8
Histidine0.2620.3
Alanine0.3729.3
Aspartic Acid0.5240.8
Glutamic Acid4.6360.5
Glycine0.4031.6
Proline1.4110.0
Serine0.6047.1

Fatty Acid Profile

Breakdown of fat types per 100g. A healthy fat profile favours unsaturated fats (mono + poly) and a balanced omega-3 to omega-6 ratio.

0.12g
Saturated
0.09g
Monounsaturated
0.25g
Polyunsaturated
Omega Fatty Acids
Linoleic acid (18:2 n-6)0.24 g

How Cooking Changes Nutrients

Estimated percentage of each nutrient retained after cooking, based on USDA retention factors for the “Rice” food category. Values of 100% mean no loss; lower values indicate nutrients lost to heat, water, or oxidation.

Key insights
Folate loses up to 40% when boiled (drained). Boiled (water used) retains 70%.

Source: USDA Table of Nutrient Retention Factors, Release 6 (2007). Retention values are category-level averages — actual retention depends on cooking time, temperature, and water volume.

USDA Retention Factors

Glycemic Impact

The Glycemic Index (GI) measures how quickly a food raises blood sugar on a 0–100 scale. Glycemic Load (GL) accounts for typical serving size. Low GI < 55, Medium 56–69, High ≥ 70.

65
Glycemic Index
Medium GI
23
Glycemic Load
High GL (per 150g)
GI Scale 65
0 Low <55 Med High ≥70 100

GI data matched from: “Couscous, boiled” · ●●● high confidence

Source: International Tables of Glycemic Index (Sydney University, 2021)

Environmental Impact

Environmental footprint per kilogram of food produced. Data represents the global average for the “Rice” category.

4.5
kg CO₂e / kg
Moderate Impact
2.8
m² land / kg
Land Use
2,248
L water / kg
Water Use
17.5
g SO₂e / kg
Acidification
How this compares (GHG emissions)
Potatoes (0.5)Chicken (9.9)Beef (99.5)
Greenhouse Gas Emissions4.5 kg CO₂e / kg
Land Use2.8 m² / kg
Water Use2,248 L / kg
Eutrophication35.1 g PO₄e / kg
Acidification17.5 g SO₂e / kg
⚠️ Important context about this data
  • Global averages: These figures are production-weighted averages from a meta-analysis of ~38,700 farms across 119 countries (Poore & Nemecek, 2018). Actual impact varies enormously by farming method, geography, and supply chain.
  • System boundary: Cradle-to-retail only — does not include consumer transport, home cooking energy, or food waste.
  • Soil carbon not included: This data does not account for soil carbon sequestration. Some argue that well-managed regenerative grazing partially offsets ruminant emissions; however, full lifecycle accounting — including methane, land-use change, and the opportunity cost of using land for grazing vs. reforestation — typically makes the net footprint of ruminant meat higher, not lower. This is especially relevant in temperate grassland regions like Ireland.
  • Not gospel: This data is informational and illustrative. It is useful for understanding relative magnitudes, but should not be treated as precise measurements for any individual product or farm.

Source: Poore & Nemecek (2018), Science 360(6392). Meta-analysis of ~38,700 farms, 119 countries, 46 product categories.

Global Supply: Cereals

Top 10 countries by per capita supply of the “Cereals” food group (kcal/capita/day, 2023). This is food group–level data from FAO Food Balance Sheets, not specific to this individual food.

1.
Egypt
1962
2.
Bhutan
1927
3.
Serbia
1888
4.
Morocco
1876
5.
Mali
1862
6.
Ethiopia
1829
7.
Philippines
1774
8.
Bangladesh
1756
9.
Myanmar
1738
10.
Nepal
1679

Global Supply Trend (1961–2023)

+8%
1961: 1030 kcal2023: 1108 kcal

Source: FAO Food Balance Sheets (2023). Supply = production + imports − exports − waste, converted to kcal/capita/day.

Frequently Asked Questions

How many calories are in Couscous, dry?

Couscous, dry contains 376 kcal per 100 grams, making it a calorie-dense food. The energy comes from 12.8g of protein (14% of calories), 0.64g of fat (2%), and 77.4g of carbohydrates (82%). Carbohydrates are the primary energy source.

What is Couscous, dry most nutritious for?

The standout nutrient in Couscous, dry is Carbohydrate, providing 77.4 g per 100g (60% of the Daily Value). It is also a notable source of Manganese (34% DV). Our database tracks 60 individual nutrients for this food, allowing detailed comparison across vitamins, minerals, amino acids, and fatty acids.

Is Couscous, dry high in protein?

Couscous, dry provides 12.8g of protein per 100 grams — a moderate amount. Protein contributes 14% of its calories.

How much fiber is in Couscous, dry?

Couscous, dry contains 5.0g of fiber per 100 grams — a moderate amount. This contributes to the recommended daily intake of 25-38g. Pairing with other fiber-rich foods like vegetables, legumes, or whole grains can help meet daily targets.

What is the glycemic index of Couscous, dry?

Couscous, dry has a glycemic index of 65, which is classified as medium (56-69). Medium-GI foods produce a moderate blood sugar response. The glycemic load, which accounts for typical serving size, provides additional context for real-world blood sugar impact.