Skip to main content

Hearts of palm, canned

Vegetables Per 100 g · Per 100g serving
Also available: Raw

Hearts of palm, canned is a vegetable, providing just 28.0 calories per 100g. It is an excellent source of Manganese, providing 1.394 mg (61% of the Daily Value) per 100g serving. This vegetable is virtually fat-free. Vegetables provide essential vitamins, minerals, and dietary fiber with relatively few calories. They are a cornerstone of virtually every dietary guideline worldwide. Our database tracks 61 nutrients for this food, plus insulin index, environmental footprint data.

28.0
Calories
kcal
2.5
Protein
g
0.62
Fat
g
4.6
Carbs
g
2.4
Fiber
g

Top Nutrients

💎
Manganese
1.4 mg
61% DV
💎
Iron
3.1 mg
39% DV
💎
Sodium
426 mg
28% DV

Data for 61 of 150 tracked nutrients

Nutrient Fingerprint

How this food scores across key nutrient categories, as a percentage of the daily recommended value per 100 g. Based on USDA DRIs for adults.

Complete Nutrient Profile

Macronutrients 8
NutrientPer 100gUnitPer Serving% DV
Water SR90.2g
2%
Calories SR28.0kcal
Energy (kJ) SR117kj
Protein SR2.5g
4%
Total Fat SR0.62g
Carbohydrate SR4.6g
4%
Fiber SR2.4g
6%
Ash SR2.0g
Minerals 10
NutrientPer 100gUnitPer Serving% DV
Calcium SR58.0mg
6%
Iron SR3.1mg
39%
Magnesium SR38.0mg
10%
Phosphorus SR65.0mg
9%
Potassium SR177mg
5%
Sodium SR426mg
28%
Zinc SR1.1mg
10%
Copper SR0.13mg
15%
Manganese SR1.4mg
61%
Selenium SR0.70µg
1%
Vitamins 16
NutrientPer 100gUnitPer Serving% DV
Vitamin A (RAE) SR0µg
Vitamin A (IU) SR0IU
Retinol SR0µg
Vitamin C SR7.9mg
9%
Vitamin D SR0µg
Vitamin D (IU) SR0IU
Thiamin (B1) SR0.01mg
1%
Riboflavin (B2) SR0.06mg
4%
Niacin (B3) SR0.44mg
3%
Pantothenic Acid (B5) SR0.13mg
2%
Vitamin B6 SR0.02mg
2%
Folate SR39.0µg
10%
Folic Acid SR0µg
Folate (food) SR39.0µg
Folate (DFE) SR39.0µg
Vitamin B12 SR0µg
Fatty Acids 5
NutrientPer 100gUnitPer Serving% DV
Saturated Fat SR0.13g
Monounsaturated Fat SR0.10g
Polyunsaturated Fat SR0.20g
Trans Fat SR0g
Cholesterol SR0mg
Individual Fatty Acids 4
NutrientPer 100gUnitPer Serving% DV
Palmitic Acid (16:0) SR0.11g
Stearic Acid (18:0) SR0.02g
Linoleic Acid (18:2) SR0.18g
1%
Linolenic Acid (18:3) SR0.02g
Amino Acids 18
NutrientPer 100gUnitPer Serving% DV
Tryptophan SR0.02g
Threonine SR0.10g
Isoleucine SR0.10g
Leucine SR0.17g
Lysine SR0.09g
Methionine SR0.04g
Cystine SR0.02g
Phenylalanine SR0.10g
Tyrosine SR0.05g
Valine SR0.11g
Arginine SR0.18g
Histidine SR0.06g
Alanine SR0.11g
Aspartic Acid SR0.17g
Glutamic Acid SR0.30g
Glycine SR0.11g
Proline SR0.09g
Serine SR0.08g

Nutrient Density Score

The NRF9.3 score measures overall nutritional quality per 100 kcal. It rewards 9 nutrients to encourage (protein, fiber, vitamins A, C, E, calcium, iron, magnesium, potassium) and penalizes 3 to limit (saturated fat, added sugars, sodium). Higher is better; negative scores indicate the food is high in limit nutrients relative to its beneficial content.

135
NRF9.3 Score
Excellent · per 100 kcal
Poor (<0) Moderate Good Excellent (100+)

NRF9.3 index: Fulgoni et al. (2009), J Nutr 139(8). DVs based on FDA 2020 reference values.

Nutrient Interactions in This Food

Nutrients in this food that enhance or compete with each other during absorption.

✔ Synergies — nutrients that help each other

Vitamin C + Iron●●●

Vitamin C dramatically enhances non-heme iron absorption by reducing Fe³⁺ to Fe²⁺ in the gut. Adding 75 mg vitamin C to a meal can increase iron absorption 3–4 fold.

Hallberg et al., Am J Clin Nutr, 1989

Vitamin C + Calcium●●

Vitamin C supports collagen synthesis, which provides the structural framework for calcium deposition in bone tissue.

Aghajanian et al., Nutrients, 2015

⚠ Antagonisms — nutrients that compete

Calcium vs Iron●●●

Calcium inhibits both heme and non-heme iron absorption when consumed in the same meal. The effect is dose-dependent, with significant inhibition at 300+ mg calcium.

Hallberg et al., Am J Clin Nutr, 1991

Zinc vs Copper●●●

High zinc intake induces metallothionein in enterocytes, which traps copper and blocks its absorption. Prolonged high-dose zinc can cause copper deficiency.

Prasad et al., JAMA, 1978; Fosmire, Am J Clin Nutr, 1990

Zinc vs Iron●●

Zinc and non-heme iron compete for the same intestinal transporter (DMT1). High doses of one can reduce absorption of the other when taken simultaneously.

Rossander-Hulten et al., Am J Clin Nutr, 1991

Calcium vs Magnesium●●

Very high calcium intake can reduce magnesium absorption by competing for shared intestinal transport pathways. A calcium:magnesium ratio above 2.6:1 may impair magnesium status.

Rosanoff et al., Nutr Rev, 2012

Fiber vs Iron●●

Phytates in high-fibre foods (whole grains, legumes) bind non-heme iron and reduce its bioavailability. Soaking, sprouting, and fermentation reduce phytate content.

Hurrell & Egli, Int J Vitam Nutr Res, 2010

Amino Acid Profile

Essential amino acid composition compared to the WHO/FAO adult reference pattern. The Amino Acid Score indicates protein quality — 100 means all essential amino acid requirements are met.

80
Amino Acid Score
Good
Lysine
Limiting Amino Acid
18
Amino Acids Tracked

Tip: The limiting amino acid is Lysine. Pair with legumes, dairy, and soy for a complete amino acid profile.

All Amino Acids (18)
Amino Acidg / 100gmg / g protein
Tryptophan0.029.1
Threonine0.1038.5
Isoleucine0.1040.1
Leucine0.1767.1
Lysine0.0936.1
Methionine0.0416.7
Cystine0.027.5
Phenylalanine0.1038.9
Tyrosine0.0519.4
Valine0.1145.2
Arginine0.1870.6
Histidine0.0621.8
Alanine0.1144.0
Aspartic Acid0.1766.7
Glutamic Acid0.30117.5
Glycine0.1142.9
Proline0.0934.9
Serine0.0832.1

Fatty Acid Profile

Breakdown of fat types per 100g. A healthy fat profile favours unsaturated fats (mono + poly) and a balanced omega-3 to omega-6 ratio.

0.13g
Saturated
0.10g
Monounsaturated
0.20g
Polyunsaturated
Omega Fatty Acids
Linoleic acid (18:2 n-6)0.18 g

How Cooking Changes Nutrients

Estimated percentage of each nutrient retained after cooking, based on USDA retention factors for the “Other Vegetables” food category. Values of 100% mean no loss; lower values indicate nutrients lost to heat, water, or oxidation.

Key insights
Folate loses up to 31% when boiled (drained). Boiled (water used) retains 85%.

Source: USDA Table of Nutrient Retention Factors, Release 6 (2007). Retention values are category-level averages — actual retention depends on cooking time, temperature, and water volume.

USDA Retention Factors

Insulin Response

The Insulin Index (II) measures the actual insulin response to food on a scale where white bread = 100. Unlike the Glycemic Index (which only measures blood sugar), the II captures the full hormonal response — including the effect of protein and fat on insulin secretion. This is why high-protein foods like meat and dairy can have significant insulin scores despite having low or zero GI values.

58
Insulin Index
Moderate Insulin Response
Insulin Index Scale 58
0 Low ≤30 Mod ≤60 High ≤100 120
Macro Model ●● Estimated from macronutrient composition (R²=0.49)

Source: Holt et al. 1997; Bao et al. 2016; Bell 2014

Environmental Impact

Environmental footprint per kilogram of food produced. Data represents the global average for the “Other Vegetables” category.

0.53
kg CO₂e / kg
Very Low Impact
0.37
m² land / kg
Land Use
103
L water / kg
Water Use
3.2
g SO₂e / kg
Acidification
How this compares (GHG emissions)
Potatoes (0.5)Chicken (9.9)Beef (99.5)
Greenhouse Gas Emissions0.53 kg CO₂e / kg
Land Use0.37 m² / kg
Water Use103 L / kg
Eutrophication4.9 g PO₄e / kg
Acidification3.2 g SO₂e / kg
⚠️ Important context about this data
  • Global averages: These figures are production-weighted averages from a meta-analysis of ~38,700 farms across 119 countries (Poore & Nemecek, 2018). Actual impact varies enormously by farming method, geography, and supply chain.
  • System boundary: Cradle-to-retail only — does not include consumer transport, home cooking energy, or food waste.
  • Soil carbon not included: This data does not account for soil carbon sequestration. Some argue that well-managed regenerative grazing partially offsets ruminant emissions; however, full lifecycle accounting — including methane, land-use change, and the opportunity cost of using land for grazing vs. reforestation — typically makes the net footprint of ruminant meat higher, not lower. This is especially relevant in temperate grassland regions like Ireland.
  • Not gospel: This data is informational and illustrative. It is useful for understanding relative magnitudes, but should not be treated as precise measurements for any individual product or farm.

Source: Poore & Nemecek (2018), Science 360(6392). Meta-analysis of ~38,700 farms, 119 countries, 46 product categories.

Global Supply: Vegetables

Top 10 countries by per capita supply of the “Vegetables” food group (kcal/capita/day, 2023). This is food group–level data from FAO Food Balance Sheets, not specific to this individual food.

1.
China; mainland
310
2.
China
306
3.
Albania
258
4.
North Macedonia
221
5.
Guyana
209
6.
Kazakhstan
204
7.
Oman
192
8.
Uzbekistan
190
9.
Tajikistan
186
10.
Bosnia and Herzegovina
183

Global Supply Trend (1961–2023)

+76%
1961: 38 kcal2023: 67 kcal

Source: FAO Food Balance Sheets (2023). Supply = production + imports − exports − waste, converted to kcal/capita/day.

Frequently Asked Questions

How many calories are in Hearts of palm, canned?

Hearts of palm, canned contains 28.0 kcal per 100 grams, making it a low-calorie food. The energy comes from 2.5g of protein (36% of calories), 0.62g of fat (20%), and 4.6g of carbohydrates (66%). Carbohydrates are the primary energy source.

What is Hearts of palm, canned most nutritious for?

The standout nutrient in Hearts of palm, canned is Manganese, providing 1.4 mg per 100g (61% of the Daily Value). It is also a notable source of Iron (39% DV). Our database tracks 61 individual nutrients for this food, allowing detailed comparison across vitamins, minerals, amino acids, and fatty acids.

Is Hearts of palm, canned high in protein?

At 2.5g per 100 grams, Hearts of palm, canned is not a significant source of protein. Pair with protein-rich foods like legumes, meat, fish, or dairy to meet daily protein needs.

How much fiber is in Hearts of palm, canned?

Hearts of palm, canned contains 2.4g of fiber per 100 grams, which is a small amount. To increase fiber intake, consider pairing with high-fiber foods such as legumes, whole grains, or vegetables.

What is the insulin index of Hearts of palm, canned?

Hearts of palm, canned has a moderate insulin response (II: 58) (estimated from macronutrient composition) on the insulin index scale (white bread = 100). This is a typical insulin response for most mixed foods. Note that the insulin index can differ substantially from the glycemic index — dairy products and high-protein foods often have higher insulin responses than their GI would suggest.