Skip to main content

Spaghetti, protein-fortified, cooked, enriched (n x 6.25)

Grains Per 100 g · Per 100g serving

Spaghetti, protein-fortified, cooked, enriched (n x 6.25) is a grain at 164 calories per 100g. It is a good source of Selenium, providing 46% of the Daily Value per 100g. This grain is virtually fat-free. Grains are a primary source of carbohydrates, B vitamins, and minerals. Whole grains retain the bran and germ, providing substantially more fiber and micronutrients than refined grains. Our database tracks 61 nutrients for this food, plus glycemic index, insulin index, environmental footprint data.

164
Calories
kcal
8.9
Protein
g
0.21
Fat
g
30.9
Carbs
g
2.0
Fiber
g

Top Nutrients

💎
Selenium
25.2 µg
46% DV
☀️
Thiamin (B1)
0.30 mg
25% DV
💪
Carbohydrate
30.9 g
24% DV

Data for 61 of 150 tracked nutrients

Nutrient Fingerprint

How this food scores across key nutrient categories, as a percentage of the daily recommended value per 100 g. Based on USDA DRIs for adults.

Complete Nutrient Profile

Macronutrients 8
NutrientPer 100gUnitPer Serving% DV
Water SR59.7g
2%
Calories SR164kcal
Energy (kJ) SR686kj
Protein SR8.9g
16%
Total Fat SR0.21g
Carbohydrate SR30.9g
24%
Fiber SR2.0g
5%
Ash SR0.31g
Minerals 10
NutrientPer 100gUnitPer Serving% DV
Calcium SR10.0mg
1%
Iron SR0.72mg
9%
Magnesium SR30.0mg
8%
Phosphorus SR50.0mg
7%
Potassium SR42.0mg
1%
Sodium SR5.0mg
0%
Zinc SR0.50mg
4%
Copper SR0.08mg
9%
Manganese SR0.42mg
18%
Selenium SR25.2µg
46%
Vitamins 16
NutrientPer 100gUnitPer Serving% DV
Vitamin A (RAE) SR0µg
Vitamin A (IU) SR0IU
Retinol SR0µg
Vitamin C SR0mg
Vitamin D SR0µg
Vitamin D (IU) SR0IU
Thiamin (B1) SR0.30mg
25%
Riboflavin (B2) SR0.16mg
12%
Niacin (B3) SR1.8mg
12%
Pantothenic Acid (B5) SR0.29mg
6%
Vitamin B6 SR0.06mg
5%
Folate SR82.0µg
20%
Folic Acid SR71.0µg
Folate (food) SR11.0µg
Folate (DFE) SR132µg
Vitamin B12 SR0µg
Fatty Acids 4
NutrientPer 100gUnitPer Serving% DV
Saturated Fat SR0.03g
Monounsaturated Fat SR0.03g
Polyunsaturated Fat SR0.10g
Cholesterol SR0mg
Individual Fatty Acids 5
NutrientPer 100gUnitPer Serving% DV
Myristic Acid (14:0) SR0g
Palmitic Acid (16:0) SR0.03g
Stearic Acid (18:0) SR0.003g
Linoleic Acid (18:2) SR0.09g
0%
Linolenic Acid (18:3) SR0.009g
Amino Acids 18
NutrientPer 100gUnitPer Serving% DV
Tryptophan SR0.10g
Threonine SR0.23g
Isoleucine SR0.32g
Leucine SR0.56g
Lysine SR0.19g
Methionine SR0.13g
Cystine SR0.22g
Phenylalanine SR0.39g
Tyrosine SR0.22g
Valine SR0.35g
Arginine SR0.32g
Histidine SR0.17g
Alanine SR0.26g
Aspartic Acid SR0.37g
Glutamic Acid SR2.8g
Glycine SR0.27g
Proline SR0.85g
Serine SR0.38g

Nutrient Density Score

The NRF9.3 score measures overall nutritional quality per 100 kcal. It rewards 9 nutrients to encourage (protein, fiber, vitamins A, C, E, calcium, iron, magnesium, potassium) and penalizes 3 to limit (saturated fat, added sugars, sodium). Higher is better; negative scores indicate the food is high in limit nutrients relative to its beneficial content.

23
NRF9.3 Score
Moderate · per 100 kcal
Poor (<0) Moderate Good Excellent (100+)

NRF9.3 index: Fulgoni et al. (2009), J Nutr 139(8). DVs based on FDA 2020 reference values.

Nutrient Interactions in This Food

Nutrients in this food that enhance or compete with each other during absorption.

⚠ Antagonisms — nutrients that compete

Fiber vs Iron●●

Phytates in high-fibre foods (whole grains, legumes) bind non-heme iron and reduce its bioavailability. Soaking, sprouting, and fermentation reduce phytate content.

Hurrell & Egli, Int J Vitam Nutr Res, 2010

Manganese vs Iron●●

Manganese and iron share the DMT1 transporter and compete for absorption. High iron status reduces manganese absorption and vice versa.

Erikson et al., Pharmacol Ther, 2007

Amino Acid Profile

Essential amino acid composition compared to the WHO/FAO adult reference pattern. The Amino Acid Score indicates protein quality — 100 means all essential amino acid requirements are met.

48
Amino Acid Score
Low
Lysine
Limiting Amino Acid
18
Amino Acids Tracked

Tip: The limiting amino acid is Lysine. Pair with legumes, dairy, and soy for a complete amino acid profile.

All Amino Acids (18)
Amino Acidg / 100gmg / g protein
Tryptophan0.1011.6
Threonine0.2325.7
Isoleucine0.3236.0
Leucine0.5662.9
Lysine0.1921.6
Methionine0.1314.6
Cystine0.2224.8
Phenylalanine0.3944.1
Tyrosine0.2224.8
Valine0.3540.0
Arginine0.3235.6
Histidine0.1719.1
Alanine0.2629.2
Aspartic Acid0.3741.4
Glutamic Acid2.8314.0
Glycine0.2730.4
Proline0.8595.7
Serine0.3843.2

How Cooking Changes Nutrients

Estimated percentage of each nutrient retained after cooking, based on USDA retention factors for the “Pasta” food category. Values of 100% mean no loss; lower values indicate nutrients lost to heat, water, or oxidation.

Key insights
Thiamin loses up to 35% when boiled (drained). Boiled (water used) retains 80%.
Vitamin B6 loses up to 20% when boiled (drained). Boiled (water used) retains 90%.

Source: USDA Table of Nutrient Retention Factors, Release 6 (2007). Retention values are category-level averages — actual retention depends on cooking time, temperature, and water volume.

USDA Retention Factors

Glycemic & Insulin Response

The Glycemic Index (GI) measures how quickly a food raises blood sugar on a 0–100 scale. The Insulin Index (II) measures the insulin response directly, which can differ from GI — notably, dairy and high-protein foods often trigger a higher insulin response than their GI suggests. White bread = 100 for both scales.

49
Glycemic Index
Low GI
24
Glycemic Load
High GL (per 180g)
GI Scale 49
0 Low <55 Med High ≥70 100

GI data matched from: “Spaghetti, white, boiled” · ●●● high confidence

46
Insulin Index
Moderate Insulin Response
Insulin Index Scale 46
0 Low ≤30 Mod ≤60 High ≤100 120
GI Model ●● Estimated via GI-based regression (R²=0.78)

Source: International Tables of Glycemic Index (Sydney University, 2021) · Holt et al. 1997; Bao et al. 2016; Bell 2014

Environmental Impact

Environmental footprint per kilogram of food produced. Data represents the global average for the “Rice” category.

4.5
kg CO₂e / kg
Moderate Impact
2.8
m² land / kg
Land Use
2,248
L water / kg
Water Use
17.5
g SO₂e / kg
Acidification
How this compares (GHG emissions)
Potatoes (0.5)Chicken (9.9)Beef (99.5)
Greenhouse Gas Emissions4.5 kg CO₂e / kg
Land Use2.8 m² / kg
Water Use2,248 L / kg
Eutrophication35.1 g PO₄e / kg
Acidification17.5 g SO₂e / kg
⚠️ Important context about this data
  • Global averages: These figures are production-weighted averages from a meta-analysis of ~38,700 farms across 119 countries (Poore & Nemecek, 2018). Actual impact varies enormously by farming method, geography, and supply chain.
  • System boundary: Cradle-to-retail only — does not include consumer transport, home cooking energy, or food waste.
  • Soil carbon not included: This data does not account for soil carbon sequestration. Some argue that well-managed regenerative grazing partially offsets ruminant emissions; however, full lifecycle accounting — including methane, land-use change, and the opportunity cost of using land for grazing vs. reforestation — typically makes the net footprint of ruminant meat higher, not lower. This is especially relevant in temperate grassland regions like Ireland.
  • Not gospel: This data is informational and illustrative. It is useful for understanding relative magnitudes, but should not be treated as precise measurements for any individual product or farm.

Source: Poore & Nemecek (2018), Science 360(6392). Meta-analysis of ~38,700 farms, 119 countries, 46 product categories.

Global Supply: Cereals

Top 10 countries by per capita supply of the “Cereals” food group (kcal/capita/day, 2023). This is food group–level data from FAO Food Balance Sheets, not specific to this individual food.

1.
Egypt
1962
2.
Bhutan
1927
3.
Serbia
1888
4.
Morocco
1876
5.
Mali
1862
6.
Ethiopia
1829
7.
Philippines
1774
8.
Bangladesh
1756
9.
Myanmar
1738
10.
Nepal
1679

Global Supply Trend (1961–2023)

+8%
1961: 1030 kcal2023: 1108 kcal

Source: FAO Food Balance Sheets (2023). Supply = production + imports − exports − waste, converted to kcal/capita/day.

Frequently Asked Questions

How many calories are in Spaghetti, protein-fortified, cooked, enriched (n x 6.25)?

Spaghetti, protein-fortified, cooked, enriched (n x 6.25) contains 164 kcal per 100 grams, making it a moderate-calorie food. The energy comes from 8.9g of protein (22% of calories), 0.21g of fat (1%), and 30.9g of carbohydrates (75%). Carbohydrates are the primary energy source.

What is Spaghetti, protein-fortified, cooked, enriched (n x 6.25) most nutritious for?

The standout nutrient in Spaghetti, protein-fortified, cooked, enriched (n x 6.25) is Selenium, providing 25.2 µg per 100g (46% of the Daily Value). It is also a notable source of Thiamin (B1) (25% DV). Our database tracks 61 individual nutrients for this food, allowing detailed comparison across vitamins, minerals, amino acids, and fatty acids.

Is Spaghetti, protein-fortified, cooked, enriched (n x 6.25) high in protein?

Spaghetti, protein-fortified, cooked, enriched (n x 6.25) contains 8.9g of protein per 100 grams. While not a high-protein food, it can contribute to daily protein needs as part of a varied diet.

How much fiber is in Spaghetti, protein-fortified, cooked, enriched (n x 6.25)?

Spaghetti, protein-fortified, cooked, enriched (n x 6.25) contains 2.0g of fiber per 100 grams, which is a small amount. To increase fiber intake, consider pairing with high-fiber foods such as legumes, whole grains, or vegetables.

What is the glycemic index of Spaghetti, protein-fortified, cooked, enriched (n x 6.25)?

Spaghetti, protein-fortified, cooked, enriched (n x 6.25) has a glycemic index of 49, which is classified as low (≤55). Low-GI foods cause a slower, more gradual rise in blood sugar levels, which may be beneficial for blood sugar management. The glycemic load, which accounts for typical serving size, provides additional context for real-world blood sugar impact.

What is the insulin index of Spaghetti, protein-fortified, cooked, enriched (n x 6.25)?

Spaghetti, protein-fortified, cooked, enriched (n x 6.25) has a moderate insulin response (II: 46) (estimated from macronutrient composition) on the insulin index scale (white bread = 100). This is a typical insulin response for most mixed foods. Note that the insulin index can differ substantially from the glycemic index — dairy products and high-protein foods often have higher insulin responses than their GI would suggest.