Skip to main content

Veal, cubed for stew (leg and shoulder), separable lean only, cooked, braised

Lamb/Game Per 100 g · Per 100g serving
Also available: Raw

Veal, cubed for stew (leg and shoulder), separable lean only, cooked, braised is a meat at 188 calories per 100g. It is an excellent source of Vitamin B12, Protein and Zinc, providing 70%, 62% and 55% of the Daily Value respectively. This meat is high in protein. Lamb and game meats are sources of complete protein, iron, zinc, and B12. Grass-fed varieties may have different fatty acid profiles compared to grain-fed. Our database tracks 62 nutrients for this food, plus environmental footprint data.

188
Calories
kcal
34.9
Protein
g
4.3
Fat
g
0
Carbs
g
0
Fiber
g

Top Nutrients

☀️
Vitamin B12
1.7 µg
70% DV
💪
Protein
34.9 g
62% DV
💎
Zinc
6.0 mg
55% DV

Data for 62 of 150 tracked nutrients

Nutrient Fingerprint

How this food scores across key nutrient categories, as a percentage of the daily recommended value per 100 g. Based on USDA DRIs for adults.

Complete Nutrient Profile

Macronutrients 8
NutrientPer 100gUnitPer Serving% DV
Water SR59.3g
2%
Calories SR188kcal
Energy (kJ) SR787kj
Protein SR34.9g
62%
Total Fat SR4.3g
Carbohydrate SR0g
Fiber SR0g
Ash SR1.9g
Minerals 10
NutrientPer 100gUnitPer Serving% DV
Calcium SR29.0mg
3%
Iron SR1.4mg
18%
Magnesium SR28.0mg
7%
Phosphorus SR239mg
34%
Potassium SR342mg
10%
Sodium SR93.0mg
6%
Zinc SR6.0mg
55%
Copper SR0.15mg
17%
Manganese SR0.04mg
2%
Selenium SR15.2µg
28%
Vitamins 15
NutrientPer 100gUnitPer Serving% DV
Vitamin A (RAE) SR0µg
Vitamin A (IU) SR0IU
Retinol SR0µg
Vitamin C SR0mg
Vitamin E SR0.45mg
3%
Thiamin (B1) SR0.07mg
6%
Riboflavin (B2) SR0.40mg
31%
Niacin (B3) SR8.3mg
52%
Pantothenic Acid (B5) SR1.2mg
24%
Vitamin B6 SR0.38mg
29%
Folate SR16.0µg
4%
Folic Acid SR0µg
Folate (food) SR16.0µg
Folate (DFE) SR16.0µg
Vitamin B12 SR1.7µg
70%
Fatty Acids 4
NutrientPer 100gUnitPer Serving% DV
Saturated Fat SR1.3g
Monounsaturated Fat SR1.4g
Polyunsaturated Fat SR0.45g
Cholesterol SR145mg
Individual Fatty Acids 7
NutrientPer 100gUnitPer Serving% DV
Capric Acid (10:0) SR0g
Lauric Acid (12:0) SR0.01g
Myristic Acid (14:0) SR0.07g
Palmitic Acid (16:0) SR0.74g
Stearic Acid (18:0) SR0.45g
Linoleic Acid (18:2) SR0.32g
2%
Linolenic Acid (18:3) SR0.02g
Amino Acids 18
NutrientPer 100gUnitPer Serving% DV
Tryptophan SR0.35g
Threonine SR1.5g
Isoleucine SR1.7g
Leucine SR2.8g
Lysine SR2.9g
Methionine SR0.81g
Cystine SR0.39g
Phenylalanine SR1.4g
Tyrosine SR1.1g
Valine SR1.9g
Arginine SR2.1g
Histidine SR1.3g
Alanine SR2.1g
Aspartic Acid SR3.0g
Glutamic Acid SR5.5g
Glycine SR1.8g
Proline SR1.5g
Serine SR1.3g

Nutrient Density Score

The NRF9.3 score measures overall nutritional quality per 100 kcal. It rewards 9 nutrients to encourage (protein, fiber, vitamins A, C, E, calcium, iron, magnesium, potassium) and penalizes 3 to limit (saturated fat, added sugars, sodium). Higher is better; negative scores indicate the food is high in limit nutrients relative to its beneficial content.

46
NRF9.3 Score
Moderate · per 100 kcal
Poor (<0) Moderate Good Excellent (100+)

NRF9.3 index: Fulgoni et al. (2009), J Nutr 139(8). DVs based on FDA 2020 reference values.

Nutrient Interactions in This Food

Nutrients in this food that enhance or compete with each other during absorption.

✔ Synergies — nutrients that help each other

Vitamin B6 + Magnesium●●

Vitamin B6 may enhance intracellular magnesium accumulation. Combined supplementation has shown greater benefits for stress and anxiety than magnesium alone.

Pouteau et al., PLoS One, 2018

⚠ Antagonisms — nutrients that compete

Zinc vs Copper●●●

High zinc intake induces metallothionein in enterocytes, which traps copper and blocks its absorption. Prolonged high-dose zinc can cause copper deficiency.

Prasad et al., JAMA, 1978; Fosmire, Am J Clin Nutr, 1990

Zinc vs Iron●●

Zinc and non-heme iron compete for the same intestinal transporter (DMT1). High doses of one can reduce absorption of the other when taken simultaneously.

Rossander-Hulten et al., Am J Clin Nutr, 1991

Potassium vs Sodium●●

High potassium intake promotes renal sodium excretion and attenuates the blood pressure–raising effect of sodium. A higher K:Na ratio is associated with lower cardiovascular risk.

Aburto et al., BMJ, 2013

Amino Acid Profile

Essential amino acid composition compared to the WHO/FAO adult reference pattern. The Amino Acid Score indicates protein quality — 100 means all essential amino acid requirements are met.

135
Amino Acid Score
Complete
Leucine
Lowest Scoring
18
Amino Acids Tracked

✓ Complete protein — all essential amino acids meet or exceed WHO reference levels.

All Amino Acids (18)
Amino Acidg / 100gmg / g protein
Tryptophan0.3510.1
Threonine1.543.7
Isoleucine1.749.3
Leucine2.879.6
Lysine2.982.4
Methionine0.8123.3
Cystine0.3911.3
Phenylalanine1.440.4
Tyrosine1.131.9
Valine1.955.3
Arginine2.158.8
Histidine1.336.3
Alanine2.159.5
Aspartic Acid3.086.3
Glutamic Acid5.5158.2
Glycine1.851.4
Proline1.541.8
Serine1.337.5

Fatty Acid Profile

Breakdown of fat types per 100g. A healthy fat profile favours unsaturated fats (mono + poly) and a balanced omega-3 to omega-6 ratio.

1.3g
Saturated
1.4g
Monounsaturated
0.45g
Polyunsaturated
Omega Fatty Acids
Linoleic acid (18:2 n-6)0.32 g

How Cooking Changes Nutrients

Estimated percentage of each nutrient retained after cooking, based on USDA retention factors for the “Veal” food category. Values of 100% mean no loss; lower values indicate nutrients lost to heat, water, or oxidation.

Key insights
Vitamin B12 loses up to 40% when simmered. Roasted retains 85%.
Folate loses up to 36% when simmered. Roasted retains 85%.
Thiamin loses up to 50% when braised. Broiled / Grilled retains 65%.

Source: USDA Table of Nutrient Retention Factors, Release 6 (2007). Retention values are category-level averages — actual retention depends on cooking time, temperature, and water volume.

USDA Retention Factors

Environmental Impact

Environmental footprint per kilogram of food produced. Data represents the global average for the “Lamb & Mutton” category.

39.7
kg CO₂e / kg
Very High Impact
370
m² land / kg
Land Use
1,803
L water / kg
Water Use
139
g SO₂e / kg
Acidification
How this compares (GHG emissions)
Potatoes (0.5)Chicken (9.9)Beef (99.5)
Greenhouse Gas Emissions39.7 kg CO₂e / kg
Land Use370 m² / kg
Water Use1,803 L / kg
Eutrophication97.1 g PO₄e / kg
Acidification139 g SO₂e / kg
⚠️ Important context about this data
  • Global averages: These figures are production-weighted averages from a meta-analysis of ~38,700 farms across 119 countries (Poore & Nemecek, 2018). Actual impact varies enormously by farming method, geography, and supply chain.
  • System boundary: Cradle-to-retail only — does not include consumer transport, home cooking energy, or food waste.
  • Soil carbon not included: This data does not account for soil carbon sequestration. Some argue that well-managed regenerative grazing partially offsets ruminant emissions; however, full lifecycle accounting — including methane, land-use change, and the opportunity cost of using land for grazing vs. reforestation — typically makes the net footprint of ruminant meat higher, not lower. This is especially relevant in temperate grassland regions like Ireland.
  • Not gospel: This data is informational and illustrative. It is useful for understanding relative magnitudes, but should not be treated as precise measurements for any individual product or farm.

Source: Poore & Nemecek (2018), Science 360(6392). Meta-analysis of ~38,700 farms, 119 countries, 46 product categories.

Global Supply: Meat

Top 10 countries by per capita supply of the “Meat” food group (kcal/capita/day, 2023). This is food group–level data from FAO Food Balance Sheets, not specific to this individual food.

1.
Tonga
755
2.
Mongolia
643
3.
Argentina
571
4.
China; Macao SAR
546
5.
Marshall Islands
539
6.
Ireland
532
7.
Bahamas
527
8.
Saint Vincent and the Grenadines
516
9.
Nauru
510
10.
Belarus
498

Global Supply Trend (1961–2023)

+56%
1961: 156 kcal2023: 244 kcal

Source: FAO Food Balance Sheets (2023). Supply = production + imports − exports − waste, converted to kcal/capita/day.

Frequently Asked Questions

How many calories are in Veal, cubed for stew (leg and shoulder), separable lean only, cooked, braised?

Veal, cubed for stew (leg and shoulder), separable lean only, cooked, braised contains 188 kcal per 100 grams, making it a moderate-calorie food. The energy comes from 34.9g of protein (74% of calories), 4.3g of fat (21%), and 0g of carbohydrates (0%). Protein is the primary energy source.

What is Veal, cubed for stew (leg and shoulder), separable lean only, cooked, braised most nutritious for?

The standout nutrient in Veal, cubed for stew (leg and shoulder), separable lean only, cooked, braised is Vitamin B12, providing 1.7 µg per 100g (70% of the Daily Value). It is also a notable source of Protein (62% DV). Our database tracks 62 individual nutrients for this food, allowing detailed comparison across vitamins, minerals, amino acids, and fatty acids.

Is Veal, cubed for stew (leg and shoulder), separable lean only, cooked, braised high in protein?

With 34.9g per 100 grams, Veal, cubed for stew (leg and shoulder), separable lean only, cooked, braised is a high-protein food. Protein accounts for 74% of its total calories, making it suitable for diets focused on protein intake.

How much fiber is in Veal, cubed for stew (leg and shoulder), separable lean only, cooked, braised?

Veal, cubed for stew (leg and shoulder), separable lean only, cooked, braised contains no dietary fiber. This is typical for animal-derived food. Pair with plant-based foods to ensure adequate fiber intake.