Amaranth leaves, cooked, boiled, drained, without salt
Amaranth leaves, cooked, boiled, drained, without salt is a vegetable, providing just 21.0 calories per 100g. It is an excellent source of Vitamin A (RAE), providing 2770.0 µg (308% of the Daily Value) per 100g serving. This vegetable is virtually fat-free. Vegetables provide essential vitamins, minerals, and dietary fiber with relatively few calories. They are a cornerstone of virtually every dietary guideline worldwide. Our database tracks 61 nutrients for this food, plus glycemic index, insulin index, environmental footprint data.
Top Nutrients
Data for 61 of 150 tracked nutrients
Nutrient Fingerprint
How this food scores across key nutrient categories, as a percentage of the daily recommended value per 100 g. Based on USDA DRIs for adults.
Complete Nutrient Profile
Macronutrients 7
| Nutrient | Per 100g | Unit | Per Serving | % DV |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Water SR | 91.5 | g | — | 2% |
| Calories SR | 21.0 | kcal | — | — |
| Energy (kJ) SR | 88.0 | kj | — | — |
| Protein SR | 2.1 | g | — | 4% |
| Total Fat SR | 0.18 | g | — | — |
| Carbohydrate SR | 4.1 | g | — | 3% |
| Ash SR | 2.1 | g | — | — |
Minerals 10
| Nutrient | Per 100g | Unit | Per Serving | % DV |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium SR | 209 | mg | — | 21% |
| Iron SR | 2.3 | mg | — | 28% |
| Magnesium SR | 55.0 | mg | — | 14% |
| Phosphorus SR | 72.0 | mg | — | 10% |
| Potassium SR | 641 | mg | — | 19% |
| Sodium SR | 21.0 | mg | — | 1% |
| Zinc SR | 0.88 | mg | — | 8% |
| Copper SR | 0.16 | mg | — | 18% |
| Manganese SR | 0.86 | mg | — | 37% |
| Selenium SR | 0.90 | µg | — | 2% |
Vitamins 16
| Nutrient | Per 100g | Unit | Per Serving | % DV |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin A (RAE) SR | 2,770 | µg | — | 308% |
| Vitamin A (IU) SR | 139 | IU | — | — |
| Retinol SR | 0 | µg | — | — |
| Vitamin C SR | 41.1 | mg | — | 46% |
| Vitamin D SR | 0 | µg | — | — |
| Vitamin D (IU) SR | 0 | IU | — | — |
| Thiamin (B1) SR | 0.02 | mg | — | 2% |
| Riboflavin (B2) SR | 0.13 | mg | — | 10% |
| Niacin (B3) SR | 0.56 | mg | — | 4% |
| Pantothenic Acid (B5) SR | 0.06 | mg | — | 1% |
| Vitamin B6 SR | 0.18 | mg | — | 14% |
| Folate SR | 57.0 | µg | — | 14% |
| Folic Acid SR | 0 | µg | — | — |
| Folate (food) SR | 57.0 | µg | — | — |
| Folate (DFE) SR | 57.0 | µg | — | — |
| Vitamin B12 SR | 0 | µg | — | — |
Fatty Acids 5
| Nutrient | Per 100g | Unit | Per Serving | % DV |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Saturated Fat SR | 0.05 | g | — | — |
| Monounsaturated Fat SR | 0.04 | g | — | — |
| Polyunsaturated Fat SR | 0.08 | g | — | — |
| Trans Fat SR | 0 | g | — | — |
| Cholesterol SR | 0 | mg | — | — |
Individual Fatty Acids 5
| Nutrient | Per 100g | Unit | Per Serving | % DV |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Myristic Acid (14:0) SR | 0 | g | — | — |
| Palmitic Acid (16:0) SR | 0.04 | g | — | — |
| Stearic Acid (18:0) SR | 0.006 | g | — | — |
| Linoleic Acid (18:2) SR | 0.08 | g | — | 0% |
| Linolenic Acid (18:3) SR | 0.001 | g | — | — |
Amino Acids 18
| Nutrient | Per 100g | Unit | Per Serving | % DV |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tryptophan SR | 0.03 | g | — | — |
| Threonine SR | 0.09 | g | — | — |
| Isoleucine SR | 0.10 | g | — | — |
| Leucine SR | 0.17 | g | — | — |
| Lysine SR | 0.11 | g | — | — |
| Methionine SR | 0.03 | g | — | — |
| Cystine SR | 0.03 | g | — | — |
| Phenylalanine SR | 0.11 | g | — | — |
| Tyrosine SR | 0.07 | g | — | — |
| Valine SR | 0.12 | g | — | — |
| Arginine SR | 0.10 | g | — | — |
| Histidine SR | 0.04 | g | — | — |
| Alanine SR | 0.12 | g | — | — |
| Aspartic Acid SR | 0.20 | g | — | — |
| Glutamic Acid SR | 0.25 | g | — | — |
| Glycine SR | 0.11 | g | — | — |
| Proline SR | 0.10 | g | — | — |
| Serine SR | 0.10 | g | — | — |
Nutrient Density Score
The NRF9.3 score measures overall nutritional quality per 100 kcal. It rewards 9 nutrients to encourage (protein, fiber, vitamins A, C, E, calcium, iron, magnesium, potassium) and penalizes 3 to limit (saturated fat, added sugars, sodium). Higher is better; negative scores indicate the food is high in limit nutrients relative to its beneficial content.
NRF9.3 index: Fulgoni et al. (2009), J Nutr 139(8). DVs based on FDA 2020 reference values.
Nutrient Interactions in This Food
Nutrients in this food that enhance or compete with each other during absorption.
✔ Synergies — nutrients that help each other
Vitamin C dramatically enhances non-heme iron absorption by reducing Fe³⁺ to Fe²⁺ in the gut. Adding 75 mg vitamin C to a meal can increase iron absorption 3–4 fold.
Hallberg et al., Am J Clin Nutr, 1989
Vitamin A is fat-soluble and requires dietary fat for absorption. Adding fat to a meal significantly increases beta-carotene and retinol absorption.
Ribaya-Mercado et al., Am J Clin Nutr, 2007
Vitamin B6 may enhance intracellular magnesium accumulation. Combined supplementation has shown greater benefits for stress and anxiety than magnesium alone.
Pouteau et al., PLoS One, 2018
Vitamin C supports collagen synthesis, which provides the structural framework for calcium deposition in bone tissue.
Aghajanian et al., Nutrients, 2015
Vitamin B6 is a cofactor in folate-dependent one-carbon metabolism. Together with B12, these three nutrients regulate homocysteine levels.
Selhub, J Nutr Health Aging, 2002
⚠ Antagonisms — nutrients that compete
Calcium inhibits both heme and non-heme iron absorption when consumed in the same meal. The effect is dose-dependent, with significant inhibition at 300+ mg calcium.
Hallberg et al., Am J Clin Nutr, 1991
High zinc intake induces metallothionein in enterocytes, which traps copper and blocks its absorption. Prolonged high-dose zinc can cause copper deficiency.
Prasad et al., JAMA, 1978; Fosmire, Am J Clin Nutr, 1990
Zinc and non-heme iron compete for the same intestinal transporter (DMT1). High doses of one can reduce absorption of the other when taken simultaneously.
Rossander-Hulten et al., Am J Clin Nutr, 1991
Very high calcium intake can reduce magnesium absorption by competing for shared intestinal transport pathways. A calcium:magnesium ratio above 2.6:1 may impair magnesium status.
Rosanoff et al., Nutr Rev, 2012
High calcium intake may modestly reduce zinc absorption, though the effect is smaller than calcium's impact on iron. Phytate amplifies this interaction.
Wood & Zheng, Am J Clin Nutr, 1997
Amino Acid Profile
Essential amino acid composition compared to the WHO/FAO adult reference pattern. The Amino Acid Score indicates protein quality — 100 means all essential amino acid requirements are met.
✓ Complete protein — all essential amino acids meet or exceed WHO reference levels.
All Amino Acids (18)
| Amino Acid | g / 100g | mg / g protein |
|---|---|---|
| Tryptophan | 0.03 | 12.8 |
| Threonine | 0.09 | 40.3 |
| Isoleucine | 0.10 | 48.3 |
| Leucine | 0.17 | 79.1 |
| Lysine | 0.11 | 51.7 |
| Methionine | 0.03 | 14.7 |
| Cystine | 0.03 | 11.8 |
| Phenylalanine | 0.11 | 54.0 |
| Tyrosine | 0.07 | 32.2 |
| Valine | 0.12 | 55.9 |
| Arginine | 0.10 | 49.3 |
| Histidine | 0.04 | 20.9 |
| Alanine | 0.12 | 56.4 |
| Aspartic Acid | 0.20 | 92.9 |
| Glutamic Acid | 0.25 | 118.5 |
| Glycine | 0.11 | 53.6 |
| Proline | 0.10 | 49.3 |
| Serine | 0.10 | 45.0 |
How Cooking Changes Nutrients
Estimated percentage of each nutrient retained after cooking, based on USDA retention factors for the “Other Vegetables” food category. Values of 100% mean no loss; lower values indicate nutrients lost to heat, water, or oxidation.
Source: USDA Table of Nutrient Retention Factors, Release 6 (2007). Retention values are category-level averages — actual retention depends on cooking time, temperature, and water volume.
Glycemic & Insulin Response
The Glycemic Index (GI) measures how quickly a food raises blood sugar on a 0–100 scale. The Insulin Index (II) measures the insulin response directly, which can differ from GI — notably, dairy and high-protein foods often trigger a higher insulin response than their GI suggests. White bread = 100 for both scales.
GI data matched from: “Amaranth, boiled” · ●●● high confidence
Source: International Tables of Glycemic Index (Sydney University, 2021) · Holt et al. 1997; Bao et al. 2016; Bell 2014
Environmental Impact
Environmental footprint per kilogram of food produced. Data represents the global average for the “Other Vegetables” category.
- Global averages: These figures are production-weighted averages from a meta-analysis of ~38,700 farms across 119 countries (Poore & Nemecek, 2018). Actual impact varies enormously by farming method, geography, and supply chain.
- System boundary: Cradle-to-retail only — does not include consumer transport, home cooking energy, or food waste.
- Soil carbon not included: This data does not account for soil carbon sequestration. Some argue that well-managed regenerative grazing partially offsets ruminant emissions; however, full lifecycle accounting — including methane, land-use change, and the opportunity cost of using land for grazing vs. reforestation — typically makes the net footprint of ruminant meat higher, not lower. This is especially relevant in temperate grassland regions like Ireland.
- Not gospel: This data is informational and illustrative. It is useful for understanding relative magnitudes, but should not be treated as precise measurements for any individual product or farm.
Source: Poore & Nemecek (2018), Science 360(6392). Meta-analysis of ~38,700 farms, 119 countries, 46 product categories.
Global Supply: Vegetables
Top 10 countries by per capita supply of the “Vegetables” food group (kcal/capita/day, 2023). This is food group–level data from FAO Food Balance Sheets, not specific to this individual food.
Global Supply Trend (1961–2023)
+76%Source: FAO Food Balance Sheets (2023). Supply = production + imports − exports − waste, converted to kcal/capita/day.
Related Foods in Vegetables and Vegetable Products
Frequently Asked Questions
How many calories are in Amaranth leaves, cooked, boiled, drained, without salt?
Amaranth leaves, cooked, boiled, drained, without salt contains 21.0 kcal per 100 grams, making it a very low-calorie food. The energy comes from 2.1g of protein (40% of calories), 0.18g of fat (8%), and 4.1g of carbohydrates (78%). Carbohydrates are the primary energy source.
What is Amaranth leaves, cooked, boiled, drained, without salt most nutritious for?
The standout nutrient in Amaranth leaves, cooked, boiled, drained, without salt is Vitamin A (RAE), providing 2,770 µg per 100g (308% of the Daily Value). It is also a notable source of Vitamin C (46% DV). Our database tracks 61 individual nutrients for this food, allowing detailed comparison across vitamins, minerals, amino acids, and fatty acids.
Is Amaranth leaves, cooked, boiled, drained, without salt high in protein?
At 2.1g per 100 grams, Amaranth leaves, cooked, boiled, drained, without salt is not a significant source of protein. Pair with protein-rich foods like legumes, meat, fish, or dairy to meet daily protein needs.
How much fiber is in Amaranth leaves, cooked, boiled, drained, without salt?
Amaranth leaves, cooked, boiled, drained, without salt contains no dietary fiber. This is typical for this type of food. Pair with plant-based foods to ensure adequate fiber intake.
What is the glycemic index of Amaranth leaves, cooked, boiled, drained, without salt?
Amaranth leaves, cooked, boiled, drained, without salt has a glycemic index of 97, which is classified as high (≥70). High-GI foods cause a rapid spike in blood sugar. Pairing with protein, fat, or fiber can help moderate the glycemic response. The glycemic load, which accounts for typical serving size, provides additional context for real-world blood sugar impact.
What is the insulin index of Amaranth leaves, cooked, boiled, drained, without salt?
Amaranth leaves, cooked, boiled, drained, without salt has a high insulin response (II: 67) (estimated from macronutrient composition) on the insulin index scale (white bread = 100). Foods with high insulin scores stimulate significant insulin release, which may be relevant for blood sugar management. Note that the insulin index can differ substantially from the glycemic index — dairy products and high-protein foods often have higher insulin responses than their GI would suggest.