Skip to main content

Peppers, sweet, yellow, raw

Vegetables Per 100 g · Per 100g serving
Data sources: 24 Foundation 34 AFCD 21 SR Legacy

Peppers, sweet, yellow, raw is a vegetable, providing just 26.6 calories per 100g. It is an excellent source of Vitamin C, providing 138.8 mg (154% of the Daily Value) per 100g serving. This vegetable is virtually fat-free. Vegetables provide essential vitamins, minerals, and dietary fiber with relatively few calories. They are a cornerstone of virtually every dietary guideline worldwide. Our database tracks 79 nutrients for this food, plus insulin index, polyphenol profile, environmental footprint data.

26.6
Calories
kcal
0.82
Protein
g
0.12
Fat
g
6.6
Carbs
g
1.1
Fiber
g

Top Nutrients

☀️
Vitamin C
139 mg
154% DV
☀️
Vitamin E
4.2 mg
28% DV
☀️
Vitamin B6
0.29 mg
22% DV

Data for 79 of 150 tracked nutrients

Nutrient Fingerprint

How this food scores across key nutrient categories, as a percentage of the daily recommended value per 100 g. Based on USDA DRIs for adults.

Complete Nutrient Profile

Macronutrients 10
NutrientPer 100gUnitPer Serving% DV
Water Foundation92.1g
2%
Calories Foundation26.6kcal
Energy (kJ) SR112kj
Protein Foundation0.82g
2%
Total Fat Foundation0.12g
Carbohydrate Foundation6.6g
5%
Fiber Foundation1.1g
3%
Total Sugars AFCD4.3g
Starch AFCD0g
Ash Foundation0.38g
Minerals 11
NutrientPer 100gUnitPer Serving% DV
Calcium Foundation6.7mg
1%
Iron Foundation0.36mg
4%
Magnesium Foundation10.3mg
3%
Phosphorus Foundation24.8mg
4%
Potassium Foundation197mg
6%
Sodium Foundation0mg
Zinc Foundation0.19mg
2%
Copper Foundation0.05mg
5%
Manganese Foundation0.14mg
6%
Selenium Foundation0µg
Fluoride AFCD0µg
Vitamins 27
NutrientPer 100gUnitPer Serving% DV
Vitamin A (RAE) AFCD15.0µg
2%
Vitamin A (IU) SR10.0IU
Retinol AFCD0µg
Beta-Carotene AFCD74.0µg
Alpha-Carotene AFCD30.0µg
Beta-Cryptoxanthin AFCD0µg
Lutein + Zeaxanthin AFCD490µg
Vitamin C Foundation139mg
154%
Vitamin D SR0µg
Vitamin D (IU) AFCD0IU
Vitamin D2 AFCD0µg
Vitamin D3 AFCD0µg
Vitamin E AFCD4.2mg
28%
Beta-Tocopherol AFCD0mg
Gamma-Tocopherol AFCD0mg
Delta-Tocopherol AFCD0mg
Thiamin (B1) Foundation0.05mg
4%
Riboflavin (B2) Foundation0.10mg
8%
Niacin (B3) Foundation0.91mg
6%
Pantothenic Acid (B5) AFCD0.07mg
1%
Vitamin B6 Foundation0.29mg
22%
Biotin (B7) Foundation0.46µg
2%
Folate Foundation41.6µg
10%
Folic Acid SR0µg
Folate (food) AFCD97.0µg
Folate (DFE) AFCD97.0µg
Vitamin B12 AFCD0µg
Fatty Acids 9
NutrientPer 100gUnitPer Serving% DV
Saturated Fat AFCD0g
Monounsaturated Fat AFCD0g
Polyunsaturated Fat AFCD0g
Trans Fat AFCD0g
Cholesterol AFCD0mg
Omega-3 ALA AFCD0g
Omega-3 EPA AFCD0g
Omega-3 DPA AFCD0g
Omega-3 DHA AFCD0g
Individual Fatty Acids 1
NutrientPer 100gUnitPer Serving% DV
Linoleic Acid (18:2) AFCD0g
Amino Acids 18
NutrientPer 100gUnitPer Serving% DV
Tryptophan AFCD0.009g
Threonine SR0.04g
Isoleucine SR0.03g
Leucine SR0.05g
Lysine SR0.04g
Methionine SR0.01g
Cystine SR0.02g
Phenylalanine SR0.03g
Tyrosine SR0.02g
Valine SR0.04g
Arginine SR0.05g
Histidine SR0.02g
Alanine SR0.04g
Aspartic Acid SR0.14g
Glutamic Acid SR0.13g
Glycine SR0.04g
Proline SR0.04g
Serine SR0.04g
Phytochemicals 1
NutrientPer 100gUnitPer Serving% DV
Oxalic Acid AFCD0mg
Other 2
NutrientPer 100gUnitPer Serving% DV
Caffeine AFCD0mg
Alcohol AFCD0g

Nutrient Density Score

The NRF9.3 score measures overall nutritional quality per 100 kcal. It rewards 9 nutrients to encourage (protein, fiber, vitamins A, C, E, calcium, iron, magnesium, potassium) and penalizes 3 to limit (saturated fat, added sugars, sodium). Higher is better; negative scores indicate the food is high in limit nutrients relative to its beneficial content.

261
NRF9.3 Score
Excellent · per 100 kcal
Poor (<0) Moderate Good Excellent (100+)

NRF9.3 index: Fulgoni et al. (2009), J Nutr 139(8). DVs based on FDA 2020 reference values.

Nutrient Interactions in This Food

Nutrients in this food that enhance or compete with each other during absorption.

✔ Synergies — nutrients that help each other

Dietary Fat + Vitamin E●●●

Vitamin E is fat-soluble and absorbed alongside dietary fats via micelle formation in the small intestine. Low-fat diets reduce vitamin E absorption.

Traber, Free Radic Biol Med, 2007

Vitamin C + Vitamin E●●

Vitamin C regenerates oxidised vitamin E (tocopheroxyl radical) back to its active form, extending its antioxidant function in cell membranes.

Niki, Free Radic Biol Med, 2014

Vitamin B6 + Folate●●

Vitamin B6 is a cofactor in folate-dependent one-carbon metabolism. Together with B12, these three nutrients regulate homocysteine levels.

Selhub, J Nutr Health Aging, 2002

⚠ Antagonisms — nutrients that compete

Vitamin C vs Copper●●

High-dose vitamin C (>1,500 mg/day) may reduce copper absorption by reducing Cu²⁺ to Cu⁺, though the clinical significance at normal intakes is minimal.

Harris, Am J Clin Nutr, 2003

Amino Acid Profile

Essential amino acid composition compared to the WHO/FAO adult reference pattern. The Amino Acid Score indicates protein quality — 100 means all essential amino acid requirements are met.

108
Amino Acid Score
Complete
Leucine
Lowest Scoring
18
Amino Acids Tracked

✓ Complete protein — all essential amino acids meet or exceed WHO reference levels.

All Amino Acids (18)
Amino Acidg / 100gmg / g protein
Tryptophan0.00911.0
Threonine0.0445.2
Isoleucine0.0339.1
Leucine0.0563.5
Lysine0.0453.7
Methionine0.0114.6
Cystine0.0223.2
Phenylalanine0.0337.8
Tyrosine0.0225.6
Valine0.0451.3
Arginine0.0558.6
Histidine0.0224.4
Alanine0.0450.0
Aspartic Acid0.14174.5
Glutamic Acid0.13161.1
Glycine0.0445.2
Proline0.0453.7
Serine0.0448.8

How Cooking Changes Nutrients

Estimated percentage of each nutrient retained after cooking, based on USDA retention factors for the “Other Vegetables” food category. Values of 100% mean no loss; lower values indicate nutrients lost to heat, water, or oxidation.

Key insights
Folate loses up to 31% when boiled (drained). Boiled (water used) retains 85%.

Source: USDA Table of Nutrient Retention Factors, Release 6 (2007). Retention values are category-level averages — actual retention depends on cooking time, temperature, and water volume.

USDA Retention Factors

Insulin Response

The Insulin Index (II) measures the actual insulin response to food on a scale where white bread = 100. Unlike the Glycemic Index (which only measures blood sugar), the II captures the full hormonal response — including the effect of protein and fat on insulin secretion. This is why high-protein foods like meat and dairy can have significant insulin scores despite having low or zero GI values.

73
Insulin Index
High Insulin Response
Insulin Index Scale 73
0 Low ≤30 Mod ≤60 High ≤100 120
Macro Model ●● Estimated from macronutrient composition (R²=0.49)

Source: Holt et al. 1997; Bao et al. 2016; Bell 2014

Polyphenols & Bioactive Compounds

Polyphenols are plant-derived compounds with antioxidant properties. Higher intake is associated with reduced cardiovascular risk and improved gut health.

26
Total Polyphenols
mg per 100g · Moderate
2
Polyphenol Classes
identified in this food
Flavonoids7 mg27%
Phenolic Acids19 mg73%

Processing Impact on Polyphenols

How common cooking methods affect polyphenol content in vegetables. Retention % is relative to the raw/unprocessed food.

Best Method
Freezing
92% retained
Most Loss
Canning
48% retained
🧊
Freezing92%
Minimal degradation; blanch before freezing for best results≈24 mg
♨️
Steaming90%
Best cooking method for polyphenol retention — no water contact≈23 mg
📡
Microwaving85%
Short cooking time and minimal water preserve most polyphenols≈22 mg
🫧
Blanching82%
Brief water contact limits losses; inactivates polyphenol oxidase≈21 mg
🍳
Stir-frying80%
Brief heat exposure; oil may extract some fat-soluble compounds≈21 mg
⏲️
Pressure cooking75%
Higher temperature but shorter time than boiling; moderate retent≈20 mg
🔥
Baking/Roasting72%
Extended dry heat causes moderate degradation≈19 mg
🍟
Deep frying65%
High temperature and oil immersion accelerate degradation≈17 mg
🫕
Boiling60%
Major losses from leaching; consuming cooking water recovers some≈16 mg
🥫
Canning48%
Most destructive common method — prolonged heat and water contact≈12 mg

Health Associations

Research-backed associations for the polyphenol classes found in this food. Evidence strength rated from systematic reviews and meta-analyses.

🔵
↑ Antioxidant capacityStrong
Phenolic Acids: Chlorogenic acid (coffee) and ferulic acid (grains) show consistent antioxidant
🔵
↑ Glucose metabolismModerate
Phenolic Acids: Chlorogenic acid may slow glucose absorption and improve insulin sensitivity
💜
↓ Cardiovascular disease riskModerate
Flavonoids: Meta-analyses of prospective cohorts show 10-20% lower CVD risk with higher flav
💜
↓ Blood pressureModerate
Flavonoids: RCTs show modest systolic BP reductions (2-5 mmHg) with flavanol-rich cocoa and
⚠ Most evidence is from observational studies and in vitro research. Randomized controlled trials are limited. Individual responses vary based on gut microbiome, genetics, and overall diet. Associations do not prove causation.

Polyphenol data matched from: “Red pepper, raw” · ●●● high confidence

Source: Phenol-Explorer 3.6 (INRA, 2023) · Retention: Rothwell 2013, Palermo 2014 · Health: Del Bo' 2019, Grosso 2017

Environmental Impact

Environmental footprint per kilogram of food produced. Data represents the global average for the “Other Vegetables” category.

0.53
kg CO₂e / kg
Very Low Impact
0.37
m² land / kg
Land Use
103
L water / kg
Water Use
3.2
g SO₂e / kg
Acidification
How this compares (GHG emissions)
Potatoes (0.5)Chicken (9.9)Beef (99.5)
Greenhouse Gas Emissions0.53 kg CO₂e / kg
Land Use0.37 m² / kg
Water Use103 L / kg
Eutrophication4.9 g PO₄e / kg
Acidification3.2 g SO₂e / kg
⚠️ Important context about this data
  • Global averages: These figures are production-weighted averages from a meta-analysis of ~38,700 farms across 119 countries (Poore & Nemecek, 2018). Actual impact varies enormously by farming method, geography, and supply chain.
  • System boundary: Cradle-to-retail only — does not include consumer transport, home cooking energy, or food waste.
  • Soil carbon not included: This data does not account for soil carbon sequestration. Some argue that well-managed regenerative grazing partially offsets ruminant emissions; however, full lifecycle accounting — including methane, land-use change, and the opportunity cost of using land for grazing vs. reforestation — typically makes the net footprint of ruminant meat higher, not lower. This is especially relevant in temperate grassland regions like Ireland.
  • Not gospel: This data is informational and illustrative. It is useful for understanding relative magnitudes, but should not be treated as precise measurements for any individual product or farm.

Source: Poore & Nemecek (2018), Science 360(6392). Meta-analysis of ~38,700 farms, 119 countries, 46 product categories.

Global Supply: Vegetables

Top 10 countries by per capita supply of the “Vegetables” food group (kcal/capita/day, 2023). This is food group–level data from FAO Food Balance Sheets, not specific to this individual food.

1.
China; mainland
310
2.
China
306
3.
Albania
258
4.
North Macedonia
221
5.
Guyana
209
6.
Kazakhstan
204
7.
Oman
192
8.
Uzbekistan
190
9.
Tajikistan
186
10.
Bosnia and Herzegovina
183

Global Supply Trend (1961–2023)

+76%
1961: 38 kcal2023: 67 kcal

Source: FAO Food Balance Sheets (2023). Supply = production + imports − exports − waste, converted to kcal/capita/day.

Frequently Asked Questions

How many calories are in Peppers, sweet, yellow, raw?

Peppers, sweet, yellow, raw contains 26.6 kcal per 100 grams, making it a low-calorie food. The energy comes from 0.82g of protein (12% of calories), 0.12g of fat (4%), and 6.6g of carbohydrates (99%). Carbohydrates are the primary energy source.

What is Peppers, sweet, yellow, raw most nutritious for?

The standout nutrient in Peppers, sweet, yellow, raw is Vitamin C, providing 139 mg per 100g (154% of the Daily Value). It is also a notable source of Vitamin E (28% DV). Our database tracks 79 individual nutrients for this food, allowing detailed comparison across vitamins, minerals, amino acids, and fatty acids.

Is Peppers, sweet, yellow, raw high in protein?

At 0.82g per 100 grams, Peppers, sweet, yellow, raw is not a significant source of protein. Pair with protein-rich foods like legumes, meat, fish, or dairy to meet daily protein needs.

How much fiber is in Peppers, sweet, yellow, raw?

Peppers, sweet, yellow, raw contains 1.1g of fiber per 100 grams, which is a small amount. To increase fiber intake, consider pairing with high-fiber foods such as legumes, whole grains, or vegetables.

Does Peppers, sweet, yellow, raw contain polyphenols?

Yes, Peppers, sweet, yellow, raw contains approximately 26.0 mg of polyphenols per 100g, primarily from the moderate class. Polyphenols are bioactive plant compounds associated with antioxidant properties. Their retention can vary with cooking and processing methods — see the processing impact section above for details.

What is the insulin index of Peppers, sweet, yellow, raw?

Peppers, sweet, yellow, raw has a high insulin response (II: 73) (estimated from macronutrient composition) on the insulin index scale (white bread = 100). Foods with high insulin scores stimulate significant insulin release, which may be relevant for blood sugar management. Note that the insulin index can differ substantially from the glycemic index — dairy products and high-protein foods often have higher insulin responses than their GI would suggest.