Do you want to learn how to move away from calorie and macro tracking, and still get results? A lot of people do, and there are some very effective strategies we can use here.
You see, a lot of people track calories and macros to get results. It’s one of the most common tools in the health and fitness space, and for good reason. It works. Tracking gives you structure, accountability, and a clearer picture of how your choices line up with your goals. For many, it’s the first time they’ve really seen their eating habits in black and white. It creates a sense of control in an area that often feels overwhelming. And when that structure is in place, results often follow.
But tracking isn’t meant to be a lifelong strategy. It’s a tool, not a lifestyle.
In the early stages, it can be incredibly powerful, but over time, it can also become a crutch. I’ve seen it countless times with clients, where, at first, they feel empowered, but eventually, they start feeling trapped by the numbers. They stress about hitting their macros exactly. They worry about eating out because the food isn’t “trackable.” They start associating success with perfect logging, instead of with habits, skills, and self-trust.
That’s not sustainable, and more importantly, it’s not necessary. If your nutrition approach only works when everything is being tracked and controlled, it’s not actually a sustainable system.
Real success isn’t being able to follow the plan when everything’s perfect. It’s being able to maintain progress when life gets messy, unpredictable, and human.
Food is a part of life, not something to be managed like a spreadsheet forever. And the real goal isn’t to become someone dependent on an app, it’s to build the skills to not need it anymore. Think of tracking like training wheels. They are useful in the beginning, but at some point, those training wheels need to come off.
What comes next is what really matters. It’s learning to navigate meals without a logbook. It’s developing a sense of what balanced eating looks like for you. It’s being able to enjoy dinner with friends, go on holiday, or grab lunch on the go without anxiety or guilt. It’s about moving from external control to internal mastery, and from relying on numbers to trusting yourself.
That transition is a skill, just like learning how to track was in the first place. It doesn’t happen overnight, and it looks a little different for everyone. But with the right mindset, strategies, and structure, you can make that shift and maintain your results long after you stop logging every bite.
In this article, we’ll break down exactly how to do that. You’ll learn how to use tracking intentionally, build the habits that make good nutrition automatic, and gradually move toward true nutritional autonomy and the ability to manage your nutrition confidently and effectively, without being chained to an app.
TL;DR
Tracking is a phenomenal tool, but that’s all it is: a tool. You’re not meant to spend your life punching numbers into an app. The real goal is to build habits strong enough that you no longer need it.
You start by tracking with intention, not just logging, but learning. You pay attention to the foods that keep you full, build a solid foundation of go-to meals, get a feel for portion sizes, and learn how to handle nights out without losing your footing. Along the way, you get better at listening to your body and its hunger, fullness, and rhythms.
Then comes the transition. You let go of tracking a little at a time: maybe just breakfast at first, or maybe you do full days and log afterwards to see how close you were. You calibrate, adjust, and keep going. One day turns into a week. A week turns into a pattern. Before long, you don’t need the training wheels.
Now tracking becomes something you dip back into when you want to fine-tune things, not something you’re chained to. That’s nutritional autonomy.
Tracking Is a Tool, Not a Lifestyle
Tracking calories and macros can be a game-changer, especially early on. It gives you clarity. It shows you what’s really going on with your nutrition, and not what you think you’re eating, but what you actually are. It helps you understand how different foods affect your energy, your performance, your hunger, and your body composition. For many people, this is the first time nutrition has ever felt concrete rather than vague or confusing.
But the reality I’ve seen over and over again with clients is that while tracking is incredibly useful, it’s not something most people want, or need, to do forever. It’s a tool, not a way of life. The ultimate goal with nutrition isn’t to get better at tracking. The goal is to build the skills, habits, and awareness that make tracking unnecessary.
Think of it like learning to ride a bike. In the beginning, the training wheels are what keep you upright. They give you stability and confidence. But nobody sets out to ride with training wheels forever. Eventually, you learn to balance. You learn to trust your body. And at some point, those training wheels just get in the way of the freedom you were working toward in the first place.
Tracking works the same way. It gives you structure and awareness when you need it, and then, once those skills are built, you should be able to ride on your own.
There’s solid psychological reasoning behind this. According to Self-Determination Theory, sustainable motivation is built on three pillars: autonomy, competence, and relatedness. Tracking supports competence as it helps you learn how food impacts your body and your progress. But competence alone isn’t the end of the road. True long-term success comes from autonomy and being able to make choices that align with your goals because you understand your body, not because an app told you to.
In the beginning, the numbers are like scaffolding. They hold things in place while you build the structure. But once the structure is strong, you take the scaffolding down. What remains isn’t the numbers, it’s the understanding, the judgment, the wisdom to navigate food choices without external rules.
And if we zoom out even further, it’s worth remembering that humans regulated their food intake for millennia before calorie trackers existed. Our ancestors didn’t count protein, carbs, or fats. Their regulation came from internal cues like hunger, fullness, and energy needs (along with the natural ebb and flow of the environment). That capacity is still built into us. It’s just that modern food environments and lifestyles have dulled that internal awareness, and made it incredibly easy to overconsume food. Tracking can help sharpen our internal cues again, but ultimately, the goal is to rely on your body’s signals, not on a phone screen.
So, if you want to eventually move away from calorie and macro tracking, you need to shift your mindset from “tracking forever” to “tracking as a temporary learning tool”. As a result of this, tracking stops feeling like a prison and starts feeling like a skill-building phase. You’re not trying to get perfect at logging, you’re learning how to eat well without needing to.
Addressing The Fear Of Not Tracking
Now, one of the biggest hurdles people face when they’ve been tracking for a while isn’t the logistics of stopping, it’s the fear of stopping. I’ve seen it again and again, where clients who are more than capable of making good choices suddenly feel like they’re stepping off a cliff the moment they take away the app.
It’s not that they don’t know how to eat; it’s that they’ve come to rely on external structure so much that the idea of letting go feels unsafe.
That fear is understandable. Tracking gives you a sense of certainty. When the numbers are in front of you, everything feels black and white: you’re either “on track” or you’re not. Take away the numbers, and suddenly things feel messier.
What if you underestimate? What if you gain weight? What if you lose the structure that helped you make progress in the first place? These are valid concerns, and pretending otherwise doesn’t help anyone.
The first mindset shift here is understanding that the goal isn’t to never track again. This isn’t about cutting the cord and declaring calorie counting “bad.” It’s about becoming flexible and self-reliant. Tracking remains a tool in your toolbox; something you can pick up and use strategically when it serves you, and put down when it doesn’t. You’re moving from dependence to choice.
Progress also doesn’t stop when you stop logging. It just looks different. Instead of relying on rigid numbers, you start relying on skills: portion awareness, hunger and fullness cues, daily structure, and nutritional literacy. It’s a shift from external rules to internal understanding. And yes, that can feel uncomfortable at first, but discomfort here isn’t a sign of failure, it’s a sign of growth.
This is where adopting a growth mindset really matters. As Carol Dweck has shown through her work on growth mindset, real skill isn’t built through instant perfection. It’s built through iteration. You’re not expected to nail it from day one. You’ll experiment, overshoot sometimes, undershoot others, and gradually find your footing. That’s how every lasting skill is learned.
Philosophically, this is what Socrates meant when he said, “know thyself.” To be able to transition away from calorie and macro tracking, you need to develop a deeper understanding of yourself. Your hunger, your tendencies, your routines, and your triggers. If you do this effectively, you will be replacing external certainty with internal confidence.
So here’s a question I often ask my clients: If every tracking app disappeared tomorrow, would you still know how to eat in a way that supports your goals? If that question makes you uneasy, good, that’s the point. That unease is the exact skill gap we want to close.
Mastery in any domain means moving from rigid external rules to flexible internal wisdom. This is true in training, in nutrition, and in life. Once you build that internal foundation, you don’t need to live in fear of letting go of the numbers. You’ll know you can trust yourself, and that’s far more powerful than any macro target ever will be.
Build Strong Nutrition Habits First
If you want to move away from tracking successfully, the real key isn’t simply stopping, it’s what you build underneath it. When tracking comes off, habits are what keep everything standing. Without that solid foundation, letting go can feel like pulling the rug out from under yourself. But when you have strong nutrition habits in place, the numbers become unnecessary.
This is where the real work happens. Tracking may teach you what to do, but habits are what make it effortless to keep doing it. The goal is to make smart nutrition choices feel second nature and something you can do automatically, without overthinking or relying on an app. That means learning what foods support your goals, understanding how to structure your day, and tuning in to your body’s signals instead of outsourcing those decisions to a tracker.
Strong habits give you stability. They make it possible to navigate busy days, travel, holidays, or unpredictable schedules without losing your footing. They give you something to fall back on when willpower runs low and life gets messy. In short, habits turn nutrition from something you manage into something you live.
Unfortunately, many people don’t use tracking to build strong habits. They track blindly, not paying attention to their choices or creating any kind of structure to their diet. So, this section is all about building a solid foundation and learning how to pay attention to what matters, simplifying your routine, and creating a structure that supports your goals without needing the numbers.
Pay Attention While You Track
If you’re going to spend time tracking, make that time count. One of the biggest mistakes people make with calorie and macro tracking is treating it like a daily chore to be checked off. Log the food, hit the numbers, close the app. That might work for a while, but if all you’re doing is punching numbers into a tracker, you’re missing the actual lesson that tracking is meant to teach.
The real value of tracking isn’t in the numbers themselves, it’s in what those numbers reveal. Every day you log is an opportunity to learn about your own patterns: which meals keep you full for hours and which leave you raiding the fridge an hour later, how different types of carbs affect your energy, how much protein actually satisfies you, or how fats influence satiety throughout the day. When you pay attention like that, tracking shifts from a control mechanism to a powerful feedback tool.
Think of it like using a map. In the beginning, the map guides every step. You need it to know where you’re going. But over time, if you’re paying attention, you start recognising the landmarks. You build a mental model of the terrain. At some point, you don’t need the map anymore because you know the territory. As Alfred Korzybski famously said, “The map is not the territory.” The numbers are the map, and your lived experience, your awareness of your body, that’s the actual territory.
There’s also a cognitive advantage to approaching tracking this way. According to Cognitive Load Theory, when we invest the effort to learn a skill properly, it eventually becomes automatic. In the beginning, paying attention takes focus and energy. But over time, it becomes intuitive. You no longer need to measure every gram of rice to know what a serving looks like. You don’t have to weigh chicken breast to know roughly how much protein is on your plate. This is how tracking turns into understanding, and understanding is what allows you to eventually let go of the numbers.
So don’t just track. Learn while you track. Ask yourself why certain days feel better than others. Notice how different foods, combinations, and portion sizes affect your hunger, energy, and performance. The more you engage with the process, the faster you’ll build the internal skills that make external tracking unnecessary.
If you don’t understand good nutrition habits and structure, I recommend reading our foundational articles on nutrition:
- How Many Calories Should You Eat?
- How Much Protein Should You Eat?
- How Much Fat Should You Eat?
- How Much Carbohydrate Should You Eat?
- How Much Fibre Should You Eat?
- How Much Water Should You Drink?
- Dealing With Alcohol In The Diet
- Overview of Diet Quantity
You won’t be able to effectively move away from calorie and macro tracking, and still eat a healthy diet, unless you have a good basic understanding of how to set up your diet properly.
Create a Solid Daily Structure
One of the easiest ways to make nutrition feel less overwhelming, and to set yourself up for a smooth transition away from tracking, is to build a solid daily structure. That means having a foundation of go-to meals and routines that make eating well the default, not the daily exception you have to fight for with willpower.
Think about how much mental energy gets wasted every day on questions like “What should I eat?” or “How do I make this fit my numbers?” When you’ve got a few reliable options in place such as a handful of breakfasts, lunches, and dinners that support your goals and actually work for your life, you remove a huge amount of that decision fatigue. You’re not starting from scratch every day. You’re following a framework you trust.
Familiar meals make it easy to estimate portions accurately, even when you’re not weighing or logging. You’ll know roughly what a balanced plate looks like, how full it leaves you, and how it fits into your overall day. That familiarity becomes a kind of nutritional muscle memory.
This isn’t just about practicality, it’s about smart behavioural design. As the book Nudge: Improving Decisions About Health, Wealth, and Happiness points out, our environments and defaults shape our behaviour far more than willpower alone. When your routine already includes meals that align with your goals, it takes less effort to stay on track. You’re nudging yourself in the right direction without even thinking about it.
Building structure here isn’t about eating the same bland chicken and broccoli every day. It’s about finding a rhythm that actually supports your goals, fits your lifestyle, and frees up your brain for more important things than hitting macros 24/7. Once that structure is in place, everything else, including letting go of tracking, becomes much easier.
Learn Portion Sizes & Plate Balance
One of the most powerful skills you can develop if you want to stop tracking successfully is learning how to build a balanced plate, not based on numbers in an app, but on what you can see and feel. Once you know what your ideal plate looks like, hitting your nutrition goals stops being about weighing every ingredient and starts becoming something you can do anywhere, anytime.
The more fluent you become in recognising appropriate portions with your eyes and hands, the more independent you become from tracking tools. A simple and incredibly effective method is to use hand or plate portioning. For example, your palm might represent a serving of protein, your cupped hand a serving of carbs, your thumb a serving of fats, and half your plate filled with vegetables. It’s not measured exactly down to the calorie, and that’s the point. It’s practical, flexible, and works in the real world.
This is what I call developing “visual macro literacy.” Instead of needing a scale and a tracker, your portion sense becomes your guide. You start to understand what a balanced meal looks like and feels like in terms of energy and satiety. Over time, this skill becomes second nature. You can walk into a restaurant, build a plate at a buffet, or make a quick lunch at home without second-guessing yourself or stressing about being off by 10 grams of carbs.
With my clients, I often help them learn how to navigate various events and social situations by using the quick shortcut of “is this a normal human size portion?” This stops a lot of the overindulgence, and still allows you to be quite flexible with food choices. However, to do this effectively, you do actually need to know what a human size portion actually looks like, and luckily, this skill can be built.
There’s an evolutionary logic to this too. Long before calorie labels and tracking apps, humans regulated their food intake using sensory cues like how much food looked like, felt like in the hand, and how satisfying it was. Evolutionary psychology shows us that we’re wired to make these judgments visually and tactilely. Our ancestors didn’t need macro charts; they used their senses and internal signals to eat appropriately. Modern tracking can help us relearn those cues, but once they’re back online, you don’t need to rely on numbers. This is how you make eating intuitive and intentional.
Learning portion sizes isn’t about precision. It’s about building practical confidence. When you can eyeball your meals and know they’re roughly balanced, you free yourself from the constant need to measure and log. That’s one of the biggest steps toward true nutritional autonomy.
Learn to Navigate Real-Life Situations
One of the biggest tests of whether your nutrition habits are truly sustainable isn’t what you do in your kitchen, it’s what happens when you step outside of it. Meals out, weekends away, holidays, birthdays, date nights, work trips, family gatherings… these moments are where a lot of people feel their structure unravel. This is because they’ve built a system that only works when everything is controlled.
If you want to stop tracking without losing your progress, this is where you need to level up your skill set. Real-life situations aren’t an interruption to your plan, they are your plan. Long-term success means being able to integrate good nutrition into your life, not retreating from life just to protect your nutrition.
The good news is that navigating these moments doesn’t have to mean strict rules or logging every bite in the middle of a restaurant. It’s about learning to make smart, flexible decisions in the moment. For example, if you’re eating out, you might prioritise a protein source first, balance your plate with a reasonable portion of carbs and some veggies, and be mindful of extras like sauces, oils, and drinks. You don’t need to obsess over exact numbers; you just need to understand the structure of a balanced meal and make trade-offs that align with your goals.
This might look like skipping the appetiser if you know you want dessert. It might mean choosing grilled instead of fried. Or it might mean enjoying something indulgent without guilt, because you’ve built the skill to do it intentionally, not impulsively. That’s the difference between control and confidence.
This is also where the social side of eating comes in. Ultimately, food isn’t just fuel, it’s a core part of how we connect with others. If your nutrition strategy isolates you from those experiences, it’s not sustainable. But if you learn to navigate them with skill, you can live your life fully and stay aligned with your goals.
Learning to handle real-world situations is what turns theory into practice. When you can enjoy a night out, a holiday, or a spontaneous brunch without needing to track, you’ve built freedom with competence.
Tune In to Internal Signals
One of the most important shifts you’ll make when transitioning away from tracking is moving from external control to internal regulation. Tracking tells you what to eat, when to stop, and how much is “enough.” But if you want to maintain your results without being chained to those numbers, you have to rebuild your connection to the signals your body is constantly sending you.
Hunger, fullness, energy, and cravings aren’t random sensations. They’re information. Your body is always talking to you, but most people have just spent years tuning it out. Tracking can be a powerful starting point, but over time, it can also drown out your natural feedback loop. Long-term success comes when you start listening again.
A big part of this is learning to separate hunger from cravings. Hunger builds gradually and is felt physically, maybe as an empty feeling in your stomach, low energy, or a clear, steady need to eat. Cravings, on the other hand, are often sudden, specific, and driven more by emotion, environment, or habit than actual energy needs. The better you get at noticing the difference, the easier it becomes to make decisions that truly serve your goals, rather than reacting automatically.
The same goes for fullness. Many people only stop eating when the plate is empty or when the tracker says they’ve hit their numbers, not when their body says, “I’ve had enough.” Rebuilding that awareness means slowing down a little, paying attention during meals, and noticing how your body feels both while eating and afterwards. This is how you relearn the natural “stop signals” that tracking can unintentionally override.
Interoception, the brain’s ability to sense and interpret internal signals, is like a muscle and it gets stronger with practice. When you regularly check in with how you actually feel, instead of outsourcing that decision to a number, your interoceptive accuracy improves. Over time, this makes it easier to maintain your nutrition without rigid external control.
This is also how humans managed their nutrition for most of our history. Our ancestors didn’t have macro calculators or calorie labels. They relied on hunger, fullness, and satiety cues shaped by evolution to regulate intake. Those systems still work, they just need to be reawakened, and calibrated to the modern world.
Ultimately, when you stop outsourcing decisions about when to eat, how much to eat, and when to stop to an app, you reclaim ownership of your nutrition. You’re no longer waiting for external permission to make choices that belong to you. Instead of being ruled by numbers, you’re guided by your own awareness, habits, and judgment.
This is similar to what Michel Foucault described as self-governance: the act of directing your own behaviour rather than surrendering it to external systems of control. In practice, it means shifting from compliance to agency, from following rules to embodying principles.
Tuning in to your internal signals won’t be perfect at first. It’s a skill, just like tracking once was. But with practice, it becomes second nature. And when it does, you’ll find that maintaining your nutrition no longer feels like following rules, it feels like living in alignment with your body.
If you get all of these things in place while you are tracking, moving away from tracking will be super easy.
Gradually Wean Off Tracking
Letting go of tracking doesn’t have to be a sudden leap. In fact, for most people, it shouldn’t be. Just like you didn’t master tracking overnight, you won’t build complete confidence without it overnight either. The smartest way to make the transition stick is to wean off gradually, one step at a time, with intention.
This is about shifting from external guardrails to internal control at a pace that builds trust, rather than abandoning structure or just “winging it”. Think of it as taking the scaffolding down slowly, each step gives you more freedom and ownership, but you go slow enough so that you know the structure is still sturdy without the scaffolding.
In this section, we’ll break down practical strategies on how to move away from calorie and macro tracking, and still get results.
Pick Your Approach
When you’re ready to step away from tracking, the smartest strategy isn’t to go from all to nothing, it’s to pick a structured, low-stress way to ease into it. That way, you’re not ripping the safety net out from under yourself. You’re loosening it, one step at a time.
There are a couple of reliable approaches I often use with clients. The first is the meal-by-meal method. Instead of tracking your entire day, you stop logging just one meal, usually breakfast, since it’s often the most consistent. You keep tracking everything else as usual. This lets you practice estimating portions and trusting your habits in a controlled way. Once that feels comfortable, you can gradually expand to other meals. If you can master breakfast, how about lunch? Then can we do dinner as well?
The second is post-hoc tracking. Here, you eat a full day without logging anything in real time. Then, at the end of the day, you enter everything into your tracker to see how close you were. It’s a simple but highly effective way to check your accuracy and build confidence without losing the structure completely. You get immediate feedback, but you’re not tethered to the app all day long. I personally really like this method, as it really allows you to see where you are without tracking and recalibrate your approach.
Both of these strategies work because they lower the psychological barrier to change. In behavioural science, this is sometimes called reducing the psychological switching cost, which is the discomfort that comes from moving away from something familiar. Instead of an abrupt transition, you create a manageable step that builds trust in your skills.
The point isn’t to be perfect from the start. It’s to practice living without the app in a way that feels safe, structured, and sustainable. With each small step, you build confidence, and before long, you’ll realise you need the numbers less than you thought.
Calibrate & Adjust
Once you’ve started easing off tracking, the next step is to use the feedback it gives you, not as a way to judge yourself, but as a way to calibrate your internal sense of portions and balance. This is where you turn practice into skill.
When you do a post-hoc log or check a meal you didn’t track in real time, don’t just glance at the numbers and move on. Compare your estimate to the actual logged intake. Notice the patterns. Are you consistently underestimating certain things, like oils, dressings, or snacks? Are you overshooting your protein? Maybe your portion sizes are spot-on at breakfast but less accurate at dinner. This isn’t about achieving perfection, it’s about building awareness.
The goal here isn’t to punish yourself for “getting it wrong.” It’s to learn. Each time you notice where your perception differs from reality, you’re sharpening your internal calibration. Over time, this gets easier and more accurate, just like learning any other skill.
This process works because of neuroplasticity which is the brain’s ability to adapt and strengthen new patterns with practice. Every time you estimate, check, and adjust, you’re reinforcing neural pathways that make portion estimation more automatic. At first, it might feel clunky or inconsistent. But the more you do it, the better your brain gets at recognising patterns and locking them in.
The beauty of this step is that it builds trust in your own judgment. The more accurately you can self-assess without the app, the less you’ll need the app at all. Tracking turns from a daily crutch into an occasional calibration tool and something you use strategically, not something that controls you.
Layer Weeks Together
Once you’ve started practising letting go of tracking and calibrating your estimates, the next step is to build momentum by layering progress week by week. This is how temporary strategies turn into lasting habits.
In the beginning, it might look as simple as doing post-hoc tracking for a day or two in the first week. That gives you a low-pressure environment to build awareness while still having the safety net of feedback. Once that feels natural, the next step is to only track unfamiliar meals — things that are harder to estimate, like a curry at a restaurant or a meal you didn’t prepare yourself. Familiar meals, the ones that have become second nature, don’t need the same level of oversight anymore.
Over time, you start stringing together untracked days. At first, it might be just one or two. Then it becomes three. Eventually, entire weeks can pass where your nutrition is guided by your habits, your understanding of portions, and your internal cues and not by the numbers on a screen.
And the best part is that it doesn’t feel like effort anymore. It’s simply how you eat.
This is the essence of turning knowledge into skill with consistent, repeated practice. As Aristotle famously said (paraphrased by Will Durant), “We are what we repeatedly do. Excellence, then, is not an act, but a habit.” You’re not trying to be perfect for a few days, you’re building patterns that become part of who you are.
By layering weeks together gradually, you’re proving to yourself that your results don’t depend on tracking. They depend on you, your habits, your awareness, and your ability to self-regulate. That’s the kind of system that lasts.
Monitor Progress Without Obsessing
One of the biggest mindset shifts when moving away from tracking is learning where to place your focus. When you’re tracking every calorie and macro, it’s easy to get caught up in the illusion of control. As if perfect logging automatically guarantees perfect outcomes. But in reality, progress isn’t about micromanaging every number. It’s about building the right processes and letting the outcomes reflect whether those processes are working.
This is where monitoring becomes both smarter and simpler. Instead of obsessing over inputs like exact macro counts, you start paying attention to key outcomes: trends in your body weight, your energy levels throughout the day, how your training feels and performs, your hunger and satiety signals, your mood, and even how your clothes fit. These aren’t random signals; they’re feedback. They tell you whether your habits are in alignment with your goals.
But here’s the crucial distinction: the outcomes are not the goal, the process is. You can’t directly control whether the scale goes down this week. You can control your daily habits like how consistently you eat balanced meals, get enough sleep, train effectively, manage stress, and tune in to your body’s signals. Those are process goals, and they’re where your energy and focus should live.
Outcomes are simply a compass, not a scoreboard. If your process is dialled in and the outcomes are trending in the right direction, great, keep going. If they’re not, that’s not a failure. It’s data. It’s a sign that something in the process might need a slight adjustment. Maybe your portion sizes have crept up a bit, maybe your sleep has been off, maybe stress is higher than usual.
The point is to use outcomes to calibrate your process.
This way of thinking mirrors systems thinking. Instead of trying to control individual variables (like hitting an exact calorie target or forcing the scale to move on a particular timeline), you build reliable systems and habits. Those systems generate outcomes. If the outcome isn’t what you want, you adjust the system, not your sense of identity or your commitment.
It also reflects a principle at the heart of stoicism which is to focus on what you can control, and accept what you can’t. Epictetus taught that freedom comes from recognising the difference between the two. You can control your behaviours, not the exact pace of fat loss, muscle gain, or performance improvement.
When you operate from this mindset, monitoring progress stops being an emotional rollercoaster. Daily weight fluctuations don’t rattle you, because you’re looking at trends over time. A single off day in the gym doesn’t spiral into self-doubt, because you trust the process you’ve built. And when something isn’t quite working, you have the clarity to adjust your behaviours without overcorrecting or resorting to rigid control.
This is what real nutritional autonomy looks like: habits that drive progress, outcomes that guide calibration, and a focus on what matters most.
Use Tracking Strategically, Not Constantly
Just because you’ve moved beyond tracking as a daily habit doesn’t mean you’ll never use it again. In fact, one of the smartest things you can do once you’ve built strong nutrition habits is to keep tracking in your back pocket as a strategic tool. The difference now is that you’re using it with purpose, not dependence.
Think of it like checking your compass, not redrawing the map every day. Once your habits are solid and you’re confident navigating without the numbers, there may still be moments when pulling out the app for a short period can be genuinely useful.
For example, maybe your weight has been trending up or down more than you’d like, or your energy levels feel off. A brief tracking phase can help you recalibrate, bring awareness back to portion sizes, and tighten things up without needing to overhaul your entire approach. Or maybe you’re intentionally entering a new phase — leaning out a bit before a holiday, pushing for a gaining phase to support training, or fine-tuning performance nutrition. In these moments, tracking can give you clarity and precision when it matters most.
But here’s the key difference: it’s strategic, not constant. The numbers aren’t running the show anymore. They’re just tools you pick up when needed, then set back down. It’s like scaffolding around a house. Once the structure is strong, you don’t keep the scaffolding up forever. You only bring it back if you’re making a renovation, you don’t keep it up when you actually want to live inside it.
This shift turns tracking from something that controls you into something you control. You decide when it’s helpful, when it isn’t, and how to use it to support, not dictate, your nutrition. That’s exactly what nutritional autonomy looks like in practice.
Embrace Flexibility and Trust the Process
One of the most important things to remember as you move away from calorie and macro tracking is that this isn’t about being perfect. In fact, perfection is the very thing that keeps so many people stuck. When every bite has to be measured and every day has to be flawless, nutrition turns into something rigid and fragile. The real goal here is flexibility and the confidence to navigate your nutrition without second-guessing yourself.
This is what true autonomy looks like. You’re no longer outsourcing your decisions to an app or relying on numbers to validate whether you “did well” today. You know how to build balanced meals, how to listen to your body’s signals, and how to make smart choices even when life gets messy. You trust your skills, and like any skill, this only gets stronger with practice.
Philosophically, this echoes a core idea espoused by Marcus Aurelius: true discipline is internal. Real mastery isn’t about following rules someone else set for you, it’s about governing yourself with clarity and purpose. When you stop needing the external structure of tracking to feel in control, you reclaim that discipline.
Psychologically, this shift also matters because autonomy is far more sustainable than external control. According to Self-Determination Theory, intrinsic motivation is built on autonomy, not dependence. When your nutrition habits belong to you, they don’t fall apart the moment the structure changes. They stick because they’re yours.
Trusting the process means accepting that it won’t always look perfect, and that’s exactly the point. It’s about being consistent enough to stay on track while flexible enough to live your life. That’s where real, lasting results come from.
Lifestyle & Identity
At some point, nutrition has to stop being something you do and start becoming part of who you are. That’s the real turning point. Because when your actions are tied to your identity, you don’t have to rely on constant motivation, external rules, or apps to keep you on track. You act in alignment with who you believe yourself to be.
This is where moving away from tracking stops being just a “how-to” and becomes something you can actually own. Instead of thinking, “I need to hit my macros,” you start thinking, “I’m the kind of person who eats balanced meals, listens to my body, and takes care of my health.” That small shift in language reflects a much bigger shift in mindset. It moves the source of control from outside of you to within you.
Developing food literacy is a lot like learning to drive without GPS. In the beginning, you might rely heavily on turn-by-turn directions. But once you’ve learned the route, you no longer need the voice telling you where to go. You know the way. You can adapt if a road is closed, take a different path, or enjoy the drive. Nutrition works the same way. Tracking can show you the path, but at some point, you have to start driving for yourself.
In The Republic, Plato described how a well-ordered soul reflects a well-ordered life. The more clarity and structure you have internally, the less you need external control. Nutrition isn’t just about what you put on your plate, it’s a reflection of how you live, the standards you hold for yourself, and the principles that guide your decisions.
Psychologically, identity-based habits are far more durable than goal-based ones. According to Identity-based habits, when your actions are tied to who you are, not just what you want to achieve, they stick. A person training for a marathon might stop running after race day. But a person who identifies as “a runner” keeps going. The same applies to nutrition: chasing goals is temporary; embodying principles is lasting.
Why this matters is simple: skills can fade, plans can change, but identity endures. If you see yourself as someone who knows how to eat well, who values health, balance, and self-trust, your habits will naturally follow that identity.
Practical Tools or Frameworks
Now, one of the most common challenges people face when transitioning away from tracking is the grey zone. That space between relying on the numbers and trusting yourself fully. It’s easy to feel confident when the app is giving you clear targets, but without that structure, many people are left wondering, “Am I doing this right?”
That’s where simple, practical frameworks come in. Think of these as guardrails rather than strict rules. They give you enough structure to stay aligned with your goals without weighing, measuring, or logging every bite. The best part is, these tools can be layered in before you stop tracking entirely, so your habits and your new framework align seamlessly.

A few of the most effective approaches I use with clients include:
- Hand portion guide: A straightforward and flexible way to estimate intake. Your palm represents a serving of protein, your cupped hand a serving of carbs, your thumb a serving of fats, and your fist a serving of vegetables. The beauty of this is that this works anywhere; at home, at a restaurant, or while travelling.
- Plate method: A balanced plate with ½ vegetables, ¼ protein, ¼ carbs, and a portion of healthy fats. This ensures that you’re prioritising nutrient-dense foods, getting adequate protein, and controlling energy intake more intuitively.
- “3-4 meals + 1 snack” template: Instead of micromanaging every calorie, build a daily rhythm around three to four balanced meals and one optional snack. This keeps energy levels stable, supports training, and prevents the kind of chaotic grazing that often happens without structure.
- Hunger/fullness scale: A simple 1-10 rating system that helps you learn when to start and stop eating based on your internal cues. Instead of eating because it’s “time” or because your tracker says so, you learn to respond to your body.
These frameworks might sound basic, but their strength lies in their simplicity. According to behavioural design, simple heuristics reduce decision fatigue, improve consistency, and make habits easier to stick to. By using a framework, you’re no longer making dozens of complicated decisions every day, you’re following clear, practical guidelines that keep you on track.
Aristotle spoke of the “golden mean”, and moderation as a guiding principle. Unfortunately, moderation isn’t intuitive for most people. What many think of as “moderation” with the diet often means too little protein, too few fruits and vegetables, and too many processed foods. People with well-built habits can afford to say “just eat in moderation” because they already have a solid framework to fall back on. But for the average person, that so-called moderation is actually a recipe for drifting far off course.
That’s why frameworks matter. They make moderation real. They give shape to what balanced eating looks like in practice, without needing to rely on tracking apps. Once these habits are in place, they provide the structure you need to maintain results long-term.
Emotional & Social Eating
When people stop tracking, the place where things often go off the rails isn’t at breakfast on a Tuesday, it’s during moments charged with emotion or social connection. Tracking can act as a guardrail against mindless eating. It adds a layer of accountability that makes people think twice before reaching for something impulsively. Once that guardrail comes down, those same situations can feel like uncharted territory.
This is why developing new strategies for emotional and social eating is such an important part of transitioning away from tracking. If you can navigate these moments with confidence, you’ve built a truly sustainable foundation.
The first step is learning to tell the difference between emotional hunger and physical hunger. Physical hunger builds gradually and shows up as clear, bodily signals: an empty stomach, lower energy, maybe a little irritability. Emotional hunger, on the other hand, tends to appear suddenly and is often tied to a specific craving, like wanting ice cream after a stressful day or raiding the fridge when you’re bored. Recognising this difference doesn’t mean suppressing the emotion. It means understanding why you want to eat, so you can choose your response rather than react automatically.
Social situations can be another sticking point. When eating out or attending events, the absence of tracking can make people feel unanchored. One simple strategy I use with clients is “choose the protein, add veggies, and go easy on the carbs and fats.” This keeps the structure of a balanced meal intact without turning dinner with friends into a mental math problem. You don’t need to track every sauce or weigh every side dish, you just need to make smart, flexible choices that align with your goals.
Indulgences are also part of the picture. Food isn’t just fuel; it’s cultural, emotional, and social. And that’s okay. The key is learning to plan for indulgences without guilt. If you decide ahead of time to enjoy dessert or a special meal, it becomes a conscious choice, not a moment of “falling off.” Guilt creates cycles of restriction and overcorrection. Intention creates balance.
Food is deeply tied to social rituals and cultural norms. Our environment and the people we share meals with shape our eating behaviours far more than we realise. Building awareness around this gives you more agency in those moments.
And on a psychological level, this comes down to emotional regulation. Learning to sit with discomfort, stress, or joy without automatically turning to food builds resilience over time. Stoicism frames it beautifully, and teaches us that emotions aren’t commands, they’re signals. You don’t have to obey every craving or urge. You can acknowledge it, understand it, and choose your next step intentionally.
When you develop these emotional and social strategies, you remove one of the biggest friction points in maintaining progress without tracking. You’re no longer relying on a food log to hold the line, you’re able to rely on yourself.
Troubleshooting & Common Pitfalls
No matter how strong your habits are, there will be times when things drift off course. That’s normal. This just means you’re human. What separates people who maintain their progress from those who spiral is their ability to self-correct quickly and calmly. This is why having a simple troubleshooting plan matters. When you know what to do before things go wrong, you remove the panic and guesswork that often makes a small detour turn into a full derailment.
The first step is learning to spot the early signs that it’s time to recalibrate. Maybe your weight is trending up or down faster than you’d like. Maybe your energy levels have dipped, your workouts feel sluggish, or you’re hungrier than usual. Sometimes it’s as simple as noticing that your meals have started to lose structure or that your “flexibility” has turned into mindless eating. These are just signals. Not moral judgments, and not signs you’ve blown it.
Once you recognise those signals, the next step is to course-correct without overreacting. A short-term return to tracking can be a powerful reset. This is not as a punishment, it’s just a diagnostic tool. Logging for a few days can bring awareness back to portion sizes, highlight where things have drifted, and help you tighten up your habits again. The key is to approach it with curiosity, not guilt or shame.
Equally important is learning to avoid swinging between extremes. A lot of people fall into the “all or nothing” trap, either tracking with obsessive precision or abandoning structure entirely. This pendulum swing is what keeps so many people stuck in cycles of progress and regression. The middle ground of using structure flexibly, making adjustments without panic, is where long-term sustainability lives.

This kind of steady course correction reflects systems thinking. In any stable system, feedback loops keep things on track. When the system drifts, small, deliberate adjustments bring it back into balance. Nutrition works the same way: your outcomes provide the feedback, and your habits are the levers you adjust. Each time you navigate a setback, you make your habits more resilient and your confidence deeper.
Ultimately, having a clear “Plan B” doesn’t just make your nutrition strategy more robust, it actually makes it anti-fragile. Instead of fearing setbacks, you learn to use them.
It can be extremely challenging to move away from calorie and macro tracking, but once you have an idea of how you will manage things and adjust things over time, it does become much easier.
What Happens If We Don’t Apply This Principle
It’s worth taking a moment to look at the other side of the coin here: what happens if we never make the transition away from external control? If tracking remains the only structure someone knows, it can become a cage. At first, it feels like clarity and discipline. But over time, it turns into dependency.
When your progress and sense of control rely entirely on numbers, apps, and external validation, you’re effectively handing your power over to a system you don’t control. You’re not building self-trust, you’re outsourcing it. That creates a fragile foundation.
Health built on external control is brittle. If tracking is the only thing holding everything together, then a holiday, a weekend away, a stressful life event, or simply a moment of burnout can unravel the whole system. I’ve seen it countless times: a person is in great shape and totally consistent… until the structure gets disrupted. Then what was once discipline turns into chaos.
This erosion of confidence happens gradually. The longer you stay dependent on tracking, the less you trust your own instincts. Flexibility becomes something to fear, not a skill to practice. And when life inevitably demands flexibility, the structure collapses.
This dynamic was warned about by Michel Foucault, when he discussed how when external systems of control are internalised without question, they can become invisible cages. What once felt empowering can quietly undermine autonomy.
This fragility also reflects a mismatch between ancient instincts and modern systems. Our bodies evolved to self-regulate through internal signals (hunger, fullness, energy cues, etc.) not external tracking apps. When we silence those signals for too long, we lose the very capacities that made humans resilient in the first place.
I’ve experienced this myself. There was a period where I was entirely externally focused, and hitting calories and macros with near-perfect precision, convinced that was the gold standard. But over time, it untethered me from my own hunger signals. I stopped noticing how different foods made me feel, when I was truly hungry, or when I’d had enough. The numbers spoke louder than my body.
When those numbers were gone, I felt adrift. I was lost. I was not in connection with my own body.
That’s the real cost of outsourcing everything to external control: you lose touch with your own internal compass. Without that anchor, any disruption like travel, stress, or simply life, can leave you feeling lost. Rebuilding that connection takes time, but it’s essential. Because no app can replace the wisdom of learning to trust your body again.
In a society obsessed with precision, measurement, and control, we often trade intuition for data and in doing so, we lose the ability to trust ourselves.
True strength is flexible, not brittle. A strong nutrition foundation doesn’t depend on perfect conditions. It bends without breaking. It adapts when life changes. If you never learn to let go of external control, you never give yourself the chance to build that kind of resilience.
How To Move Away From Calorie And Macro Tracking Conclusion
Learning how to move away from calorie and macro tracking isn’t about abandoning all structure, it’s about building something stronger. Tracking can be an incredible tool, but it was never meant to be the foundation forever. The real goal has always been autonomy and the ability to eat in a way that supports your goals, aligns with your values, and fits your real life, without needing to be tethered to numbers.
If you go through this process as I have laid out, you will have learned why tracking works and why it can become a trap if you never learn to let go. You will have built the skills that matter most such as paying attention to your body, developing strong daily habits, learning portion balance, navigating real-life situations, and tuning in to your internal signals. You will also have put in place practical frameworks and emotional strategies to handle the messy, unpredictable parts of life, because that’s where long-term success is really tested.
There will be times when you recalibrate, moments when you drift, and phases where you might choose to track strategically again. That’s all part of the process. What matters is that you’re no longer dependent on tracking to feel in control. You are in control.
This journey is about moving from external rules to internal mastery, from training wheels to real riding. True discipline is something that lives within you. It’s a return to the instincts we’re wired to trust. It’s building autonomy, which is far more sustainable than relying on external control.
At the end of the day, what creates lasting results isn’t the app on your phone. It’s the daily actions, practised over and over, until they become part of who you are. It’s the ability to trust your own judgment, stay consistent through life’s ups and downs, and make decisions that support both your health and your happiness.
When you reach that point, tracking is no longer a lifeline. It’s just a tool. One you can pick up or set down whenever you choose. That’s nutritional freedom. That’s real mastery. And it’s something no app can ever give you, but you can build for yourself.
If you need more help with your own nutrition, you can always reach out to us and get online coaching, or alternatively, you can interact with our free content, especially our free nutrition content.
If you want more free information on nutrition or training, you can follow us on Instagram, YouTube or listen to the podcast, where we discuss all the little intricacies of exercise and nutrition. You can always stay up to date with our latest content by subscribing to our newsletter.
Finally, if you want to learn how to coach nutrition, then consider our Nutrition Coach Certification course, and if you want to learn to get better at exercise program design, then consider our course on exercise program design. We do have other courses available too. If you don’t understand something, or you just need clarification, you can always reach out to us on Instagram or via email.
References and Further Reading
Patel ML, Hopkins CM, Brooks TL, Bennett GG. Comparing Self-Monitoring Strategies for Weight Loss in a Smartphone App: Randomized Controlled Trial. JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2019;7(2):e12209. Published 2019 Feb 28. doi:10.2196/12209 https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6416539/
Patel ML, Cleare AE, Smith CM, Rosas LG, King AC. Detailed Versus Simplified Dietary Self-monitoring in a Digital Weight Loss Intervention Among Racial and Ethnic Minority Adults: Fully Remote, Randomized Pilot Study. JMIR Form Res. 2022;6(12):e42191. Published 2022 Dec 13. doi:10.2196/42191 https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9795401/
Payne JE, Turk MT, Kalarchian MA, Pellegrini CA. Adherence to mobile-app-based dietary self-monitoring-Impact on weight loss in adults. Obes Sci Pract. 2021;8(3):279-288. Published 2021 Sep 28. doi:10.1002/osp4.566 https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9159560/
Dunn CG, Turner-McGrievy GM, Wilcox S, Hutto B. Dietary Self-Monitoring Through Calorie Tracking but Not Through a Digital Photography App Is Associated with Significant Weight Loss: The 2SMART Pilot Study-A 6-Month Randomized Trial. J Acad Nutr Diet. 2019;119(9):1525-1532. doi:10.1016/j.jand.2019.03.013 https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/31155474/
Silva MN, Vieira PN, Coutinho SR, et al. Using self-determination theory to promote physical activity and weight control: a randomized controlled trial in women. J Behav Med. 2010;33(2):110-122. doi:10.1007/s10865-009-9239-y https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/20012179/
Patrick H, Williams GC. Self-determination theory: its application to health behavior and complementarity with motivational interviewing. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2012;9:18. Published 2012 Mar 2. doi:10.1186/1479-5868-9-18 https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3323356/
Teixeira PJ, Carraça EV, Markland D, Silva MN, Ryan RM. Exercise, physical activity, and self-determination theory: a systematic review. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2012;9:78. Published 2012 Jun 22. doi:10.1186/1479-5868-9-78 https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3441783/
Robinson E, McFarland-Lesser I, Patel Z, Jones A. Downsizing food: a systematic review and meta-analysis examining the effect of reducing served food portion sizes on daily energy intake and body weight. Br J Nutr. 2023;129(5):888-903. doi:10.1017/S0007114522000903 https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/35387692/
Hall KD, Ayuketah A, Brychta R, et al. Ultra-Processed Diets Cause Excess Calorie Intake and Weight Gain: An Inpatient Randomized Controlled Trial of Ad Libitum Food Intake. Cell Metab. 2019;30(1):67-77.e3. doi:10.1016/j.cmet.2019.05.008 https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/31105044/
Shinozaki N, Murakami K, Masayasu S, Sasaki S. Is the hand scale an appropriate tool for guiding and estimating food portions? An evaluation among free-living adults. Appetite. 2025;215:108232. doi:10.1016/j.appet.2025.108232 https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/40669561/
Pedersen SD, Kang J, Kline GA. Portion control plate for weight loss in obese patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus: a controlled clinical trial. Arch Intern Med. 2007;167(12):1277-1283. doi:10.1001/archinte.167.12.1277 https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/17592101/
Bowen ME, Cavanaugh KL, Wolff K, et al. The diabetes nutrition education study randomized controlled trial: A comparative effectiveness study of approaches to nutrition in diabetes self-management education. Patient Educ Couns. 2016;99(8):1368-1376. doi:10.1016/j.pec.2016.03.017 https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/27026388/
Vargas-Alvarez MA, Navas-Carretero S, Palla L, Martínez JA, Almiron-Roig E. Impact of Portion Control Tools on Portion Size Awareness, Choice and Intake: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Nutrients. 2021;13(6):1978. Published 2021 Jun 9. doi:10.3390/nu13061978 https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/34207492/
Mason AE, Epel ES, Aschbacher K, et al. Reduced reward-driven eating accounts for the impact of a mindfulness-based diet and exercise intervention on weight loss: Data from the SHINE randomized controlled trial. Appetite. 2016;100:86-93. doi:10.1016/j.appet.2016.02.009 https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/26867697/
Forman EM, Butryn ML, Manasse SM, et al. Acceptance-based versus standard behavioral treatment for obesity: Results from the mind your health randomized controlled trial. Obesity (Silver Spring). 2016;24(10):2050-2056. doi:10.1002/oby.21601 https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5051349/
Lillis J, Niemeier HM, Thomas JG, et al. A randomized trial of an acceptance-based behavioral intervention for weight loss in people with high internal disinhibition. Obesity (Silver Spring). 2016;24(12):2509-2514. doi:10.1002/oby.21680 https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/27804255/
Carpenter KM, Vickerman KA, Salmon EE, Javitz HS, Epel ES, Lovejoy JC. A Randomized Pilot Study of a Phone-Based Mindfulness and Weight Loss Program. Behav Med. 2019;45(4):271-281. doi:10.1080/08964289.2017.1384359 https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8462129/
Westenhoefer J, Stunkard AJ, Pudel V. Validation of the flexible and rigid control dimensions of dietary restraint. Int J Eat Disord. 1999;26(1):53-64. doi:10.1002/(sici)1098-108x(199907)26:1<53::aid-eat7>3.0.co;2-n https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/10349584/
Westenhoefer J, Engel D, Holst C, et al. Cognitive and weight-related correlates of flexible and rigid restrained eating behaviour. Eat Behav. 2013;14(1):69-72. doi:10.1016/j.eatbeh.2012.10.015 https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/23265405/
Berg AC, Johnson KB, Straight CR, et al. Flexible Eating Behavior Predicts Greater Weight Loss Following a Diet and Exercise Intervention in Older Women. J Nutr Gerontol Geriatr. 2018;37(1):14-29. doi:10.1080/21551197.2018.1435433 https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/29494790/
Cleo G, Beller E, Glasziou P, Isenring E, Thomas R. Efficacy of habit-based weight loss interventions: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Behav Med. 2020;43(4):519-532. doi:10.1007/s10865-019-00100-w https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/31529279/
Beeken RJ, Leurent B, Vickerstaff V, et al. A brief intervention for weight control based on habit-formation theory delivered through primary care: results from a randomised controlled trial. Int J Obes (Lond). 2017;41(2):246-254. doi:10.1038/ijo.2016.206 https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5300101/
Nezami BT, Hurley L, Power J, Valle CG, Tate DF. A pilot randomized trial of simplified versus standard calorie dietary self-monitoring in a mobile weight loss intervention. Obesity (Silver Spring). 2022;30(3):628-638. doi:10.1002/oby.23377 https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9469733/
Nezami BT, Hurley L, Power J, Valle CG, Tate DF. A pilot randomized trial of simplified versus standard calorie dietary self-monitoring in a mobile weight loss intervention. Obesity (Silver Spring). 2022;30(3):628-638. doi:10.1002/oby.23377 https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9469733/
Ruddock HK, Brunstrom JM, Vartanian LR, Higgs S. A systematic review and meta-analysis of the social facilitation of eating. Am J Clin Nutr. 2019;110(4):842-861. doi:10.1093/ajcn/nqz155 https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/31435639/
Ruddock HK, Long EV, Brunstrom JM, Vartanian LR, Higgs S. People serve themselves larger portions before a social meal. Sci Rep. 2021;11(1):11072. Published 2021 May 26. doi:10.1038/s41598-021-90559-y https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8155033/
Herman CP. The social facilitation of eating or the facilitation of social eating?. J Eat Disord. 2017;5:16. Published 2017 Apr 27. doi:10.1186/s40337-017-0146-2 https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5406877/
Cohen JF, Richardson SA, Cluggish SA, Parker E, Catalano PJ, Rimm EB. Effects of choice architecture and chef-enhanced meals on the selection and consumption of healthier school foods: a randomized clinical trial. JAMA Pediatr. 2015;169(5):431-437. doi:10.1001/jamapediatrics.2014.3805 https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/25798990/