Skip to main content

Emu, outside drum, raw

Poultry Per 100 g · Per 100g serving

Emu, outside drum, raw is a poultry at 103 calories per 100g. It is an excellent source of Vitamin B12, Selenium and Iron, providing 288%, 66% and 56% of the Daily Value respectively. This poultry is high in protein, virtually fat-free. Poultry provides lean, complete protein along with B vitamins and minerals. The nutrient profile differs substantially between light and dark meat, and between skin-on and skinless preparations. Our database tracks 74 nutrients for this food, plus insulin index, environmental footprint data.

103
Calories
kcal
23.1
Protein
g
0.48
Fat
g
0
Carbs
g
0
Fiber
g

Top Nutrients

☀️
Vitamin B12
6.9 µg
288% DV
💎
Selenium
36.3 µg
66% DV
💎
Iron
4.5 mg
56% DV

Data for 74 of 150 tracked nutrients

Nutrient Fingerprint

How this food scores across key nutrient categories, as a percentage of the daily recommended value per 100 g. Based on USDA DRIs for adults.

Complete Nutrient Profile

Macronutrients 9
NutrientPer 100gUnitPer Serving% DV
Water SR74.9g
2%
Calories SR103kcal
Energy (kJ) SR430kj
Protein SR23.1g
41%
Total Fat SR0.48g
Carbohydrate SR0g
Fiber SR0g
Total Sugars SR0g
Ash SR1.0g
Minerals 10
NutrientPer 100gUnitPer Serving% DV
Calcium SR3.0mg
0%
Iron SR4.5mg
56%
Magnesium SR29.0mg
7%
Phosphorus SR225mg
32%
Potassium SR320mg
9%
Sodium SR100mg
7%
Zinc SR4.5mg
41%
Copper SR0.20mg
22%
Manganese SR0.03mg
1%
Selenium SR36.3µg
66%
Vitamins 20
NutrientPer 100gUnitPer Serving% DV
Vitamin A (RAE) SR0µg
Vitamin A (IU) SR0IU
Retinol SR0µg
Beta-Carotene SR0µg
Alpha-Carotene SR0µg
Beta-Cryptoxanthin SR0µg
Lycopene SR0µg
Lutein + Zeaxanthin SR0µg
Vitamin C SR0mg
Vitamin E SR0.17mg
1%
Thiamin (B1) SR0.26mg
22%
Riboflavin (B2) SR0.44mg
34%
Niacin (B3) SR7.2mg
45%
Pantothenic Acid (B5) SR2.5mg
50%
Vitamin B6 SR0.68mg
52%
Folate SR7.0µg
2%
Folic Acid SR0µg
Folate (food) SR7.0µg
Folate (DFE) SR7.0µg
Vitamin B12 SR6.9µg
288%
Fatty Acids 4
NutrientPer 100gUnitPer Serving% DV
Saturated Fat SR0.12g
Monounsaturated Fat SR0.20g
Polyunsaturated Fat SR0.07g
Cholesterol SR78.0mg
Individual Fatty Acids 9
NutrientPer 100gUnitPer Serving% DV
Caprylic Acid (8:0) SR0g
Capric Acid (10:0) SR0g
Lauric Acid (12:0) SR0g
Myristic Acid (14:0) SR0.001g
Palmitic Acid (16:0) SR0.08g
Stearic Acid (18:0) SR0.04g
Linoleic Acid (18:2) SR0.05g
0%
Omega-6 GLA SR0g
Linolenic Acid (18:3) SR0.003g
Amino Acids 19
NutrientPer 100gUnitPer Serving% DV
Tryptophan SR0.15g
Threonine SR0.66g
Isoleucine SR0.75g
Leucine SR1.3g
Lysine SR1.4g
Methionine SR0.44g
Cystine SR0.17g
Phenylalanine SR0.66g
Tyrosine SR0.49g
Valine SR0.77g
Arginine SR1.0g
Histidine SR0.51g
Alanine SR0.90g
Aspartic Acid SR2.0g
Glutamic Acid SR2.3g
Glycine SR0.73g
Proline SR0.94g
Serine SR0.55g
Hydroxyproline SR0.15g
Other 3
NutrientPer 100gUnitPer Serving% DV
Caffeine SR0mg
Theobromine SR0mg
Alcohol SR0g

Nutrient Density Score

The NRF9.3 score measures overall nutritional quality per 100 kcal. It rewards 9 nutrients to encourage (protein, fiber, vitamins A, C, E, calcium, iron, magnesium, potassium) and penalizes 3 to limit (saturated fat, added sugars, sodium). Higher is better; negative scores indicate the food is high in limit nutrients relative to its beneficial content.

79
NRF9.3 Score
Good · per 100 kcal
Poor (<0) Moderate Good Excellent (100+)

NRF9.3 index: Fulgoni et al. (2009), J Nutr 139(8). DVs based on FDA 2020 reference values.

Nutrient Interactions in This Food

Nutrients in this food that enhance or compete with each other during absorption.

✔ Synergies — nutrients that help each other

Vitamin B6 + Magnesium●●

Vitamin B6 may enhance intracellular magnesium accumulation. Combined supplementation has shown greater benefits for stress and anxiety than magnesium alone.

Pouteau et al., PLoS One, 2018

⚠ Antagonisms — nutrients that compete

Zinc vs Copper●●●

High zinc intake induces metallothionein in enterocytes, which traps copper and blocks its absorption. Prolonged high-dose zinc can cause copper deficiency.

Prasad et al., JAMA, 1978; Fosmire, Am J Clin Nutr, 1990

Zinc vs Iron●●

Zinc and non-heme iron compete for the same intestinal transporter (DMT1). High doses of one can reduce absorption of the other when taken simultaneously.

Rossander-Hulten et al., Am J Clin Nutr, 1991

Potassium vs Sodium●●

High potassium intake promotes renal sodium excretion and attenuates the blood pressure–raising effect of sodium. A higher K:Na ratio is associated with lower cardiovascular risk.

Aburto et al., BMJ, 2013

Amino Acid Profile

Essential amino acid composition compared to the WHO/FAO adult reference pattern. The Amino Acid Score indicates protein quality — 100 means all essential amino acid requirements are met.

85
Amino Acid Score
Good
Valine
Limiting Amino Acid
19
Amino Acids Tracked

Tip: The limiting amino acid is Valine. Pair with dairy, meat, and soy for a complete amino acid profile.

All Amino Acids (19)
Amino Acidg / 100gmg / g protein
Tryptophan0.156.6
Threonine0.6628.7
Isoleucine0.7532.5
Leucine1.355.2
Lysine1.458.8
Methionine0.4419.0
Cystine0.177.2
Phenylalanine0.6628.6
Tyrosine0.4921.3
Valine0.7733.3
Arginine1.045.0
Histidine0.5121.9
Alanine0.9038.9
Aspartic Acid2.087.0
Glutamic Acid2.397.6
Glycine0.7331.5
Proline0.9440.5
Serine0.5523.8
Hydroxyproline0.156.5

How Cooking Changes Nutrients

Estimated percentage of each nutrient retained after cooking, based on USDA retention factors for the “Chicken” food category. Values of 100% mean no loss; lower values indicate nutrients lost to heat, water, or oxidation.

Key insights
Vitamin B6 loses up to 42% when simmered. Roasted retains 80%.

Source: USDA Table of Nutrient Retention Factors, Release 6 (2007). Retention values are category-level averages — actual retention depends on cooking time, temperature, and water volume.

USDA Retention Factors

Insulin Response

The Insulin Index (II) measures the actual insulin response to food on a scale where white bread = 100. Unlike the Glycemic Index (which only measures blood sugar), the II captures the full hormonal response — including the effect of protein and fat on insulin secretion. This is why high-protein foods like meat and dairy can have significant insulin scores despite having low or zero GI values.

32
Insulin Index
Moderate Insulin Response
Insulin Index Scale 32
0 Low ≤30 Mod ≤60 High ≤100 120
Macro Model ●● Estimated from macronutrient composition (R²=0.49)

Source: Holt et al. 1997; Bao et al. 2016; Bell 2014

Environmental Impact

Environmental footprint per kilogram of food produced. Data represents the global average for the “Poultry Meat” category.

9.9
kg CO₂e / kg
High Impact
12.2
m² land / kg
Land Use
660
L water / kg
Water Use
65.6
g SO₂e / kg
Acidification
How this compares (GHG emissions)
Potatoes (0.5)Chicken (9.9)Beef (99.5)
Greenhouse Gas Emissions9.9 kg CO₂e / kg
Land Use12.2 m² / kg
Water Use660 L / kg
Eutrophication48.7 g PO₄e / kg
Acidification65.6 g SO₂e / kg
⚠️ Important context about this data
  • Global averages: These figures are production-weighted averages from a meta-analysis of ~38,700 farms across 119 countries (Poore & Nemecek, 2018). Actual impact varies enormously by farming method, geography, and supply chain.
  • System boundary: Cradle-to-retail only — does not include consumer transport, home cooking energy, or food waste.
  • Soil carbon not included: This data does not account for soil carbon sequestration. Some argue that well-managed regenerative grazing partially offsets ruminant emissions; however, full lifecycle accounting — including methane, land-use change, and the opportunity cost of using land for grazing vs. reforestation — typically makes the net footprint of ruminant meat higher, not lower. This is especially relevant in temperate grassland regions like Ireland.
  • Not gospel: This data is informational and illustrative. It is useful for understanding relative magnitudes, but should not be treated as precise measurements for any individual product or farm.

Source: Poore & Nemecek (2018), Science 360(6392). Meta-analysis of ~38,700 farms, 119 countries, 46 product categories.

Global Supply: Meat

Top 10 countries by per capita supply of the “Meat” food group (kcal/capita/day, 2023). This is food group–level data from FAO Food Balance Sheets, not specific to this individual food.

1.
Tonga
755
2.
Mongolia
643
3.
Argentina
571
4.
China; Macao SAR
546
5.
Marshall Islands
539
6.
Ireland
532
7.
Bahamas
527
8.
Saint Vincent and the Grenadines
516
9.
Nauru
510
10.
Belarus
498

Global Supply Trend (1961–2023)

+56%
1961: 156 kcal2023: 244 kcal

Source: FAO Food Balance Sheets (2023). Supply = production + imports − exports − waste, converted to kcal/capita/day.

Frequently Asked Questions

How many calories are in Emu, outside drum, raw?

Emu, outside drum, raw contains 103 kcal per 100 grams, making it a moderate-calorie food. The energy comes from 23.1g of protein (90% of calories), 0.48g of fat (4%), and 0g of carbohydrates (0%). Protein is the primary energy source.

What is Emu, outside drum, raw most nutritious for?

The standout nutrient in Emu, outside drum, raw is Vitamin B12, providing 6.9 µg per 100g (288% of the Daily Value). It is also a notable source of Selenium (66% DV). Our database tracks 74 individual nutrients for this food, allowing detailed comparison across vitamins, minerals, amino acids, and fatty acids.

Is Emu, outside drum, raw high in protein?

With 23.1g per 100 grams, Emu, outside drum, raw is a high-protein food. Protein accounts for 90% of its total calories, making it suitable for diets focused on protein intake.

How much fiber is in Emu, outside drum, raw?

Emu, outside drum, raw contains no dietary fiber. This is typical for animal-derived food. Pair with plant-based foods to ensure adequate fiber intake.

What is the insulin index of Emu, outside drum, raw?

Emu, outside drum, raw has a moderate insulin response (II: 32) (estimated from macronutrient composition) on the insulin index scale (white bread = 100). This is a typical insulin response for most mixed foods. Note that the insulin index can differ substantially from the glycemic index — dairy products and high-protein foods often have higher insulin responses than their GI would suggest.