Skip to main content

Soup, pea, green, canned, prepared with equal volume milk

Soups/Sauces Per 100 g · Per 100g serving
Contains: 🥛 Milk

Soup, pea, green, canned, prepared with equal volume milk is a prepared food at 94.0 calories per 100g. Prepared soups, sauces, and gravies vary in nutrient content based on their ingredients. Sodium content is often a key nutritional consideration in this category. Our database tracks 65 nutrients for this food, plus glycemic index, insulin index, environmental footprint data.

94.0
Calories
kcal
5.0
Protein
g
2.8
Fat
g
12.7
Carbs
g
1.1
Fiber
g

Top Nutrients

💎
Sodium
352 mg
24% DV
💎
Copper
0.15 mg
17% DV
💎
Phosphorus
94.0 mg
13% DV

Data for 65 of 150 tracked nutrients

Nutrient Fingerprint

How this food scores across key nutrient categories, as a percentage of the daily recommended value per 100 g. Based on USDA DRIs for adults.

Complete Nutrient Profile

Macronutrients 8
NutrientPer 100gUnitPer Serving% DV
Water SR77.9g
2%
Calories SR94.0kcal
Energy (kJ) SR393kj
Protein SR5.0g
9%
Total Fat SR2.8g
Carbohydrate SR12.7g
10%
Fiber SR1.1g
3%
Ash SR1.6g
Minerals 9
NutrientPer 100gUnitPer Serving% DV
Calcium SR68.0mg
7%
Iron SR0.79mg
10%
Magnesium SR22.0mg
6%
Phosphorus SR94.0mg
13%
Potassium SR148mg
4%
Sodium SR352mg
24%
Zinc SR0.69mg
6%
Copper SR0.15mg
17%
Manganese SR0.26mg
11%
Vitamins 12
NutrientPer 100gUnitPer Serving% DV
Vitamin A (IU) SR140IU
Vitamin C SR1.1mg
1%
Thiamin (B1) SR0.06mg
5%
Riboflavin (B2) SR0.10mg
8%
Niacin (B3) SR0.53mg
3%
Pantothenic Acid (B5) SR0.22mg
4%
Vitamin B6 SR0.04mg
3%
Folate SR3.0µg
1%
Folic Acid SR0µg
Folate (food) SR3.0µg
Folate (DFE) SR3.0µg
Vitamin B12 SR0.17µg
7%
Fatty Acids 7
NutrientPer 100gUnitPer Serving% DV
Saturated Fat SR1.6g
Monounsaturated Fat SR0.86g
Polyunsaturated Fat SR0.21g
Cholesterol SR7.0mg
Omega-3 EPA SR0g
Omega-3 DPA SR0g
Omega-3 DHA SR0g
Individual Fatty Acids 10
NutrientPer 100gUnitPer Serving% DV
Butyric Acid (4:0) SR0.08g
Caproic Acid (6:0) SR0.04g
Caprylic Acid (8:0) SR0.03g
Capric Acid (10:0) SR0.06g
Lauric Acid (12:0) SR0.07g
Myristic Acid (14:0) SR0.25g
Palmitic Acid (16:0) SR0.68g
Stearic Acid (18:0) SR0.32g
Linoleic Acid (18:2) SR0.17g
1%
Linolenic Acid (18:3) SR0.04g
Amino Acids 18
NutrientPer 100gUnitPer Serving% DV
Tryptophan SR0.05g
Threonine SR0.19g
Isoleucine SR0.21g
Leucine SR0.40g
Lysine SR0.33g
Methionine SR0.08g
Cystine SR0.05g
Phenylalanine SR0.23g
Tyrosine SR0.18g
Valine SR0.28g
Arginine SR0.34g
Histidine SR0.11g
Alanine SR0.20g
Aspartic Acid SR0.47g
Glutamic Acid SR0.97g
Glycine SR0.17g
Proline SR0.33g
Serine SR0.22g
Other 1
NutrientPer 100gUnitPer Serving% DV
Alcohol SR0g

Nutrient Density Score

The NRF9.3 score measures overall nutritional quality per 100 kcal. It rewards 9 nutrients to encourage (protein, fiber, vitamins A, C, E, calcium, iron, magnesium, potassium) and penalizes 3 to limit (saturated fat, added sugars, sodium). Higher is better; negative scores indicate the food is high in limit nutrients relative to its beneficial content.

10
NRF9.3 Score
Moderate · per 100 kcal
Poor (<0) Moderate Good Excellent (100+)

NRF9.3 index: Fulgoni et al. (2009), J Nutr 139(8). DVs based on FDA 2020 reference values.

Nutrient Interactions in This Food

Nutrients in this food that enhance or compete with each other during absorption.

✔ Synergies — nutrients that help each other

Protein + Calcium●●

Moderate protein intake enhances calcium absorption and supports bone health. The acid-ash hypothesis suggesting protein harms bones has been largely disproven.

Kerstetter et al., J Clin Endocrinol Metab, 2005

⚠ Antagonisms — nutrients that compete

Calcium vs Iron●●●

Calcium inhibits both heme and non-heme iron absorption when consumed in the same meal. The effect is dose-dependent, with significant inhibition at 300+ mg calcium.

Hallberg et al., Am J Clin Nutr, 1991

Zinc vs Copper●●●

High zinc intake induces metallothionein in enterocytes, which traps copper and blocks its absorption. Prolonged high-dose zinc can cause copper deficiency.

Prasad et al., JAMA, 1978; Fosmire, Am J Clin Nutr, 1990

Zinc vs Iron●●

Zinc and non-heme iron compete for the same intestinal transporter (DMT1). High doses of one can reduce absorption of the other when taken simultaneously.

Rossander-Hulten et al., Am J Clin Nutr, 1991

Calcium vs Magnesium●●

Very high calcium intake can reduce magnesium absorption by competing for shared intestinal transport pathways. A calcium:magnesium ratio above 2.6:1 may impair magnesium status.

Rosanoff et al., Nutr Rev, 2012

Calcium vs Zinc●●

High calcium intake may modestly reduce zinc absorption, though the effect is smaller than calcium's impact on iron. Phytate amplifies this interaction.

Wood & Zheng, Am J Clin Nutr, 1997

Amino Acid Profile

Essential amino acid composition compared to the WHO/FAO adult reference pattern. The Amino Acid Score indicates protein quality — 100 means all essential amino acid requirements are met.

116
Amino Acid Score
Complete
Met + Cys
Lowest Scoring
18
Amino Acids Tracked

✓ Complete protein — all essential amino acids meet or exceed WHO reference levels.

All Amino Acids (18)
Amino Acidg / 100gmg / g protein
Tryptophan0.0510.3
Threonine0.1938.4
Isoleucine0.2142.9
Leucine0.4080.5
Lysine0.3365.8
Methionine0.0816.3
Cystine0.059.3
Phenylalanine0.2345.3
Tyrosine0.1835.4
Valine0.2856.3
Arginine0.3467.6
Histidine0.1122.1
Alanine0.2040.2
Aspartic Acid0.4794.0
Glutamic Acid0.97195.0
Glycine0.1734.0
Proline0.3366.0
Serine0.2244.9

Fatty Acid Profile

Breakdown of fat types per 100g. A healthy fat profile favours unsaturated fats (mono + poly) and a balanced omega-3 to omega-6 ratio.

1.6g
Saturated
0.86g
Monounsaturated
0.21g
Polyunsaturated
Omega Fatty Acids
Linoleic acid (18:2 n-6)0.17 g

Glycemic & Insulin Response

The Glycemic Index (GI) measures how quickly a food raises blood sugar on a 0–100 scale. The Insulin Index (II) measures the insulin response directly, which can differ from GI — notably, dairy and high-protein foods often trigger a higher insulin response than their GI suggests. White bread = 100 for both scales.

51
Glycemic Index
Low GI
4
Glycemic Load
Low GL (per 80g)
GI Scale 51
0 Low <55 Med High ≥70 100

GI data matched from: “Green peas, boiled” · ●●● high confidence

40
Insulin Index
Moderate Insulin Response
Insulin Index Scale 40
0 Low ≤30 Mod ≤60 High ≤100 120
Category ●● Assigned from measured food category

Source: International Tables of Glycemic Index (Sydney University, 2021) · Holt et al. 1997; Bao et al. 2016; Bell 2014

Environmental Impact

Environmental footprint per kilogram of food produced. Data represents the global average for the “Milk” category.

3.1
kg CO₂e / kg
Moderate Impact
8.9
m² land / kg
Land Use
628
L water / kg
Water Use
27.2
g SO₂e / kg
Acidification
How this compares (GHG emissions)
Potatoes (0.5)Chicken (9.9)Beef (99.5)
Greenhouse Gas Emissions3.1 kg CO₂e / kg
Land Use8.9 m² / kg
Water Use628 L / kg
Eutrophication10.7 g PO₄e / kg
Acidification27.2 g SO₂e / kg
⚠️ Important context about this data
  • Global averages: These figures are production-weighted averages from a meta-analysis of ~38,700 farms across 119 countries (Poore & Nemecek, 2018). Actual impact varies enormously by farming method, geography, and supply chain.
  • System boundary: Cradle-to-retail only — does not include consumer transport, home cooking energy, or food waste.
  • Soil carbon not included: This data does not account for soil carbon sequestration. Some argue that well-managed regenerative grazing partially offsets ruminant emissions; however, full lifecycle accounting — including methane, land-use change, and the opportunity cost of using land for grazing vs. reforestation — typically makes the net footprint of ruminant meat higher, not lower. This is especially relevant in temperate grassland regions like Ireland.
  • Not gospel: This data is informational and illustrative. It is useful for understanding relative magnitudes, but should not be treated as precise measurements for any individual product or farm.

Source: Poore & Nemecek (2018), Science 360(6392). Meta-analysis of ~38,700 farms, 119 countries, 46 product categories.

Frequently Asked Questions

How many calories are in Soup, pea, green, canned, prepared with equal volume milk?

Soup, pea, green, canned, prepared with equal volume milk contains 94.0 kcal per 100 grams, making it a moderate-calorie food. The energy comes from 5.0g of protein (21% of calories), 2.8g of fat (27%), and 12.7g of carbohydrates (54%). Carbohydrates are the primary energy source.

What is Soup, pea, green, canned, prepared with equal volume milk most nutritious for?

The standout nutrient in Soup, pea, green, canned, prepared with equal volume milk is Sodium, providing 352 mg per 100g (24% of the Daily Value). It is also a notable source of Copper (17% DV). Our database tracks 65 individual nutrients for this food, allowing detailed comparison across vitamins, minerals, amino acids, and fatty acids.

Is Soup, pea, green, canned, prepared with equal volume milk high in protein?

Soup, pea, green, canned, prepared with equal volume milk contains 5.0g of protein per 100 grams. While not a high-protein food, it can contribute to daily protein needs as part of a varied diet.

How much fiber is in Soup, pea, green, canned, prepared with equal volume milk?

Soup, pea, green, canned, prepared with equal volume milk contains 1.1g of fiber per 100 grams, which is a small amount. To increase fiber intake, consider pairing with high-fiber foods such as legumes, whole grains, or vegetables.

What is the glycemic index of Soup, pea, green, canned, prepared with equal volume milk?

Soup, pea, green, canned, prepared with equal volume milk has a glycemic index of 51, which is classified as low (≤55). Low-GI foods cause a slower, more gradual rise in blood sugar levels, which may be beneficial for blood sugar management. The glycemic load, which accounts for typical serving size, provides additional context for real-world blood sugar impact.

What is the insulin index of Soup, pea, green, canned, prepared with equal volume milk?

Soup, pea, green, canned, prepared with equal volume milk has a moderate insulin response (II: 40) (estimated from macronutrient composition) on the insulin index scale (white bread = 100). This is a typical insulin response for most mixed foods. Note that the insulin index can differ substantially from the glycemic index — dairy products and high-protein foods often have higher insulin responses than their GI would suggest.