The Triage Rep Max Calculator allows you to instantly calculate your repetition maxes from 1-15 reps.
Now, when we talk about a rep max in strength training, what we really mean is the maximum amount of weight you can lift for a given number of repetitions, while still keeping good form. Your one-rep max, or 1RM, is the heaviest load you can lift once. If you hear someone talk about their five-rep max, that’s the most weight they can lift for five solid reps before hitting failure. Think of these rep maxes as checkpoints, as they give us a clear picture of where your strength is right now and serve as the foundation for everything else we do in training.
Knowing your rep maxes matters more than most people realise. For one, it helps us track progress. If six months ago your eight-rep max on the squat was 80 kilos, and now you can handle 95 for the same reps, there’s no doubt you’re getting stronger. Rep maxes also allow us to program your workouts with more precision. Most effective training plans are built around lifting a percentage of your one-rep max. For example, if you want to build muscle, we might target around 70% of your 1RM. If the goal is raw strength, you’ll be working closer to 85-95%. Now, we don’t need to know the exact percentage we are using, and we can use relative intensity-based measures here (RIR and RPE), however, having a rough idea of what weight you should be using, is super useful.
There’s also the matter of safety here. Testing a true one-rep max in the gym can be risky, especially if you’re new to lifting or training without a spotter. By estimating your max from a set of reps you’ve already performed, we get roughly the same useful information without exposing you to unnecessary risk.
At the end of the day, rep maxes take the guesswork out of lifting. They turn your workouts from random effort into a structured plan that actually moves you forward, while helping you stay safe in the process.
You can use the Triage Rep Max Calculator below to find your 1 to 15 RM instantly.
Triage Rep Max Calculator
Rep Max Calculator
Enter a rep-max you’ve achieved (weight × reps up to 15). We’ll estimate your 1RM and all RMs 1–15.
How to Use This Rep Max Calculator
Using this rep max calculator couldn’t be easier, and it saves you from having to do the maths yourself. All you need are two pieces of information: the weight you lifted and how many reps you managed with that weight. Type those numbers into the calculator, and it will instantly estimate your one-rep max, along with your projected rep maxes across different ranges.
For example, let’s say you benched 100 kg for 8 solid reps. If you plug that into the calculator, it will estimate your one-rep max at around 125 kg. But it doesn’t stop there. You’ll also see a breakdown of what that strength level means across the board. Maybe your estimated 5RM is 110 kg, your 10RM is 95 kg, and so on. This is valuable because it gives you a practical reference chart you can use in real time.
If your program calls for a set of your 5 rep max, you know you will likely be using something at about 85% of your 1 rep max. Now, of course, you will still have to validate this in the real world, but you will have a rough idea of what you should be aiming for.
This kind of rep max calculator is super helpful in a number of situations:
- Estimating your strength safely. You can get accurate strength numbers without ever loading up a potentially dangerous, all-out single. It won’t be perfect, but it will give you a rough estimate.
- Guiding your programming. If your training block calls for a 3 RM, you will have a pretty good idea of what weight you should be using.
- Adjusting rep ranges. If you’re moving from sets of 5 to sets of 8, you can quickly calculate the new load that matches the intensity you need. For instance, if your 1RM squat is estimated at 150 kg, your 5RM might be around 127.5 kg, and your 8RM closer to 120 kg.
- Tracking progress over time. If your estimated 1RM on the deadlift was 120 kg last month and now it’s 130 kg, you know you’re moving in the right direction.
Ultimately, the Triage Rep Max Calculator works because strength is fairly predictable across rep ranges. If you can lift a certain weight for a given number of reps, we can estimate pretty closely what you could do for one rep. Sure, it’s not perfect and everyone’s physiology is slightly different, but it’s consistent enough to be useful. We still have to have epistemic humility, and realise that we can’t know our exact strength level perfectly, but using a calculator at least gives you a rough ballpark figure to work with. And more importantly, it’s safe, fast, and actionable.
RM Calculation Formulas Explained
When it comes to estimating your one-rep max (and the rep equivalents below it), there’s more than one way to do the maths. Over the years, coaches and exercise scientists have developed several formulas that predict your 1RM based on the weight you lifted and how many reps you performed. None of them are perfect, but they’re accurate enough to be practical for training. Let’s break down the most commonly used ones.
Epley Formula: This is the most popular and straightforward formula, especially for general gym use. It works well for moderate rep ranges and is easy to apply. It’s often the go-to because of its balance between simplicity and accuracy.
Brzycki Formula: The Brzycki formula tends to be most accurate when you’re working with lower rep counts, typically fewer than 10 reps. That makes it a good choice for strength-focused athletes who usually train in the 3-8 rep range.
Lombardi Formula: Lombardi’s approach scales differently from Epley and Brzycki, and it’s sometimes favoured when lifters perform higher-rep sets. It accounts for the way endurance plays a bigger role as reps go up, though it can underpredict max strength in very strong, low-rep lifters.
O’Conner Formula: This one leans more toward endurance-based predictions. If you tend to push sets past 10 reps and still want to estimate your max, O’Conner’s method often provides more realistic numbers than formulas geared toward heavy, low-rep work.
Now, you don’t need to memorise these formulas, but it’s helpful to know why different calculators gives slightly different results depending on the formula they use. Each method reflects a different assumption about how reps relate to your strength.
Estimated % of 1RM by Formula
(values are approximate and for illustration, assuming average lifter response)
Reps | Epley | Brzycki | Lombardi | O’Conner |
---|---|---|---|---|
1 | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% |
2 | 95% | 95% | 95% | 95% |
3 | 93% | 93% | 93% | 92.5% |
4 | 90% | 90% | 91% | 90% |
5 | 87.5% | 87% | 89% | 87.5% |
6 | 85% | 85% | 87% | 86% |
7 | 83% | 82.5% | 85% | 84% |
8 | 80% | 80% | 83% | 82% |
9 | 78% | 77.5% | 81% | 80% |
10 | 75% | 75% | 79% | 77.5% |
12 | 70% | 67.5% | 75% | 72.5% |
15 | 63% | 57.5% | 70% | 66% |
(Notice how Brzycki predicts a sharper decline after 10 reps, while O’Conner stays more generous at higher reps. Lombardi falls somewhere in between, while Epley remains the most “middle-of-the-road.”)
Here’s the assumption the Triage Rep Max Calculator uses when building out your rep equivalents. These percentages aren’t pulled from thin air, they’re averages based on years of research and practical coaching experience:
Reps (RM) | % of 1RM (approx.) |
---|---|
1 | 100% |
2 | 95% |
3 | 92.5% |
4 | 90% |
5 | 87.5% |
6 | 85% |
7 | 82.5% |
8 | 80% |
9 | 77.5% |
10 | 75% |
11 | 72.5% |
12 | 70% |
13 | 67.5% |
14 | 65% |
15 | 62.5% |
So, for example, if your estimated 1RM on the bench press is 100 kg, your calculator will show you that your projected 5RM is around 87.5 kg, your 10RM is 75 kg, and your 15RM is about 62.5 kg. This is the kind of information that allows you to instantly match weights to rep ranges, no matter what your program calls for.
Why Not Just Test Your 1RM Directly?
It’s a fair question: if your rep max is such an important number, why not just load up the bar and find out? The truth is, testing something like your 1RM directly has its place, but it also comes with some serious drawbacks that most lifters, especially beginners and intermediates, don’t need to mess with.
The first issue is risk. A true max attempt pushes your body right to the edge. If your form breaks down, or if you misjudge the weight, you could strain a muscle, tweak a joint, or worse. Testing heavy singles is safest under perfect conditions: with a good warm-up, full recovery, and an experienced spotter on hand. Most people don’t have all of that lined up every time they’re curious about their strength.
There’s also the issue of fatigue. Going for a 1RM is incredibly taxing on your nervous system. Even if you hit the lift, it can take days to fully recover, which can throw off the rest of your training week. If you’re chasing progress consistently, you don’t want a single max attempt to derail your momentum.
That’s where an estimated 1RM shines. By taking a set you’ve already performed, for example, a heavy set of 5 or 8 reps, you can use a calculator to predict your max with surprising accuracy. You get the information you need without having to risk a failed lift, grind your joints, or interrupt your program.
For beginners and intermediate lifters especially, this approach is far safer and more practical. At those stages, your focus should be on building technique, consistency, and gradual strength, not on proving how much weight you can lift in a single all-out rep. Using estimated numbers keeps the emphasis on smart, sustainable progress rather than on maxing out.
So while testing a true 1RM does have its place, especially for competitive lifters peaking for a meet, or for advanced athletes checking progress once or twice a year, most of the time, an estimate gives you all the benefits with none of the unnecessary risk.
Triage Rep Max Calculator FAQs
How accurate is a 1RM calculator?
A 1RM calculator gives you an estimate, not a perfect number, but for most lifters, it’s accurate within a few percentage points. The key thing to remember is that it’s consistent. Even if the exact number is slightly off, the calculator provides a reliable baseline you can use to program your training. If you get an estimate, and you find that it is ~2% lower than your true max, it likely will stay 2% lower, and thus, you can adjust based on your unique needs. And honestly, being within 2-5% of your true max is more than good enough to guide safe and effective workouts.
Can I calculate my 1RM for bodyweight lifts?
Yes, but with a catch. A calculator like this is designed for external loads (barbells, dumbbells, machines). For bodyweight exercises like push-ups or pull-ups, you’d first need to estimate how much weight you’re actually lifting. For example, in a push-up you’re moving about 60-65% of your bodyweight, depending on your build and leverages. Once you know that, you can plug it into the calculator just like any other lift. If you are adding weight to something like dips or chin-ups, you would simply take the weight added and your body weight as your entry number, and then subtract your body weight from the rep maxes it gives you to know how much external weight to add.
How often should I retest my 1RM?
You don’t need to check it every week, or ever for that matter. For most lifters, you may want to get pretty close to failure on your exercises, at least every 6-8 weeks. But you don’t actually ever need to max out for either reps or even a single rep. If you’re in a structured program, you’ll usually find natural points to reassess your strength, often at the end of a training cycle. At these points you can get pretty close to failure, and use that as your rep max input.
Is this safe for beginners?
Absolutely, in fact, it’s the safest way for beginners to estimate strength. Testing a true 1RM when you’re still learning technique can be risky. A calculator lets you use a moderate set (say, 8-10 reps) to gauge where you’re at without the pressure or danger of maxing out. As a coach, I almost always start new lifters here, because it builds confidence and provides usable numbers without exposing them to unnecessary strain. Of course, if they do eventually want to compete in something like powerlifting, we will eventually have to test maxes, but this is a very small section of the population.
Why do different formulas give different results?
Each formula is based on a slightly different model of how strength declines as reps increase. Some assume fatigue sets in faster, while others assume you can carry strength further into higher rep ranges. That’s why Epley and Brzycki might give you very similar results at 5 reps, but differ more at 12 reps. Neither is “wrong”, they just reflect different assumptions.
Can I use this for Olympic lifts like the snatch or clean & jerk?
You can, but with caution. Olympic lifts are highly technical, and fatigue and readiness play a huge role in performance. Calculators work best for slower, controlled lifts like squats, bench, and deadlifts. With the snatch or clean, small changes in speed or technique can make a big difference in whether a rep is successful, so the estimates may be less reliable. If you’re an Olympic lifter, think of these numbers as very rough guides, not exact prescriptions.
Triage Rep Max Calculator Conclusion
It’s important to remember that the Triage rep max calculator isn’t a crystal ball. It won’t be perfect, and it doesn’t replace experience, good judgment, or proper technique. Think of it as one tool in your training toolbox. A practical, reliable guide that lets you know roughly what weight you will be able to lift at different rep ranges. It can help you select appropriate weights, or estimate what you would be able to lift if you did max out, but it is still just a rough estimate.
As with everything, there is always more to learn, and we haven’t even begun to scratch the surface with all this stuff. However, if you are interested in staying up to date with all our content, we recommend subscribing to our newsletter and bookmarking our free content page. We do have a lot of content on how to design your own exercise program on our exercise hub.
We also recommend reading our foundational nutrition article, along with our foundational articles on sleep and stress management, if you really want to learn more about how to optimise your lifestyle. If you want even more free information on exercise, you can follow us on Instagram, YouTube or listen to the podcast, where we discuss all the little intricacies of exercise. We also specifically have a lot of content for coaches in our Coaches Corner.
Finally, if you want to learn how to coach nutrition, then consider our Nutrition Coach Certification course, and if you want to learn to get better at exercise program design, then consider our course on exercise program design. We do have other courses available too, and you may be particularly interested in our Sleep Coaching Course and our Stress Management Course. If you don’t understand something, or you just need clarification, you can always reach out to us on Instagram or via email.
References and Further Reading
Reynolds JM, Gordon TJ, Robergs RA. Prediction of one repetition maximum strength from multiple repetition maximum testing and anthropometry. J Strength Cond Res. 2006;20(3):584-592. doi:10.1519/R-15304.1 https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/16937972/
Mayhew JL, Prinster JL, Ware JS, Zimmer DL, Arabas JR, Bemben MG. Muscular endurance repetitions to predict bench press strength in men of different training levels. J Sports Med Phys Fitness. 1995;35(2):108-113. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/7500624/
Macarilla CT, Sautter NM, Robinson ZP, et al. Accuracy of Predicting One-Repetition Maximum from Submaximal Velocity in The Barbell Back Squat and Bench Press. J Hum Kinet. 2022;82:201-212. Published 2022 Apr 26. doi:10.2478/hukin-2022-0046 https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9465738/
García-Ramos A, Barboza-González P, Ulloa-Díaz D, et al. Reliability and validity of different methods of estimating the one-repetition maximum during the free-weight prone bench pull exercise. J Sports Sci. 2019;37(19):2205-2212. doi:10.1080/02640414.2019.1626071 https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/31164044/
Pérez-Castilla A, Suzovic D, Domanovic A, Fernandes JFT, García-Ramos A. Validity of Different Velocity-Based Methods and Repetitions-to-Failure Equations for Predicting the 1 Repetition Maximum During 2 Upper-Body Pulling Exercises. J Strength Cond Res. 2021;35(7):1800-1808. doi:10.1519/JSC.0000000000003076 https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/30741875/
Helms ER, Cronin J, Storey A, Zourdos MC. Application of the Repetitions in Reserve-Based Rating of Perceived Exertion Scale for Resistance Training. Strength Cond J. 2016;38(4):42-49. doi:10.1519/SSC.0000000000000218 https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4961270/
Helms ER, Storey A, Cross MR, et al. RPE and Velocity Relationships for the Back Squat, Bench Press, and Deadlift in Powerlifters. J Strength Cond Res. 2017;31(2):292-297. doi:10.1519/JSC.0000000000001517 https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/27243918/
Schoenfeld BJ, Grgic J, Ogborn D, Krieger JW. Strength and Hypertrophy Adaptations Between Low- vs. High-Load Resistance Training: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. J Strength Cond Res. 2017;31(12):3508-3523. doi:10.1519/JSC.0000000000002200 https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/28834797/
American College of Sports Medicine. American College of Sports Medicine position stand. Progression models in resistance training for healthy adults. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2009;41(3):687-708. doi:10.1249/MSS.0b013e3181915670 https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/19204579/
Eston R, Evans HJ. The validity of submaximal ratings of perceived exertion to predict one repetition maximum. J Sports Sci Med. 2009;8(4):567-573. Published 2009 Dec 1. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3761544/