This Maslow’s Hierarchy of Needs Assessment will allow you to finally see where you actually stand on Maslow’s Hierarchy of Needs. This is incredibly important, and to be quite honest, I don’t understand why nobody else has created a tool like this before. 

You see, lots of people are trying to work on self-improvement, but they don’t actually have strong foundations in place. They are searching for self-actualisation and transcendence, without the foundations to allow this to realistically happen. Maslow created his hierarchy to help people understand whether their lower-level needs were being met, so that they could then more consistently actually work towards self-actualisation. 

This Maslow’s Hierarchy of Needs Assessment measures where you actually stand across the hierarchy of human needs. It shows you which foundation elements are solid and which are held together with duct tape and willpower. More importantly, it tells you exactly where to focus your effort so you stop spinning your wheels trying to self-actualise on a crumbling foundation.

Most self-improvement fails because it’s mis-levelled. You’re getting Level 5 advice (find your purpose) when you have a Level 2 problem (financial crisis). You’re chasing self-actualisation while your biology is breaking down.

The gap between aspirational goals and actual capacity is where burnout lives. Albert Ellis called this “musturbation”, which is the tendency to impose absolutist demands on ourselves. “I must be self-actualised by now.” “I should have found my purpose.” “I have to be further along.” You’re demanding transcendence from yourself while ignoring the fact that you’re sleep-deprived, financially stressed, and socially isolated. The foundation can’t support the weight of those aspirations.

This tool cuts through the noise and shows you the truth: your actual functional capacity right now, what’s undermining everything else, and what to fix first.

Take the assessment, see where you stand, and then we can build from there.

Maslow’s Hierarchy of Needs Assessment

Understanding Maslow’s Hierarchy

Before we dive into your results, let’s get clear on what we’re actually measuring. Maslow’s Hierarchy isn’t about personality; it’s about functional needs arranged in a foundational order.

Level 1: Physiological Needs – Sleep, nutrition, hydration, movement, basic hygiene, physical health. This is your biological foundation. Everything runs on this. Maslow included sex here, but I’ve left it out. Sex as a physiological need is about biological drive, while sex as intimacy belongs at Level 3. More importantly, the other needs on this level (sleep, nutrition, movement) are non-negotiable for basic functioning. They’re the foundation that everything else depends on. Including sex would muddy the diagnostic clarity of ‘is your biology actually working?’

Level 2: Safety & Stability – Housing security, financial stability, physical safety, healthcare access, consistent income, emergency resources. This is your security foundation. You can’t build when you’re in crisis mode. When your nervous system is constantly scanning for threats like eviction, bankruptcy, or violence, your brain literally can’t access higher-level thinking. Maslow understood that safety isn’t just physical; it’s the predictability and control that lets you plan beyond tomorrow. Without this level reasonably stable, everything above it becomes a luxury you’re borrowing against an uncertain future.

Level 3: Love & Belonging – Close relationships, community, authentic connection, feeling known and valued. This is your social foundation. Humans are pack animals; we need this. We didn’t evolve to survive alone, and isolation doesn’t just hurt emotionally, it damages us physically. This isn’t about having a huge social circle; it’s about having people who actually know you, who you can call at 3am, and who see you struggling and show up anyway. Without belonging, achievement feels hollow and purpose feels pointless. You need witnesses to your life.

Level 4: Esteem – Self-respect, competence, achievement, recognition, confidence. This is your psychological foundation. You need to believe in your own capability. This level splits into two parts: respect from others (recognition, status, appreciation) and respect from yourself (competence, mastery, self-confidence). You need both, but self-respect matters more. External validation without internal confidence is a house of cards. Internal confidence without any external validation makes you delusional. The goal is to build genuine competence, see it reflected back through achievement and recognition, and internalise that capability.

Level 5: Self-Actualisation – Purpose, creativity, authenticity, personal growth, contribution beyond yourself. This is peak human functioning, but it requires everything below it to be reasonably solid. This is where you stop performing a role and start expressing who you actually are. You’re not chasing validation or survival, you’re developing your potential because the foundation supports it. Maslow described this as becoming “everything one is capable of becoming.” But notice that you can’t authentically self-actualise while your biology is collapsing, your safety is threatened, you’re isolated, or you fundamentally doubt your own competence. That’s not self-actualisation; that’s escapism.

Level 6: Transcendence – Service beyond self, unity experiences, legacy work, spiritual depth. This is rare and requires an incredibly stable foundation. Most people never consistently operate here. Maslow added this level late in his life when he realised some people move beyond personal actualisation into something larger: connection to humanity, nature, the divine, or reality itself. This isn’t about believing in transcendence; it’s about experiencing moments where your individual ego dissolves into something greater. It’s incredibly difficult to access this when any lower level is compromised, which is why it remains rare.

Now, here’s the critical principle I need you to understand: Lower needs must be reasonably stable before higher needs can be consistently met.

This isn’t arbitrary, it’s just structural reality. You don’t build the 47th floor of a skyscraper until floors 1-46 can bear the load. In software, advanced applications require stable operating systems. Try to run sophisticated programs on corrupted base code, and you get crashes, not slower performance. In agriculture, Liebig’s Law of the Minimum shows that growth is limited by the scarcest resource, not total resources. A plant with abundant water and sunlight but no phosphorus won’t grow, no matter how much you optimise everything else.

Your life works the same way. In systems theory, every system has exactly one constraint limiting throughput. Improving non-constraints doesn’t improve the system. Your results on this assessment identify the constraint in your human performance system and the bottleneck(s) that are holding everything else back.

You must work through things in order, if you want to actually develop yourself. Writers and philosophers across centuries noticed the same structural reality about human development. In Dostoevsky’s The Brothers Karamazov, the Grand Inquisitor argues that humans will trade freedom for bread (Level 1 over Level 5). He understood that you cannot offer transcendent freedom to people whose basic needs are unmet. They’ll reject the higher gift because they need the lower one. 

Dante’s Inferno follows the same structure: descent before ascent. You must go through hell’s levels in order, and you can’t just skip to paradise. You have to put in the work.

Thoreau’s Walden traces this arc too. His famous “Simplify, simplify” advocates for Level 1-2 focus and stability. Only by book’s end, with his material life radically simplified and stabilised, does he achieve the transcendent experiences he’s known for.

Kierkegaard identified this as the stages of life: aesthetic → ethical → religious. Each stage builds on the previous. You can’t skip from aesthetic existence (pleasure-seeking, no commitments) directly to religious existence (transcendent meaning, devotion to the absolute). You must pass through the ethical stage (commitment, responsibility, building character) first. 

The insight here isn’t just that the stages exist, it’s that you cannot skip them. Trying to bypass a stage doesn’t accelerate growth. It guarantees failure. You don’t want to try and build on shaky ground. Unfortunately, modern self help teaches you to do exactly that. They consistently talk about higher levels, without getting the foundations right. This is just building on a house of cards.

But don’t get me wrong here; this isn’t about perfection either. You don’t need a 5.0 score on Level 1 before touching Level 2. But you need at least a ~3.5 (70%). This is stable enough that it’s not actively undermining everything else. Think of it like progressive overload in training: you need enough base strength before adding complexity, enough work capacity before adding volume.

Why This Maslow’s Hierarchy of Needs Assessment is Different

Most self-improvement tools ask subjective questions: “Do you feel fulfilled? Rate 1-10.” Everyone interprets that differently. The feeling doesn’t tell you anything about your actual foundation.

This Maslow’s Hierarchy of Needs Assessment measures actual habits and behaviours, not feelings. Not “Do you feel well-rested?” but “Do you sleep 7-9 hours per night consistently?” Not “Do you feel financially secure?” but “Do you have an emergency fund and track your spending?”

The design of this is heavily influenced by my Stoic studies. Epictetus divided life into things “up to us” (our choices, habits, responses) and things “not up to us” (circumstances, others, outcomes). This tool measures what’s actually within your control (your behaviours), not how you feel about circumstances. Feelings deceive. Behaviours reveal truth.

It’s also radically pragmatic. William James said truth is what works. Not what sounds good or aligns with theory, but what produces results in reality. This assessment measures behaviours that produce measurable outcomes, then tests whether those outcomes enable the next level of development.

This is also what Acceptance and Commitment Therapy calls “workability.” ACT doesn’t ask whether your thoughts and goals are positive or negative, it asks whether pursuing them actually works, given your current context. Is pursuing self-actualisation goals workable when you’re sleeping 4 hours a night? The answer reveals itself in the results. If you’ve been “working on finding your purpose” for two years while your foundation crumbles, that approach isn’t workable. The assessment shows you what is.

When you’re honest about your habits, the scores reveal your actual foundation across all levels simultaneously. If you score 4.2 on Physiological but 2.1 on Safety, that tells you something important: your biology is solid, but your life circumstances are precarious. That’s where to focus.

What This Tool Actually Does

1. Identifies exactly where you are on the hierarchy (not where you wish you were)

Your scores aren’t judgments; they’re just data points. A 2.3 on Safety doesn’t mean you’re failing. It means that’s currently your constraint, the level limiting everything above it. Once you know that, you can focus there instead of spinning your wheels trying to fix the wrong problem.

Most people operate on aspiration rather than assessment. They think about where they should be, where their peers are, where their younger self imagined they’d be by now. None of that matters. What matters is where you actually are, right now, measured honestly. That’s your starting point. You can’t navigate without knowing your current position. This assessment forces you to look at the map instead of the fantasy.

2. Visualises your progress across all levels simultaneously

The pyramid isn’t just pretty, it’s functional. You see at a glance where you’re solid and where you’re not. Most people have an uneven pyramid. That’s normal. However, the visual makes it impossible to ignore the gaps.

Without visualisation, you carry a vague sense that “something’s wrong” but can’t locate it precisely. The pyramid externalises your internal state. It shows you that your Level 1 is a 4.2 (solid), your Level 2 is a 2.1 (disaster), your Level 3 is a 3.7 (acceptable), and your Level 4 is a 1.8 (you’re trying to build on sand). Suddenly, the diffuse anxiety has a shape. The overwhelm has a structure. You’re not drowning in everything; you’re specifically unstable at Levels 2 and 4.

3. Reveals which foundation elements need attention before pursuing growth

You might desperately want to work on purpose and meaning (Level 5), but if your Level 2 scores 2.1, that’s your actual constraint. Fix the foundation first. The higher levels become dramatically easier once the base is solid. This is dependency management. Level 5 functions depend on Level 2 infrastructure.

Think of it like trying to run complex software on broken hardware. You can install all the productivity apps you want, but if the operating system is corrupted and the hard drive is failing, nothing works properly. Self-actualisation is high-level processing. It requires computational resources. If your system is busy just trying to stay online (Level 1 and 2 problems), you don’t have the bandwidth for transcendence.

This tool tells you to stop trying to optimise your purpose when you can’t pay rent. Stop chasing peak experiences when you’re sleeping four hours a night. Stop seeking enlightenment when you haven’t talked to a friend in three months. Those higher pursuits still matter, but because the foundation can’t support them, it isn’t the right time to have them as your main focus. Build the base before you build up.

4. Provides a baseline to measure actual progress over time

I would generally recommend that you take this assessment every 3 months. Watch the pyramid fill in. That’s where you see the real progress. Not motivated feelings, not temporary willpower spikes, but actual structural improvement. When your Level 2 goes from 2.1 to 3.8 over six months, you’ve built something real.

Most self-improvement is based on subjective feelings. “I feel more motivated.” “I’m more positive lately.” “I think I’m doing better.” Feelings are useful data, but they’re unreliable measures of structural change. You can feel motivated while your life is objectively collapsing. You can feel terrible while making steady, measurable progress.

The assessment gives you objective tracking. Six months ago, you were sleeping 5 hours a night, skipping meals, and had €347 in savings. Today, you’re sleeping 7 hours, eating consistently, and have a €3,000 emergency fund. Your Level 1 went from 2.2 to 3.9. Your Level 2 went from 1.7 to 3.4. That’s actually building the infrastructure that will compound and allow you to reach self-actualisation. Every level you stabilise makes the next level easier to build.

5. Makes the invisible visible

You know something’s off. You feel it. But you can’t articulate what. This tool shows you exactly what. Once you see it, you can fix it.

There’s a particular kind of suffering that comes from not being able to name the problem. You’re struggling, but you don’t know why. You’re exhausted, but you can’t point to the source. You’re anxious, but you can’t identify the threat. The amorphousness of it makes it worse. You blame yourself for not having clarity about your own life.

This tool converts the invisible into the visible. It takes the vague sense that “I’m not where I should be” and shows you: your physiological needs are barely met (2.4), your safety is genuinely threatened (1.9), your belonging is adequate (3.6), your esteem is non-existent (1.7), and you’re trying to self-actualise anyway (you’re reading philosophy at 2am instead of sleeping). Now you know. The enemy has a face. The problem has coordinates. You can stop flailing and start building.

Understanding Your Maslow’s Hierarchy of Needs Assessment Results

How to Read Your Pyramid

Your results appear as a pyramid with six levels, each filled to a percentage based on your score. Each section is also further broken down into a score. Here’s what the numbers mean:

4.0-5.0: Thriving – Strong habits in place, needs consistently met, minimal maintenance required. This level is solid. You can build on it.

3.0-3.9: Stable – Decent habits, mostly meeting needs, some room for growth. This level works. It’s not perfect, but it’s functional. You can maintain this while working on lower levels.

2.0-2.9: Struggling – Significant gaps, inconsistent habits, active drain on your system. This level is shaky. It’s probably undermining the levels above it. Prioritise this.

1.0-1.9: Crisis – Critical needs unmet, requires immediate attention, everything else is impossible until this stabilises. This is your constraint. Nothing else matters until you address this.

These scores are descriptive, not prescriptive. A low score doesn’t mean you’re broken. It means that level is currently your constraint, the thing holding everything else back. It’s your weak link. Just like building a strong body, you don’t ignore weak links; you strengthen them.

The Foundation Principle: Why You Can’t Skip Levels

Think about building strength. You don’t load 200kg on the bar on your first day. You build capacity progressively. Try to skip that process, and you don’t get strong faster, you just get injured.

Maslow’s Hierarchy works the same way. You can’t skip the foundation and jump to self-actualisation. You can try, and you’ll likely create the illusion of progress, but it won’t last. The foundation eventually gives way.

Now, you don’t have to be perfect here; however, I would recommend that you aim to follow the 3.5+ rule. Lower levels should score at least 3.5 before heavily investing in higher levels.

Why 3.5? Because that’s the threshold where something is functional enough that it’s not actively undermining you. I know you likely think you are different; however, this is actually the problem. You can’t even think properly when you don’t have good, strong foundations.

When basic needs are unmet, your prefrontal cortex (PFC) (the brain region handling executive function, delayed gratification, and abstract thinking) goes offline first. It requires tremendous metabolic resources. When you’re sleep-deprived or undernourished, your PFC literally has less glucose available. You can’t “think your way to purpose” while exhausted because the brain region that processes abstract meaning isn’t functioning properly.

At 3.5+, you have enough stability that higher-level work becomes possible. It’s not perfect, but it’s functional enough to not be your primary constraint.

If your Level 1 (Physiological) scores 2.8, you can’t effectively work on Level 4 (Esteem) goals. Your biology is undermining you. Fix sleep, nutrition, and movement first. Once Level 1 hits 3.5+, you have the foundation to work on higher levels.

Now, just because you need to pay more attention to lower levels doesn’t mean you ignore higher levels. You can do maintenance work on higher levels while fixing lower ones. If you have good relationships (Level 3 at 4.0) but your safety (Level 2 at 2.3) is in crisis, you don’t abandon your relationships. You maintain them while focusing most of your energy on stabilising your finances or housing. The key word is focus. Where you put your primary effort matters.

This is periodisation applied to life. Athletes cycle through different phases with different focuses, so they can reach their peak. They don’t try to work on everything all at once. They also don’t stay in base-building forever, and they don’t skip base to jump straight to peaking. Each phase builds on the previous. Each maintains minimum thresholds from earlier phases while adding new demands. You build the base, add complexity, then maintain both.

Common Pyramid Patterns and What They Mean

The Solid Foundation (Levels 1-2 both above 3.5, higher levels variable)

You have the basics handled. Life isn’t in crisis mode. You can now genuinely work on growth, relationships, purpose, etc.

Action: Maintain foundation with 20% of your effort, invest 80% in whatever higher level calls to you.

The Shaky Foundation (Levels 1-2 below 3.0, higher levels variable)

Your life is held together with willpower and caffeine. Higher-level work feels impossible because your foundation can’t support it.

Action: Focus 80% of effort on Levels 1-2. Everything else is maintenance until the foundation stabilises.

The Purpose Crisis (Levels 1-3 solid, Level 4-5 struggling)

Basic life works, but you feel empty or directionless. You’ve built a stable life but not a meaningful one.

Action: Your foundation supports growth now. Invest in purpose, creativity, and contribution.

The Belonging Gap (Levels 1-2 solid, Level 3 struggling, Levels 4-5 variable)

You function well alone but feel disconnected. This is common in high-achievers who’ve prioritised everything except relationships.

Action: Relationships are your constraint. Schedule social time like you schedule training. Protect it.

The Uneven Spike (Some levels very high, some very low)

You’ve over-invested in levels that interest you while neglecting others. Common pattern: high achievement, low safety. Or high purpose, low physiology.

Action: Bring up the low levels. Your spike isn’t sustainable without the foundation beneath it. Every week you skip basic habits, foundational debt is accumulating. Like technical debt in software, it compounds. You’re borrowing capacity from your foundation to build the penthouse. Eventually, the loan comes due, and payment is extracted all at once in a crash.

What to Do Next

Your pyramid shows you exactly where to focus. Start with your lowest-scoring level. That’s your constraint. Everything else is secondary until that stabilises.

In emergency medicine, doctors use the triage method (😉): airway, breathing, and circulation before anything else. You don’t treat broken bones before securing airways. The life-threatening constraint gets addressed first, or nothing else matters. Same principle here.

Here’s the specific action plan for each level, including timelines, warning signs of regression, and criteria for moving up.

If You’re Scoring Low on Level 1 (Physiological)

Timeline: 2-3 months to stabilise basic habits

Your biology is undermining everything. You can’t think clearly when you’re chronically sleep-deprived. You can’t regulate emotions when your blood sugar is chaotic. You can’t build anything sustainable when your body is breaking down.

When basic needs are unmet, your body achieves stability through allostasis (active adaptation to stress). But this creates cumulative wear called allostatic load. Trying to self-actualise while carrying high allostatic load from sleep deprivation or chronic stress is like sprinting with a weighted vest. You might manage it briefly through sheer willpower, but you’re burning resources you don’t have. This is your constraint. Fix it first.

Start here:

1. Choose ONE habit: Pick sleep, stress management, nutrition, or movement. Choose the one causing you the most problems right now. If you’re sleeping four hours a night, that’s obviously the target. If you’re skipping meals and binge eating, nutrition is the priority. If you haven’t moved in months, start there.

Don’t try to fix everything simultaneously. That’s how you fail. Pick one. Master it. Then add the next.

2. Make it tiny: “I will go to bed by 11pm” not “I will completely overhaul my sleep routine.” “I will eat protein at breakfast” not “I will track macros perfectly.” “I will walk 10 minutes daily” not “I will train five days a week.”

Tiny habits compound. Grand plans collapse. Start so small it feels embarrassing. That’s how you make it sustainable.

Your basal ganglia (the brain region that automates behaviours into habits) works through repetition, not intensity. It doesn’t care if you do something impressive once. It cares if you do something consistent repeatedly. Small consistent actions become automatic. Large sporadic efforts stay effortful forever.

3. Anchor to existing routine: Attach new habit to something you already do reliably. “After I brush my teeth, I will immediately get in bed.” “When I pour my coffee, I will also cook eggs.” “When I get home from work, I will put on walking shoes before sitting down.”

This is implementation intention in action: “If X, then Y” systems are super effect, and tend to lead to much better behaviour change outcomes. You’re building your overall choice architecture so that success becomes the default path. Habits stick when they’re connected to established routines. Don’t rely on willpower, rely on structure.

4. Track visibly: Use a calendar, app, or checklist you see daily. Physical check marks on a wall calendar work better than digital tracking for most people. You want to see the streak building. That becomes its own motivation.

This leverages loss aversion because most people work harder to avoid losses than to achieve equivalent gains. Once you have a 14-day streak visible on your wall, you don’t want to break it. The streak becomes a commitment device.

Warning signs of regression:

• Sleep schedule drifting by more than 2 hours from target
• Skipping meals regularly (more than once a week)
• Going 3+ days without movement
• Chronic dehydration headaches returning
• Energy crashes that require caffeine or sugar to manage

When to move focus up: Consistently scoring 3.5+ for 2 months, basic routines feel automatic (you don’t have to think about them), energy is stable throughout the day without stimulants.

If You’re Scoring Low on Level 2 (Safety & Stability)

Timeline: 3-6 months to create basic stability

Your nervous system is in threat mode. When safety is unstable, everything else shuts down. You can’t focus on growth when you don’t know if you’ll make rent. You can’t invest in relationships when you’re constantly anxious about money. You can’t find purpose when you’re in survival mode.

For 200,000 years, your ancestors faced threats where resource scarcity meant death. Your threat-detection system doesn’t distinguish between sabre-toothed tigers and financial instability. Both trigger the same cortisol response, the same prefrontal cortex shutdown, the same survival mode. Your ancestors who didn’t take resource scarcity seriously didn’t survive. You’re wired to treat Level 2 instability as life-threatening because it was. Stabilise this first.

Start here:

1. Address crisis first: If you’re facing eviction, job loss, or immediate financial emergency, this is your only priority. Seek resources immediately: look for local aid, financial counselling services, emergency assistance programs, family or community support.

Don’t try to fix everything, just stop the bleeding. Get stable enough that you’re not in immediate danger.

2. Create one safety net: Even €25/month to an emergency fund helps. Even one trusted person who would help in a crisis. Even documentation of your financial situation, so you know exactly what you’re dealing with.

The psychological shift from “I have nothing” to “I have €100 saved” is massive, and shouldn’t be underestimated. Neuroscience shows the brain responds to buffers, not just total resources. A €500 emergency fund doesn’t solve major crises, but it solves enough minor ones (car repair, small medical bills, phone replacement) that your threat-response system starts to downregulate. You’re building evidence that you’re not one setback away from catastrophe.

3. Reduce chaos: Pick ONE area to add structure. Maybe it’s reviewing your bank account every Sunday. Maybe it’s setting a consistent work schedule if you’re freelance. Maybe it’s organising your important documents so you can find them.

Chaos drains energy. Structure conserves it. You can’t fix everything, but you can reduce chaos in one area. Every point of unpredictability requires mental resources to navigate. Every automated system or established routine frees up cognitive capacity for other work.

4. Get documentation: Having proper paperwork reduces anxiety and risk. Updated resume. Organised financial records. Copies of important documents. Backup plans written down.

This is the Stoic practice of premeditatio malorum (premeditation of evils). Stoics rehearsed worst-case scenarios for preparedness. When a crisis hits, you don’t have to figure it out from scratch while panicking. You have the information ready. The difference between “I need to update my resume while unemployed and desperate” versus “I have an updated resume ready” is the difference between scrambling and responding.

Warning signs of regression:

• Missing payments that were previously on time
• Emergency fund being drained without a replacement plan
• Increasing reliance on high-interest debt or short-term fixes
• Housing instability returning (late payments, lease concerns)
• Chronic anxiety about money despite stable income

When to move focus up: 1 month of expenses saved, housing secure for at least 6 months, income stable for 3+ months, not using high-interest debt, can handle a $1000 emergency without crisis.

If You’re Scoring Low on Level 3 (Love & Belonging)

Timeline: 3-6 months to build genuine connections

Humans are pack animals. We’re not built for isolation. You can optimise everything else, but without connection, you’re running on empty.

Loneliness isn’t just emotional, it’s physiological. It impacts sleep quality, immune function, inflammation levels, stress hormone regulation, and even cardiovascular health. This makes evolutionary sense because for 200,000 years of our evolution, exile from the tribe likely meant death. You couldn’t hunt alone, defend alone, or raise children alone. Your threat-response system is calibrated to treat social isolation as mortal danger because it was. Modern loneliness triggers the same biological stress response as ancestral exile, even though we’re no longer at immediate physical risk. This isn’t optional. Fix it.

Start here:

1. Initiate more: Be the one who texts first. Suggest plans. Reach out. Stop waiting for others to make the first move. Most people are waiting for someone else to initiate. Be that person.

“Want to grab coffee this week?” is enough. Don’t overthink it.

2. Show up consistently: Pick ONE community and attend regularly for 3 months minimum. A gym class, a climbing gym, a book club, a church, a volunteer group, or anything where the same people show up repeatedly.

Relationships form through repeated, low-stakes exposure. Social psychology calls this the “mere exposure effect”, where familiarity breeds liking. You don’t need to be charismatic. You just need to show up consistently. Your brain and others’ brains are wired to build trust through repetition, not intensity. Twelve casual interactions build more connection than one intense conversation.

3. Practice vulnerability: Share one real thing about yourself per week with someone. Not your entire trauma history, just one honest thing. “I’ve been feeling really lonely lately.” “I’m struggling with my career direction.” “I was really proud of this thing I did.”

Vulnerability is how superficial acquaintances become real friends. Social psychologist Arthur Aron’s research shows mutual vulnerability creates closeness more than shared activities or time spent together. You have to go first. Someone has to take the risk of being known. Most people are waiting for the other person to do it. When you go first, you give them permission.

4. Quality over quantity: Better to have 2 close friends you see regularly than 20 acquaintances you see occasionally. Focus on depth, not breadth.

One person who actually knows you is worth more than a hundred Instagram followers. Dunbar’s number suggests humans can maintain about 150 casual relationships, 50 friendships, 15 close friends, and 5 intimate bonds. Don’t spread yourself thin trying to maintain 150 deep connections. Invest in the 5-15 that matter most.

Warning signs of regression:

• Going full weeks without meaningful conversation (work small talk and pleasantries don’t count)
• Cancelling plans more than you keep them
• Only interacting transactionally (work, errands, obligations)
• Feeling invisible or forgotten
• Increased time spent scrolling social media as a substitute for connection

When to move focus up: 2-3 close connections you maintain regularly, active participation in at least one community, feeling genuinely known by someone, able to ask for help when needed, social calendar has regular plans (not empty).

If You’re Scoring Low on Level 4 (Esteem)

Timeline: 6-12 months to build genuine confidence

Confidence isn’t a feeling you generate through affirmations. It’s a conclusion you reach through evidence. Your brain needs proof that you’re capable. If you don’t have that proof, no amount of positive thinking will convince you.

This aligns with Albert Ellis’s Rational Emotive Behaviour Therapy: emotions follow from beliefs, and beliefs follow from evidence. If your evidence says “I don’t finish things,” believing “I’m capable and disciplined” creates cognitive dissonance that willpower can’t overcome. Change the evidence first. Finish things. Your belief system will update automatically to match observed reality. Build the evidence.

Start here:

1. Document wins: Keep a “done list” or wins journal. Daily or weekly, write down what you accomplished. Not just big wins; small ones count. “Had a hard conversation.” “Finished a task I’d been avoiding.” “Showed up to the gym when I didn’t want to.”

Your brain has negativity bias, which is an evolutionary adaptation that kept ancestors alive by remembering threats more than rewards. You remember failures automatically and ignore wins by default. Counteract that by documenting wins deliberately. You’re building a database of evidence that contradicts the negative story your brain tells by default.

2. Build evidence: Create proof of capability through small completions. Finish projects. Keep commitments to yourself. Do what you say you’ll do.

Every completion is evidence. Every kept commitment is proof. Your brain tracks this through what psychologists call an internal working model, which is your ongoing assessment of self-efficacy based on observed behaviour. You cannot argue your brain into confidence. But you can show it data that forces belief revision.

3. Speak up once daily: Share one idea, opinion, or contribution each day. In meetings, in conversations, in group settings. Even if it’s small.

Confidence comes from practising self-advocacy. You have to use your voice to strengthen it. Each time you contribute and the world doesn’t end, and each time you share an opinion and aren’t rejected, you accumulate evidence that speaking up is safe and valuable. Self-efficacy is domain-specific and skill-based. You build it through repetition.

4. Learn deliberately: Pick ONE skill and practice it 3x/week for 3 months. Track your progress. Deliberately get better at something.

Watching yourself improve at something builds generalised confidence. If you can get better at one thing through practice, you have evidence that improvement is possible. That evidence generalises to other domains. You stop thinking “I’m not capable” and start thinking “I’m not capable yet, but I can learn.” The shift from fixed to growth mindset emerges from evidence, not ideology.

Warning signs of regression:

• Returning to harsh self-talk patterns (catching yourself being cruel to yourself)
• Avoiding challenges or playing it safe exclusively
• Dismissing compliments or achievements immediately
• Waiting for permission for everything
• Comparison spirals (everyone else is better/further ahead)

When to move focus up: Consistent self-advocacy in most situations, completing projects regularly (80%+ follow-through), accepting recognition without deflecting, making decisions without needing constant validation, positive self-talk is default (or at least neutral).

If You’re Scoring Low on Level 5 (Self-Actualisation)

Timeline: 12+ months of intentional development

This is peak human functioning. Purpose, creativity, authenticity, contribution. This is the good stuff. But the critical point to remember here is that you can’t do this work sustainably if your foundation isn’t solid.

Check your scores on Levels 1-2. Are they 3.5+? If not, go fix that first. You can dabble in purpose work, but you can’t make it your primary focus until the foundation supports it. This is dependency management; Level 5 applications require Level 1-2 infrastructure. Try to run them on corrupted base code, and you’ll crash.

Existential psychotherapists like Irvin Yalom and Rollo May distinguish between existential anxiety (meaning-related) and neurotic anxiety (foundation-related masquerading as existential). May made a useful distinction: fear has an object, anxiety doesn’t. If you’re afraid of losing your job, that’s a Level 2 problem. If you’re experiencing objectless dread, that might be a Level 5 crisis, but often when people examine their lives closely, the “meaning crisis” sits on top of unaddressed fear at lower levels. Stabilise the foundation first. If the existential questions remain, then you genuinely have Level 5 work to do.

Start here:

1. Check foundation first: Seriously. If you’re scoring below 3.5 on Physiological or Safety, you’re not ready for sustained self-actualisation work. You can do it in bursts, but it won’t last. Fix the foundation, then come back to this.
2. Clarify purpose: Write your values and purpose statement. What actually matters to you? Not what should matter, not what your parents wanted, not what gets likes on social media; what actually matters to YOU?

This is what Nietzsche talked about: you must create your own values rather than inheriting them. You’re not discovering pre-existing purpose, you’re creating it through choice and commitment. The existentialists are right: existence precedes essence. You exist first, then define your essence through action.

Review and refine monthly. This isn’t a one-time exercise. Purpose clarifies over time through iteration, not revelation.

3. Create weekly: Block 3 hours for creative work or expression. Protect this time fiercely. Treat it like a non-negotiable.

Creation doesn’t have to mean art. It means making something that didn’t exist before. Writing, building, designing, problem-solving, anything that brings something new into the world. This is the Aristotelian concept of poiesis (bringing forth). Humans are uniquely capable of creation, and we atrophy without it.

4. Serve something bigger: Find one cause and give 5 hours/month consistently. Mentor someone. Volunteer. Contribute to something beyond yourself.

Purpose isn’t found in isolation. It emerges through contribution to something larger than yourself. Evolutionary psychology calls this “coalitional psychology”, where humans are wired to find meaning through group contribution. Your sense of purpose isn’t abstract, it’s relational and contextual, emerging from your role in something that transcends individual survival.

However, you cannot pursue meaning directly while basic survival is threatened. Yet once survival stabilises, meaning often emerges naturally without force. The more directly you chase self-actualisation, the more it eludes you. But build stable foundations, and Level 5 work often flows without force.

5. Seek beauty daily: 10 minutes with art, music, or nature. Not as background, as focused attention. Aesthetics matter. Beauty nourishes something essential in humans.

The transcendentalists understood this: Emerson and Thoreau both argued that beauty is a primary good, not a luxury. When you engage with beauty, whether natural or created, you’re practising a mode of attention that transcends utilitarian thinking. You’re experiencing the world as something other than instrumental. This capacity atrophies without use.

6. Curate your environment: Remove one ugly thing, add one beautiful thing each month. Your environment shapes you. Make it one that supports who you want to become.

Warning signs of regression:

• Living on autopilot, disconnected from purpose
• Creating only when “inspired” (inconsistently)
• All activities are transactional or productivity-focused
• Beauty and aesthetics feel frivolous or wasteful
• Everything feels like maintenance, nothing feels meaningful

When to move focus up: Most people don’t move beyond this, and it’s a lifelong practice, not a destination. Self-actualisation is the work. There’s no “completion” here. You’re doing it right if you’re consistently engaged with purpose, creativity, and contribution.

If You’re Scoring Low on Level 6 (Transcendence)

This is normal. Less than 2% of people consistently operate here.

This isn’t a failure. This is an advanced level that requires an incredibly stable foundation plus a specific orientation toward life. Most people never get here, and that’s completely fine. Self-actualisation (Level 5) is a deeply meaningful way to live. You don’t need transcendence to have a good life.

What this level actually means:

• Working on projects that will outlive you
• Experiencing unity/oneness beyond ego regularly
• Primary motivation is service to something larger than yourself
• Regular transcendent experiences through nature, meditation, service, or contemplation
• Operating from a universal perspective rather than individual ego most of the time

This is what Maslow called “Being-cognition” versus “Deficiency-cognition”; perceiving the world not through the lens of personal needs but as an end in itself. Different wisdom traditions point at the same territory: Buddhist “non-attachment,” Christian “kenosis” (self-emptying), Sufi annihilation of ego, etc.

If you’re genuinely called here:

First, ensure your foundation is rock-solid. We’re talking 4.0+ on Levels 1-3. Transcendence work is impossible to sustain without that base.

1. Develop a contemplative practice: Meditation, prayer, philosophical reflection. 10+ minutes daily, minimum. This isn’t a productivity hack, it’s consciousness development.
2. Engage in service without recognition: Anonymous giving, quiet help, contribution where no one knows it was you. If you’re seeking recognition, you’re not at transcendence; you’re at esteem. The test here is whether you can do good work that no one will ever know about and feel fulfilled anyway.
3. Study wisdom traditions: Philosophy, spirituality, and contemplative texts. This level requires intellectual and spiritual development beyond pop psychology. Read the Stoics, the existentialists, and the contemplative traditions. Not for collection, for transformation.
4. Connect with something larger: Nature immersion, spiritual community, engagement with universal principles. Find what connects you to something beyond individual ego.

Note: This isn’t the “goal” for everyone. Self-actualisation (Level 5) is perfectly sufficient for a deeply meaningful life. Don’t feel like you’re failing if transcendence doesn’t call to you. Most people live full, rich lives at Level 5. The question isn’t “Should I aim for Level 6?” but “Am I called to Level 6?” If you’re not sure, the answer is probably no. And that’s fine.

Common Pitfalls to Avoid

You’ve got your scores. You know where to focus. Here’s how to not screw it up.

1. Working on all levels at once

The biggest mistake people make with Maslow’s Hierarchy of Needs Assessment is trying to fix everything simultaneously. “I’m going to improve my sleep AND my finances AND my relationships AND find my purpose!”

No, you’re not. That’s how you fail.

Scattered effort produces minimal results. Your attention is finite. Your energy is limited. Trying to improve six things at once means you improve nothing.

In economics, this is opportunity cost: every hour spent on Level 5 work while Level 2 is in crisis means you’re not fixing the constraint. You’re misallocating scarce resources. The law of diminishing returns applies too: going from 3.5→4.5 on Level 1 provides less life improvement than going from 2.0→3.5. Focus on the constraint until it’s functional, then move to the next constraint.

What to do instead: Focus on 1-2 levels maximum based on current scores. Put 80% of your effort there. Maintain (don’t abandon) stable levels with the remaining 20%.

Think about it like exercise. If you try to peak in strength, muscle size, endurance, power, and mobility simultaneously, you optimise nothing. You pick a primary adaptation, maintain others, and cycle focus over time. Same principle here.

This is the difference between what Jim Collins calls “the tyranny of or” versus “the genius of and.” Most people think it’s “fix foundation OR pursue growth.” Binary choice. The reality is “fix foundation THEN pursue growth AND maintain foundation.” It’s sequential and simultaneous. You focus on the constraint until it’s functional, then add the next level while maintaining what’s below. Not abandonment; maintenance with strategic allocation.

2. Ignoring the foundation while chasing growth

“I know my sleep is bad and my finances are a mess, but I really want to work on finding my purpose.”

I get it. Purpose work feels meaningful. Sleep hygiene feels boring. But the reality is that you can’t build self-actualisation on a broken foundation. You can try for a while, maybe even a few months, but eventually the foundation gives way and everything collapses.

What to do instead: Fix the constraint first. If your Level 1 or 2 scores below 3.0, that’s your constraint. Everything else is secondary until that stabilises. It’s not sexy, but it works.

You’ll be shocked at how much easier higher-level work becomes once the foundation is solid. Finding purpose is dramatically easier when you’re not chronically exhausted. Building relationships is easier when you’re not in financial crisis. The foundation isn’t separate from the growth, it enables the growth.

3. Chasing higher levels to avoid lower ones

Unfortunately, a lot of people pursue higher-level goals as experiential avoidance. They’re running from lower-level problems they don’t want to face.

You throw yourself into finding your purpose (Level 5) because examining your financial disaster (Level 2) is too painful. You chase achievement and status (Level 4) because admitting you’re lonely (Level 3) feels too vulnerable. You optimise productivity and performance (Level 4-5) because facing the fact that you’re chronically sleep-deprived (Level 1) would require changing habits you’re not ready to change.

This is a form of psychological inflexibility, where you are rigidly pursuing goals that don’t work because facing the alternative is uncomfortable. The irony is that avoiding the lower-level problem doesn’t make it go away. It makes everything harder. You’re building on a foundation you refuse to look at, and wondering why nothing feels stable.

What to do instead: Be honest about what you’re avoiding. If you’re intensely focused on higher-level work while your foundation is in crisis, ask yourself: “Am I pursuing this because it’s the right focus, or because I don’t want to deal with what’s actually broken?” The assessment cuts through the avoidance by showing you the objective foundation state. You can’t avoid what’s visible in your scores.

4. Mistaking motivation for readiness

Feeling inspired doesn’t mean your foundation is ready. I see this constantly: someone gets fired up about a big goal, attacks it with enthusiasm, and crashes hard within weeks because the foundation couldn’t support the effort.

Motivation is cheap. Capacity is what matters.

What to do instead: Check scores, not feelings. If you’re really excited about a Level 5 goal but your Levels 1-2 score under 3.0, that excitement is lying to you. Use the motivation to fix the foundation, not to skip it.

Inspiration can fuel action at your current level. Pumped about purpose? Great, use that energy to stabilise your sleep so you’ll have the capacity to pursue purpose later.

5. Not tracking or measuring progress

“I think I’m doing better” is not data. Your brain is notoriously bad at tracking actual progress. You’ll remember the wins and forget the failures, or vice versa, depending on your natural bias.

What to do instead: Re-take this assessment every 3 months. Track the scores. Watch the pyramid fill in. That’s real progress. Not feelings, not impressions, but measurable improvement.

Numbers don’t lie. “My Level 2 score improved from 2.3 to 3.1” is objective progress. “I feel better about my finances” could mean anything.

Track like you’re coaching yourself, because you are.

6. Comparing your pyramid to others

Someone else’s pyramid is irrelevant to yours. Maybe they’re crushing Level 5 while you’re working on Level 2. So what? They’re not you. They didn’t start where you started. They don’t have your circumstances, your history, your constraints.

What to do instead: Compare your pyramid to your own pyramid 3 months ago. That’s the only comparison that matters. Are you better than you were? Yes? Good. Keep going.

All levels are equally valid. Working on your financial stability (Level 2) is exactly as important as someone else’s purpose work (Level 5). The work you’re doing at your level is the right work for where you are. Period.

Maslow’s Hierarchy of Needs Assessment Conclusion

This pyramid is a snapshot, not a life sentence. Every habit you build changes your foundation. Every week of consistent action improves your scores. Progress is possible at any level, at any age, from any starting point.

I’ve seen people go from crisis (1.8 on multiple levels) to thriving (4.2+) within a year. I’ve also seen people stay stuck for years because they kept chasing growth instead of fixing the foundation. The difference isn’t talent, genetics, or circumstances; it’s focus on the right level at the right time.

You can change your score, but you have to do the actual work, not just feel motivated about it.

Small, consistent actions create massive change over time. This is the principle of progressive overload applied to life structure. 1% improvement daily doesn’t sound like much. But compounded over a year, that’s 37 times better. Not 37% better, 37 times better. That’s the maths of consistency.

You don’t need massive changes here. You need tiny habits that compound. Going to bed 30 minutes earlier, consistently, transforms sleep within weeks. Consistently saving €50/month builds an emergency fund within months. Texting one friend per week, consistently, builds a social foundation within a year.

Benjamin Franklin understood this in the 18th century with his virtue-tracking system where you had daily checkboxes for thirteen virtues he wanted to develop. Not grand resolutions. Not aspirational declarations. Just daily marks tracking actual behaviour. He was building evidence through habit, proving to himself through action that change was real.

Focus on what you can control: your daily practices. Trust the process. The compound interest of habits is more powerful than any motivational spike.

Don’t bookmark this and forget about it. Don’t say “I’ll start Monday.” Don’t wait for perfect conditions. None of that works. Here’s what works:

1. Save your results: Screenshot your pyramid and bookmark this page. You’ll want to compare when you retest in 3 months.
2. Choose ONE action from your lowest-scoring level. Not three actions. Not one action per level. ONE action from the level that’s currently your constraint.

Use this three-month focus question: If you could only improve ONE level for the next 90 days, which one would change your life most? Cross-reference against your scores. If they match, you have clarity. If they don’t, you have insight into your self-deception pattern.

3. Start today. Not Monday. Not next month. Not “when things settle down.” Today. Do the one thing. That’s it.
4. Return in 3 months. Re-take the assessment. Compare scores. Measure real progress. Adjust focus based on new results.

You can’t skip the foundation, but you also don’t have to wait for perfection. Build where you are. Progress, not perfection. The pyramid rises one habit at a time.

Sartre said existence precedes essence; you exist first, then create your essence through action and choice. Your pyramid is your current existence. Your scores reveal the foundation you’ve built, the constraints you’re working under, and the capacity you have right now. What you do next creates your essence.

You’re not discovering who you’re meant to be. You’re building who you choose to become, one level at a time, one habit at a time, from wherever you actually are right now.

You know where you stand now. You know what to focus on. You know the first action to take. Everything else is just a delay.

The foundation is built through repetition, not revelation. You don’t need another insight. You need consistent action on the fundamentals.

So look at your scores honestly. Pick one thing. Start today.

Build the foundation. Everything else follows.

If you need help creating a plan of action, with regards to your health and fitness, we can help you do this. You can reach out to us and get online coaching, or alternatively, you can interact with our free content. 

If you want more free information on nutrition and exercise, you can follow us on Instagram, YouTube or listen to the podcast, where we discuss all the little intricacies of exercise and nutrition. You can always stay up to date with our latest content by subscribing to our newsletter.

Finally, if you want to learn how to coach nutrition, then consider our Nutrition Coach Certification course, and if you want to learn to get better at exercise program design, then consider our course on exercise program design. We do have other courses available too. If you don’t understand something, or you just need clarification, you can always reach out to us on Instagram or via email.