Understanding the types of exercise is incredibly helpful when designing an exercise program. These are the tools you are going to use to get the results you desire. So knowing what tools you have available and what those tools can be used for, is naturally going to allow you to be much more specific with your exercise program design.

To design an effective exercise program, you have to know what tools you have in your toolbox to accomplish these goals. While there is actually quite a bit of nuance to this, it is actually easy enough to divide these tools into 4 categories or types of exercise. Of course, there is quite a bit of overlap between these, and each one itself can be further subcategorised. However, having these 4 big broad buckets can be really helpful for deciding on what exercise type we want to prioritise based on our unique goals.

However, to use these tools effectively, you have to understand what your goals are and what the goals of exercise are. We spend a lot of time at the start of the coaching process really nailing down goals with our clients, as this allows us to be much more specific in what type of exercise we are going to use to achieve those goals. So, if you want to use the information in this article to create a better exercise program for yourself, then we would recommend that you spend some time getting clear on what your specific goals are. This will allow you to better understand which type of exercise will be more appropriate for your goals.

The Four Types Of Exercise

Generally, there are four types of exercise we can use to accomplish our goals:

  • resistance exercise,
  • cardiovascular exercise,
  • sports/organised group exercise, 
  • and daily movement/informal exercise.
the four different types of exercise

Of course, these don’t need to be separated, and they very frequently overlap, but these are the broad categories of how people engage with exercise in the modern world. To better be able to organise your training system, we have to have to fundamentally understand what the benefits of each training system is and what adaptations it is actually providing you. There is no point spending hours upon hours trying to achieve a certain goal with a certain training modality, if it doesn’t actually provide that adaptation or it accomplishes it very inefficiently. For example, trying to get as muscular as possible, by performing hours upon hours of cardiovascular work is just going to be an exercise in frustration. 

So we must build an understanding of the why behind each training method, and then we can have a better appreciation of the how and what to do side of things.

Resistance Training

We can broadly define resistance training as exercise that involves contracting the muscles against resistance. 

This resistance can come in the form of barbells, dumbbells, machines, resistance bands, or even the mass of your own limb(s) or body (e.g. bodyweight exercises like push-ups). Technically, you could call most exercise resistance training, as even walking is contracting your calves and lower body muscles against the ground. However, for the most part, when we talk about resistance training, we generally mean significant resistance, closer to the limit of your muscular capacity. 

As noted, there are many ways you can actually apply resistance against the muscles, including:

  • barbells, 
  • dumbbells, 
  • machines, 
  • cables,
  • resistance bands,
  • odd implements (i.e. cinder blocks, barrels, sandbags, rocks etc.),
  • and your body weight.

Each of these offers something slightly different, although generally, the most significant differences are actually just in terms of ease of use, accessibility, modifiability (i.e. the ability to modify the exercise to your needs), and progressability (i.e. the ability to progress the exercise). However, it is important to be aware that there are subtle differences between each of these different modalities. We will mainly be focusing on barbells, dumbbells, machines, cables, and your body weight when we discuss resistance training, as these are generally the things that most people have access to and are most familiar with.

types of resistance training

Resistance Training Adaptations 

While there are actually many adaptations to resistance training, generally speaking, the adaptations that people are most looking for when they use resistance training as a training modality are:

  1. Improved strength 
  2. Muscle building 

Of course, this isn’t all that resistance training offers. When we resistance train (with weights, body weight, bands, or whatever), we improve our function, mobility, and bone mineral density. These are all important benefits for everyone but they are particularly important for specific populations, such as the elderly. We also soak up blood glucose into our muscles as we contract them, along with building bigger depots for glucose to be stored (building bigger muscles allows for more muscle glycogen storage). The list goes on, from reductions in blood pressure, to improved cognitive function, better balance, reduced pain, and so on. We discussed many of the benefits of resistance training in our article on why exercise is so important for health, so we won’t repeat them here. 

It is important to note that resistance training generally leads to improved function and ability to interact with the world. This is a very important benefit, as it enables you to participate in tasks that are meaningful to you. Whether it’s picking up your children, moving things around the house with ease, enjoying your hobbies, climbing a mountain or giving your significant other a piggyback, resistance training can help. 

So, we can think of resistance training as being the tool we use to improve our muscle size and overall body strength. The added benefit is that we generally see an improvement in overall function and ability to interact with the world. 

Cardiovascular Training

Cardiovascular training is a little bit more difficult to describe, as it really can be anything that raises your heart rate and challenges your cardiovascular system. If you are very unfit, and have been sedentary for a long time, you may find walking for 5 minutes to be sufficiently challenging to your cardiovascular system. However, someone who has been engaging in a lot of cardiovascular training may find their heart rate barely elevates walking for 5 minutes, and they would not see it as being something anyone would call cardiovascular training. So there is a degree of individual specificity here, and that does make understanding the adaptations a little bit harder too, as it does depend on what you have been doing previously.

The cardio can also be broken down into two energy providing systems (technically it can be further subdivided, but this isn’t generally necessary). These are the aerobic system and the anaerobic system (you do have another one, the ATP-PCr system, but for this discussion, we don’t need to include it). 

energy systems

The aerobic system requires oxygen to function effectively, and as such, it works better when your effort and heart rate is relatively lower as this facilitates you being able to breathe effectively (and thus breathe in oxygen and breathe out carbon dioxide). Once your level of effort goes up, or you are required to do movements that require very fast generation of energy, you must use the anaerobic system. This system doesn’t require the same oxygen that the aerobic system requires, and as such, it can work in low oxygen conditions, but the trade-off is that it doesn’t work for very long.

This is why you can’t sprint a marathon, the anaerobic system just can’t supply power for that long, and instead, the aerobic system must kick in, which can go for much longer, but can’t provide that “jet fuel” required for the higher intensities. This is important to understand, because some of the adaptations you get from doing higher-intensity cardio, you don’t get with lower-intensity cardio, and vice versa.

The manner in which you perform the cardio training does also matter. Just like there are differences between using your body weight or dumbbells for resistance training, there are differences between running, cycling, swimming, hiking, rucking, using the elliptical or fan bike, and so on. Some modalities are better suited to certain training methods than others.

For example, it may be difficult to do interval training on a treadmill, whereas doing it on a stationary bike may be much easier, practically speaking. However, doing it on a fan bike, even with the same training parameters (i.e. the specific interval program), may make it significantly harder as the fan bike provides more resistance than a stationary bike and challenges more muscles (as it uses the upper body too).

So, discussing cardio isn’t just a case of thinking about simply jogging or sprinting, there is a lot more nuance here. The body parts used can be significantly different, the injury risk significantly different, and the specific adaptations significantly different. 

However, even with all of this in mind, we can still broadly discuss cardio training in two distinct categories. These categories are low-intensity steady-state (LISS) cardio and high-intensity interval (HIIT) cardio. These shouldn’t be thought of as being completely distinct categories, and depending on how exactly you perform either of these there may actually be significant overlap.

For example, a lot of people perform “HIIT” workouts that go on for 30-40 minutes, and ultimately they just end up being largely aerobic sessions. There are different methods, programs and protocols you can use for each of these, depending on what exactly you want to develop.

Cardiovascular Training Adaptations and Tradeoffs

In general, most people do cardio for one of three reasons, they either want to improve their fitness, improve their health or they simply want to use it as a tool to burn calories. Of course, there are other reasons, but generally, these are the outcomes people are targeting by doing cardio. So, how do aerobic cardio and anaerobic cardio stack up against each other in achieving these?

Aerobic cardio methods like LISS are generally typified by low-intensity activity, done for longer periods of time. Generally, heart rates are going to be somewhere around 60-70% max heart rate, and generally, this type of cardio will be done for 30+ minutes. 

Anaerobic cardio methods like HIIT are generally typified by higher intensity activity, done for shorter periods of time, done in an interval pattern with work-to-rest periods generally being at least 2 or 3 (rest) to 1 (work) (i.e. 30 seconds of effort followed by 60-90 seconds of rest). While shorter work-to-rest ratios can make sense in some circumstances, especially if the effort period is longer (i.e. 90 seconds effort, followed by 90 seconds of rest may make sense), generally longer rest periods make more sense. 

Once the rest interval is below ~3 minutes, repeated efforts are going to become more aerobic in nature with each effort, but not actually be as effective as doing aerobic cardio specifically, as the heart rate is too high.

AspectLISS CardioHIIT Cardio
IntensityLow.High.
DurationLonger (typically 30 minutes or longer).Shorter (typically 4-30 minutes).
Heart RateSteady, at a moderate level, usually around 60-70% of heart rate maximum.Fluctuates throughout. Generally the goal is to reach high heart rates during the intervals.
Oxygen Consumption Increases gradually.Increases significantly during intervals.
Caloric ExpenditureModerate on a per minute basis, but can be done for longer periods of time, thus total expenditure is generally high.High on a per minute basis, but can’t be done for a long period of time.
Muscle EnduranceImproves muscular endurance.Improves muscular endurance, especially at higher intensities. However, probably doesn’t improve overall muscular endurance as much as aerobic cardio.
Muscle Mass PreservationMinimal impact.May help preserve muscle mass.
Cardiovascular HealthImproves gradually, with no real ceiling.Significant improvements in shorter duration, but adaptations slow drastically after ~4 weeks.
Recovery TimeShort.Long (due to high intensity).
Risk of InjuryLow (although may be higher if large volumes are done).Higher (due to high intensity).
Adaptation for AthletesImproves recovery and endurance.Enhances top end performance, but may interfere with ability to train for the sport, due to increased recovery demands.

Ultimately, there is a lot of overlap between each of these, however, there are some things to keep in mind. Generally, HIIT will provide quicker fitness (and potentially health) benefits, and on a per minute basis, HIIT allows you to burn more calories. So, this may seem like a win for HIIT, however, HIIT is significantly more fatiguing than LISS. The improvements from HIIT seem to quickly level off, and only progress at a very, very slow rate. Whereas LISS provides slow and steady fitness and health benefits, that don’t seem to level off as quickly, and realistically are only really limited by how much time you can dedicate to doing LISS. 

Similarly, you can actually burn significantly more calories doing LISS, purely because you can do it for so much longer and so much more frequently than HIIT. But this is also the downside of LISS, as it simply takes more time. Generally, to get the most from LISS, you likely want to do at least 30 minutes of it, whereas with HIIT, you can get a lot of bang for your buck in as little as 4 minutes. This is generally why you see HIIT being promoted, as it is very time efficient. However, this is only true if you look at things with short time horizons, and as soon as you broaden the time horizon, LISS is actually more time efficient (you can burn more calories, and you get better fitness and health returns over longer time horizons). 

However, rather than thinking of cardio as a purely an either-or question, you can actually do a little bit of both. Most people seem to do best by allocating the vast majority of their cardiovascular training towards LISS, but also allocating some time to HIIT so they don’t miss out on some of the additional benefits you can get from training at higher intensities. Generally, if someone wants to improve their fitness in some capacity, or they want to ensure they are looking after their health, we are going to want to include cardiovascular exercise in the program.

Sports/Organised Group Training

Sporting activities or organised group activities are generally the way that most people are introduced to physical activity, as it is much more likely that you will see a group of children playing some sort of field sport, rather than lifting weights. Discussing the various forms of activity that make up sports or organised group activities is beyond the scope of this article, but it does bear noting here because quite a few people will keep up some form of sport/organised group activity as their form of exercise, and may want to try and layer on resistance training and/or cardiovascular training too. This is a completely valid form of exercise, however, it really is beyond the scope of this article to discuss all the nuances here, as there are so many different potential activities in this class.

Organised Sports/Group Training Adaptations

The adaptations gained from these types of activities obviously depend pretty heavily on what type of sport/activity we are talking about. However, generally speaking, most sports/activities have some sort of cardiovascular element, and due to the nature of having to move your body around, they expose your body to some forces that are similar to those experienced with resistance training. So you do get a bit of a mix of both the adaptations you get from resistance training and from cardiovascular training (depending on the type of sport/activity). This is both a positive and a negative, as you don’t quite get the full benefits of either, and you kind of stay in this middle ground. However, some of the adaptations that you do generally get with this style of training are increases in skills, fine/gross motor control, coordination, agility, and overall body capacity and resilience. 

Along with these, and this one is very often overlooked, is the fact that you do get to interact with other humans at these sport practices/group training sessions. Humans are social animals and group training can be more enjoyable than solitary training as a result of interacting with other people and having a community of people who are also working towards the same (or similar) goals. 

The main downside is that you generally don’t get the best outcomes you could possibly get from the perspective of body composition, and you also don’t generally get the best outcomes for strength (unless you are talking about a strength sport like powerlifting) or fitness (unless you are talking about an endurance sport like running). However, that may be a trade-off you are willing to accept, due to enjoying that particular sport/activity.

There are also activities that kind of fall into this category, such as pilates or yoga, which may not offer significant benefits in terms of cardiovascular fitness or building significant muscle, but may improve other aspects such as core strength and flexibility. And of course, may be incredibly enjoyable to do.

Informal Exercise

This is a type of exercise that a lot of people ignore or don’t realise is actually exercise. If we consider the overall meta goals of exercise as being to improve health, performance, and/or body composition, well, daily movement does actually contribute quite significantly to all of these. With regards to the more common sub-goals of exercise of getting stronger, building muscle and getting cardiovascularly fitter, daily movement can help with these too. For sure, it likely isn’t going to be the best tool to accomplish any of these goals, however, it does still play a part and contribute.

So what do I mean by informal exercise?

Well, this category includes a few things that you may not necessarily consider exercise, but that do contribute towards accomplishing the same things as the stuff you likely do consider exercise. Informal exercise as a category is quite broad, but some of the more common things that fall into this category include:

  • Walking: Walking is one of the simplest and most accessible forms of exercise. It can be done anywhere, anytime, and requires minimal equipment other than shoes. Walking is probably one of the most underrated forms of exercise, and we generally advocate for people aiming to get 10,000 steps per day.
  • Active Commuting: Choosing active modes of transportation, such as cycling or walking, instead of driving or taking public transportation, can provide opportunities for informal exercise. 
  • Taking the Stairs: Opting to take the stairs instead of the elevator or escalator whenever possible can add physical activity to daily routines. Climbing stairs helps strengthen leg muscles and elevate heart rate.
  • Household Chores: Engaging in household chores like vacuuming, mopping, dusting and cleaning involves physical exertion, and you can get a decent workout in by just cleaning up the house. 
  • Gardening: Gardening involves a variety of physical movements such as digging, planting, weeding, and watering, which both provides a stimulus on the muscles and on the cardiovascular system.
  • Playing with Children or Pets: Playing games, chasing after children or pets, and engaging in outdoor activities with them can be a fun and effective way to exercise. Activities like playing, kicking a ball, or throwing a frisbee can elevate heart rate and promote movement.
  • Using Active Workstations: Using standing desks, stability balls, or treadmill desks at work can help promote movement and reduce sedentary behaviour. These active workstations allow individuals to engage their muscles, get fitter and burn calories while working. 
  • Active Leisure and Socialising: Instead of watching TV, or meeting friends for sedentary activities like watching movies or sitting at a coffee shop, you can actually get a decent bit of activity in by simply engaging in leisure and social activities that are more active. Activities like hiking, biking, or playing outdoor games together can provide opportunities for exercise and social interaction.
  • Going for a Hike: Hiking is a great way to enjoy the outdoors while getting exercise. It combines cardiovascular activity with a significant strength component, depending on the terrain. Hiking challenges leg and core muscles and cardiovascular fitness. Hiking also offers mental health benefits by reducing stress and promoting relaxation, especially if done in a natural setting.
  • Swimming in a Lake or the Sea with Friends: Swimming is a full-body workout that engages the muscles of the arms, legs, core, and back. It provides cardiovascular conditioning, improves muscle strength and endurance, and enhances flexibility. Swimming in natural bodies of water like lakes or the sea adds a bit of nature to the activity, while socialising with friends makes the activity even more enjoyable and beneficial for your health.
  • Kicking a Football Around with Friends: Playing football (soccer or Gaelic football) with friends is a fun and social way to get exercise. Similar benefits can be had from casually passing around a rugby ball, basketball or American football.

All of these, and many other potential activities, fall in the category of informal exercise. They can actually contribute quite a bit to your overall exercise activity throughout the week, especially walking. Walking is the unsung hero of activity, and simply getting a high daily step count can significantly improve your health and body composition, while also generally improving recovery too. 

the constituents of metabolism

A lot of these fall into the category of non-exercise activity thermogenesis (NEAT), so some people may take offence that I have classified these as exercise rather than non-exercise. However, non-exercise is just a bit of a nebulous term, as surely non-exercise should just mean being sedentary, no? Now, some people will point out that exercise is intentional activity intended to improve health and/or fitness, however, does that mean if you do sports without the intention of improving your health or fitness, it isn’t actually exercise? Or that the difference between whether a walk is considered exercise or not is whether you intended it to improve your health and/or fitness? Ultimately, it is all just activity, and it all can contribute to your health and fitness goals.

The Types Of Exercise As Tools In Your Toolbox

It can be difficult to design an effective exercise program if you aren’t even clear on what tools you have in your toolbox. So understanding the different types of exercise available to you, and having a rough understanding of what adaptations you get from these types of exercise can be incredibly helpful. However, you do still need to know what outcomes you are trying to influence with these tools, so it is also helpful to understand why exercise is important and what the goals of exercise are. In future articles, we will discuss the exercise guidelines, and how to actually design an effective exercise program. So if you want to stay up to date with our latest content, we recommend subscribing to our newsletter.

If you would like more help with your training (or nutrition), we do also have online coaching spaces available. You can further build your knowledge on all things exercise by interacting with our free content. We recommend reading our foundational nutrition article, along with our foundational articles on sleep and stress management, if you really want to learn more about how to optimise your lifestyle. If you want even more free information on exercise, you can follow us on InstagramYouTube or listen to the podcast, where we discuss all the little intricacies of exercise. Finally, if you want to learn how to coach nutrition, then consider our Nutrition Coach Certification course. If you don’t understand something, or you just need clarification, you can always reach out to us on Instagram or via email.

References and Further Reading

Ruegsegger GN, Booth FW. Health Benefits of Exercise. Cold Spring Harb Perspect Med. 2018;8(7):a029694. Published 2018 Jul 2. doi:10.1101/cshperspect.a029694 https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6027933/

Posadzki P, Pieper D, Bajpai R, et al. Exercise/physical activity and health outcomes: an overview of Cochrane systematic reviews. BMC Public Health. 2020;20(1):1724. Published 2020 Nov 16. doi:10.1186/s12889-020-09855-3 https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/33198717/

Warburton DER, Bredin SSD. Health benefits of physical activity: a systematic review of current systematic reviews. Curr Opin Cardiol. 2017;32(5):541-556. doi:10.1097/HCO.0000000000000437 https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/28708630/

Kramer A. An Overview of the Beneficial Effects of Exercise on Health and Performance. Adv Exp Med Biol. 2020;1228:3-22. doi:10.1007/978-981-15-1792-1_1 https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/32342447/

Qiu Y, Fernández-García B, Lehmann HI, et al. Exercise sustains the hallmarks of health. J Sport Health Sci. 2023;12(1):8-35. doi:10.1016/j.jshs.2022.10.003 https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9923435/

Thompson WR, Sallis R, Joy E, Jaworski CA, Stuhr RM, Trilk JL. Exercise Is Medicine. Am J Lifestyle Med. 2020;14(5):511-523. Published 2020 Apr 22. doi:10.1177/1559827620912192 https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7444006/

Chen, YT., Fredericson, M., Matheson, G. et al. Exercise is Medicine. Curr Phys Med Rehabil Rep 1, 48–56 (2013). https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s40141-013-0006-1

Sallis RE. Exercise is medicine and physicians need to prescribe it!. Br J Sports Med. 2009;43(1):3-4. doi:10.1136/bjsm.2008.054825 https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/18971243/

Sallis R. Exercise is medicine: a call to action for physicians to assess and prescribe exercise. Phys Sportsmed. 2015;43(1):22-26. doi:10.1080/00913847.2015.1001938 https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/25684558/

Li J, Qiu H, Li J. Exercise is medicine. Front Aging Neurosci. 2023;15:1129221. Published 2023 Jan 30. doi:10.3389/fnagi.2023.1129221 https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9922893/

Langan SP, Grosicki GJ. Exercise Is Medicine…and the Dose Matters. Front Physiol. 2021;12:660818. Published 2021 May 12. doi:10.3389/fphys.2021.660818 https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/34054576/

Anderson E, Durstine JL. Physical activity, exercise, and chronic diseases: A brief review. Sports Med Health Sci. 2019;1(1):3-10. Published 2019 Sep 10. doi:10.1016/j.smhs.2019.08.006 https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9219321/

Hamer M, Endrighi R, Poole L. Physical activity, stress reduction, and mood: insight into immunological mechanisms. Methods Mol Biol. 2012;934:89-102. doi:10.1007/978-1-62703-071-7_5 https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/22933142/

El-Kotob R, Ponzano M, Chaput JP, et al. Resistance training and health in adults: an overview of systematic reviews. Appl Physiol Nutr Metab. 2020;45(10 (Suppl. 2)):S165-S179. doi:10.1139/apnm-2020-0245 https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/33054335/

Shailendra P, Baldock KL, Li LSK, Bennie JA, Boyle T. Resistance Training and Mortality Risk: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Am J Prev Med. 2022;63(2):277-285. doi:10.1016/j.amepre.2022.03.020 https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/35599175/

Paluch AE, Boyer WR, Franklin BA, et al. Resistance Exercise Training in Individuals With and Without Cardiovascular Disease: 2023 Update: A Scientific Statement From the American Heart Association. Circulation. 2024;149(3):e217-e231. doi:10.1161/CIR.0000000000001189 https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/38059362/

Kraemer WJ, Ratamess NA, French DN. Resistance training for health and performance. Curr Sports Med Rep. 2002;1(3):165-171. doi:10.1249/00149619-200206000-00007 https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/12831709/

Strasser B, Volaklis K, Fuchs D, Burtscher M. Role of Dietary Protein and Muscular Fitness on Longevity and Aging. Aging Dis. 2018;9(1):119-132. Published 2018 Feb 1. doi:10.14336/AD.2017.0202 https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5772850/

McLeod M, Breen L, Hamilton DL, Philp A. Live strong and prosper: the importance of skeletal muscle strength for healthy ageing. Biogerontology. 2016;17(3):497-510. doi:10.1007/s10522-015-9631-7 https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4889643/

Witard OC, McGlory C, Hamilton DL, Phillips SM. Growing older with health and vitality: a nexus of physical activity, exercise and nutrition. Biogerontology. 2016;17(3):529-546. doi:10.1007/s10522-016-9637-9 https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/26878863/

Chen L, Nelson DR, Zhao Y, Cui Z, Johnston JA. Relationship between muscle mass and muscle strength, and the impact of comorbidities: a population-based, cross-sectional study of older adults in the United States. BMC Geriatr. 2013;13:74. Published 2013 Jul 16. doi:10.1186/1471-2318-13-74 https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3765109/

Srikanthan P, Karlamangla AS. Muscle mass index as a predictor of longevity in older adults. Am J Med. 2014;127(6):547-553. doi:10.1016/j.amjmed.2014.02.007 https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/24561114/

Moghetti P, Bacchi E, Brangani C, Donà S, Negri C. Metabolic Effects of Exercise. Front Horm Res. 2016;47:44-57. doi:10.1159/000445156 https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/27348753/

Hong AR, Kim SW. Effects of Resistance Exercise on Bone Health. Endocrinol Metab (Seoul). 2018;33(4):435-444. doi:10.3803/EnM.2018.33.4.435 https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6279907/

Manaye S, Cheran K, Murthy C, et al. The Role of High-intensity and High-impact Exercises in Improving Bone Health in Postmenopausal Women: A Systematic Review. Cureus. 2023;15(2):e34644. Published 2023 Feb 5. doi:10.7759/cureus.34644 https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9990535/

Liu Y, Lee DC, Li Y, et al. Associations of Resistance Exercise with Cardiovascular Disease Morbidity and Mortality. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2019;51(3):499-508. doi:10.1249/MSS.0000000000001822 https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7385554/

Lee DC, Brellenthin AG, Lanningham-Foster LM, Kohut ML, Li Y. Aerobic, resistance, or combined exercise training and cardiovascular risk profile in overweight or obese adults: the CardioRACE trial. Eur Heart J. 2024;45(13):1127-1142. doi:10.1093/eurheartj/ehad827 https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/38233024/

Halle M, Papadakis M. A new dawn of managing cardiovascular risk in obesity: the importance of combining lifestyle intervention and medication. Eur Heart J. 2024;45(13):1143-1145. doi:10.1093/eurheartj/ehae091 https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/38366823/

Kirkman DL, Lee DC, Carbone S. Resistance exercise for cardiac rehabilitation. Prog Cardiovasc Dis. 2022;70:66-72. doi:10.1016/j.pcad.2022.01.004 https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8930531/

Westcott WL. Resistance training is medicine: effects of strength training on health. Curr Sports Med Rep. 2012;11(4):209-216. doi:10.1249/JSR.0b013e31825dabb8 https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/22777332/

Lavie CJ, Lee DC, Sui X, et al. Effects of Running on Chronic Diseases and Cardiovascular and All-Cause Mortality. Mayo Clin Proc. 2015;90(11):1541-1552. doi:10.1016/j.mayocp.2015.08.001 https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/26362561/

Hackett DA. Lung Function and Respiratory Muscle Adaptations of Endurance- and Strength-Trained Males. Sports (Basel). 2020;8(12):160. Published 2020 Dec 10. doi:10.3390/sports8120160 https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7764033/

Hellsten Y, Nyberg M. Cardiovascular Adaptations to Exercise Training. Compr Physiol. 2015;6(1):1-32. Published 2015 Dec 15. doi:10.1002/cphy.c140080 https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/26756625/

Lässing J, Maudrich T, Kenville R, et al. Intensity-dependent cardiopulmonary response during and after strength training. Sci Rep. 2023;13(1):6632. Published 2023 Apr 24. doi:10.1038/s41598-023-33873-x https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/37095279/

Benck LR, Cuttica MJ, Colangelo LA, et al. Association between Cardiorespiratory Fitness and Lung Health from Young Adulthood to Middle Age. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2017;195(9):1236-1243. doi:10.1164/rccm.201610-2089OC https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5439017/

Reimers AK, Knapp G, Reimers CD. Effects of Exercise on the Resting Heart Rate: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Interventional Studies. J Clin Med. 2018;7(12):503. Published 2018 Dec 1. doi:10.3390/jcm7120503 https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6306777/

Gielen S, Schuler G, Adams V. Cardiovascular effects of exercise training: molecular mechanisms. Circulation. 2010;122(12):1221-1238. doi:10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.110.939959 https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/20855669/

Muscella A, Stefàno E, Marsigliante S. The effects of exercise training on lipid metabolism and coronary heart disease. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol. 2020;319(1):H76-H88. doi:10.1152/ajpheart.00708.2019 https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/32442027/

Wilson MG, Ellison GM, Cable NT. Basic science behind the cardiovascular benefits of exercise. Heart. 2015;101(10):758-765. doi:10.1136/heartjnl-2014-306596 https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/25911667/

Franklin BA, Eijsvogels TMH, Pandey A, Quindry J, Toth PP. Physical activity, cardiorespiratory fitness, and cardiovascular health: A clinical practice statement of the ASPC Part I: Bioenergetics, contemporary physical activity recommendations, benefits, risks, extreme exercise regimens, potential maladaptations. Am J Prev Cardiol. 2022;12:100424. Published 2022 Oct 13. doi:10.1016/j.ajpc.2022.100424 https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/36281324/

Rao P, Belanger MJ, Robbins JM. Exercise, Physical Activity, and Cardiometabolic Health: Insights into the Prevention and Treatment of Cardiometabolic Diseases. Cardiol Rev. 2022;30(4):167-178. doi:10.1097/CRD.0000000000000416 https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8920940/

Myers J, Kokkinos P, Nyelin E. Physical Activity, Cardiorespiratory Fitness, and the Metabolic Syndrome. Nutrients. 2019;11(7):1652. Published 2019 Jul 19. doi:10.3390/nu11071652 https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6683051/

Giallauria F, Strisciuglio T, Cuomo G, et al. Exercise Training: The Holistic Approach in Cardiovascular Prevention. High Blood Press Cardiovasc Prev. 2021;28(6):561-577. doi:10.1007/s40292-021-00482-6 https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8590648/

Franklin BA, Wedig IJ, Sallis RE, Lavie CJ, Elmer SJ. Physical Activity and Cardiorespiratory Fitness as Modulators of Health Outcomes: A Compelling Research-Based Case Presented to the Medical Community. Mayo Clin Proc. 2023;98(2):316-331. doi:10.1016/j.mayocp.2022.09.011 https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/36737120/

Reimers CD, Knapp G, Reimers AK. Does physical activity increase life expectancy? A review of the literature. J Aging Res. 2012;2012:243958. doi:10.1155/2012/243958 https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3395188/

Santos AC, Willumsen J, Meheus F, Ilbawi A, Bull FC. The cost of inaction on physical inactivity to public health-care systems: a population-attributable fraction analysis. Lancet Glob Health. 2023;11(1):e32-e39. doi:10.1016/S2214-109X(22)00464-8 https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/36480931/

Lee IM, Shiroma EJ, Lobelo F, et al. Effect of physical inactivity on major non-communicable diseases worldwide: an analysis of burden of disease and life expectancy. Lancet. 2012;380(9838):219-229. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(12)61031-9 https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/22818936/

Guthold R, Stevens GA, Riley LM, Bull FC. Worldwide trends in insufficient physical activity from 2001 to 2016: a pooled analysis of 358 population-based surveys with 1·9 million participants [published correction appears in Lancet Glob Health. 2019 Jan;7(1):e36]. Lancet Glob Health. 2018;6(10):e1077-e1086. doi:10.1016/S2214-109X(18)30357-7 https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/30193830/

Duggal NA, Niemiro G, Harridge SDR, Simpson RJ, Lord JM. Can physical activity ameliorate immunosenescence and thereby reduce age-related multi-morbidity?. Nat Rev Immunol. 2019;19(9):563-572. doi:10.1038/s41577-019-0177-9 https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/31175337/

Nusselder WJ, Franco OH, Peeters A, Mackenbach JP. Living healthier for longer: comparative effects of three heart-healthy behaviors on life expectancy with and without cardiovascular disease. BMC Public Health. 2009;9:487. Published 2009 Dec 24. doi:10.1186/1471-2458-9-487 https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2813239/

Gremeaux V, Gayda M, Lepers R, Sosner P, Juneau M, Nigam A. Exercise and longevity. Maturitas. 2012;73(4):312-317. doi:10.1016/j.maturitas.2012.09.012 https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/23063021/

Wen CP, Wai JP, Tsai MK, et al. Minimum amount of physical activity for reduced mortality and extended life expectancy: a prospective cohort study. Lancet. 2011;378(9798):1244-1253. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(11)60749-6 https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/21846575/

Kopp M, Burtscher M. Aiming at Optimal Physical Activity for Longevity (OPAL). Sports Med Open. 2021;7(1):70. Published 2021 Oct 9. doi:10.1186/s40798-021-00360-4 https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8502188/

Lee IM, Paffenbarger RS Jr, Hennekens CH. Physical activity, physical fitness and longevity. Aging (Milano). 1997;9(1-2):2-11. doi:10.1007/BF03340123 https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/9177581/

Sheehan CM, Li L. Associations of Exercise Types with All-Cause Mortality among U.S. Adults. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2020;52(12):2554-2562. doi:10.1249/MSS.0000000000002406 https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/32520868/

Lear SA, Hu W, Rangarajan S, et al. The effect of physical activity on mortality and cardiovascular disease in 130 000 people from 17 high-income, middle-income, and low-income countries: the PURE study [published correction appears in Lancet. 2017 Dec 16;390(10113):2626]. Lancet. 2017;390(10113):2643-2654. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(17)31634-3 https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/28943267/

Bull FC, Al-Ansari SS, Biddle S, et al. World Health Organization 2020 guidelines on physical activity and sedentary behaviour. Br J Sports Med. 2020;54(24):1451-1462. doi:10.1136/bjsports-2020-102955 https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/33239350/

Piercy KL, Troiano RP, Ballard RM, et al. The Physical Activity Guidelines for Americans. JAMA. 2018;320(19):2020-2028. doi:10.1001/jama.2018.14854 https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/30418471/

O’Donovan G, Blazevich AJ, Boreham C, et al. The ABC of Physical Activity for Health: a consensus statement from the British Association of Sport and Exercise Sciences. J Sports Sci. 2010;28(6):573-591. doi:10.1080/02640411003671212 https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/20401789/

Haskell WL, Lee IM, Pate RR, et al. Physical activity and public health: updated recommendation for adults from the American College of Sports Medicine and the American Heart Association. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2007;39(8):1423-1434. doi:10.1249/mss.0b013e3180616b27 https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/17762377/

Du Y, Liu B, Sun Y, Snetselaar LG, Wallace RB, Bao W. Trends in Adherence to the Physical Activity Guidelines for Americans for Aerobic Activity and Time Spent on Sedentary Behavior Among US Adults, 2007 to 2016. JAMA Netw Open. 2019;2(7):e197597. Published 2019 Jul 3. doi:10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2019.7597 https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/31348504/

Ding D, Mutrie N, Bauman A, Pratt M, Hallal PRC, Powell KE. Physical activity guidelines 2020: comprehensive and inclusive recommendations to activate populations. Lancet. 2020;396(10265):1780-1782. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(20)32229-7 https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/33248019/

DiPietro L, Al-Ansari SS, Biddle SJH, et al. Advancing the global physical activity agenda: recommendations for future research by the 2020 WHO physical activity and sedentary behavior guidelines development group. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2020;17(1):143. Published 2020 Nov 26. doi:10.1186/s12966-020-01042-2 https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/33239105/

Burtscher J, Burtscher M. Run for your life: tweaking the weekly physical activity volume for longevity. Br J Sports Med. 2020;54(13):759-760. doi:10.1136/bjsports-2019-101350 https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/31630092/

Marin-Couture E, Pérusse L, Tremblay A. The fit-active profile to better reflect the benefits of a lifelong vigorous physical activity participation: mini-review of literature and population data. Appl Physiol Nutr Metab. 2021;46(7):763-770. doi:10.1139/apnm-2020-1109 https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/33667123/

O’Keefe JH, O’Keefe EL, Lavie CJ. The Goldilocks Zone for Exercise: Not Too Little, Not Too Much. Mo Med. 2018;115(2):98-105. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6139866/

O’Keefe JH, O’Keefe EL, Eckert R, Lavie CJ. Training Strategies to Optimize Cardiovascular Durability and Life Expectancy. Mo Med. 2023;120(2):155-162. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10121111/

Lee DH, Rezende LFM, Joh HK, et al. Long-Term Leisure-Time Physical Activity Intensity and All-Cause and Cause-Specific Mortality: A Prospective Cohort of US Adults. Circulation. 2022;146(7):523-534. doi:10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.121.058162 https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9378548/

Master H, Annis J, Huang S, et al. Association of step counts over time with the risk of chronic disease in the All of Us Research Program [published correction appears in Nat Med. 2023 Dec;29(12):3270]. Nat Med. 2022;28(11):2301-2308. doi:10.1038/s41591-022-02012-w https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/36216933/

Choi BC, Pak AW, Choi JC, Choi EC. Daily step goal of 10,000 steps: a literature review. Clin Invest Med. 2007;30(3):E146-E151. doi:10.25011/cim.v30i3.1083 https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/17716553/

Tudor-Locke C, Bassett DR Jr. How many steps/day are enough? Preliminary pedometer indices for public health. Sports Med. 2004;34(1):1-8. doi:10.2165/00007256-200434010-00001 https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/14715035/

Paluch AE, Bajpai S, Bassett DR, et al. Daily steps and all-cause mortality: a meta-analysis of 15 international cohorts. Lancet Public Health. 2022;7(3):e219-e228. doi:10.1016/S2468-2667(21)00302-9 https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/35247352/

Hall KS, Hyde ET, Bassett DR, et al. Systematic review of the prospective association of daily step counts with risk of mortality, cardiovascular disease, and dysglycemia. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2020;17(1):78. Published 2020 Jun 20. doi:10.1186/s12966-020-00978-9 https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7305604/

Yuenyongchaiwat K. Effects of 10,000 steps a day on physical and mental health in overweight participants in a community setting: a preliminary study. Braz J Phys Ther. 2016;20(4):367-373. doi:10.1590/bjpt-rbf.2014.0160 https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/27556393/

Ahmadi MN, Rezende LFM, Ferrari G, Del Pozo Cruz B, Lee IM, Stamatakis E. Do the associations of daily steps with mortality and incident cardiovascular disease differ by sedentary time levels? A device-based cohort study. Br J Sports Med. 2024;58(5):261-268. Published 2024 Mar 8. doi:10.1136/bjsports-2023-107221 https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/38442950/

Castres I, Tourny C, Lemaitre F, Coquart J. Impact of a walking program of 10,000 steps per day and dietary counseling on health-related quality of life, energy expenditure and anthropometric parameters in obese subjects. J Endocrinol Invest. 2017;40(2):135-141. doi:10.1007/s40618-016-0530-9 https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/27600387/

Morgan AL, Tobar DA, Snyder L. Walking toward a new me: the impact of prescribed walking 10,000 steps/day on physical and psychological well-being. J Phys Act Health. 2010;7(3):299-307. doi:10.1123/jpah.7.3.299 https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/20551485/

Paddy Farrell

Hey, I'm Paddy!

I am a coach who loves to help people master their health and fitness. I am a personal trainer, strength and conditioning coach, and I have a degree in Biochemistry and Biomolecular Science. I have been coaching people for over 10 years now.

When I grew up, you couldn't find great health and fitness information, and you still can't really. So my content aims to solve that!

I enjoy training in the gym, doing martial arts and hiking in the mountains (around Europe, mainly). I am also an avid reader of history, politics and science. When I am not in the mountains, exercising or reading, you will likely find me in a museum.