Skip to main content

Cheese, Mexican, blend, reduced fat

Dairy Per 100 g · Per 100g serving
Data sources: 52 AFCD 16 SR Legacy
Contains: 🥛 Milk

Cheese, Mexican, blend, reduced fat is a dairy/egg product, containing 324 calories per 100g. It is an excellent source of Phosphorus, Calcium and Vitamin B12, providing 81%, 80% and 79% of the Daily Value respectively. This dairy/egg product is high in protein. Dairy products and eggs provide high-quality protein, calcium, and essential vitamins. They are significant dietary sources of vitamin B12, riboflavin, and phosphorus. Our database tracks 68 nutrients for this food, plus environmental footprint data.

324
Calories
kcal
27.9
Protein
g
23.4
Fat
g
3.4
Carbs
g
0
Fiber
g

Top Nutrients

💎
Phosphorus
570 mg
81% DV
💎
Calcium
800 mg
80% DV
☀️
Vitamin B12
1.9 µg
79% DV

Data for 68 of 150 tracked nutrients

Nutrient Fingerprint

How this food scores across key nutrient categories, as a percentage of the daily recommended value per 100 g. Based on USDA DRIs for adults.

Complete Nutrient Profile

Macronutrients 10
NutrientPer 100gUnitPer Serving% DV
Water AFCD41.7g
1%
Calories AFCD324kcal
Energy (kJ) SR1,181kj
Protein AFCD27.9g
50%
Total Fat AFCD23.4g
Carbohydrate SR3.4g
3%
Fiber AFCD0g
Total Sugars SR0.56g
Starch AFCD0g
Ash AFCD4.1g
Minerals 10
NutrientPer 100gUnitPer Serving% DV
Calcium AFCD800mg
80%
Iron AFCD0mg
Magnesium AFCD32.0mg
8%
Phosphorus AFCD570mg
81%
Potassium AFCD110mg
3%
Sodium AFCD550mg
37%
Zinc AFCD3.9mg
36%
Copper AFCD0.03mg
3%
Manganese AFCD0.04mg
2%
Selenium AFCD16.9µg
31%
Vitamins 25
NutrientPer 100gUnitPer Serving% DV
Vitamin A (RAE) AFCD173µg
19%
Vitamin A (IU) SR155IU
Retinol AFCD150µg
Beta-Carotene AFCD140µg
Alpha-Carotene AFCD0µg
Beta-Cryptoxanthin AFCD0µg
Lycopene SR0µg
Lutein + Zeaxanthin SR0µg
Vitamin C AFCD0mg
Vitamin D SR0.40µg
3%
Vitamin D (IU) AFCD0.59IU
Vitamin D2 AFCD0.05µg
Vitamin D3 AFCD0.17µg
Vitamin E AFCD0.40mg
3%
Vitamin K1 SR1.6µg
1%
Thiamin (B1) AFCD0.04mg
3%
Riboflavin (B2) AFCD0.40mg
31%
Niacin (B3) AFCD0.26mg
2%
Vitamin B6 AFCD0.04mg
3%
Folate AFCD52.0µg
13%
Folic Acid SR0µg
Folate (food) AFCD52.0µg
Folate (DFE) AFCD52.0µg
Vitamin B12 AFCD1.9µg
79%
Choline SR13.5mg
2%
Fatty Acids 9
NutrientPer 100gUnitPer Serving% DV
Saturated Fat AFCD15.1g
Monounsaturated Fat AFCD5.5g
Polyunsaturated Fat AFCD1.0g
Trans Fat AFCD0.49g
Cholesterol AFCD85.0mg
Omega-3 ALA AFCD0.27g
17%
Omega-3 EPA AFCD0.03g
Omega-3 DPA AFCD0.04g
Omega-3 DHA AFCD0g
Individual Fatty Acids 10
NutrientPer 100gUnitPer Serving% DV
Butyric Acid (4:0) SR0.72g
Caproic Acid (6:0) SR0.42g
Caprylic Acid (8:0) AFCD2.6g
Capric Acid (10:0) AFCD6.4g
Lauric Acid (12:0) AFCD2.3g
Myristic Acid (14:0) AFCD0.33g
Palmitic Acid (16:0) SR5.0g
Stearic Acid (18:0) SR2.2g
Linoleic Acid (18:2) AFCD0.45g
3%
Linolenic Acid (18:3) SR0.13g
Amino Acids 1
NutrientPer 100gUnitPer Serving% DV
Tryptophan AFCD0.24g
Other 3
NutrientPer 100gUnitPer Serving% DV
Caffeine AFCD0mg
Theobromine SR0mg
Alcohol AFCD0g

Nutrient Density Score

The NRF9.3 score measures overall nutritional quality per 100 kcal. It rewards 9 nutrients to encourage (protein, fiber, vitamins A, C, E, calcium, iron, magnesium, potassium) and penalizes 3 to limit (saturated fat, added sugars, sodium). Higher is better; negative scores indicate the food is high in limit nutrients relative to its beneficial content.

15
NRF9.3 Score
Moderate · per 100 kcal
Poor (<0) Moderate Good Excellent (100+)

NRF9.3 index: Fulgoni et al. (2009), J Nutr 139(8). DVs based on FDA 2020 reference values.

Nutrient Interactions in This Food

Nutrients in this food that enhance or compete with each other during absorption.

✔ Synergies — nutrients that help each other

Dietary Fat + Vitamin A●●●

Vitamin A is fat-soluble and requires dietary fat for absorption. Adding fat to a meal significantly increases beta-carotene and retinol absorption.

Ribaya-Mercado et al., Am J Clin Nutr, 2007

Vitamin B12 + Folate●●

Vitamin B12 and folate are metabolically interdependent. B12 is needed to convert methyltetrahydrofolate back to tetrahydrofolate, enabling folate to participate in DNA synthesis.

Green et al., Nat Rev Dis Primers, 2017

Protein + Calcium●●

Moderate protein intake enhances calcium absorption and supports bone health. The acid-ash hypothesis suggesting protein harms bones has been largely disproven.

Kerstetter et al., J Clin Endocrinol Metab, 2005

⚠ Antagonisms — nutrients that compete

Calcium vs Magnesium●●

Very high calcium intake can reduce magnesium absorption by competing for shared intestinal transport pathways. A calcium:magnesium ratio above 2.6:1 may impair magnesium status.

Rosanoff et al., Nutr Rev, 2012

Calcium vs Zinc●●

High calcium intake may modestly reduce zinc absorption, though the effect is smaller than calcium's impact on iron. Phytate amplifies this interaction.

Wood & Zheng, Am J Clin Nutr, 1997

Folate vs Vitamin B12●●

High folate intake can mask vitamin B12 deficiency by correcting the megaloblastic anaemia while allowing neurological damage to progress undetected.

Mills et al., Am J Clin Nutr, 2003

Fatty Acid Profile

Breakdown of fat types per 100g. A healthy fat profile favours unsaturated fats (mono + poly) and a balanced omega-3 to omega-6 ratio.

15.1g
Saturated
5.5g
Monounsaturated
1.0g
Polyunsaturated
1:1.4
Omega-3 : Omega-6 Ratio
Omega-6 dominant — ideal range is 1:1 to 1:4
Omega Fatty Acids
EPA (20:5 n-3)0.03 g
ALA (18:3 n-3)0.27 g
DPA (22:5 n-3)0.04 g
Linoleic acid (18:2 n-6)0.45 g
⚠ Trans fat: 0.49 g per 100g. WHO recommends less than 1% of total energy from trans fats.

How Cooking Changes Nutrients

Estimated percentage of each nutrient retained after cooking, based on USDA retention factors for the “Cheese” food category. Values of 100% mean no loss; lower values indicate nutrients lost to heat, water, or oxidation.

Source: USDA Table of Nutrient Retention Factors, Release 6 (2007). Retention values are category-level averages — actual retention depends on cooking time, temperature, and water volume.

USDA Retention Factors

Environmental Impact

Environmental footprint per kilogram of food produced. Data represents the global average for the “Cheese” category.

23.7
kg CO₂e / kg
Very High Impact
87.8
m² land / kg
Land Use
5,605
L water / kg
Water Use
166
g SO₂e / kg
Acidification
How this compares (GHG emissions)
Potatoes (0.5)Chicken (9.9)Beef (99.5)
Greenhouse Gas Emissions23.7 kg CO₂e / kg
Land Use87.8 m² / kg
Water Use5,605 L / kg
Eutrophication98.4 g PO₄e / kg
Acidification166 g SO₂e / kg
⚠️ Important context about this data
  • Global averages: These figures are production-weighted averages from a meta-analysis of ~38,700 farms across 119 countries (Poore & Nemecek, 2018). Actual impact varies enormously by farming method, geography, and supply chain.
  • System boundary: Cradle-to-retail only — does not include consumer transport, home cooking energy, or food waste.
  • Soil carbon not included: This data does not account for soil carbon sequestration. Some argue that well-managed regenerative grazing partially offsets ruminant emissions; however, full lifecycle accounting — including methane, land-use change, and the opportunity cost of using land for grazing vs. reforestation — typically makes the net footprint of ruminant meat higher, not lower. This is especially relevant in temperate grassland regions like Ireland.
  • Not gospel: This data is informational and illustrative. It is useful for understanding relative magnitudes, but should not be treated as precise measurements for any individual product or farm.

Source: Poore & Nemecek (2018), Science 360(6392). Meta-analysis of ~38,700 farms, 119 countries, 46 product categories.

Global Supply: Milk

Top 10 countries by per capita supply of the “Milk” food group (kcal/capita/day, 2023). This is food group–level data from FAO Food Balance Sheets, not specific to this individual food.

1.
Estonia
632
2.
Montenegro
607
3.
Netherlands (Kingdom of the)
596
4.
Albania
572
5.
Belgium
543
6.
Turkmenistan
539
7.
Finland
533
8.
Uzbekistan
532
9.
Denmark
530
10.
Germany
528

Global Supply Trend (1961–2023)

+25%
1961: 142 kcal2023: 177 kcal

Source: FAO Food Balance Sheets (2023). Supply = production + imports − exports − waste, converted to kcal/capita/day.

Frequently Asked Questions

How many calories are in Cheese, Mexican, blend, reduced fat?

Cheese, Mexican, blend, reduced fat contains 324 kcal per 100 grams, making it a calorie-dense food. The energy comes from 27.9g of protein (34% of calories), 23.4g of fat (65%), and 3.4g of carbohydrates (4%). Fat is the primary energy source.

What is Cheese, Mexican, blend, reduced fat most nutritious for?

The standout nutrient in Cheese, Mexican, blend, reduced fat is Phosphorus, providing 570 mg per 100g (81% of the Daily Value). It is also a notable source of Calcium (80% DV). Our database tracks 68 individual nutrients for this food, allowing detailed comparison across vitamins, minerals, amino acids, and fatty acids.

Is Cheese, Mexican, blend, reduced fat high in protein?

With 27.9g per 100 grams, Cheese, Mexican, blend, reduced fat is a high-protein food. Protein accounts for 34% of its total calories, making it suitable for diets focused on protein intake.

How much fiber is in Cheese, Mexican, blend, reduced fat?

Cheese, Mexican, blend, reduced fat contains no dietary fiber. This is typical for animal-derived food. Pair with plant-based foods to ensure adequate fiber intake.