Skip to main content

Mollusks, mussel, blue, cooked, moist heat

Fish/Seafood Per 100 g · Per 100g serving
Data sources: 46 AFCD 30 SR Legacy
Contains: 🦐 Shellfish

Mollusks, mussel, blue, cooked, moist heat is a seafood at 172 calories per 100g. It is an excellent source of Vitamin B12, Manganese and Selenium, providing 833%, 296% and 174% of the Daily Value respectively. This seafood is high in protein. Fish and shellfish are valued for their high-quality protein and omega-3 fatty acid content. Many dietary guidelines recommend consuming seafood at least twice per week. Our database tracks 76 nutrients for this food, plus insulin index, environmental footprint data.

172
Calories
kcal
23.8
Protein
g
4.5
Fat
g
7.4
Carbs
g
0
Fiber
g

Top Nutrients

☀️
Vitamin B12
20.0 µg
833% DV
💎
Manganese
6.8 mg
296% DV
💎
Selenium
96.0 µg
174% DV

Data for 76 of 150 tracked nutrients

Nutrient Fingerprint

How this food scores across key nutrient categories, as a percentage of the daily recommended value per 100 g. Based on USDA DRIs for adults.

Complete Nutrient Profile

Macronutrients 10
NutrientPer 100gUnitPer Serving% DV
Water AFCD75.2g
2%
Calories SR172kcal
Energy (kJ) SR720kj
Protein SR23.8g
42%
Total Fat SR4.5g
Carbohydrate SR7.4g
6%
Fiber AFCD0g
Total Sugars AFCD0g
Starch AFCD0g
Ash AFCD1.7g
Minerals 10
NutrientPer 100gUnitPer Serving% DV
Calcium AFCD173mg
17%
Iron AFCD3.0mg
37%
Magnesium AFCD76.0mg
19%
Phosphorus AFCD122mg
17%
Potassium AFCD130mg
4%
Sodium AFCD353mg
24%
Zinc AFCD3.1mg
28%
Copper SR0.15mg
17%
Manganese SR6.8mg
296%
Selenium AFCD96.0µg
174%
Vitamins 19
NutrientPer 100gUnitPer Serving% DV
Vitamin A (RAE) AFCD57.0µg
6%
Vitamin A (IU) SR91.0IU
Retinol AFCD57.0µg
Beta-Carotene AFCD0µg
Vitamin C AFCD5.0mg
6%
Vitamin D (IU) AFCD0.30IU
Vitamin D2 AFCD0.05µg
Vitamin D3 AFCD0.25µg
Vitamin E AFCD1.0mg
7%
Thiamin (B1) AFCD0mg
Riboflavin (B2) AFCD0.07mg
5%
Niacin (B3) AFCD0.73mg
5%
Pantothenic Acid (B5) SR0.95mg
19%
Vitamin B6 AFCD0.08mg
6%
Folate AFCD23.0µg
6%
Folic Acid SR0µg
Folate (food) AFCD23.0µg
Folate (DFE) AFCD23.0µg
Vitamin B12 AFCD20.0µg
833%
Fatty Acids 9
NutrientPer 100gUnitPer Serving% DV
Saturated Fat AFCD0.37g
Monounsaturated Fat AFCD0.20g
Polyunsaturated Fat AFCD0.79g
Trans Fat AFCD0.05g
Cholesterol AFCD94.0mg
Omega-3 ALA AFCD0.06g
4%
Omega-3 EPA AFCD0.19g
Omega-3 DPA AFCD0.02g
Omega-3 DHA AFCD0.40g
Individual Fatty Acids 8
NutrientPer 100gUnitPer Serving% DV
Caprylic Acid (8:0) AFCD0g
Capric Acid (10:0) AFCD0.28g
Lauric Acid (12:0) AFCD0.07g
Myristic Acid (14:0) AFCD0.07g
Palmitic Acid (16:0) SR0.59g
Stearic Acid (18:0) SR0.14g
Linoleic Acid (18:2) AFCD0.04g
0%
Linolenic Acid (18:3) SR0.04g
Amino Acids 18
NutrientPer 100gUnitPer Serving% DV
Tryptophan AFCD0.18g
Threonine SR1.0g
Isoleucine SR1.0g
Leucine SR1.7g
Lysine SR1.8g
Methionine SR0.54g
Cystine SR0.31g
Phenylalanine SR0.85g
Tyrosine SR0.76g
Valine SR1.0g
Arginine SR1.7g
Histidine SR0.46g
Alanine SR1.4g
Aspartic Acid SR2.3g
Glutamic Acid SR3.2g
Glycine SR1.5g
Proline SR0.97g
Serine SR1.1g
Other 2
NutrientPer 100gUnitPer Serving% DV
Caffeine AFCD0mg
Alcohol AFCD0g

Nutrient Density Score

The NRF9.3 score measures overall nutritional quality per 100 kcal. It rewards 9 nutrients to encourage (protein, fiber, vitamins A, C, E, calcium, iron, magnesium, potassium) and penalizes 3 to limit (saturated fat, added sugars, sodium). Higher is better; negative scores indicate the food is high in limit nutrients relative to its beneficial content.

58
NRF9.3 Score
Good · per 100 kcal
Poor (<0) Moderate Good Excellent (100+)

NRF9.3 index: Fulgoni et al. (2009), J Nutr 139(8). DVs based on FDA 2020 reference values.

Nutrient Interactions in This Food

Nutrients in this food that enhance or compete with each other during absorption.

✔ Synergies — nutrients that help each other

Vitamin C + Iron●●●

Vitamin C dramatically enhances non-heme iron absorption by reducing Fe³⁺ to Fe²⁺ in the gut. Adding 75 mg vitamin C to a meal can increase iron absorption 3–4 fold.

Hallberg et al., Am J Clin Nutr, 1989

Dietary Fat + Vitamin A●●●

Vitamin A is fat-soluble and requires dietary fat for absorption. Adding fat to a meal significantly increases beta-carotene and retinol absorption.

Ribaya-Mercado et al., Am J Clin Nutr, 2007

Dietary Fat + Vitamin E●●●

Vitamin E is fat-soluble and absorbed alongside dietary fats via micelle formation in the small intestine. Low-fat diets reduce vitamin E absorption.

Traber, Free Radic Biol Med, 2007

Vitamin C + Vitamin E●●

Vitamin C regenerates oxidised vitamin E (tocopheroxyl radical) back to its active form, extending its antioxidant function in cell membranes.

Niki, Free Radic Biol Med, 2014

Vitamin B12 + Folate●●

Vitamin B12 and folate are metabolically interdependent. B12 is needed to convert methyltetrahydrofolate back to tetrahydrofolate, enabling folate to participate in DNA synthesis.

Green et al., Nat Rev Dis Primers, 2017

⚠ Antagonisms — nutrients that compete

Calcium vs Iron●●●

Calcium inhibits both heme and non-heme iron absorption when consumed in the same meal. The effect is dose-dependent, with significant inhibition at 300+ mg calcium.

Hallberg et al., Am J Clin Nutr, 1991

Zinc vs Copper●●●

High zinc intake induces metallothionein in enterocytes, which traps copper and blocks its absorption. Prolonged high-dose zinc can cause copper deficiency.

Prasad et al., JAMA, 1978; Fosmire, Am J Clin Nutr, 1990

Zinc vs Iron●●

Zinc and non-heme iron compete for the same intestinal transporter (DMT1). High doses of one can reduce absorption of the other when taken simultaneously.

Rossander-Hulten et al., Am J Clin Nutr, 1991

Calcium vs Magnesium●●

Very high calcium intake can reduce magnesium absorption by competing for shared intestinal transport pathways. A calcium:magnesium ratio above 2.6:1 may impair magnesium status.

Rosanoff et al., Nutr Rev, 2012

Calcium vs Zinc●●

High calcium intake may modestly reduce zinc absorption, though the effect is smaller than calcium's impact on iron. Phytate amplifies this interaction.

Wood & Zheng, Am J Clin Nutr, 1997

Amino Acid Profile

Essential amino acid composition compared to the WHO/FAO adult reference pattern. The Amino Acid Score indicates protein quality — 100 means all essential amino acid requirements are met.

112
Amino Acid Score
Complete
Valine
Lowest Scoring
18
Amino Acids Tracked

✓ Complete protein — all essential amino acids meet or exceed WHO reference levels.

All Amino Acids (18)
Amino Acidg / 100gmg / g protein
Tryptophan0.187.5
Threonine1.043.1
Isoleucine1.043.5
Leucine1.770.4
Lysine1.874.7
Methionine0.5422.6
Cystine0.3113.1
Phenylalanine0.8535.8
Tyrosine0.7632.0
Valine1.043.7
Arginine1.773.0
Histidine0.4619.2
Alanine1.460.5
Aspartic Acid2.396.5
Glutamic Acid3.2136.1
Glycine1.562.6
Proline0.9740.8
Serine1.144.8

Fatty Acid Profile

Breakdown of fat types per 100g. A healthy fat profile favours unsaturated fats (mono + poly) and a balanced omega-3 to omega-6 ratio.

0.37g
Saturated
0.20g
Monounsaturated
0.79g
Polyunsaturated
16.8:1
Omega-3 : Omega-6 Ratio
Omega-3 dominant — ideal range is 1:1 to 1:4
Omega Fatty Acids
EPA (20:5 n-3)0.19 g
DHA (22:6 n-3)0.40 g
ALA (18:3 n-3)0.06 g
DPA (22:5 n-3)0.02 g
Linoleic acid (18:2 n-6)0.04 g

How Cooking Changes Nutrients

Estimated percentage of each nutrient retained after cooking, based on USDA retention factors for the “Shellfish” food category. Values of 100% mean no loss; lower values indicate nutrients lost to heat, water, or oxidation.

Key insights
Vitamin B12 loses up to 25% when simmered. Baked retains 100%.
Folate loses up to 25% when steamed. Broiled / Grilled retains 95%.
Vitamin C loses up to 22% when simmered. Broiled / Grilled retains 95%.

Source: USDA Table of Nutrient Retention Factors, Release 6 (2007). Retention values are category-level averages — actual retention depends on cooking time, temperature, and water volume.

USDA Retention Factors

Insulin Response

The Insulin Index (II) measures the actual insulin response to food on a scale where white bread = 100. Unlike the Glycemic Index (which only measures blood sugar), the II captures the full hormonal response — including the effect of protein and fat on insulin secretion. This is why high-protein foods like meat and dairy can have significant insulin scores despite having low or zero GI values.

55
Insulin Index
Moderate Insulin Response
Insulin Index Scale 55
0 Low ≤30 Mod ≤60 High ≤100 120
Category ●● Assigned from measured food category

Source: Holt et al. 1997; Bao et al. 2016; Bell 2014

Environmental Impact

Environmental footprint per kilogram of food produced. Data represents the global average for the “Crustaceans (farmed)” category.

26.9
kg CO₂e / kg
Very High Impact
3.0
m² land / kg
Land Use
3,515
L water / kg
Water Use
183
g SO₂e / kg
Acidification
How this compares (GHG emissions)
Potatoes (0.5)Chicken (9.9)Beef (99.5)
Greenhouse Gas Emissions26.9 kg CO₂e / kg
Land Use3.0 m² / kg
Water Use3,515 L / kg
Eutrophication228 g PO₄e / kg
Acidification183 g SO₂e / kg
⚠️ Important context about this data
  • Global averages: These figures are production-weighted averages from a meta-analysis of ~38,700 farms across 119 countries (Poore & Nemecek, 2018). Actual impact varies enormously by farming method, geography, and supply chain.
  • System boundary: Cradle-to-retail only — does not include consumer transport, home cooking energy, or food waste.
  • Soil carbon not included: This data does not account for soil carbon sequestration. Some argue that well-managed regenerative grazing partially offsets ruminant emissions; however, full lifecycle accounting — including methane, land-use change, and the opportunity cost of using land for grazing vs. reforestation — typically makes the net footprint of ruminant meat higher, not lower. This is especially relevant in temperate grassland regions like Ireland.
  • Not gospel: This data is informational and illustrative. It is useful for understanding relative magnitudes, but should not be treated as precise measurements for any individual product or farm.

Source: Poore & Nemecek (2018), Science 360(6392). Meta-analysis of ~38,700 farms, 119 countries, 46 product categories.

Global Supply: Fish & Seafood

Top 10 countries by per capita supply of the “Fish & Seafood” food group (kcal/capita/day, 2023). This is food group–level data from FAO Food Balance Sheets, not specific to this individual food.

1.
Iceland
161
2.
Maldives
157
3.
Kiribati
146
4.
Japan
132
5.
Micronesia
118
6.
Tuvalu
113
7.
Samoa
108
8.
Micronesia (Federated States of)
101
9.
Antigua and Barbuda
97
10.
Barbados
95

Global Supply Trend (1961–2023)

+62%
1961: 24 kcal2023: 39 kcal

Source: FAO Food Balance Sheets (2023). Supply = production + imports − exports − waste, converted to kcal/capita/day.

Frequently Asked Questions

How many calories are in Mollusks, mussel, blue, cooked, moist heat?

Mollusks, mussel, blue, cooked, moist heat contains 172 kcal per 100 grams, making it a moderate-calorie food. The energy comes from 23.8g of protein (55% of calories), 4.5g of fat (23%), and 7.4g of carbohydrates (17%). Protein is the primary energy source.

What is Mollusks, mussel, blue, cooked, moist heat most nutritious for?

The standout nutrient in Mollusks, mussel, blue, cooked, moist heat is Vitamin B12, providing 20.0 µg per 100g (833% of the Daily Value). It is also a notable source of Manganese (296% DV). Our database tracks 76 individual nutrients for this food, allowing detailed comparison across vitamins, minerals, amino acids, and fatty acids.

Is Mollusks, mussel, blue, cooked, moist heat high in protein?

With 23.8g per 100 grams, Mollusks, mussel, blue, cooked, moist heat is a high-protein food. Protein accounts for 55% of its total calories, making it suitable for diets focused on protein intake.

How much fiber is in Mollusks, mussel, blue, cooked, moist heat?

Mollusks, mussel, blue, cooked, moist heat contains no dietary fiber. This is typical for animal-derived food. Pair with plant-based foods to ensure adequate fiber intake.

What is the insulin index of Mollusks, mussel, blue, cooked, moist heat?

Mollusks, mussel, blue, cooked, moist heat has a moderate insulin response (II: 55) (estimated from macronutrient composition) on the insulin index scale (white bread = 100). This is a typical insulin response for most mixed foods. Note that the insulin index can differ substantially from the glycemic index — dairy products and high-protein foods often have higher insulin responses than their GI would suggest.