Rolls, hamburger, whole grain white, calcium-fortified
Rolls, hamburger, whole grain white, calcium-fortified is a baked product at 255 calories per 100g. It provides useful amounts of Thiamin (B1) and Manganese, contributing 44% and 40% of the Daily Value per 100g. Baked goods derive their nutrients primarily from their flour, fat, and enrichment ingredients. Whole-grain varieties generally offer more fiber and micronutrients. Our database tracks 63 nutrients for this food, plus insulin index, environmental footprint data.
Top Nutrients
Data for 63 of 150 tracked nutrients
Nutrient Fingerprint
How this food scores across key nutrient categories, as a percentage of the daily recommended value per 100 g. Based on USDA DRIs for adults.
Complete Nutrient Profile
Macronutrients 9
| Nutrient | Per 100g | Unit | Per Serving | % DV |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Water SR | 38.7 | g | — | 1% |
| Calories SR | 255 | kcal | — | — |
| Energy (kJ) SR | 1,065 | kj | — | — |
| Protein SR | 9.3 | g | — | 17% |
| Total Fat SR | 3.5 | g | — | — |
| Carbohydrate SR | 46.5 | g | — | 36% |
| Fiber SR | 2.3 | g | — | 6% |
| Total Sugars SR | 9.3 | g | — | — |
| Ash SR | 2.0 | g | — | — |
Minerals 10
| Nutrient | Per 100g | Unit | Per Serving | % DV |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium SR | 233 | mg | — | 23% |
| Iron SR | 2.6 | mg | — | 32% |
| Magnesium SR | 38.0 | mg | — | 10% |
| Phosphorus SR | 153 | mg | — | 22% |
| Potassium SR | 190 | mg | — | 6% |
| Sodium SR | 512 | mg | — | 34% |
| Zinc SR | 2.0 | mg | — | 19% |
| Copper SR | 0.18 | mg | — | 20% |
| Manganese SR | 0.93 | mg | — | 40% |
| Selenium SR | 14.0 | µg | — | 26% |
Vitamins 23
| Nutrient | Per 100g | Unit | Per Serving | % DV |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin A (RAE) SR | 2.0 | µg | — | 0% |
| Vitamin A (IU) SR | 0 | IU | — | — |
| Retinol SR | 0 | µg | — | — |
| Beta-Carotene SR | 1.0 | µg | — | — |
| Alpha-Carotene SR | 0 | µg | — | — |
| Beta-Cryptoxanthin SR | 0 | µg | — | — |
| Lycopene SR | 0 | µg | — | — |
| Lutein + Zeaxanthin SR | 52.0 | µg | — | — |
| Vitamin C SR | 0 | mg | — | — |
| Vitamin D SR | 0 | µg | — | — |
| Vitamin D (IU) SR | 0 | IU | — | — |
| Vitamin E SR | 0.33 | mg | — | 2% |
| Vitamin K1 SR | 5.0 | µg | — | 4% |
| Thiamin (B1) SR | 0.52 | mg | — | 44% |
| Riboflavin (B2) SR | 0.32 | mg | — | 24% |
| Niacin (B3) SR | 4.7 | mg | — | 29% |
| Vitamin B6 SR | 0.10 | mg | — | 8% |
| Folate SR | 140 | µg | — | 35% |
| Folic Acid SR | 33.0 | µg | — | — |
| Folate (food) SR | 106 | µg | — | — |
| Folate (DFE) SR | 163 | µg | — | — |
| Vitamin B12 SR | 0 | µg | — | — |
| Choline SR | 12.9 | mg | — | 2% |
Fatty Acids 8
| Nutrient | Per 100g | Unit | Per Serving | % DV |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Saturated Fat SR | 1.2 | g | — | — |
| Monounsaturated Fat SR | 0.56 | g | — | — |
| Polyunsaturated Fat SR | 1.2 | g | — | — |
| Trans Fat SR | 0 | g | — | — |
| Cholesterol SR | 0 | mg | — | — |
| Omega-3 EPA SR | 0 | g | — | — |
| Omega-3 DPA SR | 0 | g | — | — |
| Omega-3 DHA SR | 0 | g | — | — |
Individual Fatty Acids 10
| Nutrient | Per 100g | Unit | Per Serving | % DV |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Butyric Acid (4:0) SR | 0 | g | — | — |
| Caproic Acid (6:0) SR | 0 | g | — | — |
| Caprylic Acid (8:0) SR | 0 | g | — | — |
| Capric Acid (10:0) SR | 0 | g | — | — |
| Lauric Acid (12:0) SR | 0.003 | g | — | — |
| Myristic Acid (14:0) SR | 0 | g | — | — |
| Palmitic Acid (16:0) SR | 0.68 | g | — | — |
| Stearic Acid (18:0) SR | 0.25 | g | — | — |
| Linoleic Acid (18:2) SR | 1.1 | g | — | 6% |
| Linolenic Acid (18:3) SR | 0.14 | g | — | — |
Nutrient Density Score
The NRF9.3 score measures overall nutritional quality per 100 kcal. It rewards 9 nutrients to encourage (protein, fiber, vitamins A, C, E, calcium, iron, magnesium, potassium) and penalizes 3 to limit (saturated fat, added sugars, sodium). Higher is better; negative scores indicate the food is high in limit nutrients relative to its beneficial content.
NRF9.3 index: Fulgoni et al. (2009), J Nutr 139(8). DVs based on FDA 2020 reference values.
Nutrient Interactions in This Food
Nutrients in this food that enhance or compete with each other during absorption.
✔ Synergies — nutrients that help each other
Vitamin B6 may enhance intracellular magnesium accumulation. Combined supplementation has shown greater benefits for stress and anxiety than magnesium alone.
Pouteau et al., PLoS One, 2018
Moderate protein intake enhances calcium absorption and supports bone health. The acid-ash hypothesis suggesting protein harms bones has been largely disproven.
Kerstetter et al., J Clin Endocrinol Metab, 2005
Vitamin B6 is a cofactor in folate-dependent one-carbon metabolism. Together with B12, these three nutrients regulate homocysteine levels.
Selhub, J Nutr Health Aging, 2002
⚠ Antagonisms — nutrients that compete
Calcium inhibits both heme and non-heme iron absorption when consumed in the same meal. The effect is dose-dependent, with significant inhibition at 300+ mg calcium.
Hallberg et al., Am J Clin Nutr, 1991
High zinc intake induces metallothionein in enterocytes, which traps copper and blocks its absorption. Prolonged high-dose zinc can cause copper deficiency.
Prasad et al., JAMA, 1978; Fosmire, Am J Clin Nutr, 1990
Zinc and non-heme iron compete for the same intestinal transporter (DMT1). High doses of one can reduce absorption of the other when taken simultaneously.
Rossander-Hulten et al., Am J Clin Nutr, 1991
Very high calcium intake can reduce magnesium absorption by competing for shared intestinal transport pathways. A calcium:magnesium ratio above 2.6:1 may impair magnesium status.
Rosanoff et al., Nutr Rev, 2012
Phytates in high-fibre foods (whole grains, legumes) bind non-heme iron and reduce its bioavailability. Soaking, sprouting, and fermentation reduce phytate content.
Hurrell & Egli, Int J Vitam Nutr Res, 2010
Fatty Acid Profile
Breakdown of fat types per 100g. A healthy fat profile favours unsaturated fats (mono + poly) and a balanced omega-3 to omega-6 ratio.
How Cooking Changes Nutrients
Estimated percentage of each nutrient retained after cooking, based on USDA retention factors for the “Ham” food category. Values of 100% mean no loss; lower values indicate nutrients lost to heat, water, or oxidation.
Source: USDA Table of Nutrient Retention Factors, Release 6 (2007). Retention values are category-level averages — actual retention depends on cooking time, temperature, and water volume.
Insulin Response
The Insulin Index (II) measures the actual insulin response to food on a scale where white bread = 100. Unlike the Glycemic Index (which only measures blood sugar), the II captures the full hormonal response — including the effect of protein and fat on insulin secretion. This is why high-protein foods like meat and dairy can have significant insulin scores despite having low or zero GI values.
Source: Holt et al. 1997; Bao et al. 2016; Bell 2014
Environmental Impact
Environmental footprint per kilogram of food produced. Data represents the global average for the “Beef (beef herd)” category.
- Global averages: These figures are production-weighted averages from a meta-analysis of ~38,700 farms across 119 countries (Poore & Nemecek, 2018). Actual impact varies enormously by farming method, geography, and supply chain.
- System boundary: Cradle-to-retail only — does not include consumer transport, home cooking energy, or food waste.
- Soil carbon not included: This data does not account for soil carbon sequestration. Some argue that well-managed regenerative grazing partially offsets ruminant emissions; however, full lifecycle accounting — including methane, land-use change, and the opportunity cost of using land for grazing vs. reforestation — typically makes the net footprint of ruminant meat higher, not lower. This is especially relevant in temperate grassland regions like Ireland.
- Not gospel: This data is informational and illustrative. It is useful for understanding relative magnitudes, but should not be treated as precise measurements for any individual product or farm.
Source: Poore & Nemecek (2018), Science 360(6392). Meta-analysis of ~38,700 farms, 119 countries, 46 product categories.
Global Supply: Cereals
Top 10 countries by per capita supply of the “Cereals” food group (kcal/capita/day, 2023). This is food group–level data from FAO Food Balance Sheets, not specific to this individual food.
Global Supply Trend (1961–2023)
+8%Source: FAO Food Balance Sheets (2023). Supply = production + imports − exports − waste, converted to kcal/capita/day.
Related Foods in Baked Products
Frequently Asked Questions
How many calories are in Rolls, hamburger, whole grain white, calcium-fortified?
Rolls, hamburger, whole grain white, calcium-fortified contains 255 kcal per 100 grams, making it a calorie-dense food. The energy comes from 9.3g of protein (15% of calories), 3.5g of fat (12%), and 46.5g of carbohydrates (73%). Carbohydrates are the primary energy source.
What is Rolls, hamburger, whole grain white, calcium-fortified most nutritious for?
The standout nutrient in Rolls, hamburger, whole grain white, calcium-fortified is Thiamin (B1), providing 0.52 mg per 100g (44% of the Daily Value). It is also a notable source of Manganese (40% DV). Our database tracks 63 individual nutrients for this food, allowing detailed comparison across vitamins, minerals, amino acids, and fatty acids.
Is Rolls, hamburger, whole grain white, calcium-fortified high in protein?
Rolls, hamburger, whole grain white, calcium-fortified contains 9.3g of protein per 100 grams. While not a high-protein food, it can contribute to daily protein needs as part of a varied diet.
How much fiber is in Rolls, hamburger, whole grain white, calcium-fortified?
Rolls, hamburger, whole grain white, calcium-fortified contains 2.3g of fiber per 100 grams, which is a small amount. To increase fiber intake, consider pairing with high-fiber foods such as legumes, whole grains, or vegetables.
What is the insulin index of Rolls, hamburger, whole grain white, calcium-fortified?
Rolls, hamburger, whole grain white, calcium-fortified has a moderate insulin response (II: 57) (estimated from macronutrient composition) on the insulin index scale (white bread = 100). This is a typical insulin response for most mixed foods. Note that the insulin index can differ substantially from the glycemic index — dairy products and high-protein foods often have higher insulin responses than their GI would suggest.