Skip to main content

Salmon, sockeye, canned, drained solids, without skin and bones

Fish/Seafood Per 100 g · Per 100g serving
Contains: 🐟 Fish

Salmon, sockeye, canned, drained solids, without skin and bones is a seafood at 158 calories per 100g. It is an excellent source of Vitamin B12, Vitamin D and Selenium, providing 231%, 143% and 63% of the Daily Value respectively. This seafood is high in protein. Fish and shellfish are valued for their high-quality protein and omega-3 fatty acid content. Many dietary guidelines recommend consuming seafood at least twice per week. Our database tracks 86 nutrients for this food, plus insulin index, environmental footprint data.

158
Calories
kcal
26.3
Protein
g
5.9
Fat
g
0
Carbs
g
0
Fiber
g

Top Nutrients

☀️
Vitamin B12
5.5 µg
231% DV
☀️
Vitamin D
21.5 µg
143% DV
💎
Selenium
34.6 µg
63% DV

Data for 86 of 150 tracked nutrients

Nutrient Fingerprint

How this food scores across key nutrient categories, as a percentage of the daily recommended value per 100 g. Based on USDA DRIs for adults.

Complete Nutrient Profile

Macronutrients 9
NutrientPer 100gUnitPer Serving% DV
Water SR67.8g
2%
Calories SR158kcal
Energy (kJ) SR662kj
Protein SR26.3g
47%
Total Fat SR5.9g
Carbohydrate SR0g
Fiber SR0g
Total Sugars SR0g
Ash SR1.9g
Minerals 10
NutrientPer 100gUnitPer Serving% DV
Calcium SR37.0mg
4%
Iron SR0.48mg
6%
Magnesium SR24.0mg
6%
Phosphorus SR236mg
34%
Potassium SR312mg
9%
Sodium SR386mg
26%
Zinc SR0.58mg
5%
Copper SR0.07mg
8%
Manganese SR0.01mg
0%
Selenium SR34.6µg
63%
Vitamins 25
NutrientPer 100gUnitPer Serving% DV
Vitamin A (RAE) SR187µg
21%
Vitamin A (IU) SR56.0IU
Retinol SR56.0µg
Beta-Carotene SR0µg
Alpha-Carotene SR0µg
Beta-Cryptoxanthin SR0µg
Lycopene SR0µg
Lutein + Zeaxanthin SR0µg
Vitamin C SR0mg
Vitamin D SR21.5µg
143%
Vitamin D (IU) SR859IU
Vitamin D2 SR0µg
Vitamin D3 SR21.5µg
Vitamin E SR2.1mg
14%
Vitamin K1 SR0.10µg
0%
Thiamin (B1) SR0.03mg
3%
Riboflavin (B2) SR0.21mg
16%
Niacin (B3) SR7.7mg
48%
Vitamin B6 SR0.12mg
9%
Folate SR4.0µg
1%
Folic Acid SR0µg
Folate (food) SR4.0µg
Folate (DFE) SR4.0µg
Vitamin B12 SR5.5µg
231%
Choline SR83.3mg
15%
Fatty Acids 9
NutrientPer 100gUnitPer Serving% DV
Saturated Fat SR1.2g
Monounsaturated Fat SR1.9g
Polyunsaturated Fat SR1.6g
Trans Fat SR0.03g
Cholesterol SR66.0mg
Omega-3 ALA SR0.04g
3%
Omega-3 EPA SR0.44g
Omega-3 DPA SR0.11g
Omega-3 DHA SR0.70g
Individual Fatty Acids 12
NutrientPer 100gUnitPer Serving% DV
Butyric Acid (4:0) SR0.004g
Caproic Acid (6:0) SR0g
Caprylic Acid (8:0) SR0.001g
Capric Acid (10:0) SR0.009g
Lauric Acid (12:0) SR0.003g
Myristic Acid (14:0) SR0.18g
Palmitic Acid (16:0) SR0.83g
Stearic Acid (18:0) SR0.14g
Linoleic Acid (18:2) SR0.11g
1%
Omega-6 LA SR0.09g
Omega-6 GLA SR0.004g
Linolenic Acid (18:3) SR0.05g
Amino Acids 18
NutrientPer 100gUnitPer Serving% DV
Tryptophan SR0.32g
Threonine SR1.4g
Isoleucine SR1.3g
Leucine SR2.0g
Lysine SR2.3g
Methionine SR0.78g
Cystine SR0.20g
Phenylalanine SR1.1g
Tyrosine SR0.97g
Valine SR1.5g
Arginine SR1.7g
Histidine SR0.71g
Alanine SR1.7g
Aspartic Acid SR3.1g
Glutamic Acid SR3.7g
Glycine SR1.6g
Proline SR1.1g
Serine SR1.2g
Other 3
NutrientPer 100gUnitPer Serving% DV
Caffeine SR0mg
Theobromine SR0mg
Alcohol SR0g

Nutrient Density Score

The NRF9.3 score measures overall nutritional quality per 100 kcal. It rewards 9 nutrients to encourage (protein, fiber, vitamins A, C, E, calcium, iron, magnesium, potassium) and penalizes 3 to limit (saturated fat, added sugars, sodium). Higher is better; negative scores indicate the food is high in limit nutrients relative to its beneficial content.

52
NRF9.3 Score
Good · per 100 kcal
Poor (<0) Moderate Good Excellent (100+)

NRF9.3 index: Fulgoni et al. (2009), J Nutr 139(8). DVs based on FDA 2020 reference values.

Nutrient Interactions in This Food

Nutrients in this food that enhance or compete with each other during absorption.

✔ Synergies — nutrients that help each other

Dietary Fat + Vitamin A●●●

Vitamin A is fat-soluble and requires dietary fat for absorption. Adding fat to a meal significantly increases beta-carotene and retinol absorption.

Ribaya-Mercado et al., Am J Clin Nutr, 2007

Dietary Fat + Vitamin D●●●

Vitamin D is fat-soluble. Co-consumption with dietary fat increases absorption by up to 50% compared to taking it on an empty stomach.

Dawson-Hughes et al., J Acad Nutr Diet, 2015

Dietary Fat + Vitamin E●●●

Vitamin E is fat-soluble and absorbed alongside dietary fats via micelle formation in the small intestine. Low-fat diets reduce vitamin E absorption.

Traber, Free Radic Biol Med, 2007

Vitamin D + Phosphorus●●

Vitamin D enhances intestinal phosphorus absorption and regulates phosphorus homeostasis via parathyroid hormone signalling.

Bergwitz & Jüppner, Annu Rev Med, 2010

Vitamin D + Magnesium●●

Magnesium is required for vitamin D metabolism — it is a cofactor for the enzymes that convert vitamin D to its active form (1,25-dihydroxyvitamin D).

Uwitonze & Razzaque, J Am Osteopath Assoc, 2018

⚠ Antagonisms — nutrients that compete

Zinc vs Copper●●●

High zinc intake induces metallothionein in enterocytes, which traps copper and blocks its absorption. Prolonged high-dose zinc can cause copper deficiency.

Prasad et al., JAMA, 1978; Fosmire, Am J Clin Nutr, 1990

Zinc vs Iron●●

Zinc and non-heme iron compete for the same intestinal transporter (DMT1). High doses of one can reduce absorption of the other when taken simultaneously.

Rossander-Hulten et al., Am J Clin Nutr, 1991

Potassium vs Sodium●●

High potassium intake promotes renal sodium excretion and attenuates the blood pressure–raising effect of sodium. A higher K:Na ratio is associated with lower cardiovascular risk.

Aburto et al., BMJ, 2013

Vitamin A vs Vitamin D●●

Very high vitamin A (retinol) intake may antagonise vitamin D function by competing for shared nuclear receptor pathways (RXR). The effect occurs mainly at pharmacological doses.

Johansson & Melhus, J Bone Miner Res, 2001

Amino Acid Profile

Essential amino acid composition compared to the WHO/FAO adult reference pattern. The Amino Acid Score indicates protein quality — 100 means all essential amino acid requirements are met.

132
Amino Acid Score
Complete
Leucine
Lowest Scoring
18
Amino Acids Tracked

✓ Complete protein — all essential amino acids meet or exceed WHO reference levels.

All Amino Acids (18)
Amino Acidg / 100gmg / g protein
Tryptophan0.3212.0
Threonine1.453.8
Isoleucine1.347.9
Leucine2.077.7
Lysine2.387.3
Methionine0.7829.5
Cystine0.207.6
Phenylalanine1.142.5
Tyrosine0.9736.7
Valine1.555.4
Arginine1.762.9
Histidine0.7127.1
Alanine1.764.4
Aspartic Acid3.1116.4
Glutamic Acid3.7140.7
Glycine1.661.2
Proline1.141.0
Serine1.244.9

Fatty Acid Profile

Breakdown of fat types per 100g. A healthy fat profile favours unsaturated fats (mono + poly) and a balanced omega-3 to omega-6 ratio.

1.2g
Saturated
1.9g
Monounsaturated
1.6g
Polyunsaturated
13.3:1
Omega-3 : Omega-6 Ratio
Omega-3 dominant — ideal range is 1:1 to 1:4
Omega Fatty Acids
EPA (20:5 n-3)0.44 g
DHA (22:6 n-3)0.70 g
ALA (18:3 n-3)0.04 g
DPA (22:5 n-3)0.11 g
Linoleic acid (18:2 n-6)0.09 g

How Cooking Changes Nutrients

Estimated percentage of each nutrient retained after cooking, based on USDA retention factors for the “Fatty Fish (>5% fat)” food category. Values of 100% mean no loss; lower values indicate nutrients lost to heat, water, or oxidation.

Key insights
Vitamin B12 loses up to 25% when broiled / grilled. Simmered retains 90%.
Thiamin loses up to 15% when fried. Baked retains 98%.

Source: USDA Table of Nutrient Retention Factors, Release 6 (2007). Retention values are category-level averages — actual retention depends on cooking time, temperature, and water volume.

USDA Retention Factors

Insulin Response

The Insulin Index (II) measures the actual insulin response to food on a scale where white bread = 100. Unlike the Glycemic Index (which only measures blood sugar), the II captures the full hormonal response — including the effect of protein and fat on insulin secretion. This is why high-protein foods like meat and dairy can have significant insulin scores despite having low or zero GI values.

59
Insulin Index
Moderate Insulin Response
Insulin Index Scale 59
0 Low ≤30 Mod ≤60 High ≤100 120
Measured ●●● Clinically measured (Holt 1997, Bell 2014)

Source: Holt et al. 1997; Bao et al. 2016; Bell 2014

Environmental Impact

Environmental footprint per kilogram of food produced. Data represents the global average for the “Fish (farmed)” category.

13.6
kg CO₂e / kg
High Impact
8.4
m² land / kg
Land Use
3,691
L water / kg
Water Use
176
g SO₂e / kg
Acidification
How this compares (GHG emissions)
Potatoes (0.5)Chicken (9.9)Beef (99.5)
Greenhouse Gas Emissions13.6 kg CO₂e / kg
Land Use8.4 m² / kg
Water Use3,691 L / kg
Eutrophication235 g PO₄e / kg
Acidification176 g SO₂e / kg
⚠️ Important context about this data
  • Global averages: These figures are production-weighted averages from a meta-analysis of ~38,700 farms across 119 countries (Poore & Nemecek, 2018). Actual impact varies enormously by farming method, geography, and supply chain.
  • System boundary: Cradle-to-retail only — does not include consumer transport, home cooking energy, or food waste.
  • Soil carbon not included: This data does not account for soil carbon sequestration. Some argue that well-managed regenerative grazing partially offsets ruminant emissions; however, full lifecycle accounting — including methane, land-use change, and the opportunity cost of using land for grazing vs. reforestation — typically makes the net footprint of ruminant meat higher, not lower. This is especially relevant in temperate grassland regions like Ireland.
  • Not gospel: This data is informational and illustrative. It is useful for understanding relative magnitudes, but should not be treated as precise measurements for any individual product or farm.

Source: Poore & Nemecek (2018), Science 360(6392). Meta-analysis of ~38,700 farms, 119 countries, 46 product categories.

Global Supply: Fish & Seafood

Top 10 countries by per capita supply of the “Fish & Seafood” food group (kcal/capita/day, 2023). This is food group–level data from FAO Food Balance Sheets, not specific to this individual food.

1.
Iceland
161
2.
Maldives
157
3.
Kiribati
146
4.
Japan
132
5.
Micronesia
118
6.
Tuvalu
113
7.
Samoa
108
8.
Micronesia (Federated States of)
101
9.
Antigua and Barbuda
97
10.
Barbados
95

Global Supply Trend (1961–2023)

+62%
1961: 24 kcal2023: 39 kcal

Source: FAO Food Balance Sheets (2023). Supply = production + imports − exports − waste, converted to kcal/capita/day.

Frequently Asked Questions

How many calories are in Salmon, sockeye, canned, drained solids, without skin and bones?

Salmon, sockeye, canned, drained solids, without skin and bones contains 158 kcal per 100 grams, making it a moderate-calorie food. The energy comes from 26.3g of protein (67% of calories), 5.9g of fat (33%), and 0g of carbohydrates (0%). Protein is the primary energy source.

What is Salmon, sockeye, canned, drained solids, without skin and bones most nutritious for?

The standout nutrient in Salmon, sockeye, canned, drained solids, without skin and bones is Vitamin B12, providing 5.5 µg per 100g (231% of the Daily Value). It is also a notable source of Vitamin D (143% DV). Our database tracks 86 individual nutrients for this food, allowing detailed comparison across vitamins, minerals, amino acids, and fatty acids.

Is Salmon, sockeye, canned, drained solids, without skin and bones high in protein?

With 26.3g per 100 grams, Salmon, sockeye, canned, drained solids, without skin and bones is a high-protein food. Protein accounts for 67% of its total calories, making it suitable for diets focused on protein intake.

How much fiber is in Salmon, sockeye, canned, drained solids, without skin and bones?

Salmon, sockeye, canned, drained solids, without skin and bones contains no dietary fiber. This is typical for animal-derived food. Pair with plant-based foods to ensure adequate fiber intake.

What is the insulin index of Salmon, sockeye, canned, drained solids, without skin and bones?

Salmon, sockeye, canned, drained solids, without skin and bones has a moderate insulin response (II: 59) (clinically measured) on the insulin index scale (white bread = 100). This is a typical insulin response for most mixed foods. Note that the insulin index can differ substantially from the glycemic index — dairy products and high-protein foods often have higher insulin responses than their GI would suggest.