Skip to main content

Salmon, sockeye, canned, total can contents

Fish/Seafood Per 100 g · Per 100g serving
Contains: 🐟 Fish

Salmon, sockeye, canned, total can contents is a seafood at 153 calories per 100g. It is an excellent source of Vitamin D and Selenium, providing 127% and 55% of the Daily Value respectively. This seafood is high in protein. Fish and shellfish are valued for their high-quality protein and omega-3 fatty acid content. Many dietary guidelines recommend consuming seafood at least twice per week. Our database tracks 84 nutrients for this food, plus insulin index, environmental footprint data.

153
Calories
kcal
20.6
Protein
g
7.2
Fat
g
0
Carbs
g
0
Fiber
g

Top Nutrients

☀️
Vitamin D
19.0 µg
127% DV
💎
Selenium
30.1 µg
55% DV
💎
Phosphorus
321 mg
46% DV

Data for 84 of 150 tracked nutrients

Nutrient Fingerprint

How this food scores across key nutrient categories, as a percentage of the daily recommended value per 100 g. Based on USDA DRIs for adults.

Complete Nutrient Profile

Macronutrients 9
NutrientPer 100gUnitPer Serving% DV
Water SR71.1g
2%
Calories SR153kcal
Energy (kJ) SR639kj
Protein SR20.6g
37%
Total Fat SR7.2g
Carbohydrate SR0g
Fiber SR0g
Total Sugars SR0g
Ash SR2.5g
Minerals 10
NutrientPer 100gUnitPer Serving% DV
Calcium SR198mg
20%
Iron SR0.57mg
7%
Magnesium SR30.0mg
8%
Phosphorus SR321mg
46%
Potassium SR329mg
10%
Sodium SR433mg
29%
Zinc SR0.67mg
6%
Copper SR0.06mg
7%
Manganese SR0.02mg
1%
Selenium SR30.1µg
55%
Vitamins 23
NutrientPer 100gUnitPer Serving% DV
Vitamin A (RAE) SR129µg
14%
Vitamin A (IU) SR39.0IU
Retinol SR39.0µg
Beta-Carotene SR0µg
Alpha-Carotene SR0µg
Beta-Cryptoxanthin SR0µg
Lycopene SR0µg
Lutein + Zeaxanthin SR0µg
Vitamin C SR0mg
Vitamin D SR19.0µg
127%
Vitamin D (IU) SR761IU
Vitamin D3 SR19.0µg
Vitamin E SR1.9mg
12%
Vitamin K1 SR0.10µg
0%
Thiamin (B1) SR0.02mg
2%
Riboflavin (B2) SR0.20mg
15%
Niacin (B3) SR6.0mg
38%
Vitamin B6 SR0.33mg
25%
Folic Acid SR0µg
Folate (food) SR3.0µg
Folate (DFE) SR3.0µg
Vitamin B12 SR0.40µg
17%
Choline SR74.8mg
14%
Fatty Acids 9
NutrientPer 100gUnitPer Serving% DV
Saturated Fat SR1.5g
Monounsaturated Fat SR2.5g
Polyunsaturated Fat SR1.7g
Trans Fat SR0.04g
Cholesterol SR67.0mg
Omega-3 ALA SR0.06g
4%
Omega-3 EPA SR0.53g
Omega-3 DPA SR0.13g
Omega-3 DHA SR0.69g
Individual Fatty Acids 12
NutrientPer 100gUnitPer Serving% DV
Butyric Acid (4:0) SR0.005g
Caproic Acid (6:0) SR0g
Caprylic Acid (8:0) SR0.001g
Capric Acid (10:0) SR0.02g
Lauric Acid (12:0) SR0.004g
Myristic Acid (14:0) SR0.24g
Palmitic Acid (16:0) SR0.98g
Stearic Acid (18:0) SR0.16g
Linoleic Acid (18:2) SR0.14g
1%
Omega-6 LA SR0.12g
Omega-6 GLA SR0.005g
Linolenic Acid (18:3) SR0.06g
Amino Acids 18
NutrientPer 100gUnitPer Serving% DV
Tryptophan SR0.25g
Threonine SR1.1g
Isoleucine SR0.99g
Leucine SR1.6g
Lysine SR1.8g
Methionine SR0.61g
Cystine SR0.16g
Phenylalanine SR0.88g
Tyrosine SR0.76g
Valine SR1.1g
Arginine SR1.3g
Histidine SR0.56g
Alanine SR1.3g
Aspartic Acid SR2.4g
Glutamic Acid SR2.9g
Glycine SR1.3g
Proline SR0.84g
Serine SR0.93g
Other 3
NutrientPer 100gUnitPer Serving% DV
Caffeine SR0mg
Theobromine SR0mg
Alcohol SR0g

Nutrient Density Score

The NRF9.3 score measures overall nutritional quality per 100 kcal. It rewards 9 nutrients to encourage (protein, fiber, vitamins A, C, E, calcium, iron, magnesium, potassium) and penalizes 3 to limit (saturated fat, added sugars, sodium). Higher is better; negative scores indicate the food is high in limit nutrients relative to its beneficial content.

49
NRF9.3 Score
Moderate · per 100 kcal
Poor (<0) Moderate Good Excellent (100+)

NRF9.3 index: Fulgoni et al. (2009), J Nutr 139(8). DVs based on FDA 2020 reference values.

Nutrient Interactions in This Food

Nutrients in this food that enhance or compete with each other during absorption.

✔ Synergies — nutrients that help each other

Vitamin D + Calcium●●●

Vitamin D is essential for calcium absorption. Without adequate vitamin D, only 10–15% of dietary calcium is absorbed; with it, absorption rises to 30–40%.

Christakos et al., J Cell Biochem, 2003

Dietary Fat + Vitamin A●●●

Vitamin A is fat-soluble and requires dietary fat for absorption. Adding fat to a meal significantly increases beta-carotene and retinol absorption.

Ribaya-Mercado et al., Am J Clin Nutr, 2007

Dietary Fat + Vitamin D●●●

Vitamin D is fat-soluble. Co-consumption with dietary fat increases absorption by up to 50% compared to taking it on an empty stomach.

Dawson-Hughes et al., J Acad Nutr Diet, 2015

Dietary Fat + Vitamin E●●●

Vitamin E is fat-soluble and absorbed alongside dietary fats via micelle formation in the small intestine. Low-fat diets reduce vitamin E absorption.

Traber, Free Radic Biol Med, 2007

Vitamin D + Phosphorus●●

Vitamin D enhances intestinal phosphorus absorption and regulates phosphorus homeostasis via parathyroid hormone signalling.

Bergwitz & Jüppner, Annu Rev Med, 2010

⚠ Antagonisms — nutrients that compete

Calcium vs Iron●●●

Calcium inhibits both heme and non-heme iron absorption when consumed in the same meal. The effect is dose-dependent, with significant inhibition at 300+ mg calcium.

Hallberg et al., Am J Clin Nutr, 1991

Zinc vs Copper●●●

High zinc intake induces metallothionein in enterocytes, which traps copper and blocks its absorption. Prolonged high-dose zinc can cause copper deficiency.

Prasad et al., JAMA, 1978; Fosmire, Am J Clin Nutr, 1990

Zinc vs Iron●●

Zinc and non-heme iron compete for the same intestinal transporter (DMT1). High doses of one can reduce absorption of the other when taken simultaneously.

Rossander-Hulten et al., Am J Clin Nutr, 1991

Calcium vs Magnesium●●

Very high calcium intake can reduce magnesium absorption by competing for shared intestinal transport pathways. A calcium:magnesium ratio above 2.6:1 may impair magnesium status.

Rosanoff et al., Nutr Rev, 2012

Potassium vs Sodium●●

High potassium intake promotes renal sodium excretion and attenuates the blood pressure–raising effect of sodium. A higher K:Na ratio is associated with lower cardiovascular risk.

Aburto et al., BMJ, 2013

Amino Acid Profile

Essential amino acid composition compared to the WHO/FAO adult reference pattern. The Amino Acid Score indicates protein quality — 100 means all essential amino acid requirements are met.

132
Amino Acid Score
Complete
Leucine
Lowest Scoring
18
Amino Acids Tracked

✓ Complete protein — all essential amino acids meet or exceed WHO reference levels.

All Amino Acids (18)
Amino Acidg / 100gmg / g protein
Tryptophan0.2512.0
Threonine1.153.8
Isoleucine0.9947.9
Leucine1.677.7
Lysine1.887.3
Methionine0.6129.5
Cystine0.167.6
Phenylalanine0.8842.5
Tyrosine0.7636.7
Valine1.155.4
Arginine1.362.9
Histidine0.5627.1
Alanine1.364.4
Aspartic Acid2.4116.4
Glutamic Acid2.9140.7
Glycine1.361.2
Proline0.8441.0
Serine0.9344.9

Fatty Acid Profile

Breakdown of fat types per 100g. A healthy fat profile favours unsaturated fats (mono + poly) and a balanced omega-3 to omega-6 ratio.

1.5g
Saturated
2.5g
Monounsaturated
1.7g
Polyunsaturated
11.5:1
Omega-3 : Omega-6 Ratio
Omega-3 dominant — ideal range is 1:1 to 1:4
Omega Fatty Acids
EPA (20:5 n-3)0.53 g
DHA (22:6 n-3)0.69 g
ALA (18:3 n-3)0.06 g
DPA (22:5 n-3)0.13 g
Linoleic acid (18:2 n-6)0.12 g

How Cooking Changes Nutrients

Estimated percentage of each nutrient retained after cooking, based on USDA retention factors for the “Fatty Fish (>5% fat)” food category. Values of 100% mean no loss; lower values indicate nutrients lost to heat, water, or oxidation.

Key insights
Vitamin B12 loses up to 25% when broiled / grilled. Simmered retains 90%.
Thiamin loses up to 15% when fried. Baked retains 98%.

Source: USDA Table of Nutrient Retention Factors, Release 6 (2007). Retention values are category-level averages — actual retention depends on cooking time, temperature, and water volume.

USDA Retention Factors

Insulin Response

The Insulin Index (II) measures the actual insulin response to food on a scale where white bread = 100. Unlike the Glycemic Index (which only measures blood sugar), the II captures the full hormonal response — including the effect of protein and fat on insulin secretion. This is why high-protein foods like meat and dairy can have significant insulin scores despite having low or zero GI values.

59
Insulin Index
Moderate Insulin Response
Insulin Index Scale 59
0 Low ≤30 Mod ≤60 High ≤100 120
Measured ●●● Clinically measured (Holt 1997, Bell 2014)

Source: Holt et al. 1997; Bao et al. 2016; Bell 2014

Environmental Impact

Environmental footprint per kilogram of food produced. Data represents the global average for the “Fish (farmed)” category.

13.6
kg CO₂e / kg
High Impact
8.4
m² land / kg
Land Use
3,691
L water / kg
Water Use
176
g SO₂e / kg
Acidification
How this compares (GHG emissions)
Potatoes (0.5)Chicken (9.9)Beef (99.5)
Greenhouse Gas Emissions13.6 kg CO₂e / kg
Land Use8.4 m² / kg
Water Use3,691 L / kg
Eutrophication235 g PO₄e / kg
Acidification176 g SO₂e / kg
⚠️ Important context about this data
  • Global averages: These figures are production-weighted averages from a meta-analysis of ~38,700 farms across 119 countries (Poore & Nemecek, 2018). Actual impact varies enormously by farming method, geography, and supply chain.
  • System boundary: Cradle-to-retail only — does not include consumer transport, home cooking energy, or food waste.
  • Soil carbon not included: This data does not account for soil carbon sequestration. Some argue that well-managed regenerative grazing partially offsets ruminant emissions; however, full lifecycle accounting — including methane, land-use change, and the opportunity cost of using land for grazing vs. reforestation — typically makes the net footprint of ruminant meat higher, not lower. This is especially relevant in temperate grassland regions like Ireland.
  • Not gospel: This data is informational and illustrative. It is useful for understanding relative magnitudes, but should not be treated as precise measurements for any individual product or farm.

Source: Poore & Nemecek (2018), Science 360(6392). Meta-analysis of ~38,700 farms, 119 countries, 46 product categories.

Global Supply: Fish & Seafood

Top 10 countries by per capita supply of the “Fish & Seafood” food group (kcal/capita/day, 2023). This is food group–level data from FAO Food Balance Sheets, not specific to this individual food.

1.
Iceland
161
2.
Maldives
157
3.
Kiribati
146
4.
Japan
132
5.
Micronesia
118
6.
Tuvalu
113
7.
Samoa
108
8.
Micronesia (Federated States of)
101
9.
Antigua and Barbuda
97
10.
Barbados
95

Global Supply Trend (1961–2023)

+62%
1961: 24 kcal2023: 39 kcal

Source: FAO Food Balance Sheets (2023). Supply = production + imports − exports − waste, converted to kcal/capita/day.

Frequently Asked Questions

How many calories are in Salmon, sockeye, canned, total can contents?

Salmon, sockeye, canned, total can contents contains 153 kcal per 100 grams, making it a moderate-calorie food. The energy comes from 20.6g of protein (54% of calories), 7.2g of fat (42%), and 0g of carbohydrates (0%). Protein is the primary energy source.

What is Salmon, sockeye, canned, total can contents most nutritious for?

The standout nutrient in Salmon, sockeye, canned, total can contents is Vitamin D, providing 19.0 µg per 100g (127% of the Daily Value). It is also a notable source of Selenium (55% DV). Our database tracks 84 individual nutrients for this food, allowing detailed comparison across vitamins, minerals, amino acids, and fatty acids.

Is Salmon, sockeye, canned, total can contents high in protein?

With 20.6g per 100 grams, Salmon, sockeye, canned, total can contents is a high-protein food. Protein accounts for 54% of its total calories, making it suitable for diets focused on protein intake.

How much fiber is in Salmon, sockeye, canned, total can contents?

Salmon, sockeye, canned, total can contents contains no dietary fiber. This is typical for animal-derived food. Pair with plant-based foods to ensure adequate fiber intake.

What is the insulin index of Salmon, sockeye, canned, total can contents?

Salmon, sockeye, canned, total can contents has a moderate insulin response (II: 59) (clinically measured) on the insulin index scale (white bread = 100). This is a typical insulin response for most mixed foods. Note that the insulin index can differ substantially from the glycemic index — dairy products and high-protein foods often have higher insulin responses than their GI would suggest.