Skip to main content

Seeds, chia seeds, dried

Nuts/Seeds Per 100 g · Per 100g serving
Data sources: 20 Foundation 39 AFCD 23 SR Legacy
Contains: 🌰 Tree Nuts

Seeds, chia seeds, dried is a nut/seed, containing 490 calories per 100g. It is an excellent source of Omega-3 ALA, Manganese and Copper, providing 1173%, 329% and 174% of the Daily Value respectively. This nut/seed is a moderate protein source, rich in dietary fiber, high in fat. Nuts and seeds provide healthy fats, protein, fiber, and minerals including magnesium, zinc, and selenium. Their high nutrient density makes them a valuable component of heart-healthy diets. Our database tracks 82 nutrients for this food, plus insulin index, environmental footprint data.

490
Calories
kcal
17.0
Protein
g
32.9
Fat
g
38.3
Carbs
g
33.2
Fiber
g

Top Nutrients

🥜
Omega-3 ALA
18.8 g
1173% DV
💎
Manganese
7.6 mg
329% DV
💎
Copper
1.6 mg
174% DV

Data for 82 of 150 tracked nutrients

Nutrient Fingerprint

How this food scores across key nutrient categories, as a percentage of the daily recommended value per 100 g. Based on USDA DRIs for adults.

Complete Nutrient Profile

Macronutrients 10
NutrientPer 100gUnitPer Serving% DV
Water Foundation7.5g—
0%
Calories Foundation490kcal——
Energy (kJ) SR2,034kj——
Protein Foundation17.0g—
30%
Total Fat Foundation32.9g——
Carbohydrate Foundation38.3g—
29%
Fiber AFCD33.2g—
87%
Total Sugars AFCD0.70g——
Starch Foundation0g——
Ash Foundation4.4g——
Minerals 10
NutrientPer 100gUnitPer Serving% DV
Calcium Foundation595mg—
60%
Iron Foundation6.0mg—
76%
Magnesium Foundation326mg—
82%
Phosphorus Foundation691mg—
99%
Potassium Foundation642mg—
19%
Sodium Foundation0mg——
Zinc Foundation5.6mg—
50%
Copper Foundation1.6mg—
174%
Manganese Foundation7.6mg—
329%
Selenium AFCD12.0µg—
22%
Vitamins 24
NutrientPer 100gUnitPer Serving% DV
Vitamin A (RAE) AFCD0µg——
Vitamin A (IU) SR54.0IU——
Retinol AFCD0µg——
Beta-Carotene AFCD0µg——
Alpha-Carotene AFCD0µg——
Beta-Cryptoxanthin AFCD0µg——
Vitamin C AFCD0mg——
Vitamin D (IU) AFCD0IU——
Vitamin D2 AFCD0µg——
Vitamin D3 AFCD0µg——
Vitamin E AFCD0.10mg—
1%
Beta-Tocopherol AFCD0mg——
Gamma-Tocopherol AFCD9.8mg——
Delta-Tocopherol AFCD0.20mg——
Thiamin (B1) Foundation0.50mg—
42%
Riboflavin (B2) AFCD0.04mg—
3%
Niacin (B3) Foundation8.7mg—
54%
Pantothenic Acid (B5) AFCD0.37mg—
7%
Vitamin B6 Foundation0.20mg—
16%
Biotin (B7) Foundation14.5µg—
48%
Folate AFCD111µg—
28%
Folate (food) AFCD111µg——
Folate (DFE) AFCD111µg——
Vitamin B12 AFCD0µg——
Fatty Acids 9
NutrientPer 100gUnitPer Serving% DV
Saturated Fat AFCD2.5g——
Monounsaturated Fat AFCD1.6g——
Polyunsaturated Fat AFCD23.9g——
Trans Fat AFCD0g——
Cholesterol AFCD0mg——
Omega-3 ALA AFCD18.8g—
1173%
Omega-3 EPA AFCD0g——
Omega-3 DPA AFCD0g——
Omega-3 DHA AFCD0g——
Individual Fatty Acids 9
NutrientPer 100gUnitPer Serving% DV
Caprylic Acid (8:0) AFCD0g——
Capric Acid (10:0) AFCD1.7g——
Lauric Acid (12:0) AFCD0.80g——
Myristic Acid (14:0) AFCD0.06g——
Palmitic Acid (16:0) SR2.2g——
Stearic Acid (18:0) SR0.91g——
Linoleic Acid (18:2) AFCD5.1g—
30%
Omega-6 LA SR5.8g——
Linolenic Acid (18:3) SR17.8g——
Amino Acids 18
NutrientPer 100gUnitPer Serving% DV
Tryptophan AFCD0.28g——
Threonine SR0.71g——
Isoleucine SR0.80g——
Leucine SR1.4g——
Lysine SR0.97g——
Methionine SR0.59g——
Cystine SR0.41g——
Phenylalanine SR1.0g——
Tyrosine SR0.56g——
Valine SR0.95g——
Arginine SR2.1g——
Histidine SR0.53g——
Alanine SR1.0g——
Aspartic Acid SR1.7g——
Glutamic Acid SR3.5g——
Glycine SR0.94g——
Proline SR0.78g——
Serine SR1.0g——
Other 2
NutrientPer 100gUnitPer Serving% DV
Caffeine AFCD0mg——
Alcohol AFCD0g——

Nutrient Density Score

The NRF9.3 score measures overall nutritional quality per 100 kcal. It rewards 9 nutrients to encourage (protein, fiber, vitamins A, C, E, calcium, iron, magnesium, potassium) and penalizes 3 to limit (saturated fat, added sugars, sodium). Higher is better; negative scores indicate the food is high in limit nutrients relative to its beneficial content.

64
NRF9.3 Score
Good · per 100 kcal
Poor (<0) Moderate Good Excellent (100+)

NRF9.3 index: Fulgoni et al. (2009), J Nutr 139(8). DVs based on FDA 2020 reference values.

Nutrient Interactions in This Food

Nutrients in this food that enhance or compete with each other during absorption.

✔ Synergies — nutrients that help each other

Vitamin B6 + Magnesium●●●

Vitamin B6 may enhance intracellular magnesium accumulation. Combined supplementation has shown greater benefits for stress and anxiety than magnesium alone.

Pouteau et al., PLoS One, 2018

Protein + Calcium●●●

Moderate protein intake enhances calcium absorption and supports bone health. The acid-ash hypothesis suggesting protein harms bones has been largely disproven.

Kerstetter et al., J Clin Endocrinol Metab, 2005

Vitamin B6 + Folate●●●

Vitamin B6 is a cofactor in folate-dependent one-carbon metabolism. Together with B12, these three nutrients regulate homocysteine levels.

Selhub, J Nutr Health Aging, 2002

⚠ Antagonisms — nutrients that compete

Calcium vs Iron●●●

Calcium inhibits both heme and non-heme iron absorption when consumed in the same meal. The effect is dose-dependent, with significant inhibition at 300+ mg calcium.

Hallberg et al., Am J Clin Nutr, 1991

Zinc vs Copper●●●

High zinc intake induces metallothionein in enterocytes, which traps copper and blocks its absorption. Prolonged high-dose zinc can cause copper deficiency.

Prasad et al., JAMA, 1978; Fosmire, Am J Clin Nutr, 1990

Zinc vs Iron●●●

Zinc and non-heme iron compete for the same intestinal transporter (DMT1). High doses of one can reduce absorption of the other when taken simultaneously.

Rossander-Hulten et al., Am J Clin Nutr, 1991

Calcium vs Magnesium●●●

Very high calcium intake can reduce magnesium absorption by competing for shared intestinal transport pathways. A calcium:magnesium ratio above 2.6:1 may impair magnesium status.

Rosanoff et al., Nutr Rev, 2012

Fiber vs Iron●●●

Phytates in high-fibre foods (whole grains, legumes) bind non-heme iron and reduce its bioavailability. Soaking, sprouting, and fermentation reduce phytate content.

Hurrell & Egli, Int J Vitam Nutr Res, 2010

Amino Acid Profile

Essential amino acid composition compared to the WHO/FAO adult reference pattern. The Amino Acid Score indicates protein quality — 100 means all essential amino acid requirements are met.

127
Amino Acid Score
Complete
Lysine
Lowest Scoring
18
Amino Acids Tracked

✓ Complete protein — all essential amino acids meet or exceed WHO reference levels.

All Amino Acids (18)
Amino Acidg / 100gmg / g protein
Tryptophan0.2816.6
Threonine0.7141.7
Isoleucine0.8047.1
Leucine1.480.6
Lysine0.9757.0
Methionine0.5934.6
Cystine0.4123.9
Phenylalanine1.059.7
Tyrosine0.5633.1
Valine0.9555.8
Arginine2.1126.0
Histidine0.5331.2
Alanine1.061.4
Aspartic Acid1.799.3
Glutamic Acid3.5205.7
Glycine0.9455.4
Proline0.7845.6
Serine1.061.7

Fatty Acid Profile

Breakdown of fat types per 100g. A healthy fat profile favours unsaturated fats (mono + poly) and a balanced omega-3 to omega-6 ratio.

2.5g
Saturated
1.6g
Monounsaturated
23.9g
Polyunsaturated
3.2:1
Omega-3 : Omega-6 Ratio
Omega-3 dominant — ideal range is 1:1 to 1:4
Omega Fatty Acids
ALA (18:3 n-3)18.8 g
Linoleic acid (18:2 n-6)5.8 g

How Cooking Changes Nutrients

Estimated percentage of each nutrient retained after cooking, based on USDA retention factors for the “Dried Fruits” food category. Values of 100% mean no loss; lower values indicate nutrients lost to heat, water, or oxidation.

Key insights
⚡Folate loses up to 50% when sautéed. Dried retains 61%.

Source: USDA Table of Nutrient Retention Factors, Release 6 (2007). Retention values are category-level averages — actual retention depends on cooking time, temperature, and water volume.

USDA Retention Factors

Insulin Response

The Insulin Index (II) measures the actual insulin response to food on a scale where white bread = 100. Unlike the Glycemic Index (which only measures blood sugar), the II captures the full hormonal response — including the effect of protein and fat on insulin secretion. This is why high-protein foods like meat and dairy can have significant insulin scores despite having low or zero GI values.

20
Insulin Index
Low Insulin Response
Insulin Index Scale 20
0 Low ≤30 Mod ≤60 High ≤100 120
Category ●●● Assigned from measured food category

Source: Holt et al. 1997; Bao et al. 2016; Bell 2014

Environmental Impact

Environmental footprint per kilogram of food produced. Data represents the global average for the “Nuts” category.

0.43
kg CO₂e / kg
Very Low Impact
13.0
m² land / kg
Land Use
4,134
L water / kg
Water Use
3.3
g SO₂e / kg
Acidification
How this compares (GHG emissions)
Potatoes (0.5)Chicken (9.9)Beef (99.5)
Greenhouse Gas Emissions0.43 kg CO₂e / kg
Land Use13.0 m² / kg
Water Use4,134 L / kg
Eutrophication19.2 g PO₄e / kg
Acidification3.3 g SO₂e / kg
⚠️ Important context about this data
  • Global averages: These figures are production-weighted averages from a meta-analysis of ~38,700 farms across 119 countries (Poore & Nemecek, 2018). Actual impact varies enormously by farming method, geography, and supply chain.
  • System boundary: Cradle-to-retail only — does not include consumer transport, home cooking energy, or food waste.
  • Soil carbon not included: This data does not account for soil carbon sequestration. Some argue that well-managed regenerative grazing partially offsets ruminant emissions; however, full lifecycle accounting — including methane, land-use change, and the opportunity cost of using land for grazing vs. reforestation — typically makes the net footprint of ruminant meat higher, not lower. This is especially relevant in temperate grassland regions like Ireland.
  • Not gospel: This data is informational and illustrative. It is useful for understanding relative magnitudes, but should not be treated as precise measurements for any individual product or farm.

Source: Poore & Nemecek (2018), Science 360(6392). Meta-analysis of ~38,700 farms, 119 countries, 46 product categories.

Global Supply: Tree Nuts

Top 10 countries by per capita supply of the “Tree Nuts” food group (kcal/capita/day, 2023). This is food group–level data from FAO Food Balance Sheets, not specific to this individual food.

1.
Maldives
129
2.
Türkiye
108
3.
Kyrgyzstan
103
4.
Greece
86
5.
Libya
86
6.
Guinea-Bissau
81
7.
Bosnia and Herzegovina
79
8.
Iran (Islamic Republic of)
73
9.
Switzerland
71
10.
Lebanon
68

Global Supply Trend (1961–2023)

+75%
1961: 12 kcal2023: 21 kcal

Source: FAO Food Balance Sheets (2023). Supply = production + imports − exports − waste, converted to kcal/capita/day.

Frequently Asked Questions

How many calories are in Seeds, chia seeds, dried?

Seeds, chia seeds, dried contains 490 kcal per 100 grams, making it a calorie-dense food. The energy comes from 17.0g of protein (14% of calories), 32.9g of fat (60%), and 38.3g of carbohydrates (31%). Fat is the primary energy source.

What is Seeds, chia seeds, dried most nutritious for?

The standout nutrient in Seeds, chia seeds, dried is Omega-3 ALA, providing 18.8 g per 100g (1173% of the Daily Value). It is also a notable source of Manganese (329% DV). Our database tracks 82 individual nutrients for this food, allowing detailed comparison across vitamins, minerals, amino acids, and fatty acids.

Is Seeds, chia seeds, dried high in protein?

Seeds, chia seeds, dried provides 17.0g of protein per 100 grams — a moderate amount. Protein contributes 14% of its calories.

How much fiber is in Seeds, chia seeds, dried?

Yes, Seeds, chia seeds, dried is rich in dietary fiber with 33.2g per 100 grams. The daily recommended intake is 25-38g, so a serving contributes meaningfully toward that goal. Dietary fiber supports digestive health and is associated with reduced risk of cardiovascular disease.

What is the insulin index of Seeds, chia seeds, dried?

Seeds, chia seeds, dried has a low insulin response (II: 20) (estimated from macronutrient composition) on the insulin index scale (white bread = 100). This means it triggers relatively little insulin secretion, which may be relevant for those managing insulin sensitivity or following low-insulin dietary strategies. Note that the insulin index can differ substantially from the glycemic index — dairy products and high-protein foods often have higher insulin responses than their GI would suggest.