Skip to main content

Tortilla chips, low fat, baked without fat

Snacks Per 100 g · Per 100g serving

Tortilla chips, low fat, baked without fat is a snack food, containing 448 calories per 100g. It is an excellent source of Carbohydrate, providing 80.2 g (62% of the Daily Value) per 100g serving. This snack food is a moderate protein source, a useful source of fiber. Snack foods vary widely in their nutrient profiles. Some provide meaningful amounts of fiber, protein, or micronutrients, while others are primarily energy-dense. Our database tracks 61 nutrients for this food, plus glycemic index, insulin index, environmental footprint data.

448
Calories
kcal
11.0
Protein
g
5.7
Fat
g
80.2
Carbs
g
5.3
Fiber
g

Top Nutrients

💪
Carbohydrate
80.2 g
62% DV
💎
Phosphorus
318 mg
45% DV
💎
Sodium
517 mg
34% DV

Data for 61 of 150 tracked nutrients

Nutrient Fingerprint

How this food scores across key nutrient categories, as a percentage of the daily recommended value per 100 g. Based on USDA DRIs for adults.

Complete Nutrient Profile

Macronutrients 9
NutrientPer 100gUnitPer Serving% DV
Water SR1.7g
0%
Calories SR448kcal
Energy (kJ) SR1,875kj
Protein SR11.0g
20%
Total Fat SR5.7g
Carbohydrate SR80.2g
62%
Fiber SR5.3g
14%
Total Sugars SR0.67g
Ash SR1.4g
Minerals 9
NutrientPer 100gUnitPer Serving% DV
Calcium SR159mg
16%
Iron SR1.6mg
20%
Magnesium SR97.0mg
24%
Phosphorus SR318mg
45%
Potassium SR272mg
8%
Sodium SR517mg
34%
Zinc SR1.1mg
10%
Copper SR0.11mg
12%
Selenium SR15.7µg
28%
Vitamins 23
NutrientPer 100gUnitPer Serving% DV
Vitamin A (RAE) SR104µg
12%
Vitamin A (IU) SR5.0IU
Retinol SR0µg
Beta-Carotene SR47.0µg
Alpha-Carotene SR30.0µg
Beta-Cryptoxanthin SR1.0µg
Lycopene SR0µg
Lutein + Zeaxanthin SR652µg
Vitamin C SR0.20mg
0%
Vitamin D SR0µg
Vitamin D (IU) SR0IU
Vitamin E SR0.77mg
5%
Vitamin K1 SR0.20µg
0%
Thiamin (B1) SR0.22mg
18%
Riboflavin (B2) SR0.28mg
22%
Niacin (B3) SR0.42mg
3%
Vitamin B6 SR0.18mg
14%
Folate SR16.0µg
4%
Folic Acid SR0µg
Folate (food) SR16.0µg
Folate (DFE) SR16.0µg
Vitamin B12 SR0µg
Choline SR21.9mg
4%
Fatty Acids 7
NutrientPer 100gUnitPer Serving% DV
Saturated Fat SR0.85g
Monounsaturated Fat SR1.7g
Polyunsaturated Fat SR2.9g
Cholesterol SR0mg
Omega-3 EPA SR0g
Omega-3 DPA SR0g
Omega-3 DHA SR0g
Individual Fatty Acids 10
NutrientPer 100gUnitPer Serving% DV
Butyric Acid (4:0) SR0g
Caproic Acid (6:0) SR0g
Caprylic Acid (8:0) SR0g
Capric Acid (10:0) SR0g
Lauric Acid (12:0) SR0g
Myristic Acid (14:0) SR0g
Palmitic Acid (16:0) SR0.68g
Stearic Acid (18:0) SR0.09g
Linoleic Acid (18:2) SR2.5g
15%
Linolenic Acid (18:3) SR0.08g
Other 3
NutrientPer 100gUnitPer Serving% DV
Caffeine SR0mg
Theobromine SR0mg
Alcohol SR0g

Nutrient Density Score

The NRF9.3 score measures overall nutritional quality per 100 kcal. It rewards 9 nutrients to encourage (protein, fiber, vitamins A, C, E, calcium, iron, magnesium, potassium) and penalizes 3 to limit (saturated fat, added sugars, sodium). Higher is better; negative scores indicate the food is high in limit nutrients relative to its beneficial content.

18
NRF9.3 Score
Moderate · per 100 kcal
Poor (<0) Moderate Good Excellent (100+)

NRF9.3 index: Fulgoni et al. (2009), J Nutr 139(8). DVs based on FDA 2020 reference values.

Nutrient Interactions in This Food

Nutrients in this food that enhance or compete with each other during absorption.

✔ Synergies — nutrients that help each other

Dietary Fat + Vitamin A●●●

Vitamin A is fat-soluble and requires dietary fat for absorption. Adding fat to a meal significantly increases beta-carotene and retinol absorption.

Ribaya-Mercado et al., Am J Clin Nutr, 2007

Dietary Fat + Vitamin E●●●

Vitamin E is fat-soluble and absorbed alongside dietary fats via micelle formation in the small intestine. Low-fat diets reduce vitamin E absorption.

Traber, Free Radic Biol Med, 2007

Selenium + Vitamin E●●

Selenium (via glutathione peroxidase) and vitamin E work as complementary antioxidants. Selenium reduces peroxides while vitamin E prevents lipid peroxidation in membranes.

Combs, Br J Nutr, 2001

Vitamin B6 + Magnesium●●

Vitamin B6 may enhance intracellular magnesium accumulation. Combined supplementation has shown greater benefits for stress and anxiety than magnesium alone.

Pouteau et al., PLoS One, 2018

Protein + Calcium●●

Moderate protein intake enhances calcium absorption and supports bone health. The acid-ash hypothesis suggesting protein harms bones has been largely disproven.

Kerstetter et al., J Clin Endocrinol Metab, 2005

⚠ Antagonisms — nutrients that compete

Calcium vs Iron●●●

Calcium inhibits both heme and non-heme iron absorption when consumed in the same meal. The effect is dose-dependent, with significant inhibition at 300+ mg calcium.

Hallberg et al., Am J Clin Nutr, 1991

Zinc vs Copper●●●

High zinc intake induces metallothionein in enterocytes, which traps copper and blocks its absorption. Prolonged high-dose zinc can cause copper deficiency.

Prasad et al., JAMA, 1978; Fosmire, Am J Clin Nutr, 1990

Zinc vs Iron●●

Zinc and non-heme iron compete for the same intestinal transporter (DMT1). High doses of one can reduce absorption of the other when taken simultaneously.

Rossander-Hulten et al., Am J Clin Nutr, 1991

Calcium vs Magnesium●●

Very high calcium intake can reduce magnesium absorption by competing for shared intestinal transport pathways. A calcium:magnesium ratio above 2.6:1 may impair magnesium status.

Rosanoff et al., Nutr Rev, 2012

Fiber vs Iron●●

Phytates in high-fibre foods (whole grains, legumes) bind non-heme iron and reduce its bioavailability. Soaking, sprouting, and fermentation reduce phytate content.

Hurrell & Egli, Int J Vitam Nutr Res, 2010

Fatty Acid Profile

Breakdown of fat types per 100g. A healthy fat profile favours unsaturated fats (mono + poly) and a balanced omega-3 to omega-6 ratio.

0.85g
Saturated
1.7g
Monounsaturated
2.9g
Polyunsaturated
Omega Fatty Acids
Linoleic acid (18:2 n-6)2.5 g

Glycemic & Insulin Response

The Glycemic Index (GI) measures how quickly a food raises blood sugar on a 0–100 scale. The Insulin Index (II) measures the insulin response directly, which can differ from GI — notably, dairy and high-protein foods often trigger a higher insulin response than their GI suggests. White bread = 100 for both scales.

63
Glycemic Index
Medium GI
11
Glycemic Load
Medium GL (per 50g)
GI Scale 63
0 Low <55 Med High ≥70 100

GI data matched from: “Corn chips / tortilla chips” · ●●● high confidence

57
Insulin Index
Moderate Insulin Response
Insulin Index Scale 57
0 Low ≤30 Mod ≤60 High ≤100 120
GI Model ●● Estimated via GI-based regression (R²=0.78)

Source: International Tables of Glycemic Index (Sydney University, 2021) · Holt et al. 1997; Bao et al. 2016; Bell 2014

Environmental Impact

Environmental footprint per kilogram of food produced. Data represents the global average for the “Potatoes” category.

0.46
kg CO₂e / kg
Very Low Impact
0.88
m² land / kg
Land Use
59.0
L water / kg
Water Use
2.5
g SO₂e / kg
Acidification
How this compares (GHG emissions)
Potatoes (0.5)Chicken (9.9)Beef (99.5)
Greenhouse Gas Emissions0.46 kg CO₂e / kg
Land Use0.88 m² / kg
Water Use59.0 L / kg
Eutrophication3.5 g PO₄e / kg
Acidification2.5 g SO₂e / kg
⚠️ Important context about this data
  • Global averages: These figures are production-weighted averages from a meta-analysis of ~38,700 farms across 119 countries (Poore & Nemecek, 2018). Actual impact varies enormously by farming method, geography, and supply chain.
  • System boundary: Cradle-to-retail only — does not include consumer transport, home cooking energy, or food waste.
  • Soil carbon not included: This data does not account for soil carbon sequestration. Some argue that well-managed regenerative grazing partially offsets ruminant emissions; however, full lifecycle accounting — including methane, land-use change, and the opportunity cost of using land for grazing vs. reforestation — typically makes the net footprint of ruminant meat higher, not lower. This is especially relevant in temperate grassland regions like Ireland.
  • Not gospel: This data is informational and illustrative. It is useful for understanding relative magnitudes, but should not be treated as precise measurements for any individual product or farm.

Source: Poore & Nemecek (2018), Science 360(6392). Meta-analysis of ~38,700 farms, 119 countries, 46 product categories.

Frequently Asked Questions

How many calories are in Tortilla chips, low fat, baked without fat?

Tortilla chips, low fat, baked without fat contains 448 kcal per 100 grams, making it a calorie-dense food. The energy comes from 11.0g of protein (10% of calories), 5.7g of fat (11%), and 80.2g of carbohydrates (72%). Carbohydrates are the primary energy source.

What is Tortilla chips, low fat, baked without fat most nutritious for?

The standout nutrient in Tortilla chips, low fat, baked without fat is Carbohydrate, providing 80.2 g per 100g (62% of the Daily Value). It is also a notable source of Phosphorus (45% DV). Our database tracks 61 individual nutrients for this food, allowing detailed comparison across vitamins, minerals, amino acids, and fatty acids.

Is Tortilla chips, low fat, baked without fat high in protein?

Tortilla chips, low fat, baked without fat provides 11.0g of protein per 100 grams — a moderate amount. Protein contributes 10% of its calories.

How much fiber is in Tortilla chips, low fat, baked without fat?

Tortilla chips, low fat, baked without fat contains 5.3g of fiber per 100 grams — a moderate amount. This contributes to the recommended daily intake of 25-38g. Pairing with other fiber-rich foods like vegetables, legumes, or whole grains can help meet daily targets.

What is the glycemic index of Tortilla chips, low fat, baked without fat?

Tortilla chips, low fat, baked without fat has a glycemic index of 63, which is classified as medium (56-69). Medium-GI foods produce a moderate blood sugar response. The glycemic load, which accounts for typical serving size, provides additional context for real-world blood sugar impact.

What is the insulin index of Tortilla chips, low fat, baked without fat?

Tortilla chips, low fat, baked without fat has a moderate insulin response (II: 57) (estimated from macronutrient composition) on the insulin index scale (white bread = 100). This is a typical insulin response for most mixed foods. Note that the insulin index can differ substantially from the glycemic index — dairy products and high-protein foods often have higher insulin responses than their GI would suggest.