Skip to main content

Triticale flour, whole-grain

Grains Per 100 g · Per 100g serving
Data sources: 44 AFCD 32 SR Legacy

Triticale flour, whole-grain is a grain, containing 325 calories per 100g. It is an excellent source of Manganese and Copper, providing 182% and 62% of the Daily Value respectively. This grain is a moderate protein source, rich in dietary fiber. Grains are a primary source of carbohydrates, B vitamins, and minerals. Whole grains retain the bran and germ, providing substantially more fiber and micronutrients than refined grains. Our database tracks 76 nutrients for this food, plus insulin index, environmental footprint data.

325
Calories
kcal
13.2
Protein
g
1.8
Fat
g
58.3
Carbs
g
14.4
Fiber
g

Top Nutrients

💎
Manganese
4.2 mg
182% DV
💎
Copper
0.56 mg
62% DV
💎
Selenium
26.0 µg
47% DV

Data for 76 of 150 tracked nutrients

Nutrient Fingerprint

How this food scores across key nutrient categories, as a percentage of the daily recommended value per 100 g. Based on USDA DRIs for adults.

Complete Nutrient Profile

Macronutrients 10
NutrientPer 100gUnitPer Serving% DV
Water AFCD10.5g
0%
Calories AFCD325kcal
Energy (kJ) SR1,414kj
Protein SR13.2g
24%
Total Fat SR1.8g
Carbohydrate AFCD58.3g
45%
Fiber AFCD14.4g
38%
Total Sugars AFCD1.8g
Starch AFCD56.6g
Ash AFCD1.4g
Minerals 10
NutrientPer 100gUnitPer Serving% DV
Calcium AFCD27.0mg
3%
Iron AFCD3.5mg
44%
Magnesium AFCD114mg
28%
Phosphorus AFCD245mg
35%
Potassium AFCD332mg
10%
Sodium AFCD5.0mg
0%
Zinc AFCD2.0mg
19%
Copper SR0.56mg
62%
Manganese SR4.2mg
182%
Selenium AFCD26.0µg
47%
Vitamins 20
NutrientPer 100gUnitPer Serving% DV
Vitamin A (RAE) AFCD0µg
Vitamin A (IU) SR0IU
Retinol AFCD0µg
Beta-Carotene AFCD0µg
Vitamin C AFCD0mg
Vitamin D SR0µg
Vitamin D (IU) AFCD0IU
Vitamin D2 AFCD0µg
Vitamin D3 AFCD0µg
Vitamin E AFCD1.2mg
8%
Thiamin (B1) AFCD0.35mg
30%
Riboflavin (B2) AFCD0.03mg
2%
Niacin (B3) AFCD1.7mg
11%
Pantothenic Acid (B5) SR2.2mg
43%
Vitamin B6 AFCD0.20mg
15%
Folate AFCD73.0µg
18%
Folic Acid SR0µg
Folate (food) AFCD73.0µg
Folate (DFE) AFCD73.0µg
Vitamin B12 AFCD0µg
Fatty Acids 9
NutrientPer 100gUnitPer Serving% DV
Saturated Fat AFCD0.29g
Monounsaturated Fat AFCD0.32g
Polyunsaturated Fat AFCD1.1g
Trans Fat AFCD0g
Cholesterol AFCD0mg
Omega-3 ALA AFCD0.07g
4%
Omega-3 EPA AFCD0g
Omega-3 DPA AFCD0g
Omega-3 DHA AFCD0g
Individual Fatty Acids 7
NutrientPer 100gUnitPer Serving% DV
Caprylic Acid (8:0) SR0.01g
Lauric Acid (12:0) SR0.01g
Myristic Acid (14:0) SR0.008g
Palmitic Acid (16:0) SR0.24g
Stearic Acid (18:0) SR0.03g
Linoleic Acid (18:2) AFCD1.0g
6%
Linolenic Acid (18:3) SR0.05g
Amino Acids 18
NutrientPer 100gUnitPer Serving% DV
Tryptophan AFCD0.12g
Threonine SR0.41g
Isoleucine SR0.48g
Leucine SR0.92g
Lysine SR0.37g
Methionine SR0.21g
Cystine SR0.28g
Phenylalanine SR0.64g
Tyrosine SR0.39g
Valine SR0.61g
Arginine SR0.68g
Histidine SR0.31g
Alanine SR0.49g
Aspartic Acid SR0.79g
Glutamic Acid SR4.0g
Glycine SR0.56g
Proline SR1.2g
Serine SR0.60g
Other 2
NutrientPer 100gUnitPer Serving% DV
Caffeine AFCD0mg
Alcohol AFCD0g

Nutrient Density Score

The NRF9.3 score measures overall nutritional quality per 100 kcal. It rewards 9 nutrients to encourage (protein, fiber, vitamins A, C, E, calcium, iron, magnesium, potassium) and penalizes 3 to limit (saturated fat, added sugars, sodium). Higher is better; negative scores indicate the food is high in limit nutrients relative to its beneficial content.

43
NRF9.3 Score
Moderate · per 100 kcal
Poor (<0) Moderate Good Excellent (100+)

NRF9.3 index: Fulgoni et al. (2009), J Nutr 139(8). DVs based on FDA 2020 reference values.

Nutrient Interactions in This Food

Nutrients in this food that enhance or compete with each other during absorption.

✔ Synergies — nutrients that help each other

Dietary Fat + Vitamin E●●●

Vitamin E is fat-soluble and absorbed alongside dietary fats via micelle formation in the small intestine. Low-fat diets reduce vitamin E absorption.

Traber, Free Radic Biol Med, 2007

Selenium + Vitamin E●●

Selenium (via glutathione peroxidase) and vitamin E work as complementary antioxidants. Selenium reduces peroxides while vitamin E prevents lipid peroxidation in membranes.

Combs, Br J Nutr, 2001

Vitamin B6 + Magnesium●●

Vitamin B6 may enhance intracellular magnesium accumulation. Combined supplementation has shown greater benefits for stress and anxiety than magnesium alone.

Pouteau et al., PLoS One, 2018

Vitamin B6 + Folate●●

Vitamin B6 is a cofactor in folate-dependent one-carbon metabolism. Together with B12, these three nutrients regulate homocysteine levels.

Selhub, J Nutr Health Aging, 2002

⚠ Antagonisms — nutrients that compete

Zinc vs Copper●●●

High zinc intake induces metallothionein in enterocytes, which traps copper and blocks its absorption. Prolonged high-dose zinc can cause copper deficiency.

Prasad et al., JAMA, 1978; Fosmire, Am J Clin Nutr, 1990

Zinc vs Iron●●

Zinc and non-heme iron compete for the same intestinal transporter (DMT1). High doses of one can reduce absorption of the other when taken simultaneously.

Rossander-Hulten et al., Am J Clin Nutr, 1991

Fiber vs Iron●●

Phytates in high-fibre foods (whole grains, legumes) bind non-heme iron and reduce its bioavailability. Soaking, sprouting, and fermentation reduce phytate content.

Hurrell & Egli, Int J Vitam Nutr Res, 2010

Fiber vs Zinc●●

Phytates in fibre-rich foods chelate zinc, reducing its bioavailability by up to 50% in high-phytate diets. This is a major concern in plant-based diets.

Sandstrom, Food Nutr Res, 1997

Manganese vs Iron●●

Manganese and iron share the DMT1 transporter and compete for absorption. High iron status reduces manganese absorption and vice versa.

Erikson et al., Pharmacol Ther, 2007

Amino Acid Profile

Essential amino acid composition compared to the WHO/FAO adult reference pattern. The Amino Acid Score indicates protein quality — 100 means all essential amino acid requirements are met.

62
Amino Acid Score
Moderate
Lysine
Limiting Amino Acid
18
Amino Acids Tracked

Tip: The limiting amino acid is Lysine. Pair with legumes, dairy, and soy for a complete amino acid profile.

All Amino Acids (18)
Amino Acidg / 100gmg / g protein
Tryptophan0.129.0
Threonine0.4131.0
Isoleucine0.4836.7
Leucine0.9269.8
Lysine0.3728.0
Methionine0.2115.6
Cystine0.2821.1
Phenylalanine0.6448.9
Tyrosine0.3929.4
Valine0.6146.7
Arginine0.6851.4
Histidine0.3123.8
Alanine0.4937.3
Aspartic Acid0.7960.2
Glutamic Acid4.0307.1
Glycine0.5642.9
Proline1.290.7
Serine0.6045.4

Fatty Acid Profile

Breakdown of fat types per 100g. A healthy fat profile favours unsaturated fats (mono + poly) and a balanced omega-3 to omega-6 ratio.

0.29g
Saturated
0.32g
Monounsaturated
1.1g
Polyunsaturated
1:14.9
Omega-3 : Omega-6 Ratio
Omega-6 dominant — ideal range is 1:1 to 1:4
Omega Fatty Acids
ALA (18:3 n-3)0.07 g
Linoleic acid (18:2 n-6)1.0 g

How Cooking Changes Nutrients

Estimated percentage of each nutrient retained after cooking, based on USDA retention factors for the “Flour & Meal” food category. Values of 100% mean no loss; lower values indicate nutrients lost to heat, water, or oxidation.

Key insights
Folate loses up to 35% when sautéed. Toasted retains 85%.
Vitamin B6 loses up to 10% when steamed. Toasted retains 100%.

Source: USDA Table of Nutrient Retention Factors, Release 6 (2007). Retention values are category-level averages — actual retention depends on cooking time, temperature, and water volume.

USDA Retention Factors

Insulin Response

The Insulin Index (II) measures the actual insulin response to food on a scale where white bread = 100. Unlike the Glycemic Index (which only measures blood sugar), the II captures the full hormonal response — including the effect of protein and fat on insulin secretion. This is why high-protein foods like meat and dairy can have significant insulin scores despite having low or zero GI values.

56
Insulin Index
Moderate Insulin Response
Insulin Index Scale 56
0 Low ≤30 Mod ≤60 High ≤100 120
Macro Model ●● Estimated from macronutrient composition (R²=0.49)

Source: Holt et al. 1997; Bao et al. 2016; Bell 2014

Environmental Impact

Environmental footprint per kilogram of food produced. Data represents the global average for the “Maize (Meal)” category.

1.7
kg CO₂e / kg
Low Impact
2.9
m² land / kg
Land Use
216
L water / kg
Water Use
6.9
g SO₂e / kg
Acidification
How this compares (GHG emissions)
Potatoes (0.5)Chicken (9.9)Beef (99.5)
Greenhouse Gas Emissions1.7 kg CO₂e / kg
Land Use2.9 m² / kg
Water Use216 L / kg
Eutrophication4.0 g PO₄e / kg
Acidification6.9 g SO₂e / kg
⚠️ Important context about this data
  • Global averages: These figures are production-weighted averages from a meta-analysis of ~38,700 farms across 119 countries (Poore & Nemecek, 2018). Actual impact varies enormously by farming method, geography, and supply chain.
  • System boundary: Cradle-to-retail only — does not include consumer transport, home cooking energy, or food waste.
  • Soil carbon not included: This data does not account for soil carbon sequestration. Some argue that well-managed regenerative grazing partially offsets ruminant emissions; however, full lifecycle accounting — including methane, land-use change, and the opportunity cost of using land for grazing vs. reforestation — typically makes the net footprint of ruminant meat higher, not lower. This is especially relevant in temperate grassland regions like Ireland.
  • Not gospel: This data is informational and illustrative. It is useful for understanding relative magnitudes, but should not be treated as precise measurements for any individual product or farm.

Source: Poore & Nemecek (2018), Science 360(6392). Meta-analysis of ~38,700 farms, 119 countries, 46 product categories.

Global Supply: Cereals

Top 10 countries by per capita supply of the “Cereals” food group (kcal/capita/day, 2023). This is food group–level data from FAO Food Balance Sheets, not specific to this individual food.

1.
Egypt
1962
2.
Bhutan
1927
3.
Serbia
1888
4.
Morocco
1876
5.
Mali
1862
6.
Ethiopia
1829
7.
Philippines
1774
8.
Bangladesh
1756
9.
Myanmar
1738
10.
Nepal
1679

Global Supply Trend (1961–2023)

+8%
1961: 1030 kcal2023: 1108 kcal

Source: FAO Food Balance Sheets (2023). Supply = production + imports − exports − waste, converted to kcal/capita/day.

Frequently Asked Questions

How many calories are in Triticale flour, whole-grain?

Triticale flour, whole-grain contains 325 kcal per 100 grams, making it a calorie-dense food. The energy comes from 13.2g of protein (16% of calories), 1.8g of fat (5%), and 58.3g of carbohydrates (72%). Carbohydrates are the primary energy source.

What is Triticale flour, whole-grain most nutritious for?

The standout nutrient in Triticale flour, whole-grain is Manganese, providing 4.2 mg per 100g (182% of the Daily Value). It is also a notable source of Copper (62% DV). Our database tracks 76 individual nutrients for this food, allowing detailed comparison across vitamins, minerals, amino acids, and fatty acids.

Is Triticale flour, whole-grain high in protein?

Triticale flour, whole-grain provides 13.2g of protein per 100 grams — a moderate amount. Protein contributes 16% of its calories.

How much fiber is in Triticale flour, whole-grain?

Yes, Triticale flour, whole-grain is rich in dietary fiber with 14.4g per 100 grams. The daily recommended intake is 25-38g, so a serving contributes meaningfully toward that goal. Dietary fiber supports digestive health and is associated with reduced risk of cardiovascular disease.

What is the insulin index of Triticale flour, whole-grain?

Triticale flour, whole-grain has a moderate insulin response (II: 56) (estimated from macronutrient composition) on the insulin index scale (white bread = 100). This is a typical insulin response for most mixed foods. Note that the insulin index can differ substantially from the glycemic index — dairy products and high-protein foods often have higher insulin responses than their GI would suggest.