Skip to main content

Biscuits, plain or buttermilk, dry mix

Baked Goods Per 100 g · Per 100g serving
Contains: 🥛 Milk

Biscuits, plain or buttermilk, dry mix is a baked product, containing 428 calories per 100g. It is an excellent source of Sodium and Phosphorus, providing 85% and 84% of the Daily Value respectively. Baked goods derive their nutrients primarily from their flour, fat, and enrichment ingredients. Whole-grain varieties generally offer more fiber and micronutrients. Our database tracks 81 nutrients for this food, plus insulin index, environmental footprint data.

428
Calories
kcal
8.0
Protein
g
15.4
Fat
g
63.4
Carbs
g
2.1
Fiber
g

Top Nutrients

💎
Sodium
1,276 mg
85% DV
💎
Phosphorus
585 mg
84% DV
💪
Carbohydrate
63.4 g
49% DV

Data for 81 of 150 tracked nutrients

Nutrient Fingerprint

How this food scores across key nutrient categories, as a percentage of the daily recommended value per 100 g. Based on USDA DRIs for adults.

Complete Nutrient Profile

Macronutrients 9
NutrientPer 100gUnitPer Serving% DV
Water SR9.2g
0%
Calories SR428kcal
Energy (kJ) SR1,792kj
Protein SR8.0g
14%
Total Fat SR15.4g
Carbohydrate SR63.4g
49%
Fiber SR2.1g
6%
Total Sugars SR11.7g
Ash SR4.0g
Minerals 10
NutrientPer 100gUnitPer Serving% DV
Calcium SR179mg
18%
Iron SR2.8mg
35%
Magnesium SR25.0mg
6%
Phosphorus SR585mg
84%
Potassium SR163mg
5%
Sodium SR1,276mg
85%
Zinc SR0.60mg
6%
Copper SR0.15mg
17%
Manganese SR0.34mg
15%
Selenium SR7.5µg
14%
Vitamins 24
NutrientPer 100gUnitPer Serving% DV
Vitamin A (RAE) SR4.0µg
0%
Vitamin A (IU) SR2.0IU
Retinol SR2.0µg
Beta-Carotene SR0µg
Alpha-Carotene SR0µg
Beta-Cryptoxanthin SR0µg
Lycopene SR0µg
Lutein + Zeaxanthin SR2.0µg
Vitamin C SR0.30mg
0%
Vitamin D SR0µg
Vitamin D (IU) SR0IU
Vitamin E SR0.13mg
1%
Vitamin K1 SR6.5µg
5%
Thiamin (B1) SR0.57mg
48%
Riboflavin (B2) SR0.44mg
34%
Niacin (B3) SR4.5mg
28%
Pantothenic Acid (B5) SR0.88mg
18%
Vitamin B6 SR0.08mg
6%
Folate SR125µg
31%
Folic Acid SR91.0µg
Folate (food) SR34.0µg
Folate (DFE) SR189µg
Vitamin B12 SR0.39µg
16%
Choline SR11.0mg
2%
Fatty Acids 7
NutrientPer 100gUnitPer Serving% DV
Saturated Fat SR4.0g
Monounsaturated Fat SR8.6g
Polyunsaturated Fat SR2.0g
Cholesterol SR2.0mg
Omega-3 EPA SR0g
Omega-3 DPA SR0g
Omega-3 DHA SR0g
Individual Fatty Acids 10
NutrientPer 100gUnitPer Serving% DV
Butyric Acid (4:0) SR0.01g
Caproic Acid (6:0) SR0.003g
Caprylic Acid (8:0) SR0.002g
Capric Acid (10:0) SR0.004g
Lauric Acid (12:0) SR0.004g
Myristic Acid (14:0) SR0.10g
Palmitic Acid (16:0) SR2.0g
Stearic Acid (18:0) SR1.8g
Linoleic Acid (18:2) SR1.9g
11%
Linolenic Acid (18:3) SR0.10g
Amino Acids 18
NutrientPer 100gUnitPer Serving% DV
Tryptophan SR0.10g
Threonine SR0.23g
Isoleucine SR0.29g
Leucine SR0.56g
Lysine SR0.21g
Methionine SR0.14g
Cystine SR0.16g
Phenylalanine SR0.39g
Tyrosine SR0.24g
Valine SR0.33g
Arginine SR0.32g
Histidine SR0.18g
Alanine SR0.26g
Aspartic Acid SR0.36g
Glutamic Acid SR2.6g
Glycine SR0.28g
Proline SR0.90g
Serine SR0.39g
Other 3
NutrientPer 100gUnitPer Serving% DV
Caffeine SR0mg
Theobromine SR0mg
Alcohol SR0g

Nutrient Density Score

The NRF9.3 score measures overall nutritional quality per 100 kcal. It rewards 9 nutrients to encourage (protein, fiber, vitamins A, C, E, calcium, iron, magnesium, potassium) and penalizes 3 to limit (saturated fat, added sugars, sodium). Higher is better; negative scores indicate the food is high in limit nutrients relative to its beneficial content.

-3
NRF9.3 Score
Poor · per 100 kcal
Poor (<0) Moderate Good Excellent (100+)

NRF9.3 index: Fulgoni et al. (2009), J Nutr 139(8). DVs based on FDA 2020 reference values.

Nutrient Interactions in This Food

Nutrients in this food that enhance or compete with each other during absorption.

✔ Synergies — nutrients that help each other

Dietary Fat + Vitamin K●●●

Vitamin K is fat-soluble. Absorption increases significantly when consumed with dietary fat, particularly for phylloquinone (K1) from plant sources.

Gijsbers et al., Br J Nutr, 1996

Vitamin K + Calcium●●

Vitamin K activates osteocalcin and matrix GLA protein, which direct calcium into bones and away from soft tissues (arteries). Works synergistically with vitamin D.

Kidd, Altern Med Rev, 2010

Vitamin B12 + Folate●●

Vitamin B12 and folate are metabolically interdependent. B12 is needed to convert methyltetrahydrofolate back to tetrahydrofolate, enabling folate to participate in DNA synthesis.

Green et al., Nat Rev Dis Primers, 2017

Vitamin B6 + Magnesium●●

Vitamin B6 may enhance intracellular magnesium accumulation. Combined supplementation has shown greater benefits for stress and anxiety than magnesium alone.

Pouteau et al., PLoS One, 2018

Protein + Calcium●●

Moderate protein intake enhances calcium absorption and supports bone health. The acid-ash hypothesis suggesting protein harms bones has been largely disproven.

Kerstetter et al., J Clin Endocrinol Metab, 2005

⚠ Antagonisms — nutrients that compete

Calcium vs Iron●●●

Calcium inhibits both heme and non-heme iron absorption when consumed in the same meal. The effect is dose-dependent, with significant inhibition at 300+ mg calcium.

Hallberg et al., Am J Clin Nutr, 1991

Zinc vs Copper●●●

High zinc intake induces metallothionein in enterocytes, which traps copper and blocks its absorption. Prolonged high-dose zinc can cause copper deficiency.

Prasad et al., JAMA, 1978; Fosmire, Am J Clin Nutr, 1990

Zinc vs Iron●●

Zinc and non-heme iron compete for the same intestinal transporter (DMT1). High doses of one can reduce absorption of the other when taken simultaneously.

Rossander-Hulten et al., Am J Clin Nutr, 1991

Calcium vs Magnesium●●

Very high calcium intake can reduce magnesium absorption by competing for shared intestinal transport pathways. A calcium:magnesium ratio above 2.6:1 may impair magnesium status.

Rosanoff et al., Nutr Rev, 2012

Fiber vs Iron●●

Phytates in high-fibre foods (whole grains, legumes) bind non-heme iron and reduce its bioavailability. Soaking, sprouting, and fermentation reduce phytate content.

Hurrell & Egli, Int J Vitam Nutr Res, 2010

Amino Acid Profile

Essential amino acid composition compared to the WHO/FAO adult reference pattern. The Amino Acid Score indicates protein quality — 100 means all essential amino acid requirements are met.

59
Amino Acid Score
Moderate
Lysine
Limiting Amino Acid
18
Amino Acids Tracked

Tip: The limiting amino acid is Lysine. Pair with legumes, dairy, and soy for a complete amino acid profile.

All Amino Acids (18)
Amino Acidg / 100gmg / g protein
Tryptophan0.1012.2
Threonine0.2329.1
Isoleucine0.2936.0
Leucine0.5670.2
Lysine0.2126.6
Methionine0.1417.8
Cystine0.1620.5
Phenylalanine0.3949.0
Tyrosine0.2430.2
Valine0.3341.8
Arginine0.3239.4
Histidine0.1822.1
Alanine0.2632.6
Aspartic Acid0.3645.5
Glutamic Acid2.6320.9
Glycine0.2834.5
Proline0.90112.0
Serine0.3949.1

Fatty Acid Profile

Breakdown of fat types per 100g. A healthy fat profile favours unsaturated fats (mono + poly) and a balanced omega-3 to omega-6 ratio.

4.0g
Saturated
8.6g
Monounsaturated
2.0g
Polyunsaturated
Omega Fatty Acids
Linoleic acid (18:2 n-6)1.9 g

How Cooking Changes Nutrients

Estimated percentage of each nutrient retained after cooking, based on USDA retention factors for the “Milk” food category. Values of 100% mean no loss; lower values indicate nutrients lost to heat, water, or oxidation.

Source: USDA Table of Nutrient Retention Factors, Release 6 (2007). Retention values are category-level averages — actual retention depends on cooking time, temperature, and water volume.

USDA Retention Factors

Insulin Response

The Insulin Index (II) measures the actual insulin response to food on a scale where white bread = 100. Unlike the Glycemic Index (which only measures blood sugar), the II captures the full hormonal response — including the effect of protein and fat on insulin secretion. This is why high-protein foods like meat and dairy can have significant insulin scores despite having low or zero GI values.

48
Insulin Index
Moderate Insulin Response
Insulin Index Scale 48
0 Low ≤30 Mod ≤60 High ≤100 120
Macro Model ●● Estimated from macronutrient composition (R²=0.49)

Source: Holt et al. 1997; Bao et al. 2016; Bell 2014

Environmental Impact

Environmental footprint per kilogram of food produced. Data represents the global average for the “Wheat & Rye (Bread)” category.

1.6
kg CO₂e / kg
Low Impact
3.5
m² land / kg
Land Use
648
L water / kg
Water Use
12.2
g SO₂e / kg
Acidification
How this compares (GHG emissions)
Potatoes (0.5)Chicken (9.9)Beef (99.5)
Greenhouse Gas Emissions1.6 kg CO₂e / kg
Land Use3.5 m² / kg
Water Use648 L / kg
Eutrophication7.2 g PO₄e / kg
Acidification12.2 g SO₂e / kg
⚠️ Important context about this data
  • Global averages: These figures are production-weighted averages from a meta-analysis of ~38,700 farms across 119 countries (Poore & Nemecek, 2018). Actual impact varies enormously by farming method, geography, and supply chain.
  • System boundary: Cradle-to-retail only — does not include consumer transport, home cooking energy, or food waste.
  • Soil carbon not included: This data does not account for soil carbon sequestration. Some argue that well-managed regenerative grazing partially offsets ruminant emissions; however, full lifecycle accounting — including methane, land-use change, and the opportunity cost of using land for grazing vs. reforestation — typically makes the net footprint of ruminant meat higher, not lower. This is especially relevant in temperate grassland regions like Ireland.
  • Not gospel: This data is informational and illustrative. It is useful for understanding relative magnitudes, but should not be treated as precise measurements for any individual product or farm.

Source: Poore & Nemecek (2018), Science 360(6392). Meta-analysis of ~38,700 farms, 119 countries, 46 product categories.

Global Supply: Cereals

Top 10 countries by per capita supply of the “Cereals” food group (kcal/capita/day, 2023). This is food group–level data from FAO Food Balance Sheets, not specific to this individual food.

1.
Egypt
1962
2.
Bhutan
1927
3.
Serbia
1888
4.
Morocco
1876
5.
Mali
1862
6.
Ethiopia
1829
7.
Philippines
1774
8.
Bangladesh
1756
9.
Myanmar
1738
10.
Nepal
1679

Global Supply Trend (1961–2023)

+8%
1961: 1030 kcal2023: 1108 kcal

Source: FAO Food Balance Sheets (2023). Supply = production + imports − exports − waste, converted to kcal/capita/day.

Frequently Asked Questions

How many calories are in Biscuits, plain or buttermilk, dry mix?

Biscuits, plain or buttermilk, dry mix contains 428 kcal per 100 grams, making it a calorie-dense food. The energy comes from 8.0g of protein (7% of calories), 15.4g of fat (32%), and 63.4g of carbohydrates (59%). Carbohydrates are the primary energy source.

What is Biscuits, plain or buttermilk, dry mix most nutritious for?

The standout nutrient in Biscuits, plain or buttermilk, dry mix is Sodium, providing 1,276 mg per 100g (85% of the Daily Value). It is also a notable source of Phosphorus (84% DV). Our database tracks 81 individual nutrients for this food, allowing detailed comparison across vitamins, minerals, amino acids, and fatty acids.

Is Biscuits, plain or buttermilk, dry mix high in protein?

Biscuits, plain or buttermilk, dry mix contains 8.0g of protein per 100 grams. While not a high-protein food, it can contribute to daily protein needs as part of a varied diet.

How much fiber is in Biscuits, plain or buttermilk, dry mix?

Biscuits, plain or buttermilk, dry mix contains 2.1g of fiber per 100 grams, which is a small amount. To increase fiber intake, consider pairing with high-fiber foods such as legumes, whole grains, or vegetables.

What is the insulin index of Biscuits, plain or buttermilk, dry mix?

Biscuits, plain or buttermilk, dry mix has a moderate insulin response (II: 48) (estimated from macronutrient composition) on the insulin index scale (white bread = 100). This is a typical insulin response for most mixed foods. Note that the insulin index can differ substantially from the glycemic index — dairy products and high-protein foods often have higher insulin responses than their GI would suggest.