Skip to main content

Cereals ready-to-eat, MALT-O-MEAL, GOLDEN PUFFS

Cereals Per 100 g · Per 100g serving

Cereals ready-to-eat, MALT-O-MEAL, GOLDEN PUFFS is a cereal, containing 370 calories per 100g. It is an excellent source of Vitamin B12, Vitamin A (RAE) and Folate, providing 278%, 206% and 185% of the Daily Value respectively. This cereal is virtually fat-free. Breakfast cereals vary widely in nutrient density. Many are fortified with vitamins and minerals, which can contribute meaningfully to daily nutrient intakes. Our database tracks 86 nutrients for this food, plus glycemic index, insulin index, environmental footprint data.

370
Calories
kcal
5.8
Protein
g
0.89
Fat
g
89.7
Carbs
g
2.6
Fiber
g

Top Nutrients

☀️
Vitamin B12
6.7 µg
278% DV
☀️
Vitamin A (RAE)
1,852 µg
206% DV
☀️
Folate
741 µg
185% DV

Data for 86 of 150 tracked nutrients

Nutrient Fingerprint

How this food scores across key nutrient categories, as a percentage of the daily recommended value per 100 g. Based on USDA DRIs for adults.

Complete Nutrient Profile

Macronutrients 10
NutrientPer 100gUnitPer Serving% DV
Water SR2.8g
0%
Calories SR370kcal
Energy (kJ) SR1,550kj
Protein SR5.8g
10%
Total Fat SR0.89g
Carbohydrate SR89.7g
69%
Fiber SR2.6g
7%
Total Sugars SR51.3g
Starch SR21.4g
Ash SR0.86g
Minerals 10
NutrientPer 100gUnitPer Serving% DV
Calcium SR11.0mg
1%
Iron SR7.9mg
99%
Magnesium SR46.0mg
12%
Phosphorus SR222mg
32%
Potassium SR204mg
6%
Sodium SR204mg
14%
Zinc SR7.3mg
66%
Copper SR0.30mg
33%
Manganese SR0.85mg
37%
Selenium SR27.2µg
50%
Vitamins 24
NutrientPer 100gUnitPer Serving% DV
Vitamin A (RAE) SR1,852µg
206%
Vitamin A (IU) SR555IU
Retinol SR554µg
Beta-Carotene SR2.0µg
Alpha-Carotene SR0µg
Beta-Cryptoxanthin SR0µg
Lycopene SR0µg
Lutein + Zeaxanthin SR94.0µg
Vitamin C SR27.6mg
31%
Vitamin D SR3.8µg
25%
Vitamin D (IU) SR151IU
Vitamin E SR0.43mg
3%
Vitamin K1 SR1.1µg
1%
Thiamin (B1) SR1.7mg
145%
Riboflavin (B2) SR2.2mg
167%
Niacin (B3) SR25.2mg
157%
Pantothenic Acid (B5) SR0.32mg
6%
Vitamin B6 SR2.1mg
159%
Folate SR741µg
185%
Folic Acid SR728µg
Folate (food) SR13.0µg
Folate (DFE) SR1,250µg
Vitamin B12 SR6.7µg
278%
Choline SR14.4mg
3%
Fatty Acids 9
NutrientPer 100gUnitPer Serving% DV
Saturated Fat SR0.16g
Monounsaturated Fat SR0.22g
Polyunsaturated Fat SR0.35g
Trans Fat SR0.03g
Cholesterol SR0mg
Omega-3 ALA SR0.02g
1%
Omega-3 EPA SR0.001g
Omega-3 DPA SR0.001g
Omega-3 DHA SR0g
Individual Fatty Acids 12
NutrientPer 100gUnitPer Serving% DV
Butyric Acid (4:0) SR0g
Caproic Acid (6:0) SR0g
Caprylic Acid (8:0) SR0.001g
Capric Acid (10:0) SR0.008g
Lauric Acid (12:0) SR0g
Myristic Acid (14:0) SR0.001g
Palmitic Acid (16:0) SR0.12g
Stearic Acid (18:0) SR0.02g
Linoleic Acid (18:2) SR0.33g
2%
Omega-6 LA SR0.32g
Omega-6 GLA SR0g
Linolenic Acid (18:3) SR0.02g
Amino Acids 18
NutrientPer 100gUnitPer Serving% DV
Tryptophan SR0.12g
Threonine SR0.17g
Isoleucine SR0.20g
Leucine SR0.43g
Lysine SR0.05g
Methionine SR0.09g
Cystine SR0.05g
Phenylalanine SR0.32g
Tyrosine SR0.14g
Valine SR0.24g
Arginine SR0.12g
Histidine SR0.14g
Alanine SR0.20g
Aspartic Acid SR0.27g
Glutamic Acid SR2.2g
Glycine SR0.21g
Proline SR0.44g
Serine SR0.31g
Other 3
NutrientPer 100gUnitPer Serving% DV
Caffeine SR0mg
Theobromine SR0mg
Alcohol SR0g

Nutrient Density Score

The NRF9.3 score measures overall nutritional quality per 100 kcal. It rewards 9 nutrients to encourage (protein, fiber, vitamins A, C, E, calcium, iron, magnesium, potassium) and penalizes 3 to limit (saturated fat, added sugars, sodium). Higher is better; negative scores indicate the food is high in limit nutrients relative to its beneficial content.

84
NRF9.3 Score
Good · per 100 kcal
Poor (<0) Moderate Good Excellent (100+)

NRF9.3 index: Fulgoni et al. (2009), J Nutr 139(8). DVs based on FDA 2020 reference values.

Nutrient Interactions in This Food

Nutrients in this food that enhance or compete with each other during absorption.

✔ Synergies — nutrients that help each other

Vitamin C + Iron●●●

Vitamin C dramatically enhances non-heme iron absorption by reducing Fe³⁺ to Fe²⁺ in the gut. Adding 75 mg vitamin C to a meal can increase iron absorption 3–4 fold.

Hallberg et al., Am J Clin Nutr, 1989

Dietary Fat + Vitamin A●●●

Vitamin A is fat-soluble and requires dietary fat for absorption. Adding fat to a meal significantly increases beta-carotene and retinol absorption.

Ribaya-Mercado et al., Am J Clin Nutr, 2007

Dietary Fat + Vitamin D●●●

Vitamin D is fat-soluble. Co-consumption with dietary fat increases absorption by up to 50% compared to taking it on an empty stomach.

Dawson-Hughes et al., J Acad Nutr Diet, 2015

Vitamin D + Phosphorus●●

Vitamin D enhances intestinal phosphorus absorption and regulates phosphorus homeostasis via parathyroid hormone signalling.

Bergwitz & Jüppner, Annu Rev Med, 2010

Vitamin D + Magnesium●●

Magnesium is required for vitamin D metabolism — it is a cofactor for the enzymes that convert vitamin D to its active form (1,25-dihydroxyvitamin D).

Uwitonze & Razzaque, J Am Osteopath Assoc, 2018

⚠ Antagonisms — nutrients that compete

Zinc vs Copper●●●

High zinc intake induces metallothionein in enterocytes, which traps copper and blocks its absorption. Prolonged high-dose zinc can cause copper deficiency.

Prasad et al., JAMA, 1978; Fosmire, Am J Clin Nutr, 1990

Zinc vs Iron●●

Zinc and non-heme iron compete for the same intestinal transporter (DMT1). High doses of one can reduce absorption of the other when taken simultaneously.

Rossander-Hulten et al., Am J Clin Nutr, 1991

Fiber vs Iron●●

Phytates in high-fibre foods (whole grains, legumes) bind non-heme iron and reduce its bioavailability. Soaking, sprouting, and fermentation reduce phytate content.

Hurrell & Egli, Int J Vitam Nutr Res, 2010

Fiber vs Zinc●●

Phytates in fibre-rich foods chelate zinc, reducing its bioavailability by up to 50% in high-phytate diets. This is a major concern in plant-based diets.

Sandstrom, Food Nutr Res, 1997

Potassium vs Sodium●●

High potassium intake promotes renal sodium excretion and attenuates the blood pressure–raising effect of sodium. A higher K:Na ratio is associated with lower cardiovascular risk.

Aburto et al., BMJ, 2013

Amino Acid Profile

Essential amino acid composition compared to the WHO/FAO adult reference pattern. The Amino Acid Score indicates protein quality — 100 means all essential amino acid requirements are met.

20
Amino Acid Score
Low
Lysine
Limiting Amino Acid
18
Amino Acids Tracked

Tip: The limiting amino acid is Lysine. Pair with legumes, dairy, and soy for a complete amino acid profile.

All Amino Acids (18)
Amino Acidg / 100gmg / g protein
Tryptophan0.1221.3
Threonine0.1730.2
Isoleucine0.2035.4
Leucine0.4374.4
Lysine0.058.8
Methionine0.0915.9
Cystine0.058.8
Phenylalanine0.3254.9
Tyrosine0.1424.8
Valine0.2442.5
Arginine0.1221.3
Histidine0.1424.8
Alanine0.2035.4
Aspartic Acid0.2746.1
Glutamic Acid2.2380.9
Glycine0.2137.3
Proline0.4476.3
Serine0.3153.2

Fatty Acid Profile

Breakdown of fat types per 100g. A healthy fat profile favours unsaturated fats (mono + poly) and a balanced omega-3 to omega-6 ratio.

0.16g
Saturated
0.22g
Monounsaturated
0.35g
Polyunsaturated
1:14.7
Omega-3 : Omega-6 Ratio
Omega-6 dominant — ideal range is 1:1 to 1:4
Omega Fatty Acids
EPA (20:5 n-3)0.001 g
ALA (18:3 n-3)0.02 g
DPA (22:5 n-3)0.001 g
Linoleic acid (18:2 n-6)0.32 g

How Cooking Changes Nutrients

Estimated percentage of each nutrient retained after cooking, based on USDA retention factors for the “Cereal” food category. Values of 100% mean no loss; lower values indicate nutrients lost to heat, water, or oxidation.

Source: USDA Table of Nutrient Retention Factors, Release 6 (2007). Retention values are category-level averages — actual retention depends on cooking time, temperature, and water volume.

USDA Retention Factors

Glycemic & Insulin Response

The Glycemic Index (GI) measures how quickly a food raises blood sugar on a 0–100 scale. The Insulin Index (II) measures the insulin response directly, which can differ from GI — notably, dairy and high-protein foods often trigger a higher insulin response than their GI suggests. White bread = 100 for both scales.

70
Glycemic Index
High GI
18
Glycemic Load
Medium GL (per 50g)
GI Scale 70
0 Low <55 Med High ≥70 100

GI data matched from: “Breakfast cereal (estimated from category)” · ●● low confidence

71
Insulin Index
High Insulin Response
Insulin Index Scale 71
0 Low ≤30 Mod ≤60 High ≤100 120
GI Model ●● Estimated via GI-based regression (R²=0.78)

Source: International Tables of Glycemic Index (Sydney University, 2021) · Holt et al. 1997; Bao et al. 2016; Bell 2014

Environmental Impact

Environmental footprint per kilogram of food produced. Data represents the global average for the “Wheat & Rye (Bread)” category.

1.6
kg CO₂e / kg
Low Impact
3.5
m² land / kg
Land Use
648
L water / kg
Water Use
12.2
g SO₂e / kg
Acidification
How this compares (GHG emissions)
Potatoes (0.5)Chicken (9.9)Beef (99.5)
Greenhouse Gas Emissions1.6 kg CO₂e / kg
Land Use3.5 m² / kg
Water Use648 L / kg
Eutrophication7.2 g PO₄e / kg
Acidification12.2 g SO₂e / kg
⚠️ Important context about this data
  • Global averages: These figures are production-weighted averages from a meta-analysis of ~38,700 farms across 119 countries (Poore & Nemecek, 2018). Actual impact varies enormously by farming method, geography, and supply chain.
  • System boundary: Cradle-to-retail only — does not include consumer transport, home cooking energy, or food waste.
  • Soil carbon not included: This data does not account for soil carbon sequestration. Some argue that well-managed regenerative grazing partially offsets ruminant emissions; however, full lifecycle accounting — including methane, land-use change, and the opportunity cost of using land for grazing vs. reforestation — typically makes the net footprint of ruminant meat higher, not lower. This is especially relevant in temperate grassland regions like Ireland.
  • Not gospel: This data is informational and illustrative. It is useful for understanding relative magnitudes, but should not be treated as precise measurements for any individual product or farm.

Source: Poore & Nemecek (2018), Science 360(6392). Meta-analysis of ~38,700 farms, 119 countries, 46 product categories.

Global Supply: Cereals

Top 10 countries by per capita supply of the “Cereals” food group (kcal/capita/day, 2023). This is food group–level data from FAO Food Balance Sheets, not specific to this individual food.

1.
Egypt
1962
2.
Bhutan
1927
3.
Serbia
1888
4.
Morocco
1876
5.
Mali
1862
6.
Ethiopia
1829
7.
Philippines
1774
8.
Bangladesh
1756
9.
Myanmar
1738
10.
Nepal
1679

Global Supply Trend (1961–2023)

+8%
1961: 1030 kcal2023: 1108 kcal

Source: FAO Food Balance Sheets (2023). Supply = production + imports − exports − waste, converted to kcal/capita/day.

Frequently Asked Questions

How many calories are in Cereals ready-to-eat, MALT-O-MEAL, GOLDEN PUFFS?

Cereals ready-to-eat, MALT-O-MEAL, GOLDEN PUFFS contains 370 kcal per 100 grams, making it a calorie-dense food. The energy comes from 5.8g of protein (6% of calories), 0.89g of fat (2%), and 89.7g of carbohydrates (97%). Carbohydrates are the primary energy source.

What is Cereals ready-to-eat, MALT-O-MEAL, GOLDEN PUFFS most nutritious for?

The standout nutrient in Cereals ready-to-eat, MALT-O-MEAL, GOLDEN PUFFS is Vitamin B12, providing 6.7 µg per 100g (278% of the Daily Value). It is also a notable source of Vitamin A (RAE) (206% DV). Our database tracks 86 individual nutrients for this food, allowing detailed comparison across vitamins, minerals, amino acids, and fatty acids.

Is Cereals ready-to-eat, MALT-O-MEAL, GOLDEN PUFFS high in protein?

Cereals ready-to-eat, MALT-O-MEAL, GOLDEN PUFFS contains 5.8g of protein per 100 grams. While not a high-protein food, it can contribute to daily protein needs as part of a varied diet.

How much fiber is in Cereals ready-to-eat, MALT-O-MEAL, GOLDEN PUFFS?

Cereals ready-to-eat, MALT-O-MEAL, GOLDEN PUFFS contains 2.6g of fiber per 100 grams, which is a small amount. To increase fiber intake, consider pairing with high-fiber foods such as legumes, whole grains, or vegetables.

What is the glycemic index of Cereals ready-to-eat, MALT-O-MEAL, GOLDEN PUFFS?

Cereals ready-to-eat, MALT-O-MEAL, GOLDEN PUFFS has a glycemic index of 70, which is classified as high (≥70). High-GI foods cause a rapid spike in blood sugar. Pairing with protein, fat, or fiber can help moderate the glycemic response. The glycemic load, which accounts for typical serving size, provides additional context for real-world blood sugar impact.

What is the insulin index of Cereals ready-to-eat, MALT-O-MEAL, GOLDEN PUFFS?

Cereals ready-to-eat, MALT-O-MEAL, GOLDEN PUFFS has a high insulin response (II: 71) (estimated from macronutrient composition) on the insulin index scale (white bread = 100). Foods with high insulin scores stimulate significant insulin release, which may be relevant for blood sugar management. Note that the insulin index can differ substantially from the glycemic index — dairy products and high-protein foods often have higher insulin responses than their GI would suggest.