Skip to main content

Cereals ready-to-eat, POST Raisin Bran Cereal

Cereals Per 100 g · Per 100g serving

Cereals ready-to-eat, POST Raisin Bran Cereal is a cereal, containing 324 calories per 100g. It is an excellent source of Iron, Vitamin A (RAE) and Manganese, providing 229%, 141% and 140% of the Daily Value respectively. This cereal is rich in dietary fiber. Breakfast cereals vary widely in nutrient density. Many are fortified with vitamins and minerals, which can contribute meaningfully to daily nutrient intakes. Our database tracks 83 nutrients for this food, plus glycemic index, insulin index, polyphenol profile, environmental footprint data.

324
Calories
kcal
7.6
Protein
g
1.6
Fat
g
78.9
Carbs
g
13.7
Fiber
g

Top Nutrients

💎
Iron
18.3 mg
229% DV
☀️
Vitamin A (RAE)
1,271 µg
141% DV
💎
Manganese
3.2 mg
140% DV

Data for 83 of 150 tracked nutrients

Nutrient Fingerprint

How this food scores across key nutrient categories, as a percentage of the daily recommended value per 100 g. Based on USDA DRIs for adults.

Complete Nutrient Profile

Macronutrients 9
NutrientPer 100gUnitPer Serving% DV
Water SR8.6g
0%
Calories SR324kcal
Energy (kJ) SR1,354kj
Protein SR7.6g
14%
Total Fat SR1.6g
Carbohydrate SR78.9g
61%
Fiber SR13.7g
36%
Total Sugars SR32.9g
Ash SR3.2g
Minerals 10
NutrientPer 100gUnitPer Serving% DV
Calcium SR44.0mg
4%
Iron SR18.3mg
229%
Magnesium SR168mg
42%
Phosphorus SR339mg
48%
Potassium SR525mg
15%
Sodium SR382mg
26%
Zinc SR3.8mg
34%
Copper SR0.40mg
44%
Manganese SR3.2mg
140%
Selenium SR5.9µg
11%
Vitamins 25
NutrientPer 100gUnitPer Serving% DV
Vitamin A (RAE) SR1,271µg
141%
Vitamin A (IU) SR380IU
Retinol SR380µg
Beta-Carotene SR2.0µg
Alpha-Carotene SR0µg
Beta-Cryptoxanthin SR0µg
Lycopene SR0µg
Lutein + Zeaxanthin SR101µg
Vitamin C SR0.90mg
1%
Vitamin D SR1.7µg
11%
Vitamin D (IU) SR68.0IU
Vitamin D3 SR1.7µg
Vitamin E SR0.54mg
4%
Vitamin K1 SR1.9µg
2%
Thiamin (B1) SR0.60mg
50%
Riboflavin (B2) SR0.70mg
54%
Niacin (B3) SR8.5mg
53%
Pantothenic Acid (B5) SR0.21mg
4%
Vitamin B6 SR0.80mg
62%
Folate SR339µg
85%
Folic Acid SR320µg
Folate (food) SR19.0µg
Folate (DFE) SR563µg
Vitamin B12 SR2.5µg
104%
Choline SR27.3mg
5%
Fatty Acids 8
NutrientPer 100gUnitPer Serving% DV
Saturated Fat SR0.30g
Monounsaturated Fat SR0.35g
Polyunsaturated Fat SR0.80g
Trans Fat SR0g
Cholesterol SR0mg
Omega-3 EPA SR0g
Omega-3 DPA SR0g
Omega-3 DHA SR0g
Individual Fatty Acids 10
NutrientPer 100gUnitPer Serving% DV
Butyric Acid (4:0) SR0g
Caproic Acid (6:0) SR0g
Caprylic Acid (8:0) SR0g
Capric Acid (10:0) SR0g
Lauric Acid (12:0) SR0g
Myristic Acid (14:0) SR0g
Palmitic Acid (16:0) SR0.27g
Stearic Acid (18:0) SR0.02g
Linoleic Acid (18:2) SR0.73g
4%
Linolenic Acid (18:3) SR0.06g
Amino Acids 18
NutrientPer 100gUnitPer Serving% DV
Tryptophan SR0.12g
Threonine SR0.21g
Isoleucine SR0.21g
Leucine SR0.41g
Lysine SR0.16g
Methionine SR0.08g
Cystine SR0.15g
Phenylalanine SR0.30g
Tyrosine SR0.08g
Valine SR0.29g
Arginine SR0.35g
Histidine SR0.15g
Alanine SR0.27g
Aspartic Acid SR0.39g
Glutamic Acid SR1.6g
Glycine SR0.30g
Proline SR0.56g
Serine SR0.30g
Other 3
NutrientPer 100gUnitPer Serving% DV
Caffeine SR0mg
Theobromine SR0mg
Alcohol SR0g

Nutrient Density Score

The NRF9.3 score measures overall nutritional quality per 100 kcal. It rewards 9 nutrients to encourage (protein, fiber, vitamins A, C, E, calcium, iron, magnesium, potassium) and penalizes 3 to limit (saturated fat, added sugars, sodium). Higher is better; negative scores indicate the food is high in limit nutrients relative to its beneficial content.

107
NRF9.3 Score
Excellent · per 100 kcal
Poor (<0) Moderate Good Excellent (100+)

NRF9.3 index: Fulgoni et al. (2009), J Nutr 139(8). DVs based on FDA 2020 reference values.

Nutrient Interactions in This Food

Nutrients in this food that enhance or compete with each other during absorption.

✔ Synergies — nutrients that help each other

Dietary Fat + Vitamin A●●●

Vitamin A is fat-soluble and requires dietary fat for absorption. Adding fat to a meal significantly increases beta-carotene and retinol absorption.

Ribaya-Mercado et al., Am J Clin Nutr, 2007

Dietary Fat + Vitamin D●●●

Vitamin D is fat-soluble. Co-consumption with dietary fat increases absorption by up to 50% compared to taking it on an empty stomach.

Dawson-Hughes et al., J Acad Nutr Diet, 2015

Vitamin D + Phosphorus●●

Vitamin D enhances intestinal phosphorus absorption and regulates phosphorus homeostasis via parathyroid hormone signalling.

Bergwitz & Jüppner, Annu Rev Med, 2010

Vitamin D + Magnesium●●

Magnesium is required for vitamin D metabolism — it is a cofactor for the enzymes that convert vitamin D to its active form (1,25-dihydroxyvitamin D).

Uwitonze & Razzaque, J Am Osteopath Assoc, 2018

Vitamin B12 + Folate●●

Vitamin B12 and folate are metabolically interdependent. B12 is needed to convert methyltetrahydrofolate back to tetrahydrofolate, enabling folate to participate in DNA synthesis.

Green et al., Nat Rev Dis Primers, 2017

⚠ Antagonisms — nutrients that compete

Zinc vs Copper●●●

High zinc intake induces metallothionein in enterocytes, which traps copper and blocks its absorption. Prolonged high-dose zinc can cause copper deficiency.

Prasad et al., JAMA, 1978; Fosmire, Am J Clin Nutr, 1990

Zinc vs Iron●●

Zinc and non-heme iron compete for the same intestinal transporter (DMT1). High doses of one can reduce absorption of the other when taken simultaneously.

Rossander-Hulten et al., Am J Clin Nutr, 1991

Fiber vs Iron●●

Phytates in high-fibre foods (whole grains, legumes) bind non-heme iron and reduce its bioavailability. Soaking, sprouting, and fermentation reduce phytate content.

Hurrell & Egli, Int J Vitam Nutr Res, 2010

Fiber vs Zinc●●

Phytates in fibre-rich foods chelate zinc, reducing its bioavailability by up to 50% in high-phytate diets. This is a major concern in plant-based diets.

Sandstrom, Food Nutr Res, 1997

Potassium vs Sodium●●

High potassium intake promotes renal sodium excretion and attenuates the blood pressure–raising effect of sodium. A higher K:Na ratio is associated with lower cardiovascular risk.

Aburto et al., BMJ, 2013

Amino Acid Profile

Essential amino acid composition compared to the WHO/FAO adult reference pattern. The Amino Acid Score indicates protein quality — 100 means all essential amino acid requirements are met.

46
Amino Acid Score
Low
Lysine
Limiting Amino Acid
18
Amino Acids Tracked

Tip: The limiting amino acid is Lysine. Pair with legumes, dairy, and soy for a complete amino acid profile.

All Amino Acids (18)
Amino Acidg / 100gmg / g protein
Tryptophan0.1215.3
Threonine0.2127.1
Isoleucine0.2127.1
Leucine0.4154.3
Lysine0.1620.7
Methionine0.0810.9
Cystine0.1519.6
Phenylalanine0.3040.1
Tyrosine0.0810.9
Valine0.2938.0
Arginine0.3545.7
Histidine0.1519.6
Alanine0.2735.8
Aspartic Acid0.3951.1
Glutamic Acid1.6215.0
Glycine0.3039.1
Proline0.5673.8
Serine0.3039.1

Fatty Acid Profile

Breakdown of fat types per 100g. A healthy fat profile favours unsaturated fats (mono + poly) and a balanced omega-3 to omega-6 ratio.

0.30g
Saturated
0.35g
Monounsaturated
0.80g
Polyunsaturated
Omega Fatty Acids
Linoleic acid (18:2 n-6)0.73 g

How Cooking Changes Nutrients

Estimated percentage of each nutrient retained after cooking, based on USDA retention factors for the “Dried Fruits” food category. Values of 100% mean no loss; lower values indicate nutrients lost to heat, water, or oxidation.

Key insights
Vitamin C loses up to 49% when dried. Baked retains 80%.
Folate loses up to 50% when sautéed. Dried retains 61%.

Source: USDA Table of Nutrient Retention Factors, Release 6 (2007). Retention values are category-level averages — actual retention depends on cooking time, temperature, and water volume.

USDA Retention Factors

Glycemic & Insulin Response

The Glycemic Index (GI) measures how quickly a food raises blood sugar on a 0–100 scale. The Insulin Index (II) measures the insulin response directly, which can differ from GI — notably, dairy and high-protein foods often trigger a higher insulin response than their GI suggests. White bread = 100 for both scales.

64
Glycemic Index
Medium GI
28
Glycemic Load
High GL (per 60g)
GI Scale 64
0 Low <55 Med High ≥70 100

GI data matched from: “Raisins” · ●●● high confidence

42
Insulin Index
Moderate Insulin Response
Insulin Index Scale 42
0 Low ≤30 Mod ≤60 High ≤100 120
Measured ●●● Clinically measured (Holt 1997, Bell 2014)

Source: International Tables of Glycemic Index (Sydney University, 2021) · Holt et al. 1997; Bao et al. 2016; Bell 2014

Polyphenols & Bioactive Compounds

Polyphenols are plant-derived compounds with antioxidant properties. Higher intake is associated with reduced cardiovascular risk and improved gut health.

24
Total Polyphenols
mg per 100g · Low
2
Polyphenol Classes
identified in this food
Flavonoids14 mg58%
Phenolic Acids10 mg42%

Processing Impact on Polyphenols

How common cooking methods affect polyphenol content in fruits. Retention % is relative to the raw/unprocessed food.

Best Method
Freezing
95% retained
Most Loss
Juicing
52% retained
🧊
Freezing95%
Excellent retention; flash-freezing preserves structure and polyp≈23 mg
☀️
Drying82%
Moderate heat degradation offset by concentration; sun-drying ret≈20 mg
🫕
Boiling68%
Significant leaching of water-soluble flavonoids into cooking wat≈16 mg
🔥
Baking/Roasting65%
Dry heat degrades anthocyanins more than other flavonoids≈16 mg
🥫
Canning55%
Prolonged thermal treatment and water contact cause significant l≈13 mg
🧃
Juicing52%
Fiber-bound polyphenols lost with pulp; clear juices lose more th≈12 mg

Health Associations

Research-backed associations for the polyphenol classes found in this food. Evidence strength rated from systematic reviews and meta-analyses.

💜
↓ Cardiovascular disease riskModerate
Flavonoids: Meta-analyses of prospective cohorts show 10-20% lower CVD risk with higher flav
💜
↓ Blood pressureModerate
Flavonoids: RCTs show modest systolic BP reductions (2-5 mmHg) with flavanol-rich cocoa and
🔵
↑ Antioxidant capacityStrong
Phenolic Acids: Chlorogenic acid (coffee) and ferulic acid (grains) show consistent antioxidant
🔵
↑ Glucose metabolismModerate
Phenolic Acids: Chlorogenic acid may slow glucose absorption and improve insulin sensitivity
⚠ Most evidence is from observational studies and in vitro research. Randomized controlled trials are limited. Individual responses vary based on gut microbiome, genetics, and overall diet. Associations do not prove causation.

Polyphenol data matched from: “Raisins” · ●●● high confidence

Source: Phenol-Explorer 3.6 (INRA, 2023) · Retention: Rothwell 2013, Palermo 2014 · Health: Del Bo' 2019, Grosso 2017

Environmental Impact

Environmental footprint per kilogram of food produced. Data represents the global average for the “Berries & Grapes” category.

1.5
kg CO₂e / kg
Low Impact
2.4
m² land / kg
Land Use
420
L water / kg
Water Use
7.3
g SO₂e / kg
Acidification
How this compares (GHG emissions)
Potatoes (0.5)Chicken (9.9)Beef (99.5)
Greenhouse Gas Emissions1.5 kg CO₂e / kg
Land Use2.4 m² / kg
Water Use420 L / kg
Eutrophication5.2 g PO₄e / kg
Acidification7.3 g SO₂e / kg
⚠️ Important context about this data
  • Global averages: These figures are production-weighted averages from a meta-analysis of ~38,700 farms across 119 countries (Poore & Nemecek, 2018). Actual impact varies enormously by farming method, geography, and supply chain.
  • System boundary: Cradle-to-retail only — does not include consumer transport, home cooking energy, or food waste.
  • Soil carbon not included: This data does not account for soil carbon sequestration. Some argue that well-managed regenerative grazing partially offsets ruminant emissions; however, full lifecycle accounting — including methane, land-use change, and the opportunity cost of using land for grazing vs. reforestation — typically makes the net footprint of ruminant meat higher, not lower. This is especially relevant in temperate grassland regions like Ireland.
  • Not gospel: This data is informational and illustrative. It is useful for understanding relative magnitudes, but should not be treated as precise measurements for any individual product or farm.

Source: Poore & Nemecek (2018), Science 360(6392). Meta-analysis of ~38,700 farms, 119 countries, 46 product categories.

Global Supply: Cereals

Top 10 countries by per capita supply of the “Cereals” food group (kcal/capita/day, 2023). This is food group–level data from FAO Food Balance Sheets, not specific to this individual food.

1.
Egypt
1962
2.
Bhutan
1927
3.
Serbia
1888
4.
Morocco
1876
5.
Mali
1862
6.
Ethiopia
1829
7.
Philippines
1774
8.
Bangladesh
1756
9.
Myanmar
1738
10.
Nepal
1679

Global Supply Trend (1961–2023)

+8%
1961: 1030 kcal2023: 1108 kcal

Source: FAO Food Balance Sheets (2023). Supply = production + imports − exports − waste, converted to kcal/capita/day.

Frequently Asked Questions

How many calories are in Cereals ready-to-eat, POST Raisin Bran Cereal?

Cereals ready-to-eat, POST Raisin Bran Cereal contains 324 kcal per 100 grams, making it a calorie-dense food. The energy comes from 7.6g of protein (9% of calories), 1.6g of fat (4%), and 78.9g of carbohydrates (97%). Carbohydrates are the primary energy source.

What is Cereals ready-to-eat, POST Raisin Bran Cereal most nutritious for?

The standout nutrient in Cereals ready-to-eat, POST Raisin Bran Cereal is Iron, providing 18.3 mg per 100g (229% of the Daily Value). It is also a notable source of Vitamin A (RAE) (141% DV). Our database tracks 83 individual nutrients for this food, allowing detailed comparison across vitamins, minerals, amino acids, and fatty acids.

Is Cereals ready-to-eat, POST Raisin Bran Cereal high in protein?

Cereals ready-to-eat, POST Raisin Bran Cereal contains 7.6g of protein per 100 grams. While not a high-protein food, it can contribute to daily protein needs as part of a varied diet.

How much fiber is in Cereals ready-to-eat, POST Raisin Bran Cereal?

Yes, Cereals ready-to-eat, POST Raisin Bran Cereal is rich in dietary fiber with 13.7g per 100 grams. The daily recommended intake is 25-38g, so a serving contributes meaningfully toward that goal. Dietary fiber supports digestive health and is associated with reduced risk of cardiovascular disease.

What is the glycemic index of Cereals ready-to-eat, POST Raisin Bran Cereal?

Cereals ready-to-eat, POST Raisin Bran Cereal has a glycemic index of 64, which is classified as medium (56-69). Medium-GI foods produce a moderate blood sugar response. The glycemic load, which accounts for typical serving size, provides additional context for real-world blood sugar impact.

Does Cereals ready-to-eat, POST Raisin Bran Cereal contain polyphenols?

Yes, Cereals ready-to-eat, POST Raisin Bran Cereal contains approximately 24.0 mg of polyphenols per 100g, primarily from the low class. Polyphenols are bioactive plant compounds associated with antioxidant properties. Their retention can vary with cooking and processing methods — see the processing impact section above for details.

What is the insulin index of Cereals ready-to-eat, POST Raisin Bran Cereal?

Cereals ready-to-eat, POST Raisin Bran Cereal has a moderate insulin response (II: 42) (clinically measured) on the insulin index scale (white bread = 100). This is a typical insulin response for most mixed foods. Note that the insulin index can differ substantially from the glycemic index — dairy products and high-protein foods often have higher insulin responses than their GI would suggest.