Skip to main content

Chili with beans, canned

Legumes Per 100 g · Per 100g serving

Chili with beans, canned is a legume at 103 calories per 100g. It provides useful amounts of Iron and Vitamin A (RAE), contributing 43% and 37% of the Daily Value per 100g. This legume is a useful source of fiber. Legumes are among the most nutrient-dense plant foods, providing protein, fiber, folate, iron, and potassium. They are a staple protein source in many traditional diets worldwide. Our database tracks 82 nutrients for this food, plus glycemic index, insulin index, environmental footprint data.

103
Calories
kcal
6.1
Protein
g
3.8
Fat
g
13.2
Carbs
g
3.3
Fiber
g

Top Nutrients

💎
Iron
3.4 mg
43% DV
☀️
Vitamin A (RAE)
337 µg
37% DV
☀️
Pantothenic Acid (B5)
1.4 mg
28% DV

Data for 82 of 150 tracked nutrients

Nutrient Fingerprint

How this food scores across key nutrient categories, as a percentage of the daily recommended value per 100 g. Based on USDA DRIs for adults.

Complete Nutrient Profile

Macronutrients 9
NutrientPer 100gUnitPer Serving% DV
Water SR75.5g
2%
Calories SR103kcal
Energy (kJ) SR433kj
Protein SR6.1g
11%
Total Fat SR3.8g
Carbohydrate SR13.2g
10%
Fiber SR3.3g
9%
Total Sugars SR1.6g
Ash SR1.4g
Minerals 10
NutrientPer 100gUnitPer Serving% DV
Calcium SR47.0mg
5%
Iron SR3.4mg
43%
Magnesium SR45.0mg
11%
Phosphorus SR154mg
22%
Potassium SR365mg
11%
Sodium SR423mg
28%
Zinc SR2.0mg
18%
Copper SR0.12mg
13%
Manganese SR0.13mg
6%
Selenium SR1.3µg
2%
Vitamins 24
NutrientPer 100gUnitPer Serving% DV
Vitamin A (RAE) SR337µg
37%
Vitamin A (IU) SR17.0IU
Retinol SR0µg
Beta-Carotene SR180µg
Alpha-Carotene SR0µg
Beta-Cryptoxanthin SR43.0µg
Lycopene SR1,069µg
Lutein + Zeaxanthin SR107µg
Vitamin C SR1.7mg
2%
Vitamin D SR0µg
Vitamin D (IU) SR0IU
Vitamin E SR0.52mg
4%
Vitamin K1 SR1.9µg
2%
Thiamin (B1) SR0.05mg
4%
Riboflavin (B2) SR0.10mg
8%
Niacin (B3) SR0.36mg
2%
Pantothenic Acid (B5) SR1.4mg
28%
Vitamin B6 SR0.13mg
10%
Folate SR23.0µg
6%
Folic Acid SR0µg
Folate (food) SR23.0µg
Folate (DFE) SR23.0µg
Vitamin B12 SR0µg
Choline SR20.2mg
4%
Fatty Acids 8
NutrientPer 100gUnitPer Serving% DV
Saturated Fat SR1.1g
Monounsaturated Fat SR1.6g
Polyunsaturated Fat SR0.25g
Trans Fat SR0g
Cholesterol SR17.0mg
Omega-3 EPA SR0g
Omega-3 DPA SR0g
Omega-3 DHA SR0g
Individual Fatty Acids 10
NutrientPer 100gUnitPer Serving% DV
Butyric Acid (4:0) SR0g
Caproic Acid (6:0) SR0g
Caprylic Acid (8:0) SR0g
Capric Acid (10:0) SR0.01g
Lauric Acid (12:0) SR0.006g
Myristic Acid (14:0) SR0.07g
Palmitic Acid (16:0) SR0.81g
Stearic Acid (18:0) SR0.24g
Linoleic Acid (18:2) SR0.14g
1%
Linolenic Acid (18:3) SR0.10g
Amino Acids 18
NutrientPer 100gUnitPer Serving% DV
Tryptophan SR0.07g
Threonine SR0.24g
Isoleucine SR0.25g
Leucine SR0.46g
Lysine SR0.41g
Methionine SR0.10g
Cystine SR0.06g
Phenylalanine SR0.29g
Tyrosine SR0.16g
Valine SR0.29g
Arginine SR0.36g
Histidine SR0.16g
Alanine SR0.27g
Aspartic Acid SR0.66g
Glutamic Acid SR0.88g
Glycine SR0.26g
Proline SR0.25g
Serine SR0.29g
Other 3
NutrientPer 100gUnitPer Serving% DV
Caffeine SR0mg
Theobromine SR0mg
Alcohol SR0g

Nutrient Density Score

The NRF9.3 score measures overall nutritional quality per 100 kcal. It rewards 9 nutrients to encourage (protein, fiber, vitamins A, C, E, calcium, iron, magnesium, potassium) and penalizes 3 to limit (saturated fat, added sugars, sodium). Higher is better; negative scores indicate the food is high in limit nutrients relative to its beneficial content.

82
NRF9.3 Score
Good · per 100 kcal
Poor (<0) Moderate Good Excellent (100+)

NRF9.3 index: Fulgoni et al. (2009), J Nutr 139(8). DVs based on FDA 2020 reference values.

Nutrient Interactions in This Food

Nutrients in this food that enhance or compete with each other during absorption.

✔ Synergies — nutrients that help each other

Dietary Fat + Vitamin A●●●

Vitamin A is fat-soluble and requires dietary fat for absorption. Adding fat to a meal significantly increases beta-carotene and retinol absorption.

Ribaya-Mercado et al., Am J Clin Nutr, 2007

Vitamin B6 + Magnesium●●

Vitamin B6 may enhance intracellular magnesium accumulation. Combined supplementation has shown greater benefits for stress and anxiety than magnesium alone.

Pouteau et al., PLoS One, 2018

Vitamin B6 + Folate●●

Vitamin B6 is a cofactor in folate-dependent one-carbon metabolism. Together with B12, these three nutrients regulate homocysteine levels.

Selhub, J Nutr Health Aging, 2002

⚠ Antagonisms — nutrients that compete

Zinc vs Copper●●●

High zinc intake induces metallothionein in enterocytes, which traps copper and blocks its absorption. Prolonged high-dose zinc can cause copper deficiency.

Prasad et al., JAMA, 1978; Fosmire, Am J Clin Nutr, 1990

Zinc vs Iron●●

Zinc and non-heme iron compete for the same intestinal transporter (DMT1). High doses of one can reduce absorption of the other when taken simultaneously.

Rossander-Hulten et al., Am J Clin Nutr, 1991

Fiber vs Iron●●

Phytates in high-fibre foods (whole grains, legumes) bind non-heme iron and reduce its bioavailability. Soaking, sprouting, and fermentation reduce phytate content.

Hurrell & Egli, Int J Vitam Nutr Res, 2010

Fiber vs Zinc●●

Phytates in fibre-rich foods chelate zinc, reducing its bioavailability by up to 50% in high-phytate diets. This is a major concern in plant-based diets.

Sandstrom, Food Nutr Res, 1997

Potassium vs Sodium●●

High potassium intake promotes renal sodium excretion and attenuates the blood pressure–raising effect of sodium. A higher K:Na ratio is associated with lower cardiovascular risk.

Aburto et al., BMJ, 2013

Amino Acid Profile

Essential amino acid composition compared to the WHO/FAO adult reference pattern. The Amino Acid Score indicates protein quality — 100 means all essential amino acid requirements are met.

116
Amino Acid Score
Complete
Met + Cys
Lowest Scoring
18
Amino Acids Tracked

✓ Complete protein — all essential amino acids meet or exceed WHO reference levels.

All Amino Acids (18)
Amino Acidg / 100gmg / g protein
Tryptophan0.0711.3
Threonine0.2439.2
Isoleucine0.2540.8
Leucine0.4674.5
Lysine0.4166.8
Methionine0.1015.5
Cystine0.0610.0
Phenylalanine0.2947.7
Tyrosine0.1626.8
Valine0.2948.0
Arginine0.3658.8
Histidine0.1626.8
Alanine0.2743.3
Aspartic Acid0.66107.7
Glutamic Acid0.88143.3
Glycine0.2642.6
Proline0.2541.0
Serine0.2947.9

Fatty Acid Profile

Breakdown of fat types per 100g. A healthy fat profile favours unsaturated fats (mono + poly) and a balanced omega-3 to omega-6 ratio.

1.1g
Saturated
1.6g
Monounsaturated
0.25g
Polyunsaturated
Omega Fatty Acids
Linoleic acid (18:2 n-6)0.14 g

How Cooking Changes Nutrients

Estimated percentage of each nutrient retained after cooking, based on USDA retention factors for the “Legumes (45-75 min)” food category. Values of 100% mean no loss; lower values indicate nutrients lost to heat, water, or oxidation.

Key insights
Vitamin C loses up to 40% when boiled (drained). Boiled (water used) retains 70%.
Thiamin loses up to 45% when boiled (drained). Boiled (water used) retains 65%.
Vitamin B6 loses up to 40% when boiled (drained). Boiled (water used) retains 70%.

Source: USDA Table of Nutrient Retention Factors, Release 6 (2007). Retention values are category-level averages — actual retention depends on cooking time, temperature, and water volume.

USDA Retention Factors

Glycemic & Insulin Response

The Glycemic Index (GI) measures how quickly a food raises blood sugar on a 0–100 scale. The Insulin Index (II) measures the insulin response directly, which can differ from GI — notably, dairy and high-protein foods often trigger a higher insulin response than their GI suggests. White bread = 100 for both scales.

32
Glycemic Index
Low GI
8
Glycemic Load
Low GL (per 50g)
GI Scale 32
0 Low <55 Med High ≥70 100

GI data matched from: “Beans (estimated from category)” · ●● low confidence

36
Insulin Index
Moderate Insulin Response
Insulin Index Scale 36
0 Low ≤30 Mod ≤60 High ≤100 120
GI Model ●● Estimated via GI-based regression (R²=0.78)

Source: International Tables of Glycemic Index (Sydney University, 2021) · Holt et al. 1997; Bao et al. 2016; Bell 2014

Environmental Impact

Environmental footprint per kilogram of food produced. Data represents the global average for the “Other Pulses” category.

1.8
kg CO₂e / kg
Low Impact
15.6
m² land / kg
Land Use
734
L water / kg
Water Use
9.8
g SO₂e / kg
Acidification
How this compares (GHG emissions)
Potatoes (0.5)Chicken (9.9)Beef (99.5)
Greenhouse Gas Emissions1.8 kg CO₂e / kg
Land Use15.6 m² / kg
Water Use734 L / kg
Eutrophication18.1 g PO₄e / kg
Acidification9.8 g SO₂e / kg
⚠️ Important context about this data
  • Global averages: These figures are production-weighted averages from a meta-analysis of ~38,700 farms across 119 countries (Poore & Nemecek, 2018). Actual impact varies enormously by farming method, geography, and supply chain.
  • System boundary: Cradle-to-retail only — does not include consumer transport, home cooking energy, or food waste.
  • Soil carbon not included: This data does not account for soil carbon sequestration. Some argue that well-managed regenerative grazing partially offsets ruminant emissions; however, full lifecycle accounting — including methane, land-use change, and the opportunity cost of using land for grazing vs. reforestation — typically makes the net footprint of ruminant meat higher, not lower. This is especially relevant in temperate grassland regions like Ireland.
  • Not gospel: This data is informational and illustrative. It is useful for understanding relative magnitudes, but should not be treated as precise measurements for any individual product or farm.

Source: Poore & Nemecek (2018), Science 360(6392). Meta-analysis of ~38,700 farms, 119 countries, 46 product categories.

Global Supply: Pulses

Top 10 countries by per capita supply of the “Pulses” food group (kcal/capita/day, 2023). This is food group–level data from FAO Food Balance Sheets, not specific to this individual food.

1.
Niger
450
2.
Burkina Faso
290
3.
Rwanda
273
4.
Ethiopia
199
5.
Norway
195
6.
Mali
181
7.
Kenya
175
8.
El Salvador
172
9.
Djibouti
169
10.
Kazakhstan
167

Global Supply Trend (1961–2023)

+2%
1961: 58 kcal2023: 59 kcal

Source: FAO Food Balance Sheets (2023). Supply = production + imports − exports − waste, converted to kcal/capita/day.

Frequently Asked Questions

How many calories are in Chili with beans, canned?

Chili with beans, canned contains 103 kcal per 100 grams, making it a moderate-calorie food. The energy comes from 6.1g of protein (24% of calories), 3.8g of fat (33%), and 13.2g of carbohydrates (51%). Carbohydrates are the primary energy source.

What is Chili with beans, canned most nutritious for?

The standout nutrient in Chili with beans, canned is Iron, providing 3.4 mg per 100g (43% of the Daily Value). It is also a notable source of Vitamin A (RAE) (37% DV). Our database tracks 82 individual nutrients for this food, allowing detailed comparison across vitamins, minerals, amino acids, and fatty acids.

Is Chili with beans, canned high in protein?

Chili with beans, canned contains 6.1g of protein per 100 grams. While not a high-protein food, it can contribute to daily protein needs as part of a varied diet.

How much fiber is in Chili with beans, canned?

Chili with beans, canned contains 3.3g of fiber per 100 grams — a moderate amount. This contributes to the recommended daily intake of 25-38g. Pairing with other fiber-rich foods like vegetables, legumes, or whole grains can help meet daily targets.

What is the glycemic index of Chili with beans, canned?

Chili with beans, canned has a glycemic index of 32, which is classified as low (≤55). Low-GI foods cause a slower, more gradual rise in blood sugar levels, which may be beneficial for blood sugar management. The glycemic load, which accounts for typical serving size, provides additional context for real-world blood sugar impact.

What is the insulin index of Chili with beans, canned?

Chili with beans, canned has a moderate insulin response (II: 36) (estimated from macronutrient composition) on the insulin index scale (white bread = 100). This is a typical insulin response for most mixed foods. Note that the insulin index can differ substantially from the glycemic index — dairy products and high-protein foods often have higher insulin responses than their GI would suggest.