Skip to main content

Fish, tuna, white, canned in water, drained solids

Fish/Seafood Per 100 g · Per 100g serving
Data sources: 76 AFCD 17 SR Legacy
Contains: 🐟 Fish

Fish, tuna, white, canned in water, drained solids is a seafood at 129 calories per 100g. It is an excellent source of Selenium and Niacin (B3), providing 132% and 75% of the Daily Value respectively. This seafood is high in protein. Fish and shellfish are valued for their high-quality protein and omega-3 fatty acid content. Many dietary guidelines recommend consuming seafood at least twice per week. Our database tracks 93 nutrients for this food, plus insulin index, environmental footprint data.

129
Calories
kcal
26.1
Protein
g
2.6
Fat
g
0
Carbs
g
0
Fiber
g

Top Nutrients

💎
Selenium
72.6 µg
132% DV
☀️
Niacin (B3)
12.0 mg
75% DV
💪
Protein
26.1 g
47% DV

Data for 93 of 150 tracked nutrients

Nutrient Fingerprint

How this food scores across key nutrient categories, as a percentage of the daily recommended value per 100 g. Based on USDA DRIs for adults.

Complete Nutrient Profile

Macronutrients 10
NutrientPer 100gUnitPer Serving% DV
Water AFCD74.4g
2%
Calories AFCD129kcal
Energy (kJ) SR536kj
Protein AFCD26.1g
47%
Total Fat AFCD2.6g
Carbohydrate AFCD0g
Fiber AFCD0g
Total Sugars AFCD0g
Starch AFCD0g
Ash AFCD1.2g
Minerals 11
NutrientPer 100gUnitPer Serving% DV
Calcium AFCD5.0mg
0%
Iron AFCD1.2mg
14%
Magnesium AFCD24.0mg
6%
Phosphorus AFCD186mg
27%
Potassium AFCD205mg
6%
Sodium AFCD250mg
17%
Zinc AFCD0.76mg
7%
Copper AFCD0.06mg
6%
Manganese AFCD0.009mg
0%
Selenium AFCD72.6µg
132%
Fluoride AFCD44.0µg
1%
Vitamins 32
NutrientPer 100gUnitPer Serving% DV
Vitamin A (RAE) AFCD0µg
Vitamin A (IU) SR6.0IU
Retinol AFCD0µg
Beta-Carotene AFCD0µg
Alpha-Carotene AFCD0µg
Beta-Cryptoxanthin AFCD0µg
Lycopene SR0µg
Lutein + Zeaxanthin SR0µg
Vitamin C AFCD0mg
Vitamin D SR2.0µg
13%
Vitamin D (IU) AFCD2.7IU
Vitamin D2 AFCD0µg
Vitamin D3 AFCD2.2µg
Vitamin E AFCD0mg
Beta-Tocopherol AFCD0mg
Gamma-Tocopherol AFCD0mg
Delta-Tocopherol AFCD0mg
Alpha-Tocotrienol SR0.08mg
Beta-Tocotrienol SR0mg
Gamma-Tocotrienol SR0mg
Vitamin K1 SR2.5µg
2%
Thiamin (B1) AFCD0mg
Riboflavin (B2) AFCD0.02mg
2%
Niacin (B3) AFCD12.0mg
75%
Pantothenic Acid (B5) AFCD0.08mg
2%
Vitamin B6 AFCD0.14mg
11%
Folate AFCD26.0µg
6%
Folic Acid SR0µg
Folate (food) AFCD26.0µg
Folate (DFE) AFCD26.0µg
Vitamin B12 AFCD1.1µg
46%
Choline SR29.3mg
5%
Fatty Acids 9
NutrientPer 100gUnitPer Serving% DV
Saturated Fat AFCD1.0g
Monounsaturated Fat AFCD0.50g
Polyunsaturated Fat AFCD0.80g
Trans Fat AFCD0.01g
Cholesterol AFCD53.0mg
Omega-3 ALA AFCD0.01g
1%
Omega-3 EPA AFCD0.09g
Omega-3 DPA AFCD0.02g
Omega-3 DHA AFCD0.64g
Individual Fatty Acids 10
NutrientPer 100gUnitPer Serving% DV
Butyric Acid (4:0) SR0g
Caproic Acid (6:0) SR0g
Caprylic Acid (8:0) AFCD0.06g
Capric Acid (10:0) AFCD0.59g
Lauric Acid (12:0) AFCD0.28g
Myristic Acid (14:0) AFCD0.09g
Palmitic Acid (16:0) SR0.59g
Stearic Acid (18:0) SR0.12g
Linoleic Acid (18:2) AFCD0.03g
0%
Linolenic Acid (18:3) SR0.07g
Amino Acids 18
NutrientPer 100gUnitPer Serving% DV
Tryptophan AFCD0.36g
Threonine AFCD1.4g
Isoleucine AFCD1.3g
Leucine AFCD1.7g
Lysine AFCD2.0g
Methionine AFCD0.76g
Cystine AFCD0.28g
Phenylalanine AFCD1.1g
Tyrosine AFCD0.94g
Valine AFCD1.5g
Arginine AFCD1.5g
Histidine AFCD1.7g
Alanine AFCD1.3g
Aspartic Acid AFCD2.2g
Glutamic Acid AFCD3.1g
Glycine AFCD1.0g
Proline AFCD0.88g
Serine AFCD1.1g
Other 3
NutrientPer 100gUnitPer Serving% DV
Caffeine AFCD0mg
Theobromine SR0mg
Alcohol AFCD0g

Nutrient Density Score

The NRF9.3 score measures overall nutritional quality per 100 kcal. It rewards 9 nutrients to encourage (protein, fiber, vitamins A, C, E, calcium, iron, magnesium, potassium) and penalizes 3 to limit (saturated fat, added sugars, sodium). Higher is better; negative scores indicate the food is high in limit nutrients relative to its beneficial content.

41
NRF9.3 Score
Moderate · per 100 kcal
Poor (<0) Moderate Good Excellent (100+)

NRF9.3 index: Fulgoni et al. (2009), J Nutr 139(8). DVs based on FDA 2020 reference values.

Nutrient Interactions in This Food

Nutrients in this food that enhance or compete with each other during absorption.

✔ Synergies — nutrients that help each other

Dietary Fat + Vitamin D●●●

Vitamin D is fat-soluble. Co-consumption with dietary fat increases absorption by up to 50% compared to taking it on an empty stomach.

Dawson-Hughes et al., J Acad Nutr Diet, 2015

Vitamin D + Phosphorus●●

Vitamin D enhances intestinal phosphorus absorption and regulates phosphorus homeostasis via parathyroid hormone signalling.

Bergwitz & Jüppner, Annu Rev Med, 2010

Vitamin D + Magnesium●●

Magnesium is required for vitamin D metabolism — it is a cofactor for the enzymes that convert vitamin D to its active form (1,25-dihydroxyvitamin D).

Uwitonze & Razzaque, J Am Osteopath Assoc, 2018

Vitamin B12 + Folate●●

Vitamin B12 and folate are metabolically interdependent. B12 is needed to convert methyltetrahydrofolate back to tetrahydrofolate, enabling folate to participate in DNA synthesis.

Green et al., Nat Rev Dis Primers, 2017

Vitamin B6 + Magnesium●●

Vitamin B6 may enhance intracellular magnesium accumulation. Combined supplementation has shown greater benefits for stress and anxiety than magnesium alone.

Pouteau et al., PLoS One, 2018

⚠ Antagonisms — nutrients that compete

Zinc vs Copper●●●

High zinc intake induces metallothionein in enterocytes, which traps copper and blocks its absorption. Prolonged high-dose zinc can cause copper deficiency.

Prasad et al., JAMA, 1978; Fosmire, Am J Clin Nutr, 1990

Zinc vs Iron●●

Zinc and non-heme iron compete for the same intestinal transporter (DMT1). High doses of one can reduce absorption of the other when taken simultaneously.

Rossander-Hulten et al., Am J Clin Nutr, 1991

Potassium vs Sodium●●

High potassium intake promotes renal sodium excretion and attenuates the blood pressure–raising effect of sodium. A higher K:Na ratio is associated with lower cardiovascular risk.

Aburto et al., BMJ, 2013

Folate vs Vitamin B12●●

High folate intake can mask vitamin B12 deficiency by correcting the megaloblastic anaemia while allowing neurological damage to progress undetected.

Mills et al., Am J Clin Nutr, 2003

Amino Acid Profile

Essential amino acid composition compared to the WHO/FAO adult reference pattern. The Amino Acid Score indicates protein quality — 100 means all essential amino acid requirements are met.

113
Amino Acid Score
Complete
Leucine
Lowest Scoring
18
Amino Acids Tracked

✓ Complete protein — all essential amino acids meet or exceed WHO reference levels.

All Amino Acids (18)
Amino Acidg / 100gmg / g protein
Tryptophan0.3613.9
Threonine1.452.3
Isoleucine1.349.3
Leucine1.766.6
Lysine2.075.4
Methionine0.7629.3
Cystine0.2810.7
Phenylalanine1.143.4
Tyrosine0.9436.2
Valine1.557.0
Arginine1.557.1
Histidine1.766.2
Alanine1.350.9
Aspartic Acid2.285.6
Glutamic Acid3.1117.8
Glycine1.039.0
Proline0.8833.6
Serine1.141.6

Fatty Acid Profile

Breakdown of fat types per 100g. A healthy fat profile favours unsaturated fats (mono + poly) and a balanced omega-3 to omega-6 ratio.

1.0g
Saturated
0.50g
Monounsaturated
0.80g
Polyunsaturated
25.4:1
Omega-3 : Omega-6 Ratio
Omega-3 dominant — ideal range is 1:1 to 1:4
Omega Fatty Acids
EPA (20:5 n-3)0.09 g
DHA (22:6 n-3)0.64 g
ALA (18:3 n-3)0.01 g
DPA (22:5 n-3)0.02 g
Linoleic acid (18:2 n-6)0.03 g

How Cooking Changes Nutrients

Estimated percentage of each nutrient retained after cooking, based on USDA retention factors for the “Fatty Fish (>5% fat)” food category. Values of 100% mean no loss; lower values indicate nutrients lost to heat, water, or oxidation.

Key insights
Vitamin B12 loses up to 25% when broiled / grilled. Simmered retains 90%.

Source: USDA Table of Nutrient Retention Factors, Release 6 (2007). Retention values are category-level averages — actual retention depends on cooking time, temperature, and water volume.

USDA Retention Factors

Insulin Response

The Insulin Index (II) measures the actual insulin response to food on a scale where white bread = 100. Unlike the Glycemic Index (which only measures blood sugar), the II captures the full hormonal response — including the effect of protein and fat on insulin secretion. This is why high-protein foods like meat and dairy can have significant insulin scores despite having low or zero GI values.

59
Insulin Index
Moderate Insulin Response
Insulin Index Scale 59
0 Low ≤30 Mod ≤60 High ≤100 120
Measured ●●● Clinically measured (Holt 1997, Bell 2014)

Source: Holt et al. 1997; Bao et al. 2016; Bell 2014

Environmental Impact

Environmental footprint per kilogram of food produced. Data represents the global average for the “Fish (farmed)” category.

13.6
kg CO₂e / kg
High Impact
8.4
m² land / kg
Land Use
3,691
L water / kg
Water Use
176
g SO₂e / kg
Acidification
How this compares (GHG emissions)
Potatoes (0.5)Chicken (9.9)Beef (99.5)
Greenhouse Gas Emissions13.6 kg CO₂e / kg
Land Use8.4 m² / kg
Water Use3,691 L / kg
Eutrophication235 g PO₄e / kg
Acidification176 g SO₂e / kg
⚠️ Important context about this data
  • Global averages: These figures are production-weighted averages from a meta-analysis of ~38,700 farms across 119 countries (Poore & Nemecek, 2018). Actual impact varies enormously by farming method, geography, and supply chain.
  • System boundary: Cradle-to-retail only — does not include consumer transport, home cooking energy, or food waste.
  • Soil carbon not included: This data does not account for soil carbon sequestration. Some argue that well-managed regenerative grazing partially offsets ruminant emissions; however, full lifecycle accounting — including methane, land-use change, and the opportunity cost of using land for grazing vs. reforestation — typically makes the net footprint of ruminant meat higher, not lower. This is especially relevant in temperate grassland regions like Ireland.
  • Not gospel: This data is informational and illustrative. It is useful for understanding relative magnitudes, but should not be treated as precise measurements for any individual product or farm.

Source: Poore & Nemecek (2018), Science 360(6392). Meta-analysis of ~38,700 farms, 119 countries, 46 product categories.

Global Supply: Fish & Seafood

Top 10 countries by per capita supply of the “Fish & Seafood” food group (kcal/capita/day, 2023). This is food group–level data from FAO Food Balance Sheets, not specific to this individual food.

1.
Iceland
161
2.
Maldives
157
3.
Kiribati
146
4.
Japan
132
5.
Micronesia
118
6.
Tuvalu
113
7.
Samoa
108
8.
Micronesia (Federated States of)
101
9.
Antigua and Barbuda
97
10.
Barbados
95

Global Supply Trend (1961–2023)

+62%
1961: 24 kcal2023: 39 kcal

Source: FAO Food Balance Sheets (2023). Supply = production + imports − exports − waste, converted to kcal/capita/day.

Frequently Asked Questions

How many calories are in Fish, tuna, white, canned in water, drained solids?

Fish, tuna, white, canned in water, drained solids contains 129 kcal per 100 grams, making it a moderate-calorie food. The energy comes from 26.1g of protein (81% of calories), 2.6g of fat (18%), and 0g of carbohydrates (0%). Protein is the primary energy source.

What is Fish, tuna, white, canned in water, drained solids most nutritious for?

The standout nutrient in Fish, tuna, white, canned in water, drained solids is Selenium, providing 72.6 µg per 100g (132% of the Daily Value). It is also a notable source of Niacin (B3) (75% DV). Our database tracks 93 individual nutrients for this food, allowing detailed comparison across vitamins, minerals, amino acids, and fatty acids.

Is Fish, tuna, white, canned in water, drained solids high in protein?

With 26.1g per 100 grams, Fish, tuna, white, canned in water, drained solids is a high-protein food. Protein accounts for 81% of its total calories, making it suitable for diets focused on protein intake.

How much fiber is in Fish, tuna, white, canned in water, drained solids?

Fish, tuna, white, canned in water, drained solids contains no dietary fiber. This is typical for animal-derived food. Pair with plant-based foods to ensure adequate fiber intake.

What is the insulin index of Fish, tuna, white, canned in water, drained solids?

Fish, tuna, white, canned in water, drained solids has a moderate insulin response (II: 59) (clinically measured) on the insulin index scale (white bread = 100). This is a typical insulin response for most mixed foods. Note that the insulin index can differ substantially from the glycemic index — dairy products and high-protein foods often have higher insulin responses than their GI would suggest.