Skip to main content

Mung beans, mature seeds, raw

Legumes Per 100 g · Per 100g serving

Mung beans, mature seeds, raw is a legume, containing 347 calories per 100g. It is an excellent source of Folate, Copper and Iron, providing 156%, 105% and 84% of the Daily Value respectively. This legume is high in protein, rich in dietary fiber. Legumes are among the most nutrient-dense plant foods, providing protein, fiber, folate, iron, and potassium. They are a staple protein source in many traditional diets worldwide. Our database tracks 83 nutrients for this food, plus glycemic index, insulin index, environmental footprint data.

347
Calories
kcal
23.9
Protein
g
1.1
Fat
g
62.6
Carbs
g
16.3
Fiber
g

Top Nutrients

☀️
Folate
625 µg
156% DV
💎
Copper
0.94 mg
105% DV
💎
Iron
6.7 mg
84% DV

Data for 83 of 150 tracked nutrients

Nutrient Fingerprint

How this food scores across key nutrient categories, as a percentage of the daily recommended value per 100 g. Based on USDA DRIs for adults.

Complete Nutrient Profile

Macronutrients 9
NutrientPer 100gUnitPer Serving% DV
Water SR9.1g
0%
Calories SR347kcal
Energy (kJ) SR1,452kj
Protein SR23.9g
43%
Total Fat SR1.1g
Carbohydrate SR62.6g
48%
Fiber SR16.3g
43%
Total Sugars SR6.6g
Ash SR3.3g
Minerals 10
NutrientPer 100gUnitPer Serving% DV
Calcium SR132mg
13%
Iron SR6.7mg
84%
Magnesium SR189mg
47%
Phosphorus SR367mg
52%
Potassium SR1,246mg
37%
Sodium SR15.0mg
1%
Zinc SR2.7mg
24%
Copper SR0.94mg
105%
Manganese SR1.0mg
45%
Selenium SR8.2µg
15%
Vitamins 24
NutrientPer 100gUnitPer Serving% DV
Vitamin A (RAE) SR114µg
13%
Vitamin A (IU) SR6.0IU
Retinol SR0µg
Beta-Carotene SR68.0µg
Alpha-Carotene SR0µg
Beta-Cryptoxanthin SR0µg
Lycopene SR0µg
Lutein + Zeaxanthin SR0µg
Vitamin C SR4.8mg
5%
Vitamin D SR0µg
Vitamin D (IU) SR0IU
Vitamin E SR0.51mg
3%
Vitamin K1 SR9.0µg
8%
Thiamin (B1) SR0.62mg
52%
Riboflavin (B2) SR0.23mg
18%
Niacin (B3) SR2.3mg
14%
Pantothenic Acid (B5) SR1.9mg
38%
Vitamin B6 SR0.38mg
29%
Folate SR625µg
156%
Folic Acid SR0µg
Folate (food) SR625µg
Folate (DFE) SR625µg
Vitamin B12 SR0µg
Choline SR97.9mg
18%
Fatty Acids 9
NutrientPer 100gUnitPer Serving% DV
Saturated Fat SR0.35g
Monounsaturated Fat SR0.16g
Polyunsaturated Fat SR0.38g
Trans Fat SR0g
Cholesterol SR0mg
Phytosterols SR23.0mg
Omega-3 EPA SR0g
Omega-3 DPA SR0g
Omega-3 DHA SR0g
Individual Fatty Acids 10
NutrientPer 100gUnitPer Serving% DV
Butyric Acid (4:0) SR0g
Caproic Acid (6:0) SR0g
Caprylic Acid (8:0) SR0g
Capric Acid (10:0) SR0g
Lauric Acid (12:0) SR0g
Myristic Acid (14:0) SR0g
Palmitic Acid (16:0) SR0.25g
Stearic Acid (18:0) SR0.07g
Linoleic Acid (18:2) SR0.36g
2%
Linolenic Acid (18:3) SR0.03g
Amino Acids 18
NutrientPer 100gUnitPer Serving% DV
Tryptophan SR0.26g
Threonine SR0.78g
Isoleucine SR1.0g
Leucine SR1.8g
Lysine SR1.7g
Methionine SR0.29g
Cystine SR0.21g
Phenylalanine SR1.4g
Tyrosine SR0.71g
Valine SR1.2g
Arginine SR1.7g
Histidine SR0.69g
Alanine SR1.1g
Aspartic Acid SR2.8g
Glutamic Acid SR4.3g
Glycine SR0.95g
Proline SR1.1g
Serine SR1.2g
Other 3
NutrientPer 100gUnitPer Serving% DV
Caffeine SR0mg
Theobromine SR0mg
Alcohol SR0g

Nutrient Density Score

The NRF9.3 score measures overall nutritional quality per 100 kcal. It rewards 9 nutrients to encourage (protein, fiber, vitamins A, C, E, calcium, iron, magnesium, potassium) and penalizes 3 to limit (saturated fat, added sugars, sodium). Higher is better; negative scores indicate the food is high in limit nutrients relative to its beneficial content.

70
NRF9.3 Score
Good · per 100 kcal
Poor (<0) Moderate Good Excellent (100+)

NRF9.3 index: Fulgoni et al. (2009), J Nutr 139(8). DVs based on FDA 2020 reference values.

Nutrient Interactions in This Food

Nutrients in this food that enhance or compete with each other during absorption.

✔ Synergies — nutrients that help each other

Vitamin C + Iron●●●

Vitamin C dramatically enhances non-heme iron absorption by reducing Fe³⁺ to Fe²⁺ in the gut. Adding 75 mg vitamin C to a meal can increase iron absorption 3–4 fold.

Hallberg et al., Am J Clin Nutr, 1989

Dietary Fat + Vitamin A●●●

Vitamin A is fat-soluble and requires dietary fat for absorption. Adding fat to a meal significantly increases beta-carotene and retinol absorption.

Ribaya-Mercado et al., Am J Clin Nutr, 2007

Dietary Fat + Vitamin K●●●

Vitamin K is fat-soluble. Absorption increases significantly when consumed with dietary fat, particularly for phylloquinone (K1) from plant sources.

Gijsbers et al., Br J Nutr, 1996

Vitamin K + Calcium●●

Vitamin K activates osteocalcin and matrix GLA protein, which direct calcium into bones and away from soft tissues (arteries). Works synergistically with vitamin D.

Kidd, Altern Med Rev, 2010

Vitamin B6 + Magnesium●●

Vitamin B6 may enhance intracellular magnesium accumulation. Combined supplementation has shown greater benefits for stress and anxiety than magnesium alone.

Pouteau et al., PLoS One, 2018

⚠ Antagonisms — nutrients that compete

Calcium vs Iron●●●

Calcium inhibits both heme and non-heme iron absorption when consumed in the same meal. The effect is dose-dependent, with significant inhibition at 300+ mg calcium.

Hallberg et al., Am J Clin Nutr, 1991

Zinc vs Copper●●●

High zinc intake induces metallothionein in enterocytes, which traps copper and blocks its absorption. Prolonged high-dose zinc can cause copper deficiency.

Prasad et al., JAMA, 1978; Fosmire, Am J Clin Nutr, 1990

Zinc vs Iron●●

Zinc and non-heme iron compete for the same intestinal transporter (DMT1). High doses of one can reduce absorption of the other when taken simultaneously.

Rossander-Hulten et al., Am J Clin Nutr, 1991

Calcium vs Magnesium●●

Very high calcium intake can reduce magnesium absorption by competing for shared intestinal transport pathways. A calcium:magnesium ratio above 2.6:1 may impair magnesium status.

Rosanoff et al., Nutr Rev, 2012

Fiber vs Iron●●

Phytates in high-fibre foods (whole grains, legumes) bind non-heme iron and reduce its bioavailability. Soaking, sprouting, and fermentation reduce phytate content.

Hurrell & Egli, Int J Vitam Nutr Res, 2010

Amino Acid Profile

Essential amino acid composition compared to the WHO/FAO adult reference pattern. The Amino Acid Score indicates protein quality — 100 means all essential amino acid requirements are met.

94
Amino Acid Score
Good
Met + Cys
Limiting Amino Acid
18
Amino Acids Tracked

Tip: The limiting amino acid is Met + Cys. Pair with grains, nuts, and seeds for a complete amino acid profile.

All Amino Acids (18)
Amino Acidg / 100gmg / g protein
Tryptophan0.2610.9
Threonine0.7832.8
Isoleucine1.042.2
Leucine1.877.4
Lysine1.769.7
Methionine0.2912.0
Cystine0.218.8
Phenylalanine1.460.5
Tyrosine0.7129.9
Valine1.251.8
Arginine1.770.1
Histidine0.6929.1
Alanine1.144.0
Aspartic Acid2.8115.5
Glutamic Acid4.3178.7
Glycine0.9540.0
Proline1.145.9
Serine1.249.3

Fatty Acid Profile

Breakdown of fat types per 100g. A healthy fat profile favours unsaturated fats (mono + poly) and a balanced omega-3 to omega-6 ratio.

0.35g
Saturated
0.16g
Monounsaturated
0.38g
Polyunsaturated
Omega Fatty Acids
Linoleic acid (18:2 n-6)0.36 g

How Cooking Changes Nutrients

Estimated percentage of each nutrient retained after cooking, based on USDA retention factors for the “Legumes (45-75 min)” food category. Values of 100% mean no loss; lower values indicate nutrients lost to heat, water, or oxidation.

Key insights
Vitamin C loses up to 40% when boiled (drained). Boiled (water used) retains 70%.
Thiamin loses up to 45% when boiled (drained). Boiled (water used) retains 65%.
Vitamin B6 loses up to 40% when boiled (drained). Boiled (water used) retains 70%.

Source: USDA Table of Nutrient Retention Factors, Release 6 (2007). Retention values are category-level averages — actual retention depends on cooking time, temperature, and water volume.

USDA Retention Factors

Glycemic & Insulin Response

The Glycemic Index (GI) measures how quickly a food raises blood sugar on a 0–100 scale. The Insulin Index (II) measures the insulin response directly, which can differ from GI — notably, dairy and high-protein foods often trigger a higher insulin response than their GI suggests. White bread = 100 for both scales.

31
Glycemic Index
Low GI
5
Glycemic Load
Low GL (per 150g)
GI Scale 31
0 Low <55 Med High ≥70 100

GI data matched from: “Mung beans, boiled” · ●●● high confidence

34
Insulin Index
Moderate Insulin Response
Insulin Index Scale 34
0 Low ≤30 Mod ≤60 High ≤100 120
GI Model ●● Estimated via GI-based regression (R²=0.78)

Source: International Tables of Glycemic Index (Sydney University, 2021) · Holt et al. 1997; Bao et al. 2016; Bell 2014

Environmental Impact

Environmental footprint per kilogram of food produced. Data represents the global average for the “Other Pulses” category.

1.8
kg CO₂e / kg
Low Impact
15.6
m² land / kg
Land Use
734
L water / kg
Water Use
9.8
g SO₂e / kg
Acidification
How this compares (GHG emissions)
Potatoes (0.5)Chicken (9.9)Beef (99.5)
Greenhouse Gas Emissions1.8 kg CO₂e / kg
Land Use15.6 m² / kg
Water Use734 L / kg
Eutrophication18.1 g PO₄e / kg
Acidification9.8 g SO₂e / kg
⚠️ Important context about this data
  • Global averages: These figures are production-weighted averages from a meta-analysis of ~38,700 farms across 119 countries (Poore & Nemecek, 2018). Actual impact varies enormously by farming method, geography, and supply chain.
  • System boundary: Cradle-to-retail only — does not include consumer transport, home cooking energy, or food waste.
  • Soil carbon not included: This data does not account for soil carbon sequestration. Some argue that well-managed regenerative grazing partially offsets ruminant emissions; however, full lifecycle accounting — including methane, land-use change, and the opportunity cost of using land for grazing vs. reforestation — typically makes the net footprint of ruminant meat higher, not lower. This is especially relevant in temperate grassland regions like Ireland.
  • Not gospel: This data is informational and illustrative. It is useful for understanding relative magnitudes, but should not be treated as precise measurements for any individual product or farm.

Source: Poore & Nemecek (2018), Science 360(6392). Meta-analysis of ~38,700 farms, 119 countries, 46 product categories.

Global Supply: Pulses

Top 10 countries by per capita supply of the “Pulses” food group (kcal/capita/day, 2023). This is food group–level data from FAO Food Balance Sheets, not specific to this individual food.

1.
Niger
450
2.
Burkina Faso
290
3.
Rwanda
273
4.
Ethiopia
199
5.
Norway
195
6.
Mali
181
7.
Kenya
175
8.
El Salvador
172
9.
Djibouti
169
10.
Kazakhstan
167

Global Supply Trend (1961–2023)

+2%
1961: 58 kcal2023: 59 kcal

Source: FAO Food Balance Sheets (2023). Supply = production + imports − exports − waste, converted to kcal/capita/day.

Frequently Asked Questions

How many calories are in Mung beans, mature seeds, raw?

Mung beans, mature seeds, raw contains 347 kcal per 100 grams, making it a calorie-dense food. The energy comes from 23.9g of protein (28% of calories), 1.1g of fat (3%), and 62.6g of carbohydrates (72%). Carbohydrates are the primary energy source.

What is Mung beans, mature seeds, raw most nutritious for?

The standout nutrient in Mung beans, mature seeds, raw is Folate, providing 625 µg per 100g (156% of the Daily Value). It is also a notable source of Copper (105% DV). Our database tracks 83 individual nutrients for this food, allowing detailed comparison across vitamins, minerals, amino acids, and fatty acids.

Is Mung beans, mature seeds, raw high in protein?

With 23.9g per 100 grams, Mung beans, mature seeds, raw is a high-protein food. Protein accounts for 28% of its total calories, making it suitable for diets focused on protein intake.

How much fiber is in Mung beans, mature seeds, raw?

Yes, Mung beans, mature seeds, raw is rich in dietary fiber with 16.3g per 100 grams. The daily recommended intake is 25-38g, so a serving contributes meaningfully toward that goal. Dietary fiber supports digestive health and is associated with reduced risk of cardiovascular disease.

What is the glycemic index of Mung beans, mature seeds, raw?

Mung beans, mature seeds, raw has a glycemic index of 31, which is classified as low (≤55). Low-GI foods cause a slower, more gradual rise in blood sugar levels, which may be beneficial for blood sugar management. The glycemic load, which accounts for typical serving size, provides additional context for real-world blood sugar impact.

What is the insulin index of Mung beans, mature seeds, raw?

Mung beans, mature seeds, raw has a moderate insulin response (II: 34) (estimated from macronutrient composition) on the insulin index scale (white bread = 100). This is a typical insulin response for most mixed foods. Note that the insulin index can differ substantially from the glycemic index — dairy products and high-protein foods often have higher insulin responses than their GI would suggest.