Skip to main content

Noodles, japanese, somen, dry

Grains Per 100 g · Per 100g serving

Noodles, japanese, somen, dry is a grain, containing 356 calories per 100g. It is an excellent source of Sodium and Carbohydrate, providing 123% and 57% of the Daily Value respectively. This grain is a moderate protein source, a useful source of fiber, virtually fat-free. Grains are a primary source of carbohydrates, B vitamins, and minerals. Whole grains retain the bran and germ, providing substantially more fiber and micronutrients than refined grains. Our database tracks 60 nutrients for this food, plus glycemic index, insulin index, environmental footprint data.

356
Calories
kcal
11.3
Protein
g
0.81
Fat
g
74.1
Carbs
g
4.3
Fiber
g

Top Nutrients

💎
Sodium
1,840 mg
123% DV
💪
Carbohydrate
74.1 g
57% DV
💎
Manganese
0.48 mg
21% DV

Data for 60 of 150 tracked nutrients

Nutrient Fingerprint

How this food scores across key nutrient categories, as a percentage of the daily recommended value per 100 g. Based on USDA DRIs for adults.

Complete Nutrient Profile

Macronutrients 8
NutrientPer 100gUnitPer Serving% DV
Water SR9.2g
0%
Calories SR356kcal
Energy (kJ) SR1,490kj
Protein SR11.3g
20%
Total Fat SR0.81g
Carbohydrate SR74.1g
57%
Fiber SR4.3g
11%
Ash SR4.5g
Minerals 10
NutrientPer 100gUnitPer Serving% DV
Calcium SR23.0mg
2%
Iron SR1.3mg
16%
Magnesium SR28.0mg
7%
Phosphorus SR80.0mg
11%
Potassium SR164mg
5%
Sodium SR1,840mg
123%
Zinc SR0.45mg
4%
Copper SR0.14mg
16%
Manganese SR0.48mg
21%
Selenium SR8.3µg
15%
Vitamins 16
NutrientPer 100gUnitPer Serving% DV
Vitamin A (RAE) SR0µg
Vitamin A (IU) SR0IU
Retinol SR0µg
Vitamin C SR0mg
Vitamin D SR0µg
Vitamin D (IU) SR0IU
Thiamin (B1) SR0.10mg
8%
Riboflavin (B2) SR0.03mg
2%
Niacin (B3) SR0.88mg
6%
Pantothenic Acid (B5) SR0.49mg
10%
Vitamin B6 SR0.05mg
4%
Folate SR14.0µg
4%
Folic Acid SR0µg
Folate (food) SR14.0µg
Folate (DFE) SR14.0µg
Vitamin B12 SR0µg
Fatty Acids 7
NutrientPer 100gUnitPer Serving% DV
Saturated Fat SR0.12g
Monounsaturated Fat SR0.10g
Polyunsaturated Fat SR0.33g
Cholesterol SR0mg
Omega-3 EPA SR0g
Omega-3 DPA SR0g
Omega-3 DHA SR0g
Amino Acids 18
NutrientPer 100gUnitPer Serving% DV
Tryptophan SR0.14g
Threonine SR0.30g
Isoleucine SR0.44g
Leucine SR0.78g
Lysine SR0.22g
Methionine SR0.18g
Cystine SR0.32g
Phenylalanine SR0.55g
Tyrosine SR0.30g
Valine SR0.48g
Arginine SR0.42g
Histidine SR0.23g
Alanine SR0.33g
Aspartic Acid SR0.46g
Glutamic Acid SR4.1g
Glycine SR0.36g
Proline SR1.2g
Serine SR0.54g
Other 1
NutrientPer 100gUnitPer Serving% DV
Alcohol SR0g

Nutrient Density Score

The NRF9.3 score measures overall nutritional quality per 100 kcal. It rewards 9 nutrients to encourage (protein, fiber, vitamins A, C, E, calcium, iron, magnesium, potassium) and penalizes 3 to limit (saturated fat, added sugars, sodium). Higher is better; negative scores indicate the food is high in limit nutrients relative to its beneficial content.

-6
NRF9.3 Score
Poor · per 100 kcal
Poor (<0) Moderate Good Excellent (100+)

NRF9.3 index: Fulgoni et al. (2009), J Nutr 139(8). DVs based on FDA 2020 reference values.

Nutrient Interactions in This Food

Nutrients in this food that enhance or compete with each other during absorption.

⚠ Antagonisms — nutrients that compete

Fiber vs Iron●●

Phytates in high-fibre foods (whole grains, legumes) bind non-heme iron and reduce its bioavailability. Soaking, sprouting, and fermentation reduce phytate content.

Hurrell & Egli, Int J Vitam Nutr Res, 2010

Manganese vs Iron●●

Manganese and iron share the DMT1 transporter and compete for absorption. High iron status reduces manganese absorption and vice versa.

Erikson et al., Pharmacol Ther, 2007

Amino Acid Profile

Essential amino acid composition compared to the WHO/FAO adult reference pattern. The Amino Acid Score indicates protein quality — 100 means all essential amino acid requirements are met.

43
Amino Acid Score
Low
Lysine
Limiting Amino Acid
18
Amino Acids Tracked

Tip: The limiting amino acid is Lysine. Pair with legumes, dairy, and soy for a complete amino acid profile.

All Amino Acids (18)
Amino Acidg / 100gmg / g protein
Tryptophan0.1412.8
Threonine0.3026.4
Isoleucine0.4438.7
Leucine0.7868.4
Lysine0.2219.2
Methionine0.1815.6
Cystine0.3228.2
Phenylalanine0.5548.5
Tyrosine0.3026.3
Valine0.4842.6
Arginine0.4236.8
Histidine0.2320.3
Alanine0.3329.3
Aspartic Acid0.4640.9
Glutamic Acid4.1360.5
Glycine0.3631.6
Proline1.2110.0
Serine0.5447.1

Fatty Acid Profile

Breakdown of fat types per 100g. A healthy fat profile favours unsaturated fats (mono + poly) and a balanced omega-3 to omega-6 ratio.

0.12g
Saturated
0.10g
Monounsaturated
0.33g
Polyunsaturated

How Cooking Changes Nutrients

Estimated percentage of each nutrient retained after cooking, based on USDA retention factors for the “Pasta” food category. Values of 100% mean no loss; lower values indicate nutrients lost to heat, water, or oxidation.

Key insights
Thiamin loses up to 35% when boiled (drained). Boiled (water used) retains 80%.
Vitamin B6 loses up to 20% when boiled (drained). Boiled (water used) retains 90%.

Source: USDA Table of Nutrient Retention Factors, Release 6 (2007). Retention values are category-level averages — actual retention depends on cooking time, temperature, and water volume.

USDA Retention Factors

Glycemic & Insulin Response

The Glycemic Index (GI) measures how quickly a food raises blood sugar on a 0–100 scale. The Insulin Index (II) measures the insulin response directly, which can differ from GI — notably, dairy and high-protein foods often trigger a higher insulin response than their GI suggests. White bread = 100 for both scales.

49
Glycemic Index
Low GI
24
Glycemic Load
High GL (per 50g)
GI Scale 49
0 Low <55 Med High ≥70 100

GI data matched from: “Pasta/noodles (estimated from category)” · ●● low confidence

44
Insulin Index
Moderate Insulin Response
Insulin Index Scale 44
0 Low ≤30 Mod ≤60 High ≤100 120
GI Model ●● Estimated via GI-based regression (R²=0.78)

Source: International Tables of Glycemic Index (Sydney University, 2021) · Holt et al. 1997; Bao et al. 2016; Bell 2014

Environmental Impact

Environmental footprint per kilogram of food produced. Data represents the global average for the “Rice” category.

4.5
kg CO₂e / kg
Moderate Impact
2.8
m² land / kg
Land Use
2,248
L water / kg
Water Use
17.5
g SO₂e / kg
Acidification
How this compares (GHG emissions)
Potatoes (0.5)Chicken (9.9)Beef (99.5)
Greenhouse Gas Emissions4.5 kg CO₂e / kg
Land Use2.8 m² / kg
Water Use2,248 L / kg
Eutrophication35.1 g PO₄e / kg
Acidification17.5 g SO₂e / kg
⚠️ Important context about this data
  • Global averages: These figures are production-weighted averages from a meta-analysis of ~38,700 farms across 119 countries (Poore & Nemecek, 2018). Actual impact varies enormously by farming method, geography, and supply chain.
  • System boundary: Cradle-to-retail only — does not include consumer transport, home cooking energy, or food waste.
  • Soil carbon not included: This data does not account for soil carbon sequestration. Some argue that well-managed regenerative grazing partially offsets ruminant emissions; however, full lifecycle accounting — including methane, land-use change, and the opportunity cost of using land for grazing vs. reforestation — typically makes the net footprint of ruminant meat higher, not lower. This is especially relevant in temperate grassland regions like Ireland.
  • Not gospel: This data is informational and illustrative. It is useful for understanding relative magnitudes, but should not be treated as precise measurements for any individual product or farm.

Source: Poore & Nemecek (2018), Science 360(6392). Meta-analysis of ~38,700 farms, 119 countries, 46 product categories.

Global Supply: Cereals

Top 10 countries by per capita supply of the “Cereals” food group (kcal/capita/day, 2023). This is food group–level data from FAO Food Balance Sheets, not specific to this individual food.

1.
1962
2.
1927
3.
1888
4.
1876
5.
1862
6.
1829
7.
1774
8.
1756
9.
1738
10.
1679

Global Supply Trend (1961–2023)

+8%
1961: 1030 kcal2023: 1108 kcal

Source: FAO Food Balance Sheets (2023). Supply = production + imports − exports − waste, converted to kcal/capita/day.

Frequently Asked Questions

How many calories are in Noodles, japanese, somen, dry?

Noodles, japanese, somen, dry contains 356 kcal per 100 grams, making it a calorie-dense food. The energy comes from 11.3g of protein (13% of calories), 0.81g of fat (2%), and 74.1g of carbohydrates (83%). Carbohydrates are the primary energy source.

What is Noodles, japanese, somen, dry most nutritious for?

The standout nutrient in Noodles, japanese, somen, dry is Sodium, providing 1,840 mg per 100g (123% of the Daily Value). It is also a notable source of Carbohydrate (57% DV). Our database tracks 60 individual nutrients for this food, allowing detailed comparison across vitamins, minerals, amino acids, and fatty acids.

Is Noodles, japanese, somen, dry high in protein?

Noodles, japanese, somen, dry provides 11.3g of protein per 100 grams — a moderate amount. Protein contributes 13% of its calories.

How much fiber is in Noodles, japanese, somen, dry?

Noodles, japanese, somen, dry contains 4.3g of fiber per 100 grams — a moderate amount. This contributes to the recommended daily intake of 25-38g. Pairing with other fiber-rich foods like vegetables, legumes, or whole grains can help meet daily targets.

What is the glycemic index of Noodles, japanese, somen, dry?

Noodles, japanese, somen, dry has a glycemic index of 49, which is classified as low (≤55). Low-GI foods cause a slower, more gradual rise in blood sugar levels, which may be beneficial for blood sugar management. The glycemic load, which accounts for typical serving size, provides additional context for real-world blood sugar impact.

What is the insulin index of Noodles, japanese, somen, dry?

Noodles, japanese, somen, dry has a moderate insulin response (II: 44) (estimated from macronutrient composition) on the insulin index scale (white bread = 100). This is a typical insulin response for most mixed foods. Note that the insulin index can differ substantially from the glycemic index — dairy products and high-protein foods often have higher insulin responses than their GI would suggest.