Skip to main content

Peas, green, raw

Vegetables Per 100 g · Per 100g serving
Data sources: 50 AFCD 40 SR Legacy

Peas, green, raw is a vegetable at 81.0 calories per 100g. It is an excellent source of Vitamin A (RAE), providing 583.0 µg (65% of the Daily Value) per 100g serving. This vegetable is a useful source of fiber, virtually fat-free. Vegetables provide essential vitamins, minerals, and dietary fiber with relatively few calories. They are a cornerstone of virtually every dietary guideline worldwide. Our database tracks 90 nutrients for this food, plus glycemic index, insulin index, environmental footprint data.

81.0
Calories
kcal
5.4
Protein
g
0.50
Fat
g
14.4
Carbs
g
3.3
Fiber
g

Top Nutrients

☀️
Vitamin A (RAE)
583 µg
65% DV
💎
Manganese
1.1 mg
48% DV
💎
Iron
3.0 mg
38% DV

Data for 90 of 150 tracked nutrients

Nutrient Fingerprint

How this food scores across key nutrient categories, as a percentage of the daily recommended value per 100 g. Based on USDA DRIs for adults.

Complete Nutrient Profile

Macronutrients 10
NutrientPer 100gUnitPer Serving% DV
Water AFCD91.6g
2%
Calories SR81.0kcal
Energy (kJ) SR339kj
Protein SR5.4g
10%
Total Fat AFCD0.50g
Carbohydrate SR14.4g
11%
Fiber AFCD3.3g
9%
Total Sugars SR5.7g
Starch AFCD0.20g
Ash AFCD1.5g
Minerals 10
NutrientPer 100gUnitPer Serving% DV
Calcium AFCD220mg
22%
Iron AFCD3.0mg
38%
Magnesium AFCD55.0mg
14%
Phosphorus AFCD91.0mg
13%
Potassium AFCD440mg
13%
Sodium AFCD10.0mg
1%
Zinc AFCD0.92mg
8%
Copper AFCD0.22mg
24%
Manganese AFCD1.1mg
48%
Selenium AFCD0µg
Vitamins 30
NutrientPer 100gUnitPer Serving% DV
Vitamin A (RAE) AFCD583µg
65%
Vitamin A (IU) SR38.0IU
Retinol AFCD0µg
Beta-Carotene AFCD3,500µg
Alpha-Carotene AFCD0µg
Beta-Cryptoxanthin AFCD0µg
Lycopene SR0µg
Lutein + Zeaxanthin SR2,477µg
Vitamin C AFCD6.0mg
7%
Vitamin D SR0µg
Vitamin D (IU) AFCD0IU
Vitamin D2 AFCD0µg
Vitamin D3 AFCD0µg
Vitamin E AFCD2.1mg
14%
Beta-Tocopherol AFCD0mg
Gamma-Tocopherol AFCD0mg
Delta-Tocopherol AFCD0mg
Vitamin K1 SR24.8µg
21%
Thiamin (B1) AFCD0.05mg
4%
Riboflavin (B2) AFCD0.10mg
8%
Niacin (B3) AFCD0mg
Pantothenic Acid (B5) AFCD0.15mg
3%
Vitamin B6 AFCD0.07mg
5%
Folate AFCD91.0µg
23%
Folic Acid SR0µg
Folate (food) AFCD91.0µg
Folate (DFE) AFCD91.0µg
Vitamin B12 AFCD0µg
Choline SR28.4mg
5%
Betaine SR0.20mg
Fatty Acids 9
NutrientPer 100gUnitPer Serving% DV
Saturated Fat AFCD0.03g
Monounsaturated Fat AFCD0.07g
Polyunsaturated Fat AFCD0.30g
Trans Fat AFCD0g
Cholesterol AFCD0mg
Omega-3 ALA AFCD0.24g
15%
Omega-3 EPA AFCD0g
Omega-3 DPA AFCD0g
Omega-3 DHA AFCD0g
Individual Fatty Acids 10
NutrientPer 100gUnitPer Serving% DV
Butyric Acid (4:0) SR0g
Caproic Acid (6:0) SR0g
Caprylic Acid (8:0) SR0g
Capric Acid (10:0) SR0g
Lauric Acid (12:0) SR0g
Myristic Acid (14:0) SR0g
Palmitic Acid (16:0) SR0.06g
Stearic Acid (18:0) SR0.007g
Linoleic Acid (18:2) AFCD0.06g
0%
Linolenic Acid (18:3) SR0.04g
Amino Acids 18
NutrientPer 100gUnitPer Serving% DV
Tryptophan AFCD0.03g
Threonine SR0.20g
Isoleucine SR0.20g
Leucine SR0.32g
Lysine SR0.32g
Methionine SR0.08g
Cystine SR0.03g
Phenylalanine SR0.20g
Tyrosine SR0.11g
Valine SR0.23g
Arginine SR0.43g
Histidine SR0.11g
Alanine SR0.24g
Aspartic Acid SR0.50g
Glutamic Acid SR0.74g
Glycine SR0.18g
Proline SR0.17g
Serine SR0.18g
Other 3
NutrientPer 100gUnitPer Serving% DV
Caffeine AFCD0mg
Theobromine SR0mg
Alcohol AFCD0g

Nutrient Density Score

The NRF9.3 score measures overall nutritional quality per 100 kcal. It rewards 9 nutrients to encourage (protein, fiber, vitamins A, C, E, calcium, iron, magnesium, potassium) and penalizes 3 to limit (saturated fat, added sugars, sodium). Higher is better; negative scores indicate the food is high in limit nutrients relative to its beneficial content.

202
NRF9.3 Score
Excellent · per 100 kcal
Poor (<0) Moderate Good Excellent (100+)

NRF9.3 index: Fulgoni et al. (2009), J Nutr 139(8). DVs based on FDA 2020 reference values.

Nutrient Interactions in This Food

Nutrients in this food that enhance or compete with each other during absorption.

✔ Synergies — nutrients that help each other

Vitamin C + Iron●●●

Vitamin C dramatically enhances non-heme iron absorption by reducing Fe³⁺ to Fe²⁺ in the gut. Adding 75 mg vitamin C to a meal can increase iron absorption 3–4 fold.

Hallberg et al., Am J Clin Nutr, 1989

Dietary Fat + Vitamin A●●●

Vitamin A is fat-soluble and requires dietary fat for absorption. Adding fat to a meal significantly increases beta-carotene and retinol absorption.

Ribaya-Mercado et al., Am J Clin Nutr, 2007

Dietary Fat + Vitamin E●●●

Vitamin E is fat-soluble and absorbed alongside dietary fats via micelle formation in the small intestine. Low-fat diets reduce vitamin E absorption.

Traber, Free Radic Biol Med, 2007

Dietary Fat + Vitamin K●●●

Vitamin K is fat-soluble. Absorption increases significantly when consumed with dietary fat, particularly for phylloquinone (K1) from plant sources.

Gijsbers et al., Br J Nutr, 1996

Vitamin C + Vitamin E●●

Vitamin C regenerates oxidised vitamin E (tocopheroxyl radical) back to its active form, extending its antioxidant function in cell membranes.

Niki, Free Radic Biol Med, 2014

⚠ Antagonisms — nutrients that compete

Calcium vs Iron●●●

Calcium inhibits both heme and non-heme iron absorption when consumed in the same meal. The effect is dose-dependent, with significant inhibition at 300+ mg calcium.

Hallberg et al., Am J Clin Nutr, 1991

Zinc vs Copper●●●

High zinc intake induces metallothionein in enterocytes, which traps copper and blocks its absorption. Prolonged high-dose zinc can cause copper deficiency.

Prasad et al., JAMA, 1978; Fosmire, Am J Clin Nutr, 1990

Zinc vs Iron●●

Zinc and non-heme iron compete for the same intestinal transporter (DMT1). High doses of one can reduce absorption of the other when taken simultaneously.

Rossander-Hulten et al., Am J Clin Nutr, 1991

Calcium vs Magnesium●●

Very high calcium intake can reduce magnesium absorption by competing for shared intestinal transport pathways. A calcium:magnesium ratio above 2.6:1 may impair magnesium status.

Rosanoff et al., Nutr Rev, 2012

Fiber vs Iron●●

Phytates in high-fibre foods (whole grains, legumes) bind non-heme iron and reduce its bioavailability. Soaking, sprouting, and fermentation reduce phytate content.

Hurrell & Egli, Int J Vitam Nutr Res, 2010

Amino Acid Profile

Essential amino acid composition compared to the WHO/FAO adult reference pattern. The Amino Acid Score indicates protein quality — 100 means all essential amino acid requirements are met.

96
Amino Acid Score
Good
Met + Cys
Limiting Amino Acid
18
Amino Acids Tracked

Tip: The limiting amino acid is Met + Cys. Pair with grains, nuts, and seeds for a complete amino acid profile.

All Amino Acids (18)
Amino Acidg / 100gmg / g protein
Tryptophan0.036.3
Threonine0.2037.5
Isoleucine0.2036.0
Leucine0.3259.6
Lysine0.3258.5
Methionine0.0815.1
Cystine0.035.9
Phenylalanine0.2036.9
Tyrosine0.1121.0
Valine0.2343.4
Arginine0.4379.0
Histidine0.1119.7
Alanine0.2444.3
Aspartic Acid0.5091.5
Glutamic Acid0.74136.7
Glycine0.1833.9
Proline0.1731.9
Serine0.1833.4

Fatty Acid Profile

Breakdown of fat types per 100g. A healthy fat profile favours unsaturated fats (mono + poly) and a balanced omega-3 to omega-6 ratio.

0.03g
Saturated
0.07g
Monounsaturated
0.30g
Polyunsaturated
4.0:1
Omega-3 : Omega-6 Ratio
Omega-3 dominant — ideal range is 1:1 to 1:4
Omega Fatty Acids
ALA (18:3 n-3)0.24 g
Linoleic acid (18:2 n-6)0.06 g

How Cooking Changes Nutrients

Estimated percentage of each nutrient retained after cooking, based on USDA retention factors for the “Other Vegetables” food category. Values of 100% mean no loss; lower values indicate nutrients lost to heat, water, or oxidation.

Key insights
Folate loses up to 31% when boiled (drained). Boiled (water used) retains 85%.
Choline loses up to 10% when fried. Boiled (drained) retains 100%.

Source: USDA Table of Nutrient Retention Factors, Release 6 (2007). Retention values are category-level averages — actual retention depends on cooking time, temperature, and water volume.

USDA Retention Factors

Glycemic & Insulin Response

The Glycemic Index (GI) measures how quickly a food raises blood sugar on a 0–100 scale. The Insulin Index (II) measures the insulin response directly, which can differ from GI — notably, dairy and high-protein foods often trigger a higher insulin response than their GI suggests. White bread = 100 for both scales.

51
Glycemic Index
Low GI
4
Glycemic Load
Low GL (per 80g)
GI Scale 51
0 Low <55 Med High ≥70 100

GI data matched from: “Green peas, boiled” · ●●● high confidence

59
Insulin Index
Moderate Insulin Response
Insulin Index Scale 59
0 Low ≤30 Mod ≤60 High ≤100 120
Macro Model ●● Estimated from macronutrient composition (R²=0.49)

Source: International Tables of Glycemic Index (Sydney University, 2021) · Holt et al. 1997; Bao et al. 2016; Bell 2014

Environmental Impact

Environmental footprint per kilogram of food produced. Data represents the global average for the “Peas” category.

0.98
kg CO₂e / kg
Very Low Impact
7.5
m² land / kg
Land Use
397
L water / kg
Water Use
5.4
g SO₂e / kg
Acidification
How this compares (GHG emissions)
Potatoes (0.5)Chicken (9.9)Beef (99.5)
Greenhouse Gas Emissions0.98 kg CO₂e / kg
Land Use7.5 m² / kg
Water Use397 L / kg
Eutrophication7.5 g PO₄e / kg
Acidification5.4 g SO₂e / kg
⚠️ Important context about this data
  • Global averages: These figures are production-weighted averages from a meta-analysis of ~38,700 farms across 119 countries (Poore & Nemecek, 2018). Actual impact varies enormously by farming method, geography, and supply chain.
  • System boundary: Cradle-to-retail only — does not include consumer transport, home cooking energy, or food waste.
  • Soil carbon not included: This data does not account for soil carbon sequestration. Some argue that well-managed regenerative grazing partially offsets ruminant emissions; however, full lifecycle accounting — including methane, land-use change, and the opportunity cost of using land for grazing vs. reforestation — typically makes the net footprint of ruminant meat higher, not lower. This is especially relevant in temperate grassland regions like Ireland.
  • Not gospel: This data is informational and illustrative. It is useful for understanding relative magnitudes, but should not be treated as precise measurements for any individual product or farm.

Source: Poore & Nemecek (2018), Science 360(6392). Meta-analysis of ~38,700 farms, 119 countries, 46 product categories.

Global Supply: Vegetables

Top 10 countries by per capita supply of the “Vegetables” food group (kcal/capita/day, 2023). This is food group–level data from FAO Food Balance Sheets, not specific to this individual food.

1.
China; mainland
310
2.
China
306
3.
Albania
258
4.
North Macedonia
221
5.
Guyana
209
6.
Kazakhstan
204
7.
Oman
192
8.
Uzbekistan
190
9.
Tajikistan
186
10.
Bosnia and Herzegovina
183

Global Supply Trend (1961–2023)

+76%
1961: 38 kcal2023: 67 kcal

Source: FAO Food Balance Sheets (2023). Supply = production + imports − exports − waste, converted to kcal/capita/day.

Frequently Asked Questions

How many calories are in Peas, green, raw?

Peas, green, raw contains 81.0 kcal per 100 grams, making it a moderate-calorie food. The energy comes from 5.4g of protein (27% of calories), 0.50g of fat (6%), and 14.4g of carbohydrates (71%). Carbohydrates are the primary energy source.

What is Peas, green, raw most nutritious for?

The standout nutrient in Peas, green, raw is Vitamin A (RAE), providing 583 µg per 100g (65% of the Daily Value). It is also a notable source of Manganese (48% DV). Our database tracks 90 individual nutrients for this food, allowing detailed comparison across vitamins, minerals, amino acids, and fatty acids.

Is Peas, green, raw high in protein?

Peas, green, raw contains 5.4g of protein per 100 grams. While not a high-protein food, it can contribute to daily protein needs as part of a varied diet.

How much fiber is in Peas, green, raw?

Peas, green, raw contains 3.3g of fiber per 100 grams — a moderate amount. This contributes to the recommended daily intake of 25-38g. Pairing with other fiber-rich foods like vegetables, legumes, or whole grains can help meet daily targets.

What is the glycemic index of Peas, green, raw?

Peas, green, raw has a glycemic index of 51, which is classified as low (≤55). Low-GI foods cause a slower, more gradual rise in blood sugar levels, which may be beneficial for blood sugar management. The glycemic load, which accounts for typical serving size, provides additional context for real-world blood sugar impact.

What is the insulin index of Peas, green, raw?

Peas, green, raw has a moderate insulin response (II: 59) (estimated from macronutrient composition) on the insulin index scale (white bread = 100). This is a typical insulin response for most mixed foods. Note that the insulin index can differ substantially from the glycemic index — dairy products and high-protein foods often have higher insulin responses than their GI would suggest.