Skip to main content

Pie, fried pies, fruit

Baked Goods Per 100 g · Per 100g serving

Pie, fried pies, fruit is a baked product, containing 316 calories per 100g. It provides useful amounts of Carbohydrate and Linoleic Acid (18:2), contributing 33% and 28% of the Daily Value per 100g. Baked goods derive their nutrients primarily from their flour, fat, and enrichment ingredients. Whole-grain varieties generally offer more fiber and micronutrients. Our database tracks 81 nutrients for this food, plus insulin index, environmental footprint data.

316
Calories
kcal
3.0
Protein
g
16.1
Fat
g
42.6
Carbs
g
2.6
Fiber
g

Top Nutrients

💪
Carbohydrate
42.6 g
33% DV
Linoleic Acid (18:2)
4.8 g
28% DV
💎
Sodium
333 mg
22% DV

Data for 81 of 150 tracked nutrients

Nutrient Fingerprint

How this food scores across key nutrient categories, as a percentage of the daily recommended value per 100 g. Based on USDA DRIs for adults.

Complete Nutrient Profile

Macronutrients 9
NutrientPer 100gUnitPer Serving% DV
Water SR37.6g
1%
Calories SR316kcal
Energy (kJ) SR1,322kj
Protein SR3.0g
5%
Total Fat SR16.1g
Carbohydrate SR42.6g
33%
Fiber SR2.6g
7%
Total Sugars SR21.4g
Ash SR1.1g
Minerals 10
NutrientPer 100gUnitPer Serving% DV
Calcium SR22.0mg
2%
Iron SR1.2mg
15%
Magnesium SR10.0mg
2%
Phosphorus SR43.0mg
6%
Potassium SR65.0mg
2%
Sodium SR333mg
22%
Zinc SR0.23mg
2%
Copper SR0.05mg
5%
Manganese SR0.22mg
10%
Selenium SR2.4µg
4%
Vitamins 24
NutrientPer 100gUnitPer Serving% DV
Vitamin A (RAE) SR27.0µg
3%
Vitamin A (IU) SR5.0IU
Retinol SR5.0µg
Beta-Carotene SR5.0µg
Alpha-Carotene SR0µg
Beta-Cryptoxanthin SR5.0µg
Lycopene SR0µg
Lutein + Zeaxanthin SR8.0µg
Vitamin C SR1.3mg
1%
Vitamin D SR0µg
Vitamin D (IU) SR0IU
Vitamin E SR1.7mg
12%
Vitamin K1 SR4.1µg
3%
Thiamin (B1) SR0.14mg
12%
Riboflavin (B2) SR0.11mg
8%
Niacin (B3) SR1.4mg
9%
Pantothenic Acid (B5) SR0.11mg
2%
Vitamin B6 SR0.03mg
2%
Folate SR18.0µg
4%
Folic Acid SR15.0µg
Folate (food) SR3.0µg
Folate (DFE) SR29.0µg
Vitamin B12 SR0.08µg
3%
Choline SR7.2mg
1%
Fatty Acids 7
NutrientPer 100gUnitPer Serving% DV
Saturated Fat SR2.5g
Monounsaturated Fat SR7.4g
Polyunsaturated Fat SR5.4g
Cholesterol SR0mg
Omega-3 EPA SR0g
Omega-3 DPA SR0g
Omega-3 DHA SR0g
Individual Fatty Acids 10
NutrientPer 100gUnitPer Serving% DV
Butyric Acid (4:0) SR0.001g
Caproic Acid (6:0) SR0g
Caprylic Acid (8:0) SR0g
Capric Acid (10:0) SR0.001g
Lauric Acid (12:0) SR0.001g
Myristic Acid (14:0) SR0.03g
Palmitic Acid (16:0) SR1.5g
Stearic Acid (18:0) SR0.83g
Linoleic Acid (18:2) SR4.8g
28%
Linolenic Acid (18:3) SR0.57g
Amino Acids 18
NutrientPer 100gUnitPer Serving% DV
Tryptophan SR0.04g
Threonine SR0.09g
Isoleucine SR0.12g
Leucine SR0.21g
Lysine SR0.12g
Methionine SR0.05g
Cystine SR0.06g
Phenylalanine SR0.14g
Tyrosine SR0.09g
Valine SR0.14g
Arginine SR0.11g
Histidine SR0.06g
Alanine SR0.09g
Aspartic Acid SR0.16g
Glutamic Acid SR0.91g
Glycine SR0.10g
Proline SR0.31g
Serine SR0.15g
Other 3
NutrientPer 100gUnitPer Serving% DV
Caffeine SR0mg
Theobromine SR0mg
Alcohol SR0g

Nutrient Density Score

The NRF9.3 score measures overall nutritional quality per 100 kcal. It rewards 9 nutrients to encourage (protein, fiber, vitamins A, C, E, calcium, iron, magnesium, potassium) and penalizes 3 to limit (saturated fat, added sugars, sodium). Higher is better; negative scores indicate the food is high in limit nutrients relative to its beneficial content.

5
NRF9.3 Score
Moderate · per 100 kcal
Poor (<0) Moderate Good Excellent (100+)

NRF9.3 index: Fulgoni et al. (2009), J Nutr 139(8). DVs based on FDA 2020 reference values.

Nutrient Interactions in This Food

Nutrients in this food that enhance or compete with each other during absorption.

✔ Synergies — nutrients that help each other

Dietary Fat + Vitamin E●●●

Vitamin E is fat-soluble and absorbed alongside dietary fats via micelle formation in the small intestine. Low-fat diets reduce vitamin E absorption.

Traber, Free Radic Biol Med, 2007

⚠ Antagonisms — nutrients that compete

Fiber vs Iron●●

Phytates in high-fibre foods (whole grains, legumes) bind non-heme iron and reduce its bioavailability. Soaking, sprouting, and fermentation reduce phytate content.

Hurrell & Egli, Int J Vitam Nutr Res, 2010

Manganese vs Iron●●

Manganese and iron share the DMT1 transporter and compete for absorption. High iron status reduces manganese absorption and vice versa.

Erikson et al., Pharmacol Ther, 2007

Amino Acid Profile

Essential amino acid composition compared to the WHO/FAO adult reference pattern. The Amino Acid Score indicates protein quality — 100 means all essential amino acid requirements are met.

90
Amino Acid Score
Good
Lysine
Limiting Amino Acid
18
Amino Acids Tracked

Tip: The limiting amino acid is Lysine. Pair with legumes, dairy, and soy for a complete amino acid profile.

All Amino Acids (18)
Amino Acidg / 100gmg / g protein
Tryptophan0.0414.0
Threonine0.0929.7
Isoleucine0.1240.0
Leucine0.2170.3
Lysine0.1240.3
Methionine0.0517.3
Cystine0.0619.7
Phenylalanine0.1446.0
Tyrosine0.0930.0
Valine0.1446.0
Arginine0.1137.3
Histidine0.0620.7
Alanine0.0931.0
Aspartic Acid0.1652.0
Glutamic Acid0.91302.0
Glycine0.1032.7
Proline0.31104.7
Serine0.1551.3

Fatty Acid Profile

Breakdown of fat types per 100g. A healthy fat profile favours unsaturated fats (mono + poly) and a balanced omega-3 to omega-6 ratio.

2.5g
Saturated
7.4g
Monounsaturated
5.4g
Polyunsaturated
Omega Fatty Acids
Linoleic acid (18:2 n-6)4.8 g

How Cooking Changes Nutrients

Estimated percentage of each nutrient retained after cooking, based on USDA retention factors for the “Rice” food category. Values of 100% mean no loss; lower values indicate nutrients lost to heat, water, or oxidation.

Key insights
Vitamin C loses up to 30% when sautéed & simmered. Boiled (water used) retains 80%.
Folate loses up to 40% when boiled (drained). Boiled (water used) retains 70%.

Source: USDA Table of Nutrient Retention Factors, Release 6 (2007). Retention values are category-level averages — actual retention depends on cooking time, temperature, and water volume.

USDA Retention Factors

Insulin Response

The Insulin Index (II) measures the actual insulin response to food on a scale where white bread = 100. Unlike the Glycemic Index (which only measures blood sugar), the II captures the full hormonal response — including the effect of protein and fat on insulin secretion. This is why high-protein foods like meat and dairy can have significant insulin scores despite having low or zero GI values.

44
Insulin Index
Moderate Insulin Response
Insulin Index Scale 44
0 Low ≤30 Mod ≤60 High ≤100 120
Macro Model ●● Estimated from macronutrient composition (R²=0.49)

Source: Holt et al. 1997; Bao et al. 2016; Bell 2014

Environmental Impact

Environmental footprint per kilogram of food produced. Data represents the global average for the “Cane Sugar” category.

3.2
kg CO₂e / kg
Moderate Impact
2.0
m² land / kg
Land Use
620
L water / kg
Water Use
5.2
g SO₂e / kg
Acidification
How this compares (GHG emissions)
Potatoes (0.5)Chicken (9.9)Beef (99.5)
Greenhouse Gas Emissions3.2 kg CO₂e / kg
Land Use2.0 m² / kg
Water Use620 L / kg
Eutrophication17.1 g PO₄e / kg
Acidification5.2 g SO₂e / kg
⚠️ Important context about this data
  • Global averages: These figures are production-weighted averages from a meta-analysis of ~38,700 farms across 119 countries (Poore & Nemecek, 2018). Actual impact varies enormously by farming method, geography, and supply chain.
  • System boundary: Cradle-to-retail only — does not include consumer transport, home cooking energy, or food waste.
  • Soil carbon not included: This data does not account for soil carbon sequestration. Some argue that well-managed regenerative grazing partially offsets ruminant emissions; however, full lifecycle accounting — including methane, land-use change, and the opportunity cost of using land for grazing vs. reforestation — typically makes the net footprint of ruminant meat higher, not lower. This is especially relevant in temperate grassland regions like Ireland.
  • Not gospel: This data is informational and illustrative. It is useful for understanding relative magnitudes, but should not be treated as precise measurements for any individual product or farm.

Source: Poore & Nemecek (2018), Science 360(6392). Meta-analysis of ~38,700 farms, 119 countries, 46 product categories.

Global Supply: Cereals

Top 10 countries by per capita supply of the “Cereals” food group (kcal/capita/day, 2023). This is food group–level data from FAO Food Balance Sheets, not specific to this individual food.

1.
Egypt
1962
2.
Bhutan
1927
3.
Serbia
1888
4.
Morocco
1876
5.
Mali
1862
6.
Ethiopia
1829
7.
Philippines
1774
8.
Bangladesh
1756
9.
Myanmar
1738
10.
Nepal
1679

Global Supply Trend (1961–2023)

+8%
1961: 1030 kcal2023: 1108 kcal

Source: FAO Food Balance Sheets (2023). Supply = production + imports − exports − waste, converted to kcal/capita/day.

Frequently Asked Questions

How many calories are in Pie, fried pies, fruit?

Pie, fried pies, fruit contains 316 kcal per 100 grams, making it a calorie-dense food. The energy comes from 3.0g of protein (4% of calories), 16.1g of fat (46%), and 42.6g of carbohydrates (54%). Carbohydrates are the primary energy source.

What is Pie, fried pies, fruit most nutritious for?

The standout nutrient in Pie, fried pies, fruit is Carbohydrate, providing 42.6 g per 100g (33% of the Daily Value). It is also a notable source of Linoleic Acid (18:2) (28% DV). Our database tracks 81 individual nutrients for this food, allowing detailed comparison across vitamins, minerals, amino acids, and fatty acids.

Is Pie, fried pies, fruit high in protein?

Pie, fried pies, fruit contains 3.0g of protein per 100 grams. While not a high-protein food, it can contribute to daily protein needs as part of a varied diet.

How much fiber is in Pie, fried pies, fruit?

Pie, fried pies, fruit contains 2.6g of fiber per 100 grams, which is a small amount. To increase fiber intake, consider pairing with high-fiber foods such as legumes, whole grains, or vegetables.

What is the insulin index of Pie, fried pies, fruit?

Pie, fried pies, fruit has a moderate insulin response (II: 44) (estimated from macronutrient composition) on the insulin index scale (white bread = 100). This is a typical insulin response for most mixed foods. Note that the insulin index can differ substantially from the glycemic index — dairy products and high-protein foods often have higher insulin responses than their GI would suggest.