Skip to main content

Shallots, freeze-dried

Vegetables Per 100 g · Per 100g serving

Shallots, freeze-dried is a vegetable, containing 348 calories per 100g. It is an excellent source of Vitamin B6, Iron and Carbohydrate, providing 129%, 75% and 62% of the Daily Value respectively. This vegetable is a moderate protein source, rich in dietary fiber, virtually fat-free. Vegetables provide essential vitamins, minerals, and dietary fiber with relatively few calories. They are a cornerstone of virtually every dietary guideline worldwide. Our database tracks 81 nutrients for this food, plus insulin index, environmental footprint data.

348
Calories
kcal
12.3
Protein
g
0.50
Fat
g
80.7
Carbs
g
15.7
Fiber
g

Top Nutrients

☀️
Vitamin B6
1.7 mg
129% DV
💎
Iron
6.0 mg
75% DV
💪
Carbohydrate
80.7 g
62% DV

Data for 81 of 150 tracked nutrients

Nutrient Fingerprint

How this food scores across key nutrient categories, as a percentage of the daily recommended value per 100 g. Based on USDA DRIs for adults.

Complete Nutrient Profile

Macronutrients 9
NutrientPer 100gUnitPer Serving% DV
Water SR2.0g
0%
Calories SR348kcal
Energy (kJ) SR1,457kj
Protein SR12.3g
22%
Total Fat SR0.50g
Carbohydrate SR80.7g
62%
Fiber SR15.7g
41%
Total Sugars SR38.2g
Ash SR4.5g
Minerals 10
NutrientPer 100gUnitPer Serving% DV
Calcium SR183mg
18%
Iron SR6.0mg
75%
Magnesium SR104mg
26%
Phosphorus SR296mg
42%
Potassium SR1,650mg
48%
Sodium SR59.0mg
4%
Zinc SR1.9mg
18%
Copper SR0.42mg
47%
Manganese SR1.4mg
62%
Selenium SR5.7µg
10%
Vitamins 24
NutrientPer 100gUnitPer Serving% DV
Vitamin A (RAE) SR21.0µg
2%
Vitamin A (IU) SR1.0IU
Retinol SR0µg
Beta-Carotene SR13.0µg
Alpha-Carotene SR0µg
Beta-Cryptoxanthin SR0µg
Lycopene SR0µg
Lutein + Zeaxanthin SR38.0µg
Vitamin C SR39.0mg
43%
Vitamin D SR0µg
Vitamin D (IU) SR0IU
Vitamin E SR0.18mg
1%
Vitamin K1 SR3.9µg
3%
Thiamin (B1) SR0.30mg
25%
Riboflavin (B2) SR0.10mg
8%
Niacin (B3) SR1.0mg
6%
Pantothenic Acid (B5) SR1.4mg
28%
Vitamin B6 SR1.7mg
129%
Folate SR116µg
29%
Folic Acid SR0µg
Folate (food) SR116µg
Folate (DFE) SR116µg
Vitamin B12 SR0µg
Choline SR55.0mg
10%
Fatty Acids 8
NutrientPer 100gUnitPer Serving% DV
Saturated Fat SR0.08g
Monounsaturated Fat SR0.07g
Polyunsaturated Fat SR0.20g
Trans Fat SR0g
Cholesterol SR0mg
Omega-3 EPA SR0g
Omega-3 DPA SR0g
Omega-3 DHA SR0g
Individual Fatty Acids 10
NutrientPer 100gUnitPer Serving% DV
Butyric Acid (4:0) SR0g
Caproic Acid (6:0) SR0g
Caprylic Acid (8:0) SR0g
Capric Acid (10:0) SR0g
Lauric Acid (12:0) SR0g
Myristic Acid (14:0) SR0.002g
Palmitic Acid (16:0) SR0.07g
Stearic Acid (18:0) SR0.007g
Linoleic Acid (18:2) SR0.18g
1%
Linolenic Acid (18:3) SR0.01g
Amino Acids 17
NutrientPer 100gUnitPer Serving% DV
Tryptophan SR0.14g
Threonine SR0.48g
Isoleucine SR0.52g
Leucine SR0.73g
Lysine SR0.61g
Methionine SR0.13g
Phenylalanine SR0.40g
Tyrosine SR0.36g
Valine SR0.54g
Arginine SR0.89g
Histidine SR0.21g
Alanine SR0.56g
Aspartic Acid SR1.1g
Glutamic Acid SR2.5g
Glycine SR0.61g
Proline SR0.81g
Serine SR0.56g
Other 3
NutrientPer 100gUnitPer Serving% DV
Caffeine SR0mg
Theobromine SR0mg
Alcohol SR0g

Nutrient Density Score

The NRF9.3 score measures overall nutritional quality per 100 kcal. It rewards 9 nutrients to encourage (protein, fiber, vitamins A, C, E, calcium, iron, magnesium, potassium) and penalizes 3 to limit (saturated fat, added sugars, sodium). Higher is better; negative scores indicate the food is high in limit nutrients relative to its beneficial content.

67
NRF9.3 Score
Good · per 100 kcal
Poor (<0) Moderate Good Excellent (100+)

NRF9.3 index: Fulgoni et al. (2009), J Nutr 139(8). DVs based on FDA 2020 reference values.

Nutrient Interactions in This Food

Nutrients in this food that enhance or compete with each other during absorption.

✔ Synergies — nutrients that help each other

Vitamin C + Iron●●●

Vitamin C dramatically enhances non-heme iron absorption by reducing Fe³⁺ to Fe²⁺ in the gut. Adding 75 mg vitamin C to a meal can increase iron absorption 3–4 fold.

Hallberg et al., Am J Clin Nutr, 1989

Vitamin B6 + Magnesium●●

Vitamin B6 may enhance intracellular magnesium accumulation. Combined supplementation has shown greater benefits for stress and anxiety than magnesium alone.

Pouteau et al., PLoS One, 2018

Vitamin C + Selenium●●

Vitamin C supports selenium's antioxidant function by maintaining the glutathione system in its reduced state.

Rayman, Lancet, 2012

Protein + Calcium●●

Moderate protein intake enhances calcium absorption and supports bone health. The acid-ash hypothesis suggesting protein harms bones has been largely disproven.

Kerstetter et al., J Clin Endocrinol Metab, 2005

Vitamin C + Calcium●●

Vitamin C supports collagen synthesis, which provides the structural framework for calcium deposition in bone tissue.

Aghajanian et al., Nutrients, 2015

⚠ Antagonisms — nutrients that compete

Calcium vs Iron●●●

Calcium inhibits both heme and non-heme iron absorption when consumed in the same meal. The effect is dose-dependent, with significant inhibition at 300+ mg calcium.

Hallberg et al., Am J Clin Nutr, 1991

Zinc vs Copper●●●

High zinc intake induces metallothionein in enterocytes, which traps copper and blocks its absorption. Prolonged high-dose zinc can cause copper deficiency.

Prasad et al., JAMA, 1978; Fosmire, Am J Clin Nutr, 1990

Zinc vs Iron●●

Zinc and non-heme iron compete for the same intestinal transporter (DMT1). High doses of one can reduce absorption of the other when taken simultaneously.

Rossander-Hulten et al., Am J Clin Nutr, 1991

Calcium vs Magnesium●●

Very high calcium intake can reduce magnesium absorption by competing for shared intestinal transport pathways. A calcium:magnesium ratio above 2.6:1 may impair magnesium status.

Rosanoff et al., Nutr Rev, 2012

Fiber vs Iron●●

Phytates in high-fibre foods (whole grains, legumes) bind non-heme iron and reduce its bioavailability. Soaking, sprouting, and fermentation reduce phytate content.

Hurrell & Egli, Int J Vitam Nutr Res, 2010

Amino Acid Profile

Essential amino acid composition compared to the WHO/FAO adult reference pattern. The Amino Acid Score indicates protein quality — 100 means all essential amino acid requirements are met.

50
Amino Acid Score
Moderate
Met + Cys
Limiting Amino Acid
17
Amino Acids Tracked

Tip: The limiting amino acid is Met + Cys. Pair with grains, nuts, and seeds for a complete amino acid profile.

All Amino Acids (17)
Amino Acidg / 100gmg / g protein
Tryptophan0.1411.2
Threonine0.4839.2
Isoleucine0.5242.4
Leucine0.7359.7
Lysine0.6149.9
Methionine0.1310.9
Phenylalanine0.4032.2
Tyrosine0.3628.9
Valine0.5444.1
Arginine0.8972.4
Histidine0.2117.3
Alanine0.5645.1
Aspartic Acid1.192.5
Glutamic Acid2.5206.9
Glycine0.6149.6
Proline0.8166.1
Serine0.5645.1

Fatty Acid Profile

Breakdown of fat types per 100g. A healthy fat profile favours unsaturated fats (mono + poly) and a balanced omega-3 to omega-6 ratio.

0.08g
Saturated
0.07g
Monounsaturated
0.20g
Polyunsaturated
Omega Fatty Acids
Linoleic acid (18:2 n-6)0.18 g

How Cooking Changes Nutrients

Estimated percentage of each nutrient retained after cooking, based on USDA retention factors for the “Dried Fruits” food category. Values of 100% mean no loss; lower values indicate nutrients lost to heat, water, or oxidation.

Key insights
Vitamin C loses up to 49% when dried. Baked retains 80%.
Folate loses up to 50% when sautéed. Dried retains 61%.

Source: USDA Table of Nutrient Retention Factors, Release 6 (2007). Retention values are category-level averages — actual retention depends on cooking time, temperature, and water volume.

USDA Retention Factors

Insulin Response

The Insulin Index (II) measures the actual insulin response to food on a scale where white bread = 100. Unlike the Glycemic Index (which only measures blood sugar), the II captures the full hormonal response — including the effect of protein and fat on insulin secretion. This is why high-protein foods like meat and dairy can have significant insulin scores despite having low or zero GI values.

69
Insulin Index
High Insulin Response
Insulin Index Scale 69
0 Low ≤30 Mod ≤60 High ≤100 120
Macro Model ●● Estimated from macronutrient composition (R²=0.49)

Source: Holt et al. 1997; Bao et al. 2016; Bell 2014

Environmental Impact

Environmental footprint per kilogram of food produced. Data represents the global average for the “Onions & Leeks” category.

0.50
kg CO₂e / kg
Very Low Impact
0.37
m² land / kg
Land Use
14.0
L water / kg
Water Use
2.8
g SO₂e / kg
Acidification
How this compares (GHG emissions)
Potatoes (0.5)Chicken (9.9)Beef (99.5)
Greenhouse Gas Emissions0.50 kg CO₂e / kg
Land Use0.37 m² / kg
Water Use14.0 L / kg
Eutrophication3.2 g PO₄e / kg
Acidification2.8 g SO₂e / kg
⚠️ Important context about this data
  • Global averages: These figures are production-weighted averages from a meta-analysis of ~38,700 farms across 119 countries (Poore & Nemecek, 2018). Actual impact varies enormously by farming method, geography, and supply chain.
  • System boundary: Cradle-to-retail only — does not include consumer transport, home cooking energy, or food waste.
  • Soil carbon not included: This data does not account for soil carbon sequestration. Some argue that well-managed regenerative grazing partially offsets ruminant emissions; however, full lifecycle accounting — including methane, land-use change, and the opportunity cost of using land for grazing vs. reforestation — typically makes the net footprint of ruminant meat higher, not lower. This is especially relevant in temperate grassland regions like Ireland.
  • Not gospel: This data is informational and illustrative. It is useful for understanding relative magnitudes, but should not be treated as precise measurements for any individual product or farm.

Source: Poore & Nemecek (2018), Science 360(6392). Meta-analysis of ~38,700 farms, 119 countries, 46 product categories.

Global Supply: Vegetables

Top 10 countries by per capita supply of the “Vegetables” food group (kcal/capita/day, 2023). This is food group–level data from FAO Food Balance Sheets, not specific to this individual food.

1.
China; mainland
310
2.
China
306
3.
Albania
258
4.
North Macedonia
221
5.
Guyana
209
6.
Kazakhstan
204
7.
Oman
192
8.
Uzbekistan
190
9.
Tajikistan
186
10.
Bosnia and Herzegovina
183

Global Supply Trend (1961–2023)

+76%
1961: 38 kcal2023: 67 kcal

Source: FAO Food Balance Sheets (2023). Supply = production + imports − exports − waste, converted to kcal/capita/day.

Frequently Asked Questions

How many calories are in Shallots, freeze-dried?

Shallots, freeze-dried contains 348 kcal per 100 grams, making it a calorie-dense food. The energy comes from 12.3g of protein (14% of calories), 0.50g of fat (1%), and 80.7g of carbohydrates (93%). Carbohydrates are the primary energy source.

What is Shallots, freeze-dried most nutritious for?

The standout nutrient in Shallots, freeze-dried is Vitamin B6, providing 1.7 mg per 100g (129% of the Daily Value). It is also a notable source of Iron (75% DV). Our database tracks 81 individual nutrients for this food, allowing detailed comparison across vitamins, minerals, amino acids, and fatty acids.

Is Shallots, freeze-dried high in protein?

Shallots, freeze-dried provides 12.3g of protein per 100 grams — a moderate amount. Protein contributes 14% of its calories.

How much fiber is in Shallots, freeze-dried?

Yes, Shallots, freeze-dried is rich in dietary fiber with 15.7g per 100 grams. The daily recommended intake is 25-38g, so a serving contributes meaningfully toward that goal. Dietary fiber supports digestive health and is associated with reduced risk of cardiovascular disease.

What is the insulin index of Shallots, freeze-dried?

Shallots, freeze-dried has a high insulin response (II: 69) (estimated from macronutrient composition) on the insulin index scale (white bread = 100). Foods with high insulin scores stimulate significant insulin release, which may be relevant for blood sugar management. Note that the insulin index can differ substantially from the glycemic index — dairy products and high-protein foods often have higher insulin responses than their GI would suggest.