Skip to main content

Soup, pea, green, canned, condensed

Soups/Sauces Per 100 g · Per 100g serving

Soup, pea, green, canned, condensed is a prepared food at 125 calories per 100g. It provides useful amounts of Sodium and Copper, contributing 45% and 32% of the Daily Value per 100g. This prepared food is a useful source of fiber. Prepared soups, sauces, and gravies vary in nutrient content based on their ingredients. Sodium content is often a key nutritional consideration in this category. Our database tracks 81 nutrients for this food, plus glycemic index, insulin index, environmental footprint data.

125
Calories
kcal
6.5
Protein
g
2.2
Fat
g
20.2
Carbs
g
3.9
Fiber
g

Top Nutrients

💎
Sodium
680 mg
45% DV
💎
Copper
0.29 mg
32% DV
💎
Manganese
0.50 mg
22% DV

Data for 81 of 150 tracked nutrients

Nutrient Fingerprint

How this food scores across key nutrient categories, as a percentage of the daily recommended value per 100 g. Based on USDA DRIs for adults.

Complete Nutrient Profile

Macronutrients 9
NutrientPer 100gUnitPer Serving% DV
Water SR68.5g
2%
Calories SR125kcal
Energy (kJ) SR523kj
Protein SR6.5g
12%
Total Fat SR2.2g
Carbohydrate SR20.2g
16%
Fiber SR3.9g
10%
Total Sugars SR6.5g
Ash SR2.5g
Minerals 10
NutrientPer 100gUnitPer Serving% DV
Calcium SR21.0mg
2%
Iron SR1.5mg
18%
Magnesium SR30.0mg
8%
Phosphorus SR95.0mg
14%
Potassium SR145mg
4%
Sodium SR680mg
45%
Zinc SR1.3mg
12%
Copper SR0.29mg
32%
Manganese SR0.50mg
22%
Selenium SR7.4µg
14%
Vitamins 24
NutrientPer 100gUnitPer Serving% DV
Vitamin A (RAE) SR25.0µg
3%
Vitamin A (IU) SR7.0IU
Retinol SR7.0µg
Beta-Carotene SR2.0µg
Alpha-Carotene SR0µg
Beta-Cryptoxanthin SR0µg
Lycopene SR0µg
Lutein + Zeaxanthin SR0µg
Vitamin C SR1.3mg
1%
Vitamin D SR0µg
Vitamin D (IU) SR0IU
Vitamin E SR0.18mg
1%
Vitamin K1 SR0.40µg
0%
Thiamin (B1) SR0.08mg
7%
Riboflavin (B2) SR0.05mg
4%
Niacin (B3) SR0.94mg
6%
Pantothenic Acid (B5) SR0.10mg
2%
Vitamin B6 SR0.04mg
3%
Folate SR1.0µg
0%
Folic Acid SR0µg
Folate (food) SR1.0µg
Folate (DFE) SR1.0µg
Vitamin B12 SR0µg
Choline SR27.0mg
5%
Fatty Acids 7
NutrientPer 100gUnitPer Serving% DV
Saturated Fat SR1.1g
Monounsaturated Fat SR0.76g
Polyunsaturated Fat SR0.29g
Cholesterol SR0mg
Omega-3 EPA SR0g
Omega-3 DPA SR0g
Omega-3 DHA SR0g
Individual Fatty Acids 10
NutrientPer 100gUnitPer Serving% DV
Butyric Acid (4:0) SR0.05g
Caproic Acid (6:0) SR0.03g
Caprylic Acid (8:0) SR0.02g
Capric Acid (10:0) SR0.04g
Lauric Acid (12:0) SR0.04g
Myristic Acid (14:0) SR0.15g
Palmitic Acid (16:0) SR0.48g
Stearic Acid (18:0) SR0.24g
Linoleic Acid (18:2) SR0.26g
2%
Linolenic Acid (18:3) SR0.03g
Amino Acids 18
NutrientPer 100gUnitPer Serving% DV
Tryptophan SR0.06g
Threonine SR0.23g
Isoleucine SR0.23g
Leucine SR0.47g
Lysine SR0.39g
Methionine SR0.08g
Cystine SR0.06g
Phenylalanine SR0.29g
Tyrosine SR0.19g
Valine SR0.34g
Arginine SR0.54g
Histidine SR0.13g
Alanine SR0.28g
Aspartic Acid SR0.67g
Glutamic Acid SR1.2g
Glycine SR0.26g
Proline SR0.34g
Serine SR0.26g
Other 3
NutrientPer 100gUnitPer Serving% DV
Caffeine SR0mg
Theobromine SR0mg
Alcohol SR0g

Nutrient Density Score

The NRF9.3 score measures overall nutritional quality per 100 kcal. It rewards 9 nutrients to encourage (protein, fiber, vitamins A, C, E, calcium, iron, magnesium, potassium) and penalizes 3 to limit (saturated fat, added sugars, sodium). Higher is better; negative scores indicate the food is high in limit nutrients relative to its beneficial content.

14
NRF9.3 Score
Moderate · per 100 kcal
Poor (<0) Moderate Good Excellent (100+)

NRF9.3 index: Fulgoni et al. (2009), J Nutr 139(8). DVs based on FDA 2020 reference values.

Nutrient Interactions in This Food

Nutrients in this food that enhance or compete with each other during absorption.

⚠ Antagonisms — nutrients that compete

Zinc vs Copper●●●

High zinc intake induces metallothionein in enterocytes, which traps copper and blocks its absorption. Prolonged high-dose zinc can cause copper deficiency.

Prasad et al., JAMA, 1978; Fosmire, Am J Clin Nutr, 1990

Zinc vs Iron●●

Zinc and non-heme iron compete for the same intestinal transporter (DMT1). High doses of one can reduce absorption of the other when taken simultaneously.

Rossander-Hulten et al., Am J Clin Nutr, 1991

Fiber vs Iron●●

Phytates in high-fibre foods (whole grains, legumes) bind non-heme iron and reduce its bioavailability. Soaking, sprouting, and fermentation reduce phytate content.

Hurrell & Egli, Int J Vitam Nutr Res, 2010

Fiber vs Zinc●●

Phytates in fibre-rich foods chelate zinc, reducing its bioavailability by up to 50% in high-phytate diets. This is a major concern in plant-based diets.

Sandstrom, Food Nutr Res, 1997

Manganese vs Iron●●

Manganese and iron share the DMT1 transporter and compete for absorption. High iron status reduces manganese absorption and vice versa.

Erikson et al., Pharmacol Ther, 2007

Amino Acid Profile

Essential amino acid composition compared to the WHO/FAO adult reference pattern. The Amino Acid Score indicates protein quality — 100 means all essential amino acid requirements are met.

97
Amino Acid Score
Good
Met + Cys
Limiting Amino Acid
18
Amino Acids Tracked

Tip: The limiting amino acid is Met + Cys. Pair with grains, nuts, and seeds for a complete amino acid profile.

All Amino Acids (18)
Amino Acidg / 100gmg / g protein
Tryptophan0.068.4
Threonine0.2335.3
Isoleucine0.2334.6
Leucine0.4772.3
Lysine0.3959.3
Methionine0.0812.1
Cystine0.069.3
Phenylalanine0.2943.9
Tyrosine0.1929.2
Valine0.3451.4
Arginine0.5482.3
Histidine0.1319.9
Alanine0.2843.1
Aspartic Acid0.67102.3
Glutamic Acid1.2188.2
Glycine0.2639.9
Proline0.3451.5
Serine0.2640.4

Fatty Acid Profile

Breakdown of fat types per 100g. A healthy fat profile favours unsaturated fats (mono + poly) and a balanced omega-3 to omega-6 ratio.

1.1g
Saturated
0.76g
Monounsaturated
0.29g
Polyunsaturated
Omega Fatty Acids
Linoleic acid (18:2 n-6)0.26 g

Glycemic & Insulin Response

The Glycemic Index (GI) measures how quickly a food raises blood sugar on a 0–100 scale. The Insulin Index (II) measures the insulin response directly, which can differ from GI — notably, dairy and high-protein foods often trigger a higher insulin response than their GI suggests. White bread = 100 for both scales.

51
Glycemic Index
Low GI
4
Glycemic Load
Low GL (per 80g)
GI Scale 51
0 Low <55 Med High ≥70 100

GI data matched from: “Green peas, boiled” · ●●● high confidence

40
Insulin Index
Moderate Insulin Response
Insulin Index Scale 40
0 Low ≤30 Mod ≤60 High ≤100 120
Category ●● Assigned from measured food category

Source: International Tables of Glycemic Index (Sydney University, 2021) · Holt et al. 1997; Bao et al. 2016; Bell 2014

Environmental Impact

Environmental footprint per kilogram of food produced. Data represents the global average for the “Peas” category.

0.98
kg CO₂e / kg
Very Low Impact
7.5
m² land / kg
Land Use
397
L water / kg
Water Use
5.4
g SO₂e / kg
Acidification
How this compares (GHG emissions)
Potatoes (0.5)Chicken (9.9)Beef (99.5)
Greenhouse Gas Emissions0.98 kg CO₂e / kg
Land Use7.5 m² / kg
Water Use397 L / kg
Eutrophication7.5 g PO₄e / kg
Acidification5.4 g SO₂e / kg
⚠️ Important context about this data
  • Global averages: These figures are production-weighted averages from a meta-analysis of ~38,700 farms across 119 countries (Poore & Nemecek, 2018). Actual impact varies enormously by farming method, geography, and supply chain.
  • System boundary: Cradle-to-retail only — does not include consumer transport, home cooking energy, or food waste.
  • Soil carbon not included: This data does not account for soil carbon sequestration. Some argue that well-managed regenerative grazing partially offsets ruminant emissions; however, full lifecycle accounting — including methane, land-use change, and the opportunity cost of using land for grazing vs. reforestation — typically makes the net footprint of ruminant meat higher, not lower. This is especially relevant in temperate grassland regions like Ireland.
  • Not gospel: This data is informational and illustrative. It is useful for understanding relative magnitudes, but should not be treated as precise measurements for any individual product or farm.

Source: Poore & Nemecek (2018), Science 360(6392). Meta-analysis of ~38,700 farms, 119 countries, 46 product categories.

Frequently Asked Questions

How many calories are in Soup, pea, green, canned, condensed?

Soup, pea, green, canned, condensed contains 125 kcal per 100 grams, making it a moderate-calorie food. The energy comes from 6.5g of protein (21% of calories), 2.2g of fat (16%), and 20.2g of carbohydrates (65%). Carbohydrates are the primary energy source.

What is Soup, pea, green, canned, condensed most nutritious for?

The standout nutrient in Soup, pea, green, canned, condensed is Sodium, providing 680 mg per 100g (45% of the Daily Value). It is also a notable source of Copper (32% DV). Our database tracks 81 individual nutrients for this food, allowing detailed comparison across vitamins, minerals, amino acids, and fatty acids.

Is Soup, pea, green, canned, condensed high in protein?

Soup, pea, green, canned, condensed contains 6.5g of protein per 100 grams. While not a high-protein food, it can contribute to daily protein needs as part of a varied diet.

How much fiber is in Soup, pea, green, canned, condensed?

Soup, pea, green, canned, condensed contains 3.9g of fiber per 100 grams — a moderate amount. This contributes to the recommended daily intake of 25-38g. Pairing with other fiber-rich foods like vegetables, legumes, or whole grains can help meet daily targets.

What is the glycemic index of Soup, pea, green, canned, condensed?

Soup, pea, green, canned, condensed has a glycemic index of 51, which is classified as low (≤55). Low-GI foods cause a slower, more gradual rise in blood sugar levels, which may be beneficial for blood sugar management. The glycemic load, which accounts for typical serving size, provides additional context for real-world blood sugar impact.

What is the insulin index of Soup, pea, green, canned, condensed?

Soup, pea, green, canned, condensed has a moderate insulin response (II: 40) (estimated from macronutrient composition) on the insulin index scale (white bread = 100). This is a typical insulin response for most mixed foods. Note that the insulin index can differ substantially from the glycemic index — dairy products and high-protein foods often have higher insulin responses than their GI would suggest.