Skip to main content

Tofu, raw, regular, prepared with calcium sulfate

Legumes Per 100 g · Per 100g serving
Contains: 🫘 Soy

Tofu, raw, regular, prepared with calcium sulfate is a legume at 76.0 calories per 100g. It is an excellent source of Iron, providing 5.36 mg (67% of the Daily Value) per 100g serving. Legumes are among the most nutrient-dense plant foods, providing protein, fiber, folate, iron, and potassium. They are a staple protein source in many traditional diets worldwide. Our database tracks 65 nutrients for this food, plus insulin index, polyphenol profile, environmental footprint data.

76.0
Calories
kcal
8.1
Protein
g
4.8
Fat
g
1.9
Carbs
g
0.30
Fiber
g

Top Nutrients

💎
Iron
5.4 mg
67% DV
💎
Calcium
350 mg
35% DV
💎
Manganese
0.60 mg
26% DV

Data for 65 of 150 tracked nutrients

Nutrient Fingerprint

How this food scores across key nutrient categories, as a percentage of the daily recommended value per 100 g. Based on USDA DRIs for adults.

Complete Nutrient Profile

Macronutrients 9
NutrientPer 100gUnitPer Serving% DV
Water SR84.5g
2%
Calories SR76.0kcal
Energy (kJ) SR317kj
Protein SR8.1g
14%
Total Fat SR4.8g
Carbohydrate SR1.9g
1%
Fiber SR0.30g
1%
Total Sugars SR0.62g
Ash SR0.72g
Minerals 10
NutrientPer 100gUnitPer Serving% DV
Calcium SR350mg
35%
Iron SR5.4mg
67%
Magnesium SR30.0mg
8%
Phosphorus SR97.0mg
14%
Potassium SR121mg
4%
Sodium SR7.0mg
0%
Zinc SR0.80mg
7%
Copper SR0.19mg
21%
Manganese SR0.60mg
26%
Selenium SR8.9µg
16%
Vitamins 17
NutrientPer 100gUnitPer Serving% DV
Vitamin A (IU) SR85.0IU
Vitamin C SR0.10mg
0%
Vitamin D SR0µg
Vitamin D (IU) SR0IU
Vitamin E SR0.01mg
0%
Vitamin K1 SR2.4µg
2%
Thiamin (B1) SR0.08mg
7%
Riboflavin (B2) SR0.05mg
4%
Niacin (B3) SR0.20mg
1%
Pantothenic Acid (B5) SR0.07mg
1%
Vitamin B6 SR0.05mg
4%
Folate SR15.0µg
4%
Folic Acid SR0µg
Folate (food) SR15.0µg
Folate (DFE) SR15.0µg
Vitamin B12 SR0µg
Choline SR28.8mg
5%
Fatty Acids 8
NutrientPer 100gUnitPer Serving% DV
Saturated Fat SR0.69g
Monounsaturated Fat SR1.1g
Polyunsaturated Fat SR2.7g
Trans Fat SR0g
Cholesterol SR0mg
Omega-3 EPA SR0g
Omega-3 DPA SR0g
Omega-3 DHA SR0g
Amino Acids 18
NutrientPer 100gUnitPer Serving% DV
Tryptophan SR0.12g
Threonine SR0.40g
Isoleucine SR0.43g
Leucine SR0.71g
Lysine SR0.45g
Methionine SR0.11g
Cystine SR0.03g
Phenylalanine SR0.43g
Tyrosine SR0.36g
Valine SR0.45g
Arginine SR0.70g
Histidine SR0.22g
Alanine SR0.40g
Aspartic Acid SR1.0g
Glutamic Acid SR1.7g
Glycine SR0.38g
Proline SR0.56g
Serine SR0.52g
Other 3
NutrientPer 100gUnitPer Serving% DV
Caffeine SR0mg
Theobromine SR0mg
Alcohol SR0g

Nutrient Density Score

The NRF9.3 score measures overall nutritional quality per 100 kcal. It rewards 9 nutrients to encourage (protein, fiber, vitamins A, C, E, calcium, iron, magnesium, potassium) and penalizes 3 to limit (saturated fat, added sugars, sodium). Higher is better; negative scores indicate the food is high in limit nutrients relative to its beneficial content.

105
NRF9.3 Score
Excellent · per 100 kcal
Poor (<0) Moderate Good Excellent (100+)

NRF9.3 index: Fulgoni et al. (2009), J Nutr 139(8). DVs based on FDA 2020 reference values.

Nutrient Interactions in This Food

Nutrients in this food that enhance or compete with each other during absorption.

✔ Synergies — nutrients that help each other

Protein + Calcium●●

Moderate protein intake enhances calcium absorption and supports bone health. The acid-ash hypothesis suggesting protein harms bones has been largely disproven.

Kerstetter et al., J Clin Endocrinol Metab, 2005

⚠ Antagonisms — nutrients that compete

Calcium vs Iron●●●

Calcium inhibits both heme and non-heme iron absorption when consumed in the same meal. The effect is dose-dependent, with significant inhibition at 300+ mg calcium.

Hallberg et al., Am J Clin Nutr, 1991

Zinc vs Copper●●●

High zinc intake induces metallothionein in enterocytes, which traps copper and blocks its absorption. Prolonged high-dose zinc can cause copper deficiency.

Prasad et al., JAMA, 1978; Fosmire, Am J Clin Nutr, 1990

Zinc vs Iron●●

Zinc and non-heme iron compete for the same intestinal transporter (DMT1). High doses of one can reduce absorption of the other when taken simultaneously.

Rossander-Hulten et al., Am J Clin Nutr, 1991

Calcium vs Magnesium●●

Very high calcium intake can reduce magnesium absorption by competing for shared intestinal transport pathways. A calcium:magnesium ratio above 2.6:1 may impair magnesium status.

Rosanoff et al., Nutr Rev, 2012

Calcium vs Zinc●●

High calcium intake may modestly reduce zinc absorption, though the effect is smaller than calcium's impact on iron. Phytate amplifies this interaction.

Wood & Zheng, Am J Clin Nutr, 1997

Amino Acid Profile

Essential amino acid composition compared to the WHO/FAO adult reference pattern. The Amino Acid Score indicates protein quality — 100 means all essential amino acid requirements are met.

77
Amino Acid Score
Good
Met + Cys
Limiting Amino Acid
18
Amino Acids Tracked

Tip: The limiting amino acid is Met + Cys. Pair with grains, nuts, and seeds for a complete amino acid profile.

All Amino Acids (18)
Amino Acidg / 100gmg / g protein
Tryptophan0.1214.9
Threonine0.4049.8
Isoleucine0.4353.8
Leucine0.7188.2
Lysine0.4555.9
Methionine0.1113.4
Cystine0.033.6
Phenylalanine0.4353.0
Tyrosine0.3644.4
Valine0.4555.2
Arginine0.7086.8
Histidine0.2227.4
Alanine0.4049.0
Aspartic Acid1.0129.1
Glutamic Acid1.7208.4
Glycine0.3846.4
Proline0.5668.7
Serine0.5264.2

Fatty Acid Profile

Breakdown of fat types per 100g. A healthy fat profile favours unsaturated fats (mono + poly) and a balanced omega-3 to omega-6 ratio.

0.69g
Saturated
1.1g
Monounsaturated
2.7g
Polyunsaturated

How Cooking Changes Nutrients

Estimated percentage of each nutrient retained after cooking, based on USDA retention factors for the “Legumes (15-20 min)” food category. Values of 100% mean no loss; lower values indicate nutrients lost to heat, water, or oxidation.

Source: USDA Table of Nutrient Retention Factors, Release 6 (2007). Retention values are category-level averages — actual retention depends on cooking time, temperature, and water volume.

USDA Retention Factors

Insulin Response

The Insulin Index (II) measures the actual insulin response to food on a scale where white bread = 100. Unlike the Glycemic Index (which only measures blood sugar), the II captures the full hormonal response — including the effect of protein and fat on insulin secretion. This is why high-protein foods like meat and dairy can have significant insulin scores despite having low or zero GI values.

45
Insulin Index
Moderate Insulin Response
Insulin Index Scale 45
0 Low ≤30 Mod ≤60 High ≤100 120
Category ●● Assigned from measured food category

Source: Holt et al. 1997; Bao et al. 2016; Bell 2014

Polyphenols & Bioactive Compounds

Polyphenols are plant-derived compounds with antioxidant properties. Higher intake is associated with reduced cardiovascular risk and improved gut health.

34
Total Polyphenols
mg per 100g · Moderate
1
Polyphenol Classes
identified in this food
Flavonoids34 mg100%

Processing Impact on Polyphenols

How common cooking methods affect polyphenol content in legumes. Retention % is relative to the raw/unprocessed food.

Best Method
Fermentation
88% retained
Most Loss
Canning
52% retained
🫙
Fermentation88%
Fermentation can release bound phenolics, sometimes increasing bi≈30 mg
💧
Soaking80%
Some leaching during overnight soaking; discard soaking water los≈27 mg
♨️
Steaming78%
Better than boiling but legumes need longer steam times≈27 mg
⏲️
Pressure cooking70%
Shorter time partially offsets higher temperature≈24 mg
🫕
Boiling62%
Extended cooking time needed for legumes causes significant pheno≈21 mg
🥫
Canning52%
Thermal processing plus long water contact≈18 mg

Health Associations

Research-backed associations for the polyphenol classes found in this food. Evidence strength rated from systematic reviews and meta-analyses.

💜
↓ Cardiovascular disease riskModerate
Flavonoids: Meta-analyses of prospective cohorts show 10-20% lower CVD risk with higher flav
💜
↓ Blood pressureModerate
Flavonoids: RCTs show modest systolic BP reductions (2-5 mmHg) with flavanol-rich cocoa and
⚠ Most evidence is from observational studies and in vitro research. Randomized controlled trials are limited. Individual responses vary based on gut microbiome, genetics, and overall diet. Associations do not prove causation.

Polyphenol data matched from: “Tofu” · ●●● high confidence

Source: Phenol-Explorer 3.6 (INRA, 2023) · Retention: Rothwell 2013, Palermo 2014 · Health: Del Bo' 2019, Grosso 2017

Environmental Impact

Environmental footprint per kilogram of food produced. Data represents the global average for the “Tofu” category.

3.2
kg CO₂e / kg
Moderate Impact
3.5
m² land / kg
Land Use
149
L water / kg
Water Use
6.7
g SO₂e / kg
Acidification
How this compares (GHG emissions)
Potatoes (0.5)Chicken (9.9)Beef (99.5)
Greenhouse Gas Emissions3.2 kg CO₂e / kg
Land Use3.5 m² / kg
Water Use149 L / kg
Eutrophication6.1 g PO₄e / kg
Acidification6.7 g SO₂e / kg
⚠️ Important context about this data
  • Global averages: These figures are production-weighted averages from a meta-analysis of ~38,700 farms across 119 countries (Poore & Nemecek, 2018). Actual impact varies enormously by farming method, geography, and supply chain.
  • System boundary: Cradle-to-retail only — does not include consumer transport, home cooking energy, or food waste.
  • Soil carbon not included: This data does not account for soil carbon sequestration. Some argue that well-managed regenerative grazing partially offsets ruminant emissions; however, full lifecycle accounting — including methane, land-use change, and the opportunity cost of using land for grazing vs. reforestation — typically makes the net footprint of ruminant meat higher, not lower. This is especially relevant in temperate grassland regions like Ireland.
  • Not gospel: This data is informational and illustrative. It is useful for understanding relative magnitudes, but should not be treated as precise measurements for any individual product or farm.

Source: Poore & Nemecek (2018), Science 360(6392). Meta-analysis of ~38,700 farms, 119 countries, 46 product categories.

Global Supply: Pulses

Top 10 countries by per capita supply of the “Pulses” food group (kcal/capita/day, 2023). This is food group–level data from FAO Food Balance Sheets, not specific to this individual food.

1.
450
2.
290
3.
273
4.
199
5.
195
6.
181
7.
175
8.
172
9.
169
10.
167

Global Supply Trend (1961–2023)

+2%
1961: 58 kcal2023: 59 kcal

Source: FAO Food Balance Sheets (2023). Supply = production + imports − exports − waste, converted to kcal/capita/day.

Compare This Food

See how this food stacks up in detailed side-by-side comparisons.

Chicken Breast vs TofuSalmon vs TofuGround Beef vs TofuEggs vs Tofu

Frequently Asked Questions

How many calories are in Tofu, raw, regular, prepared with calcium sulfate?

Tofu, raw, regular, prepared with calcium sulfate contains 76.0 kcal per 100 grams, making it a low-calorie food. The energy comes from 8.1g of protein (43% of calories), 4.8g of fat (57%), and 1.9g of carbohydrates (10%). Fat is the primary energy source.

What is Tofu, raw, regular, prepared with calcium sulfate most nutritious for?

The standout nutrient in Tofu, raw, regular, prepared with calcium sulfate is Iron, providing 5.4 mg per 100g (67% of the Daily Value). It is also a notable source of Calcium (35% DV). Our database tracks 65 individual nutrients for this food, allowing detailed comparison across vitamins, minerals, amino acids, and fatty acids.

Is Tofu, raw, regular, prepared with calcium sulfate high in protein?

Tofu, raw, regular, prepared with calcium sulfate contains 8.1g of protein per 100 grams. While not a high-protein food, it can contribute to daily protein needs as part of a varied diet.

How much fiber is in Tofu, raw, regular, prepared with calcium sulfate?

Tofu, raw, regular, prepared with calcium sulfate contains 0.30g of fiber per 100 grams, which is a small amount. To increase fiber intake, consider pairing with high-fiber foods such as legumes, whole grains, or vegetables.

Does Tofu, raw, regular, prepared with calcium sulfate contain polyphenols?

Yes, Tofu, raw, regular, prepared with calcium sulfate contains approximately 34.0 mg of polyphenols per 100g, primarily from the moderate class. Polyphenols are bioactive plant compounds associated with antioxidant properties. Their retention can vary with cooking and processing methods — see the processing impact section above for details.

What is the insulin index of Tofu, raw, regular, prepared with calcium sulfate?

Tofu, raw, regular, prepared with calcium sulfate has a moderate insulin response (II: 45) (estimated from macronutrient composition) on the insulin index scale (white bread = 100). This is a typical insulin response for most mixed foods. Note that the insulin index can differ substantially from the glycemic index — dairy products and high-protein foods often have higher insulin responses than their GI would suggest.