Skip to main content

Veal, external fat only, cooked

Lamb/Game Per 100 g · Per 100g serving
Also available: Raw

Veal, external fat only, cooked is a meat, with a high energy density of 540 kcal per 100g. It is an excellent source of Vitamin B12, providing 1.61 µg (67% of the Daily Value) per 100g serving. This meat is a moderate protein source, high in fat. Lamb and game meats are sources of complete protein, iron, zinc, and B12. Grass-fed varieties may have different fatty acid profiles compared to grain-fed. Our database tracks 89 nutrients for this food, plus insulin index, environmental footprint data.

540
Calories
kcal
15.3
Protein
g
53.2
Fat
g
0
Carbs
g
0
Fiber
g

Top Nutrients

☀️
Vitamin B12
1.6 µg
67% DV
💪
Protein
15.3 g
27% DV
☀️
Niacin (B3)
4.2 mg
26% DV

Data for 89 of 150 tracked nutrients

Nutrient Fingerprint

How this food scores across key nutrient categories, as a percentage of the daily recommended value per 100 g. Based on USDA DRIs for adults.

Complete Nutrient Profile

Macronutrients 9
NutrientPer 100gUnitPer Serving% DV
Water SR32.7g—
1%
Calories SR540kcal——
Energy (kJ) SR2,260kj——
Protein SR15.3g—
27%
Total Fat SR53.2g——
Carbohydrate SR0g——
Fiber SR0g——
Total Sugars SR0g——
Ash SR0.60g——
Minerals 10
NutrientPer 100gUnitPer Serving% DV
Calcium SR58.0mg—
6%
Iron SR1.1mg—
14%
Magnesium SR26.0mg—
6%
Phosphorus SR168mg—
24%
Potassium SR152mg—
4%
Sodium SR103mg—
7%
Zinc SR1.4mg—
13%
Copper SR0.07mg—
8%
Manganese SR0.04mg—
2%
Selenium SR9.8µg—
18%
Vitamins 29
NutrientPer 100gUnitPer Serving% DV
Vitamin A (RAE) SR0µg——
Vitamin A (IU) SR0IU——
Retinol SR0µg——
Beta-Carotene SR0µg——
Alpha-Carotene SR0µg——
Beta-Cryptoxanthin SR0µg——
Lycopene SR0µg——
Lutein + Zeaxanthin SR0µg——
Vitamin C SR0mg——
Vitamin D SR3.6µg—
24%
Vitamin D (IU) SR142IU——
Vitamin D3 SR3.6µg——
Vitamin E SR0.45mg—
3%
Beta-Tocopherol SR0mg——
Gamma-Tocopherol SR0.07mg——
Delta-Tocopherol SR0.04mg——
Vitamin K1 SR2.4µg—
2%
Thiamin (B1) SR0.05mg—
4%
Riboflavin (B2) SR0.16mg—
12%
Niacin (B3) SR4.2mg—
26%
Pantothenic Acid (B5) SR0.39mg—
8%
Vitamin B6 SR0.21mg—
16%
Folate SR0µg——
Folic Acid SR0µg——
Folate (food) SR0µg——
Folate (DFE) SR0µg——
Vitamin B12 SR1.6µg—
67%
Choline SR41.9mg—
8%
Betaine SR15.3mg——
Fatty Acids 8
NutrientPer 100gUnitPer Serving% DV
Saturated Fat SR17.8g——
Monounsaturated Fat SR23.9g——
Polyunsaturated Fat SR1.7g——
Trans Fat SR2.1g——
Cholesterol SR85.0mg——
Omega-3 EPA SR0g——
Omega-3 DPA SR0.01g——
Omega-3 DHA SR0g——
Individual Fatty Acids 11
NutrientPer 100gUnitPer Serving% DV
Butyric Acid (4:0) SR0g——
Caproic Acid (6:0) SR0g——
Caprylic Acid (8:0) SR0g——
Capric Acid (10:0) SR0.01g——
Lauric Acid (12:0) SR0.03g——
Myristic Acid (14:0) SR1.2g——
Palmitic Acid (16:0) SR11.2g——
Stearic Acid (18:0) SR4.8g——
Linoleic Acid (18:2) SR1.6g—
10%
Omega-6 LA SR1.3g——
Linolenic Acid (18:3) SR0.05g——
Amino Acids 19
NutrientPer 100gUnitPer Serving% DV
Tryptophan SR0.15g——
Threonine SR0.67g——
Isoleucine SR0.75g——
Leucine SR1.2g——
Lysine SR1.3g——
Methionine SR0.36g——
Cystine SR0.17g——
Phenylalanine SR0.62g——
Tyrosine SR0.49g——
Valine SR0.84g——
Arginine SR0.90g——
Histidine SR0.56g——
Alanine SR0.91g——
Aspartic Acid SR1.3g——
Glutamic Acid SR2.4g——
Glycine SR0.79g——
Proline SR0.64g——
Serine SR0.57g——
Hydroxyproline SR0.08g——
Other 3
NutrientPer 100gUnitPer Serving% DV
Caffeine SR0mg——
Theobromine SR0mg——
Alcohol SR0g——

Nutrient Density Score

The NRF9.3 score measures overall nutritional quality per 100 kcal. It rewards 9 nutrients to encourage (protein, fiber, vitamins A, C, E, calcium, iron, magnesium, potassium) and penalizes 3 to limit (saturated fat, added sugars, sodium). Higher is better; negative scores indicate the food is high in limit nutrients relative to its beneficial content.

-7
NRF9.3 Score
Poor · per 100 kcal
Poor (<0) Moderate Good Excellent (100+)

NRF9.3 index: Fulgoni et al. (2009), J Nutr 139(8). DVs based on FDA 2020 reference values.

Nutrient Interactions in This Food

Nutrients in this food that enhance or compete with each other during absorption.

✔ Synergies — nutrients that help each other

Vitamin D + Calcium●●●

Vitamin D is essential for calcium absorption. Without adequate vitamin D, only 10–15% of dietary calcium is absorbed; with it, absorption rises to 30–40%.

Christakos et al., J Cell Biochem, 2003

Dietary Fat + Vitamin D●●●

Vitamin D is fat-soluble. Co-consumption with dietary fat increases absorption by up to 50% compared to taking it on an empty stomach.

Dawson-Hughes et al., J Acad Nutr Diet, 2015

Vitamin D + Phosphorus●●●

Vitamin D enhances intestinal phosphorus absorption and regulates phosphorus homeostasis via parathyroid hormone signalling.

Bergwitz & Jüppner, Annu Rev Med, 2010

Vitamin D + Magnesium●●●

Magnesium is required for vitamin D metabolism — it is a cofactor for the enzymes that convert vitamin D to its active form (1,25-dihydroxyvitamin D).

Uwitonze & Razzaque, J Am Osteopath Assoc, 2018

Vitamin B6 + Magnesium●●●

Vitamin B6 may enhance intracellular magnesium accumulation. Combined supplementation has shown greater benefits for stress and anxiety than magnesium alone.

Pouteau et al., PLoS One, 2018

⚠ Antagonisms — nutrients that compete

Calcium vs Iron●●●

Calcium inhibits both heme and non-heme iron absorption when consumed in the same meal. The effect is dose-dependent, with significant inhibition at 300+ mg calcium.

Hallberg et al., Am J Clin Nutr, 1991

Zinc vs Copper●●●

High zinc intake induces metallothionein in enterocytes, which traps copper and blocks its absorption. Prolonged high-dose zinc can cause copper deficiency.

Prasad et al., JAMA, 1978; Fosmire, Am J Clin Nutr, 1990

Zinc vs Iron●●●

Zinc and non-heme iron compete for the same intestinal transporter (DMT1). High doses of one can reduce absorption of the other when taken simultaneously.

Rossander-Hulten et al., Am J Clin Nutr, 1991

Calcium vs Magnesium●●●

Very high calcium intake can reduce magnesium absorption by competing for shared intestinal transport pathways. A calcium:magnesium ratio above 2.6:1 may impair magnesium status.

Rosanoff et al., Nutr Rev, 2012

Calcium vs Zinc●●●

High calcium intake may modestly reduce zinc absorption, though the effect is smaller than calcium's impact on iron. Phytate amplifies this interaction.

Wood & Zheng, Am J Clin Nutr, 1997

Amino Acid Profile

Essential amino acid composition compared to the WHO/FAO adult reference pattern. The Amino Acid Score indicates protein quality — 100 means all essential amino acid requirements are met.

135
Amino Acid Score
Complete
Leucine
Lowest Scoring
19
Amino Acids Tracked

✓ Complete protein — all essential amino acids meet or exceed WHO reference levels.

All Amino Acids (19)
Amino Acidg / 100gmg / g protein
Tryptophan0.1510.1
Threonine0.6743.7
Isoleucine0.7549.3
Leucine1.279.6
Lysine1.382.4
Methionine0.3623.4
Cystine0.1711.3
Phenylalanine0.6240.4
Tyrosine0.4931.9
Valine0.8455.3
Arginine0.9058.8
Histidine0.5636.3
Alanine0.9159.5
Aspartic Acid1.386.3
Glutamic Acid2.4158.2
Glycine0.7951.4
Proline0.6441.8
Serine0.5737.5
Hydroxyproline0.085.5

Fatty Acid Profile

Breakdown of fat types per 100g. A healthy fat profile favours unsaturated fats (mono + poly) and a balanced omega-3 to omega-6 ratio.

17.8g
Saturated
23.9g
Monounsaturated
1.7g
Polyunsaturated
1:129.8
Omega-3 : Omega-6 Ratio
Omega-6 dominant — ideal range is 1:1 to 1:4
Omega Fatty Acids
DPA (22:5 n-3)0.01 g
Linoleic acid (18:2 n-6)1.3 g
⚠ Trans fat: 2.1 g per 100g. WHO recommends less than 1% of total energy from trans fats.

How Cooking Changes Nutrients

Estimated percentage of each nutrient retained after cooking, based on USDA retention factors for the “Veal” food category. Values of 100% mean no loss; lower values indicate nutrients lost to heat, water, or oxidation.

Key insights
⚡Vitamin B12 loses up to 40% when simmered. Roasted retains 85%.
⚡Thiamin loses up to 50% when braised. Broiled / Grilled retains 65%.

Source: USDA Table of Nutrient Retention Factors, Release 6 (2007). Retention values are category-level averages — actual retention depends on cooking time, temperature, and water volume.

USDA Retention Factors

Insulin Response

The Insulin Index (II) measures the actual insulin response to food on a scale where white bread = 100. Unlike the Glycemic Index (which only measures blood sugar), the II captures the full hormonal response — including the effect of protein and fat on insulin secretion. This is why high-protein foods like meat and dairy can have significant insulin scores despite having low or zero GI values.

51
Insulin Index
Moderate Insulin Response
Insulin Index Scale 51
0 Low ≤30 Mod ≤60 High ≤100 120
Category ●●● Assigned from measured food category

Source: Holt et al. 1997; Bao et al. 2016; Bell 2014

Environmental Impact

Environmental footprint per kilogram of food produced. Data represents the global average for the “Lamb & Mutton” category.

39.7
kg CO₂e / kg
Very High Impact
370
m² land / kg
Land Use
1,803
L water / kg
Water Use
139
g SO₂e / kg
Acidification
How this compares (GHG emissions)
Potatoes (0.5)Chicken (9.9)Beef (99.5)
Greenhouse Gas Emissions39.7 kg CO₂e / kg
Land Use370 m² / kg
Water Use1,803 L / kg
Eutrophication97.1 g PO₄e / kg
Acidification139 g SO₂e / kg
⚠️ Important context about this data
  • Global averages: These figures are production-weighted averages from a meta-analysis of ~38,700 farms across 119 countries (Poore & Nemecek, 2018). Actual impact varies enormously by farming method, geography, and supply chain.
  • System boundary: Cradle-to-retail only — does not include consumer transport, home cooking energy, or food waste.
  • Soil carbon not included: This data does not account for soil carbon sequestration. Some argue that well-managed regenerative grazing partially offsets ruminant emissions; however, full lifecycle accounting — including methane, land-use change, and the opportunity cost of using land for grazing vs. reforestation — typically makes the net footprint of ruminant meat higher, not lower. This is especially relevant in temperate grassland regions like Ireland.
  • Not gospel: This data is informational and illustrative. It is useful for understanding relative magnitudes, but should not be treated as precise measurements for any individual product or farm.

Source: Poore & Nemecek (2018), Science 360(6392). Meta-analysis of ~38,700 farms, 119 countries, 46 product categories.

Global Supply: Meat

Top 10 countries by per capita supply of the “Meat” food group (kcal/capita/day, 2023). This is food group–level data from FAO Food Balance Sheets, not specific to this individual food.

1.
Tonga
755
2.
Mongolia
643
3.
Argentina
571
4.
China; Macao SAR
546
5.
Marshall Islands
539
6.
Ireland
532
7.
Bahamas
527
8.
Saint Vincent and the Grenadines
516
9.
Nauru
510
10.
Belarus
498

Global Supply Trend (1961–2023)

+56%
1961: 156 kcal2023: 244 kcal

Source: FAO Food Balance Sheets (2023). Supply = production + imports − exports − waste, converted to kcal/capita/day.

Frequently Asked Questions

How many calories are in Veal, external fat only, cooked?

Veal, external fat only, cooked contains 540 kcal per 100 grams, making it a very calorie-dense food. The energy comes from 15.3g of protein (11% of calories), 53.2g of fat (89%), and 0g of carbohydrates (0%). Fat is the primary energy source.

What is Veal, external fat only, cooked most nutritious for?

The standout nutrient in Veal, external fat only, cooked is Vitamin B12, providing 1.6 µg per 100g (67% of the Daily Value). It is also a notable source of Protein (27% DV). Our database tracks 89 individual nutrients for this food, allowing detailed comparison across vitamins, minerals, amino acids, and fatty acids.

Is Veal, external fat only, cooked high in protein?

Veal, external fat only, cooked provides 15.3g of protein per 100 grams — a moderate amount. Protein contributes 11% of its calories.

How much fiber is in Veal, external fat only, cooked?

Veal, external fat only, cooked contains no dietary fiber. This is typical for animal-derived food. Pair with plant-based foods to ensure adequate fiber intake.

What is the insulin index of Veal, external fat only, cooked?

Veal, external fat only, cooked has a moderate insulin response (II: 51) (estimated from macronutrient composition) on the insulin index scale (white bread = 100). This is a typical insulin response for most mixed foods. Note that the insulin index can differ substantially from the glycemic index — dairy products and high-protein foods often have higher insulin responses than their GI would suggest.