Skip to main content

Beet greens, cooked, boiled, drained, without salt

Vegetables Per 100 g · Per 100g serving

Beet greens, cooked, boiled, drained, without salt is a vegetable, providing just 27.0 calories per 100g. It is an excellent source of Vitamin A (RAE) and Vitamin K1, providing 850% and 403% of the Daily Value respectively. This vegetable is virtually fat-free. Vegetables provide essential vitamins, minerals, and dietary fiber with relatively few calories. They are a cornerstone of virtually every dietary guideline worldwide. Our database tracks 83 nutrients for this food, plus insulin index, environmental footprint data.

27.0
Calories
kcal
2.6
Protein
g
0.20
Fat
g
5.5
Carbs
g
2.9
Fiber
g

Top Nutrients

☀️
Vitamin A (RAE)
7,654 µg
850% DV
☀️
Vitamin K1
484 µg
403% DV
💎
Copper
0.25 mg
28% DV

Data for 83 of 150 tracked nutrients

Nutrient Fingerprint

How this food scores across key nutrient categories, as a percentage of the daily recommended value per 100 g. Based on USDA DRIs for adults.

Complete Nutrient Profile

Macronutrients 9
NutrientPer 100gUnitPer Serving% DV
Water SR89.1g
2%
Calories SR27.0kcal
Energy (kJ) SR115kj
Protein SR2.6g
5%
Total Fat SR0.20g
Carbohydrate SR5.5g
4%
Fiber SR2.9g
8%
Total Sugars SR0.60g
Ash SR2.6g
Minerals 10
NutrientPer 100gUnitPer Serving% DV
Calcium SR114mg
11%
Iron SR1.9mg
24%
Magnesium SR68.0mg
17%
Phosphorus SR41.0mg
6%
Potassium SR909mg
27%
Sodium SR241mg
16%
Zinc SR0.50mg
4%
Copper SR0.25mg
28%
Manganese SR0.51mg
22%
Selenium SR0.90µg
2%
Vitamins 25
NutrientPer 100gUnitPer Serving% DV
Vitamin A (RAE) SR7,654µg
850%
Vitamin A (IU) SR383IU
Retinol SR0µg
Beta-Carotene SR4,590µg
Alpha-Carotene SR4.0µg
Beta-Cryptoxanthin SR0µg
Lycopene SR0µg
Lutein + Zeaxanthin SR1,819µg
Vitamin C SR24.9mg
28%
Vitamin D SR0µg
Vitamin D (IU) SR0IU
Vitamin E SR1.8mg
12%
Vitamin K1 SR484µg
403%
Thiamin (B1) SR0.12mg
10%
Riboflavin (B2) SR0.29mg
22%
Niacin (B3) SR0.50mg
3%
Pantothenic Acid (B5) SR0.33mg
7%
Vitamin B6 SR0.13mg
10%
Folate SR14.0µg
4%
Folic Acid SR0µg
Folate (food) SR14.0µg
Folate (DFE) SR14.0µg
Vitamin B12 SR0µg
Choline SR0.50mg
0%
Betaine SR0.30mg
Fatty Acids 8
NutrientPer 100gUnitPer Serving% DV
Saturated Fat SR0.03g
Monounsaturated Fat SR0.04g
Polyunsaturated Fat SR0.07g
Trans Fat SR0g
Cholesterol SR0mg
Omega-3 EPA SR0g
Omega-3 DPA SR0g
Omega-3 DHA SR0g
Individual Fatty Acids 10
NutrientPer 100gUnitPer Serving% DV
Butyric Acid (4:0) SR0g
Caproic Acid (6:0) SR0g
Caprylic Acid (8:0) SR0g
Capric Acid (10:0) SR0g
Lauric Acid (12:0) SR0g
Myristic Acid (14:0) SR0g
Palmitic Acid (16:0) SR0.03g
Stearic Acid (18:0) SR0.001g
Linoleic Acid (18:2) SR0.07g
0%
Linolenic Acid (18:3) SR0.006g
Amino Acids 18
NutrientPer 100gUnitPer Serving% DV
Tryptophan SR0.04g
Threonine SR0.08g
Isoleucine SR0.05g
Leucine SR0.12g
Lysine SR0.07g
Methionine SR0.02g
Cystine SR0.02g
Phenylalanine SR0.07g
Tyrosine SR0.06g
Valine SR0.08g
Arginine SR0.07g
Histidine SR0.04g
Alanine SR0.10g
Aspartic Acid SR0.15g
Glutamic Acid SR0.31g
Glycine SR0.09g
Proline SR0.06g
Serine SR0.08g
Other 3
NutrientPer 100gUnitPer Serving% DV
Caffeine SR0mg
Theobromine SR0mg
Alcohol SR0g

Nutrient Density Score

The NRF9.3 score measures overall nutritional quality per 100 kcal. It rewards 9 nutrients to encourage (protein, fiber, vitamins A, C, E, calcium, iron, magnesium, potassium) and penalizes 3 to limit (saturated fat, added sugars, sodium). Higher is better; negative scores indicate the food is high in limit nutrients relative to its beneficial content.

466
NRF9.3 Score
Excellent · per 100 kcal
Poor (<0) Moderate Good Excellent (100+)

NRF9.3 index: Fulgoni et al. (2009), J Nutr 139(8). DVs based on FDA 2020 reference values.

Nutrient Interactions in This Food

Nutrients in this food that enhance or compete with each other during absorption.

✔ Synergies — nutrients that help each other

Vitamin C + Iron●●●

Vitamin C dramatically enhances non-heme iron absorption by reducing Fe³⁺ to Fe²⁺ in the gut. Adding 75 mg vitamin C to a meal can increase iron absorption 3–4 fold.

Hallberg et al., Am J Clin Nutr, 1989

Dietary Fat + Vitamin A●●●

Vitamin A is fat-soluble and requires dietary fat for absorption. Adding fat to a meal significantly increases beta-carotene and retinol absorption.

Ribaya-Mercado et al., Am J Clin Nutr, 2007

Dietary Fat + Vitamin E●●●

Vitamin E is fat-soluble and absorbed alongside dietary fats via micelle formation in the small intestine. Low-fat diets reduce vitamin E absorption.

Traber, Free Radic Biol Med, 2007

Dietary Fat + Vitamin K●●●

Vitamin K is fat-soluble. Absorption increases significantly when consumed with dietary fat, particularly for phylloquinone (K1) from plant sources.

Gijsbers et al., Br J Nutr, 1996

Vitamin C + Vitamin E●●

Vitamin C regenerates oxidised vitamin E (tocopheroxyl radical) back to its active form, extending its antioxidant function in cell membranes.

Niki, Free Radic Biol Med, 2014

⚠ Antagonisms — nutrients that compete

Calcium vs Iron●●●

Calcium inhibits both heme and non-heme iron absorption when consumed in the same meal. The effect is dose-dependent, with significant inhibition at 300+ mg calcium.

Hallberg et al., Am J Clin Nutr, 1991

Calcium vs Magnesium●●

Very high calcium intake can reduce magnesium absorption by competing for shared intestinal transport pathways. A calcium:magnesium ratio above 2.6:1 may impair magnesium status.

Rosanoff et al., Nutr Rev, 2012

Fiber vs Iron●●

Phytates in high-fibre foods (whole grains, legumes) bind non-heme iron and reduce its bioavailability. Soaking, sprouting, and fermentation reduce phytate content.

Hurrell & Egli, Int J Vitam Nutr Res, 2010

Potassium vs Sodium●●

High potassium intake promotes renal sodium excretion and attenuates the blood pressure–raising effect of sodium. A higher K:Na ratio is associated with lower cardiovascular risk.

Aburto et al., BMJ, 2013

Fiber vs Calcium●●

Oxalates (in spinach, rhubarb) and phytates (in bran) can bind calcium, reducing absorption. However, the net effect of high-fibre diets on calcium status is modest.

Weaver et al., Am J Clin Nutr, 1999

Amino Acid Profile

Essential amino acid composition compared to the WHO/FAO adult reference pattern. The Amino Acid Score indicates protein quality — 100 means all essential amino acid requirements are met.

65
Amino Acid Score
Moderate
Lysine
Limiting Amino Acid
18
Amino Acids Tracked

Tip: The limiting amino acid is Lysine. Pair with legumes, dairy, and soy for a complete amino acid profile.

All Amino Acids (18)
Amino Acidg / 100gmg / g protein
Tryptophan0.0415.6
Threonine0.0829.6
Isoleucine0.0520.6
Leucine0.1244.7
Lysine0.0729.2
Methionine0.028.2
Cystine0.029.3
Phenylalanine0.0726.5
Tyrosine0.0623.7
Valine0.0829.6
Arginine0.0728.4
Histidine0.0415.2
Alanine0.1037.0
Aspartic Acid0.1559.1
Glutamic Acid0.31121.4
Glycine0.0936.6
Proline0.0623.7
Serine0.0831.9

How Cooking Changes Nutrients

Estimated percentage of each nutrient retained after cooking, based on USDA retention factors for the “Leafy Greens” food category. Values of 100% mean no loss; lower values indicate nutrients lost to heat, water, or oxidation.

Key insights
Folate loses up to 45% when cooked from frozen. Stir-fried retains 85%.
Vitamin C loses up to 42% when boiled (drained). Stir-fried retains 85%.

Source: USDA Table of Nutrient Retention Factors, Release 6 (2007). Retention values are category-level averages — actual retention depends on cooking time, temperature, and water volume.

USDA Retention Factors

Insulin Response

The Insulin Index (II) measures the actual insulin response to food on a scale where white bread = 100. Unlike the Glycemic Index (which only measures blood sugar), the II captures the full hormonal response — including the effect of protein and fat on insulin secretion. This is why high-protein foods like meat and dairy can have significant insulin scores despite having low or zero GI values.

68
Insulin Index
High Insulin Response
Insulin Index Scale 68
0 Low ≤30 Mod ≤60 High ≤100 120
Macro Model ●● Estimated from macronutrient composition (R²=0.49)

Source: Holt et al. 1997; Bao et al. 2016; Bell 2014

Environmental Impact

Environmental footprint per kilogram of food produced. Data represents the global average for the “Root Vegetables” category.

0.43
kg CO₂e / kg
Very Low Impact
0.33
m² land / kg
Land Use
28.0
L water / kg
Water Use
1.6
g SO₂e / kg
Acidification
How this compares (GHG emissions)
Potatoes (0.5)Chicken (9.9)Beef (99.5)
Greenhouse Gas Emissions0.43 kg CO₂e / kg
Land Use0.33 m² / kg
Water Use28.0 L / kg
Eutrophication1.8 g PO₄e / kg
Acidification1.6 g SO₂e / kg
⚠️ Important context about this data
  • Global averages: These figures are production-weighted averages from a meta-analysis of ~38,700 farms across 119 countries (Poore & Nemecek, 2018). Actual impact varies enormously by farming method, geography, and supply chain.
  • System boundary: Cradle-to-retail only — does not include consumer transport, home cooking energy, or food waste.
  • Soil carbon not included: This data does not account for soil carbon sequestration. Some argue that well-managed regenerative grazing partially offsets ruminant emissions; however, full lifecycle accounting — including methane, land-use change, and the opportunity cost of using land for grazing vs. reforestation — typically makes the net footprint of ruminant meat higher, not lower. This is especially relevant in temperate grassland regions like Ireland.
  • Not gospel: This data is informational and illustrative. It is useful for understanding relative magnitudes, but should not be treated as precise measurements for any individual product or farm.

Source: Poore & Nemecek (2018), Science 360(6392). Meta-analysis of ~38,700 farms, 119 countries, 46 product categories.

Global Supply: Vegetables

Top 10 countries by per capita supply of the “Vegetables” food group (kcal/capita/day, 2023). This is food group–level data from FAO Food Balance Sheets, not specific to this individual food.

1.
China; mainland
310
2.
China
306
3.
Albania
258
4.
North Macedonia
221
5.
Guyana
209
6.
Kazakhstan
204
7.
Oman
192
8.
Uzbekistan
190
9.
Tajikistan
186
10.
Bosnia and Herzegovina
183

Global Supply Trend (1961–2023)

+76%
1961: 38 kcal2023: 67 kcal

Source: FAO Food Balance Sheets (2023). Supply = production + imports − exports − waste, converted to kcal/capita/day.

Frequently Asked Questions

How many calories are in Beet greens, cooked, boiled, drained, without salt?

Beet greens, cooked, boiled, drained, without salt contains 27.0 kcal per 100 grams, making it a low-calorie food. The energy comes from 2.6g of protein (38% of calories), 0.20g of fat (7%), and 5.5g of carbohydrates (81%). Carbohydrates are the primary energy source.

What is Beet greens, cooked, boiled, drained, without salt most nutritious for?

The standout nutrient in Beet greens, cooked, boiled, drained, without salt is Vitamin A (RAE), providing 7,654 µg per 100g (850% of the Daily Value). It is also a notable source of Vitamin K1 (403% DV). Our database tracks 83 individual nutrients for this food, allowing detailed comparison across vitamins, minerals, amino acids, and fatty acids.

Is Beet greens, cooked, boiled, drained, without salt high in protein?

At 2.6g per 100 grams, Beet greens, cooked, boiled, drained, without salt is not a significant source of protein. Pair with protein-rich foods like legumes, meat, fish, or dairy to meet daily protein needs.

How much fiber is in Beet greens, cooked, boiled, drained, without salt?

Beet greens, cooked, boiled, drained, without salt contains 2.9g of fiber per 100 grams, which is a small amount. To increase fiber intake, consider pairing with high-fiber foods such as legumes, whole grains, or vegetables.

What is the insulin index of Beet greens, cooked, boiled, drained, without salt?

Beet greens, cooked, boiled, drained, without salt has a high insulin response (II: 68) (estimated from macronutrient composition) on the insulin index scale (white bread = 100). Foods with high insulin scores stimulate significant insulin release, which may be relevant for blood sugar management. Note that the insulin index can differ substantially from the glycemic index — dairy products and high-protein foods often have higher insulin responses than their GI would suggest.