Skip to main content

Blueberries, canned, light syrup, drained

Fruits Per 100 g · Per 100g serving
Data sources: 50 AFCD 29 SR Legacy

Blueberries, canned, light syrup, drained is a fruit at 82.0 calories per 100g. This fruit is rich in dietary fiber, virtually fat-free. Fruits are naturally rich in vitamins, dietary fiber, and antioxidants. They are an important part of a balanced diet and contribute to daily micronutrient needs. Our database tracks 79 nutrients for this food, plus insulin index, environmental footprint data.

82.0
Calories
kcal
1.0
Protein
g
0.40
Fat
g
22.7
Carbs
g
6.0
Fiber
g

Top Nutrients

💪
Carbohydrate
22.7 g
17% DV
☀️
Vitamin K1
19.9 µg
17% DV
💎
Iron
1.3 mg
16% DV

Data for 79 of 150 tracked nutrients

Nutrient Fingerprint

How this food scores across key nutrient categories, as a percentage of the daily recommended value per 100 g. Based on USDA DRIs for adults.

Complete Nutrient Profile

Macronutrients 10
NutrientPer 100gUnitPer Serving% DV
Water AFCD75.1g
2%
Calories AFCD82.0kcal
Energy (kJ) SR370kj
Protein AFCD1.0g
2%
Total Fat SR0.40g
Carbohydrate SR22.7g
17%
Fiber AFCD6.0g
16%
Total Sugars AFCD15.9g
Starch AFCD0.30g
Ash AFCD0.20g
Minerals 10
NutrientPer 100gUnitPer Serving% DV
Calcium AFCD18.0mg
2%
Iron AFCD1.3mg
16%
Magnesium AFCD12.0mg
3%
Phosphorus AFCD25.0mg
4%
Potassium AFCD77.0mg
2%
Sodium AFCD6.0mg
0%
Zinc AFCD0.20mg
2%
Copper AFCD0.08mg
9%
Manganese AFCD0.21mg
9%
Selenium AFCD1.0µg
2%
Vitamins 35
NutrientPer 100gUnitPer Serving% DV
Vitamin A (RAE) AFCD2.0µg
0%
Vitamin A (IU) SR2.0IU
Retinol AFCD0µg
Beta-Carotene AFCD0µg
Alpha-Carotene AFCD18.0µg
Beta-Cryptoxanthin AFCD0µg
Lycopene SR0µg
Lutein + Zeaxanthin SR53.0µg
Vitamin C AFCD5.0mg
6%
Vitamin D SR0µg
Vitamin D (IU) AFCD0IU
Vitamin D2 AFCD0µg
Vitamin D3 AFCD0µg
Vitamin E AFCD0.70mg
5%
Beta-Tocopherol SR0.01mg
Gamma-Tocopherol SR0.46mg
Delta-Tocopherol SR0.03mg
Alpha-Tocotrienol SR0mg
Beta-Tocotrienol SR0mg
Gamma-Tocotrienol SR0.19mg
Delta-Tocotrienol SR0mg
Vitamin K1 SR19.9µg
17%
Vitamin K1 (dihydro) SR0µg
Vitamin K2 (MK-4) SR0µg
Thiamin (B1) AFCD0mg
Riboflavin (B2) AFCD0mg
Niacin (B3) AFCD0mg
Pantothenic Acid (B5) SR0.04mg
1%
Vitamin B6 AFCD0.05mg
4%
Folate AFCD34.0µg
8%
Folic Acid SR0µg
Folate (food) AFCD34.0µg
Folate (DFE) AFCD34.0µg
Vitamin B12 AFCD0µg
Choline SR4.0mg
1%
Fatty Acids 9
NutrientPer 100gUnitPer Serving% DV
Saturated Fat AFCD0g
Monounsaturated Fat AFCD0g
Polyunsaturated Fat AFCD0g
Trans Fat AFCD0g
Cholesterol AFCD0mg
Omega-3 ALA AFCD0g
Omega-3 EPA AFCD0g
Omega-3 DPA AFCD0g
Omega-3 DHA AFCD0g
Individual Fatty Acids 10
NutrientPer 100gUnitPer Serving% DV
Butyric Acid (4:0) SR0g
Caproic Acid (6:0) SR0g
Caprylic Acid (8:0) SR0g
Capric Acid (10:0) AFCD0g
Lauric Acid (12:0) SR0g
Myristic Acid (14:0) SR0g
Palmitic Acid (16:0) SR0.02g
Stearic Acid (18:0) SR0.006g
Linoleic Acid (18:2) AFCD0g
Linolenic Acid (18:3) SR0.07g
Amino Acids 1
NutrientPer 100gUnitPer Serving% DV
Tryptophan AFCD0.01g
Phytochemicals 1
NutrientPer 100gUnitPer Serving% DV
Oxalic Acid AFCD0mg
Other 3
NutrientPer 100gUnitPer Serving% DV
Caffeine AFCD0mg
Theobromine SR0mg
Alcohol AFCD0g

Nutrient Density Score

The NRF9.3 score measures overall nutritional quality per 100 kcal. It rewards 9 nutrients to encourage (protein, fiber, vitamins A, C, E, calcium, iron, magnesium, potassium) and penalizes 3 to limit (saturated fat, added sugars, sodium). Higher is better; negative scores indicate the food is high in limit nutrients relative to its beneficial content.

57
NRF9.3 Score
Good · per 100 kcal
Poor (<0) Moderate Good Excellent (100+)

NRF9.3 index: Fulgoni et al. (2009), J Nutr 139(8). DVs based on FDA 2020 reference values.

Nutrient Interactions in This Food

Nutrients in this food that enhance or compete with each other during absorption.

✔ Synergies — nutrients that help each other

Vitamin C + Iron●●●

Vitamin C dramatically enhances non-heme iron absorption by reducing Fe³⁺ to Fe²⁺ in the gut. Adding 75 mg vitamin C to a meal can increase iron absorption 3–4 fold.

Hallberg et al., Am J Clin Nutr, 1989

Dietary Fat + Vitamin K●●●

Vitamin K is fat-soluble. Absorption increases significantly when consumed with dietary fat, particularly for phylloquinone (K1) from plant sources.

Gijsbers et al., Br J Nutr, 1996

⚠ Antagonisms — nutrients that compete

Fiber vs Iron●●

Phytates in high-fibre foods (whole grains, legumes) bind non-heme iron and reduce its bioavailability. Soaking, sprouting, and fermentation reduce phytate content.

Hurrell & Egli, Int J Vitam Nutr Res, 2010

Manganese vs Iron●●

Manganese and iron share the DMT1 transporter and compete for absorption. High iron status reduces manganese absorption and vice versa.

Erikson et al., Pharmacol Ther, 2007

Vitamin C vs Copper●●

High-dose vitamin C (>1,500 mg/day) may reduce copper absorption by reducing Cu²⁺ to Cu⁺, though the clinical significance at normal intakes is minimal.

Harris, Am J Clin Nutr, 2003

How Cooking Changes Nutrients

Estimated percentage of each nutrient retained after cooking, based on USDA retention factors for the “Fresh Fruits” food category. Values of 100% mean no loss; lower values indicate nutrients lost to heat, water, or oxidation.

Key insights
Vitamin C loses up to 30% when sautéed. Baked retains 80%.
Folate loses up to 50% when sautéed. Baked retains 60%.

Source: USDA Table of Nutrient Retention Factors, Release 6 (2007). Retention values are category-level averages — actual retention depends on cooking time, temperature, and water volume.

USDA Retention Factors

Insulin Response

The Insulin Index (II) measures the actual insulin response to food on a scale where white bread = 100. Unlike the Glycemic Index (which only measures blood sugar), the II captures the full hormonal response — including the effect of protein and fat on insulin secretion. This is why high-protein foods like meat and dairy can have significant insulin scores despite having low or zero GI values.

66
Insulin Index
High Insulin Response
Insulin Index Scale 66
0 Low ≤30 Mod ≤60 High ≤100 120
Macro Model ●● Estimated from macronutrient composition (R²=0.49)

Source: Holt et al. 1997; Bao et al. 2016; Bell 2014

Environmental Impact

Environmental footprint per kilogram of food produced. Data represents the global average for the “Berries & Grapes” category.

1.5
kg CO₂e / kg
Low Impact
2.4
m² land / kg
Land Use
420
L water / kg
Water Use
7.3
g SO₂e / kg
Acidification
How this compares (GHG emissions)
Potatoes (0.5)Chicken (9.9)Beef (99.5)
Greenhouse Gas Emissions1.5 kg CO₂e / kg
Land Use2.4 m² / kg
Water Use420 L / kg
Eutrophication5.2 g PO₄e / kg
Acidification7.3 g SO₂e / kg
⚠️ Important context about this data
  • Global averages: These figures are production-weighted averages from a meta-analysis of ~38,700 farms across 119 countries (Poore & Nemecek, 2018). Actual impact varies enormously by farming method, geography, and supply chain.
  • System boundary: Cradle-to-retail only — does not include consumer transport, home cooking energy, or food waste.
  • Soil carbon not included: This data does not account for soil carbon sequestration. Some argue that well-managed regenerative grazing partially offsets ruminant emissions; however, full lifecycle accounting — including methane, land-use change, and the opportunity cost of using land for grazing vs. reforestation — typically makes the net footprint of ruminant meat higher, not lower. This is especially relevant in temperate grassland regions like Ireland.
  • Not gospel: This data is informational and illustrative. It is useful for understanding relative magnitudes, but should not be treated as precise measurements for any individual product or farm.

Source: Poore & Nemecek (2018), Science 360(6392). Meta-analysis of ~38,700 farms, 119 countries, 46 product categories.

Global Supply: Fruits

Top 10 countries by per capita supply of the “Fruits” food group (kcal/capita/day, 2023). This is food group–level data from FAO Food Balance Sheets, not specific to this individual food.

1.
Dominican Republic
618
2.
Oman
424
3.
Uganda
422
4.
Guyana
416
5.
Sao Tome and Principe
366
6.
Saudi Arabia
352
7.
Papua New Guinea
317
8.
Dominica
308
9.
Albania
293
10.
Ghana
286

Global Supply Trend (1961–2023)

+38%
1961: 93 kcal2023: 128 kcal

Source: FAO Food Balance Sheets (2023). Supply = production + imports − exports − waste, converted to kcal/capita/day.

Frequently Asked Questions

How many calories are in Blueberries, canned, light syrup, drained?

Blueberries, canned, light syrup, drained contains 82.0 kcal per 100 grams, making it a moderate-calorie food. The energy comes from 1.0g of protein (5% of calories), 0.40g of fat (4%), and 22.7g of carbohydrates (111%). Carbohydrates are the primary energy source.

What is Blueberries, canned, light syrup, drained most nutritious for?

The standout nutrient in Blueberries, canned, light syrup, drained is Carbohydrate, providing 22.7 g per 100g (17% of the Daily Value). It is also a notable source of Vitamin K1 (17% DV). Our database tracks 79 individual nutrients for this food, allowing detailed comparison across vitamins, minerals, amino acids, and fatty acids.

Is Blueberries, canned, light syrup, drained high in protein?

At 1.0g per 100 grams, Blueberries, canned, light syrup, drained is not a significant source of protein. Pair with protein-rich foods like legumes, meat, fish, or dairy to meet daily protein needs.

How much fiber is in Blueberries, canned, light syrup, drained?

Yes, Blueberries, canned, light syrup, drained is rich in dietary fiber with 6.0g per 100 grams. The daily recommended intake is 25-38g, so a serving contributes meaningfully toward that goal. Dietary fiber supports digestive health and is associated with reduced risk of cardiovascular disease.

What is the insulin index of Blueberries, canned, light syrup, drained?

Blueberries, canned, light syrup, drained has a high insulin response (II: 66) (estimated from macronutrient composition) on the insulin index scale (white bread = 100). Foods with high insulin scores stimulate significant insulin release, which may be relevant for blood sugar management. Note that the insulin index can differ substantially from the glycemic index — dairy products and high-protein foods often have higher insulin responses than their GI would suggest.