Skip to main content

Brussels sprouts, cooked, boiled, drained, without salt

Vegetables Per 100 g · Per 100g serving
Data sources: 69 AFCD 27 SR Legacy

Brussels sprouts, cooked, boiled, drained, without salt is a vegetable, providing just 36.0 calories per 100g. It is an excellent source of Vitamin K1 and Vitamin C, providing 117% and 77% of the Daily Value respectively. This vegetable is a useful source of fiber, virtually fat-free. Vegetables provide essential vitamins, minerals, and dietary fiber with relatively few calories. They are a cornerstone of virtually every dietary guideline worldwide. Our database tracks 96 nutrients for this food, plus insulin index, environmental footprint data.

36.0
Calories
kcal
2.5
Protein
g
0.50
Fat
g
7.1
Carbs
g
4.8
Fiber
g

Top Nutrients

☀️
Vitamin K1
140 µg
117% DV
☀️
Vitamin C
69.0 mg
77% DV
☀️
Folate
66.0 µg
16% DV

Data for 96 of 150 tracked nutrients

Nutrient Fingerprint

How this food scores across key nutrient categories, as a percentage of the daily recommended value per 100 g. Based on USDA DRIs for adults.

Complete Nutrient Profile

Macronutrients 10
NutrientPer 100gUnitPer Serving% DV
Water AFCD86.0g—
2%
Calories SR36.0kcal——
Energy (kJ) SR150kj——
Protein SR2.5g—
5%
Total Fat SR0.50g——
Carbohydrate SR7.1g—
6%
Fiber AFCD4.8g—
13%
Total Sugars SR1.7g——
Starch AFCD0.80g——
Ash AFCD1.1g——
Minerals 10
NutrientPer 100gUnitPer Serving% DV
Calcium AFCD24.0mg—
2%
Iron AFCD0.68mg—
8%
Magnesium AFCD21.0mg—
5%
Phosphorus AFCD65.0mg—
9%
Potassium AFCD372mg—
11%
Sodium AFCD31.0mg—
2%
Zinc AFCD0.34mg—
3%
Copper AFCD0.08mg—
9%
Manganese AFCD0.23mg—
10%
Selenium AFCD0µg——
Vitamins 35
NutrientPer 100gUnitPer Serving% DV
Vitamin A (RAE) AFCD15.0µg—
2%
Vitamin A (IU) SR39.0IU——
Retinol AFCD0µg——
Beta-Carotene AFCD85.0µg——
Alpha-Carotene AFCD0µg——
Beta-Cryptoxanthin AFCD6.0µg——
Lycopene SR0µg——
Lutein + Zeaxanthin AFCD336µg——
Vitamin C AFCD69.0mg—
77%
Vitamin D SR0µg——
Vitamin D (IU) AFCD0IU——
Vitamin D2 AFCD0µg——
Vitamin D3 AFCD0µg——
Vitamin E AFCD0mg——
Beta-Tocopherol AFCD0mg——
Gamma-Tocopherol AFCD0mg——
Delta-Tocopherol AFCD0mg——
Alpha-Tocotrienol SR0mg——
Beta-Tocotrienol SR0mg——
Gamma-Tocotrienol SR0mg——
Delta-Tocotrienol SR0mg——
Vitamin K1 SR140µg—
117%
Thiamin (B1) AFCD0.10mg—
8%
Riboflavin (B2) AFCD0.11mg—
8%
Niacin (B3) AFCD0.35mg—
2%
Pantothenic Acid (B5) AFCD0.37mg—
7%
Vitamin B6 AFCD0.20mg—
15%
Biotin (B7) AFCD0.80µg—
3%
Folate AFCD66.0µg—
16%
Folic Acid SR0µg——
Folate (food) AFCD66.0µg——
Folate (DFE) AFCD66.0µg——
Vitamin B12 AFCD0µg——
Choline SR40.6mg—
7%
Betaine SR0.20mg——
Fatty Acids 9
NutrientPer 100gUnitPer Serving% DV
Saturated Fat AFCD0g——
Monounsaturated Fat AFCD0g——
Polyunsaturated Fat AFCD0g——
Trans Fat AFCD0g——
Cholesterol AFCD0mg——
Omega-3 ALA AFCD0g——
Omega-3 EPA AFCD0g——
Omega-3 DPA AFCD0g——
Omega-3 DHA AFCD0g——
Individual Fatty Acids 10
NutrientPer 100gUnitPer Serving% DV
Butyric Acid (4:0) SR0g——
Caproic Acid (6:0) SR0g——
Caprylic Acid (8:0) SR0.003g——
Capric Acid (10:0) SR0g——
Lauric Acid (12:0) SR0g——
Myristic Acid (14:0) SR0.001g——
Palmitic Acid (16:0) SR0.09g——
Stearic Acid (18:0) SR0.005g——
Linoleic Acid (18:2) AFCD0g——
Linolenic Acid (18:3) SR0.17g——
Amino Acids 18
NutrientPer 100gUnitPer Serving% DV
Tryptophan AFCD0.04g——
Threonine AFCD0.11g——
Isoleucine AFCD0.10g——
Leucine AFCD0.15g——
Lysine AFCD0.14g——
Methionine AFCD0.03g——
Cystine AFCD0.04g——
Phenylalanine AFCD0.08g——
Tyrosine AFCD0.06g——
Valine AFCD0.15g——
Arginine AFCD0.27g——
Histidine AFCD0.06g——
Alanine AFCD0.18g——
Aspartic Acid AFCD0.27g——
Glutamic Acid AFCD0.74g——
Glycine AFCD0.10g——
Proline AFCD0.59g——
Serine AFCD0.13g——
Phytochemicals 1
NutrientPer 100gUnitPer Serving% DV
Oxalic Acid AFCD0mg——
Other 3
NutrientPer 100gUnitPer Serving% DV
Caffeine AFCD0mg——
Theobromine SR0mg——
Alcohol AFCD0g——

Nutrient Density Score

The NRF9.3 score measures overall nutritional quality per 100 kcal. It rewards 9 nutrients to encourage (protein, fiber, vitamins A, C, E, calcium, iron, magnesium, potassium) and penalizes 3 to limit (saturated fat, added sugars, sodium). Higher is better; negative scores indicate the food is high in limit nutrients relative to its beneficial content.

214
NRF9.3 Score
Excellent · per 100 kcal
Poor (<0) Moderate Good Excellent (100+)

NRF9.3 index: Fulgoni et al. (2009), J Nutr 139(8). DVs based on FDA 2020 reference values.

Nutrient Interactions in This Food

Nutrients in this food that enhance or compete with each other during absorption.

✔ Synergies — nutrients that help each other

Vitamin C + Iron●●●

Vitamin C dramatically enhances non-heme iron absorption by reducing Fe³⁺ to Fe²⁺ in the gut. Adding 75 mg vitamin C to a meal can increase iron absorption 3–4 fold.

Hallberg et al., Am J Clin Nutr, 1989

Dietary Fat + Vitamin K●●●

Vitamin K is fat-soluble. Absorption increases significantly when consumed with dietary fat, particularly for phylloquinone (K1) from plant sources.

Gijsbers et al., Br J Nutr, 1996

Vitamin B6 + Magnesium●●●

Vitamin B6 may enhance intracellular magnesium accumulation. Combined supplementation has shown greater benefits for stress and anxiety than magnesium alone.

Pouteau et al., PLoS One, 2018

Vitamin B6 + Folate●●●

Vitamin B6 is a cofactor in folate-dependent one-carbon metabolism. Together with B12, these three nutrients regulate homocysteine levels.

Selhub, J Nutr Health Aging, 2002

⚠ Antagonisms — nutrients that compete

Fiber vs Iron●●●

Phytates in high-fibre foods (whole grains, legumes) bind non-heme iron and reduce its bioavailability. Soaking, sprouting, and fermentation reduce phytate content.

Hurrell & Egli, Int J Vitam Nutr Res, 2010

Manganese vs Iron●●●

Manganese and iron share the DMT1 transporter and compete for absorption. High iron status reduces manganese absorption and vice versa.

Erikson et al., Pharmacol Ther, 2007

Vitamin C vs Copper●●●

High-dose vitamin C (>1,500 mg/day) may reduce copper absorption by reducing Cu²⁺ to Cu⁺, though the clinical significance at normal intakes is minimal.

Harris, Am J Clin Nutr, 2003

Amino Acid Profile

Essential amino acid composition compared to the WHO/FAO adult reference pattern. The Amino Acid Score indicates protein quality — 100 means all essential amino acid requirements are met.

101
Amino Acid Score
Complete
Leucine
Lowest Scoring
18
Amino Acids Tracked

✓ Complete protein — all essential amino acids meet or exceed WHO reference levels.

All Amino Acids (18)
Amino Acidg / 100gmg / g protein
Tryptophan0.0414.1
Threonine0.1141.6
Isoleucine0.1038.8
Leucine0.1559.6
Lysine0.1453.7
Methionine0.0311.4
Cystine0.0414.1
Phenylalanine0.0831.8
Tyrosine0.0623.1
Valine0.1558.4
Arginine0.27104.7
Histidine0.0622.7
Alanine0.1870.6
Aspartic Acid0.27104.3
Glutamic Acid0.74289.8
Glycine0.1040.0
Proline0.59229.8
Serine0.1352.5

How Cooking Changes Nutrients

Estimated percentage of each nutrient retained after cooking, based on USDA retention factors for the “Other Vegetables” food category. Values of 100% mean no loss; lower values indicate nutrients lost to heat, water, or oxidation.

Key insights
⚡Folate loses up to 31% when boiled (drained). Boiled (water used) retains 85%.
⚡Choline loses up to 10% when fried. Boiled (drained) retains 100%.

Source: USDA Table of Nutrient Retention Factors, Release 6 (2007). Retention values are category-level averages — actual retention depends on cooking time, temperature, and water volume.

USDA Retention Factors

Insulin Response

The Insulin Index (II) measures the actual insulin response to food on a scale where white bread = 100. Unlike the Glycemic Index (which only measures blood sugar), the II captures the full hormonal response — including the effect of protein and fat on insulin secretion. This is why high-protein foods like meat and dairy can have significant insulin scores despite having low or zero GI values.

64
Insulin Index
High Insulin Response
Insulin Index Scale 64
0 Low ≤30 Mod ≤60 High ≤100 120
Macro Model ●●● Estimated from macronutrient composition (R²=0.49)

Source: Holt et al. 1997; Bao et al. 2016; Bell 2014

Environmental Impact

Environmental footprint per kilogram of food produced. Data represents the global average for the “Brassicas” category.

0.51
kg CO₂e / kg
Very Low Impact
0.55
m² land / kg
Land Use
119
L water / kg
Water Use
4.0
g SO₂e / kg
Acidification
How this compares (GHG emissions)
Potatoes (0.5)Chicken (9.9)Beef (99.5)
Greenhouse Gas Emissions0.51 kg CO₂e / kg
Land Use0.55 m² / kg
Water Use119 L / kg
Eutrophication5.4 g PO₄e / kg
Acidification4.0 g SO₂e / kg
⚠️ Important context about this data
  • Global averages: These figures are production-weighted averages from a meta-analysis of ~38,700 farms across 119 countries (Poore & Nemecek, 2018). Actual impact varies enormously by farming method, geography, and supply chain.
  • System boundary: Cradle-to-retail only — does not include consumer transport, home cooking energy, or food waste.
  • Soil carbon not included: This data does not account for soil carbon sequestration. Some argue that well-managed regenerative grazing partially offsets ruminant emissions; however, full lifecycle accounting — including methane, land-use change, and the opportunity cost of using land for grazing vs. reforestation — typically makes the net footprint of ruminant meat higher, not lower. This is especially relevant in temperate grassland regions like Ireland.
  • Not gospel: This data is informational and illustrative. It is useful for understanding relative magnitudes, but should not be treated as precise measurements for any individual product or farm.

Source: Poore & Nemecek (2018), Science 360(6392). Meta-analysis of ~38,700 farms, 119 countries, 46 product categories.

Global Supply: Vegetables

Top 10 countries by per capita supply of the “Vegetables” food group (kcal/capita/day, 2023). This is food group–level data from FAO Food Balance Sheets, not specific to this individual food.

1.
China; mainland
310
2.
China
306
3.
Albania
258
4.
North Macedonia
221
5.
Guyana
209
6.
Kazakhstan
204
7.
Oman
192
8.
Uzbekistan
190
9.
Tajikistan
186
10.
Bosnia and Herzegovina
183

Global Supply Trend (1961–2023)

+76%
1961: 38 kcal2023: 67 kcal

Source: FAO Food Balance Sheets (2023). Supply = production + imports − exports − waste, converted to kcal/capita/day.

Frequently Asked Questions

How many calories are in Brussels sprouts, cooked, boiled, drained, without salt?

Brussels sprouts, cooked, boiled, drained, without salt contains 36.0 kcal per 100 grams, making it a low-calorie food. The energy comes from 2.5g of protein (28% of calories), 0.50g of fat (12%), and 7.1g of carbohydrates (79%). Carbohydrates are the primary energy source.

What is Brussels sprouts, cooked, boiled, drained, without salt most nutritious for?

The standout nutrient in Brussels sprouts, cooked, boiled, drained, without salt is Vitamin K1, providing 140 µg per 100g (117% of the Daily Value). It is also a notable source of Vitamin C (77% DV). Our database tracks 96 individual nutrients for this food, allowing detailed comparison across vitamins, minerals, amino acids, and fatty acids.

Is Brussels sprouts, cooked, boiled, drained, without salt high in protein?

At 2.5g per 100 grams, Brussels sprouts, cooked, boiled, drained, without salt is not a significant source of protein. Pair with protein-rich foods like legumes, meat, fish, or dairy to meet daily protein needs.

How much fiber is in Brussels sprouts, cooked, boiled, drained, without salt?

Brussels sprouts, cooked, boiled, drained, without salt contains 4.8g of fiber per 100 grams — a moderate amount. This contributes to the recommended daily intake of 25-38g. Pairing with other fiber-rich foods like vegetables, legumes, or whole grains can help meet daily targets.

What is the insulin index of Brussels sprouts, cooked, boiled, drained, without salt?

Brussels sprouts, cooked, boiled, drained, without salt has a high insulin response (II: 64) (estimated from macronutrient composition) on the insulin index scale (white bread = 100). Foods with high insulin scores stimulate significant insulin release, which may be relevant for blood sugar management. Note that the insulin index can differ substantially from the glycemic index — dairy products and high-protein foods often have higher insulin responses than their GI would suggest.