Skip to main content

Candies, sweet chocolate

Sweets Per 100 g · Per 100g serving

Candies, sweet chocolate is a sweet/confection, with a high energy density of 507 kcal per 100g. It is an excellent source of Copper, providing 0.574 mg (64% of the Daily Value) per 100g serving. This sweet/confection is a useful source of fiber, high in fat. Sweets and confections are primarily energy-dense foods. Some varieties, such as dark chocolate, contain notable amounts of minerals and bioactive compounds. Our database tracks 71 nutrients for this food, plus insulin index, environmental footprint data.

507
Calories
kcal
3.9
Protein
g
34.2
Fat
g
60.4
Carbs
g
5.5
Fiber
g

Top Nutrients

💎
Copper
0.57 mg
64% DV
💪
Carbohydrate
60.4 g
46% DV
💎
Iron
2.8 mg
34% DV

Data for 71 of 150 tracked nutrients

Nutrient Fingerprint

How this food scores across key nutrient categories, as a percentage of the daily recommended value per 100 g. Based on USDA DRIs for adults.

Complete Nutrient Profile

Macronutrients 9
NutrientPer 100gUnitPer Serving% DV
Water SR0.50g
0%
Calories SR507kcal
Energy (kJ) SR2,120kj
Protein SR3.9g
7%
Total Fat SR34.2g
Carbohydrate SR60.4g
46%
Fiber SR5.5g
14%
Total Sugars SR51.5g
Ash SR1.0g
Minerals 10
NutrientPer 100gUnitPer Serving% DV
Calcium SR24.0mg
2%
Iron SR2.8mg
34%
Magnesium SR113mg
28%
Phosphorus SR147mg
21%
Potassium SR290mg
8%
Sodium SR16.0mg
1%
Zinc SR1.5mg
14%
Copper SR0.57mg
64%
Manganese SR0.49mg
22%
Selenium SR2.8µg
5%
Vitamins 24
NutrientPer 100gUnitPer Serving% DV
Vitamin A (RAE) SR0µg
Vitamin A (IU) SR0IU
Retinol SR0µg
Beta-Carotene SR0µg
Alpha-Carotene SR0µg
Beta-Cryptoxanthin SR0µg
Lycopene SR0µg
Lutein + Zeaxanthin SR18.0µg
Vitamin C SR0mg
Vitamin D SR0µg
Vitamin D (IU) SR0IU
Vitamin E SR0.26mg
2%
Vitamin K1 SR6.3µg
5%
Thiamin (B1) SR0.02mg
2%
Riboflavin (B2) SR0.24mg
18%
Niacin (B3) SR0.67mg
4%
Pantothenic Acid (B5) SR0.07mg
1%
Vitamin B6 SR0.04mg
3%
Folate SR3.0µg
1%
Folic Acid SR0µg
Folate (food) SR3.0µg
Folate (DFE) SR3.0µg
Vitamin B12 SR0µg
Choline SR29.9mg
5%
Fatty Acids 7
NutrientPer 100gUnitPer Serving% DV
Saturated Fat SR20.1g
Monounsaturated Fat SR11.2g
Polyunsaturated Fat SR0.99g
Cholesterol SR0mg
Omega-3 EPA SR0g
Omega-3 DPA SR0g
Omega-3 DHA SR0g
Amino Acids 18
NutrientPer 100gUnitPer Serving% DV
Tryptophan SR0.06g
Threonine SR0.15g
Isoleucine SR0.15g
Leucine SR0.24g
Lysine SR0.20g
Methionine SR0.04g
Cystine SR0.05g
Phenylalanine SR0.19g
Tyrosine SR0.15g
Valine SR0.23g
Arginine SR0.22g
Histidine SR0.07g
Alanine SR0.18g
Aspartic Acid SR0.39g
Glutamic Acid SR0.59g
Glycine SR0.17g
Proline SR0.17g
Serine SR0.17g
Other 3
NutrientPer 100gUnitPer Serving% DV
Caffeine SR66.0mg
Theobromine SR426mg
Alcohol SR0g

Nutrient Density Score

The NRF9.3 score measures overall nutritional quality per 100 kcal. It rewards 9 nutrients to encourage (protein, fiber, vitamins A, C, E, calcium, iron, magnesium, potassium) and penalizes 3 to limit (saturated fat, added sugars, sodium). Higher is better; negative scores indicate the food is high in limit nutrients relative to its beneficial content.

-4
NRF9.3 Score
Poor · per 100 kcal
Poor (<0) Moderate Good Excellent (100+)

NRF9.3 index: Fulgoni et al. (2009), J Nutr 139(8). DVs based on FDA 2020 reference values.

Nutrient Interactions in This Food

Nutrients in this food that enhance or compete with each other during absorption.

✔ Synergies — nutrients that help each other

Dietary Fat + Vitamin K●●●

Vitamin K is fat-soluble. Absorption increases significantly when consumed with dietary fat, particularly for phylloquinone (K1) from plant sources.

Gijsbers et al., Br J Nutr, 1996

⚠ Antagonisms — nutrients that compete

Zinc vs Copper●●●

High zinc intake induces metallothionein in enterocytes, which traps copper and blocks its absorption. Prolonged high-dose zinc can cause copper deficiency.

Prasad et al., JAMA, 1978; Fosmire, Am J Clin Nutr, 1990

Zinc vs Iron●●

Zinc and non-heme iron compete for the same intestinal transporter (DMT1). High doses of one can reduce absorption of the other when taken simultaneously.

Rossander-Hulten et al., Am J Clin Nutr, 1991

Fiber vs Iron●●

Phytates in high-fibre foods (whole grains, legumes) bind non-heme iron and reduce its bioavailability. Soaking, sprouting, and fermentation reduce phytate content.

Hurrell & Egli, Int J Vitam Nutr Res, 2010

Fiber vs Zinc●●

Phytates in fibre-rich foods chelate zinc, reducing its bioavailability by up to 50% in high-phytate diets. This is a major concern in plant-based diets.

Sandstrom, Food Nutr Res, 1997

Manganese vs Iron●●

Manganese and iron share the DMT1 transporter and compete for absorption. High iron status reduces manganese absorption and vice versa.

Erikson et al., Pharmacol Ther, 2007

Amino Acid Profile

Essential amino acid composition compared to the WHO/FAO adult reference pattern. The Amino Acid Score indicates protein quality — 100 means all essential amino acid requirements are met.

103
Amino Acid Score
Complete
Leucine
Lowest Scoring
18
Amino Acids Tracked

✓ Complete protein — all essential amino acids meet or exceed WHO reference levels.

All Amino Acids (18)
Amino Acidg / 100gmg / g protein
Tryptophan0.0614.9
Threonine0.1539.5
Isoleucine0.1538.7
Leucine0.2460.5
Lysine0.2050.0
Methionine0.0410.3
Cystine0.0512.3
Phenylalanine0.1947.9
Tyrosine0.1537.4
Valine0.2360.0
Arginine0.2256.7
Histidine0.0717.2
Alanine0.1846.2
Aspartic Acid0.3999.5
Glutamic Acid0.59150.3
Glycine0.1744.9
Proline0.1742.8
Serine0.1743.1

Fatty Acid Profile

Breakdown of fat types per 100g. A healthy fat profile favours unsaturated fats (mono + poly) and a balanced omega-3 to omega-6 ratio.

20.1g
Saturated
11.2g
Monounsaturated
0.99g
Polyunsaturated

Insulin Response

The Insulin Index (II) measures the actual insulin response to food on a scale where white bread = 100. Unlike the Glycemic Index (which only measures blood sugar), the II captures the full hormonal response — including the effect of protein and fat on insulin secretion. This is why high-protein foods like meat and dairy can have significant insulin scores despite having low or zero GI values.

40
Insulin Index
Moderate Insulin Response
Insulin Index Scale 40
0 Low ≤30 Mod ≤60 High ≤100 120
Macro Model ●● Estimated from macronutrient composition (R²=0.49)

Source: Holt et al. 1997; Bao et al. 2016; Bell 2014

Environmental Impact

Environmental footprint per kilogram of food produced. Data represents the global average for the “Cane Sugar” category.

3.2
kg CO₂e / kg
Moderate Impact
2.0
m² land / kg
Land Use
620
L water / kg
Water Use
5.2
g SO₂e / kg
Acidification
How this compares (GHG emissions)
Potatoes (0.5)Chicken (9.9)Beef (99.5)
Greenhouse Gas Emissions3.2 kg CO₂e / kg
Land Use2.0 m² / kg
Water Use620 L / kg
Eutrophication17.1 g PO₄e / kg
Acidification5.2 g SO₂e / kg
⚠️ Important context about this data
  • Global averages: These figures are production-weighted averages from a meta-analysis of ~38,700 farms across 119 countries (Poore & Nemecek, 2018). Actual impact varies enormously by farming method, geography, and supply chain.
  • System boundary: Cradle-to-retail only — does not include consumer transport, home cooking energy, or food waste.
  • Soil carbon not included: This data does not account for soil carbon sequestration. Some argue that well-managed regenerative grazing partially offsets ruminant emissions; however, full lifecycle accounting — including methane, land-use change, and the opportunity cost of using land for grazing vs. reforestation — typically makes the net footprint of ruminant meat higher, not lower. This is especially relevant in temperate grassland regions like Ireland.
  • Not gospel: This data is informational and illustrative. It is useful for understanding relative magnitudes, but should not be treated as precise measurements for any individual product or farm.

Source: Poore & Nemecek (2018), Science 360(6392). Meta-analysis of ~38,700 farms, 119 countries, 46 product categories.

Global Supply: Sugar & Sweeteners

Top 10 countries by per capita supply of the “Sugar & Sweeteners” food group (kcal/capita/day, 2023). This is food group–level data from FAO Food Balance Sheets, not specific to this individual food.

1.
594
2.
569
3.
564
4.
555
5.
528
6.
520
7.
499
8.
493
9.
493
10.
489

Global Supply Trend (1961–2023)

+26%
1961: 230 kcal2023: 289 kcal

Source: FAO Food Balance Sheets (2023). Supply = production + imports − exports − waste, converted to kcal/capita/day.

Frequently Asked Questions

How many calories are in Candies, sweet chocolate?

Candies, sweet chocolate contains 507 kcal per 100 grams, making it a very calorie-dense food. The energy comes from 3.9g of protein (3% of calories), 34.2g of fat (61%), and 60.4g of carbohydrates (48%). Fat is the primary energy source.

What is Candies, sweet chocolate most nutritious for?

The standout nutrient in Candies, sweet chocolate is Copper, providing 0.57 mg per 100g (64% of the Daily Value). It is also a notable source of Carbohydrate (46% DV). Our database tracks 71 individual nutrients for this food, allowing detailed comparison across vitamins, minerals, amino acids, and fatty acids.

Is Candies, sweet chocolate high in protein?

Candies, sweet chocolate contains 3.9g of protein per 100 grams. While not a high-protein food, it can contribute to daily protein needs as part of a varied diet.

How much fiber is in Candies, sweet chocolate?

Candies, sweet chocolate contains 5.5g of fiber per 100 grams — a moderate amount. This contributes to the recommended daily intake of 25-38g. Pairing with other fiber-rich foods like vegetables, legumes, or whole grains can help meet daily targets.

What is the insulin index of Candies, sweet chocolate?

Candies, sweet chocolate has a moderate insulin response (II: 40) (estimated from macronutrient composition) on the insulin index scale (white bread = 100). This is a typical insulin response for most mixed foods. Note that the insulin index can differ substantially from the glycemic index — dairy products and high-protein foods often have higher insulin responses than their GI would suggest.