Skip to main content

Cereals ready-to-eat, QUAKER, CAP'N CRUNCH

Cereals Per 100 g · Per 100g serving

Cereals ready-to-eat, QUAKER, CAP'N CRUNCH is a cereal, containing 398 calories per 100g. It is an excellent source of Folate, Iron and Vitamin B6, providing 389%, 243% and 164% of the Daily Value respectively. Breakfast cereals vary widely in nutrient density. Many are fortified with vitamins and minerals, which can contribute meaningfully to daily nutrient intakes. Our database tracks 54 nutrients for this food, plus glycemic index, insulin index, environmental footprint data.

398
Calories
kcal
4.4
Protein
g
5.1
Fat
g
85.5
Carbs
g
2.5
Fiber
g

Top Nutrients

☀️
Folate
1,555 µg
389% DV
💎
Iron
19.4 mg
243% DV
☀️
Vitamin B6
2.1 mg
164% DV

Data for 54 of 150 tracked nutrients

Nutrient Fingerprint

How this food scores across key nutrient categories, as a percentage of the daily recommended value per 100 g. Based on USDA DRIs for adults.

Complete Nutrient Profile

Macronutrients 9
NutrientPer 100gUnitPer Serving% DV
Water SR2.5g
0%
Calories SR398kcal
Energy (kJ) SR1,665kj
Protein SR4.4g
8%
Total Fat SR5.1g
Carbohydrate SR85.5g
66%
Fiber SR2.5g
7%
Total Sugars SR44.3g
Ash SR2.5g
Minerals 10
NutrientPer 100gUnitPer Serving% DV
Calcium SR11.0mg
1%
Iron SR19.4mg
243%
Magnesium SR55.0mg
14%
Phosphorus SR167mg
24%
Potassium SR186mg
6%
Sodium SR754mg
50%
Zinc SR16.2mg
147%
Copper SR0.11mg
12%
Manganese SR0.75mg
32%
Selenium SR6.5µg
12%
Vitamins 24
NutrientPer 100gUnitPer Serving% DV
Vitamin A (RAE) SR7.0µg
1%
Vitamin A (IU) SR148IU
Retinol SR0µg
Beta-Carotene SR67.0µg
Alpha-Carotene SR44.0µg
Beta-Cryptoxanthin SR0µg
Lycopene SR0µg
Lutein + Zeaxanthin SR645µg
Vitamin C SR0mg
Vitamin D SR0µg
Vitamin D (IU) SR0IU
Vitamin E SR0.62mg
4%
Vitamin K1 SR0.60µg
0%
Thiamin (B1) SR1.6mg
134%
Riboflavin (B2) SR1.8mg
140%
Niacin (B3) SR21.5mg
134%
Pantothenic Acid (B5) SR0.14mg
3%
Vitamin B6 SR2.1mg
164%
Folate SR1,555µg
389%
Folic Acid SR1,536µg
Folate (food) SR19.0µg
Folate (DFE) SR2,630µg
Vitamin B12 SR0µg
Choline SR8.6mg
2%
Fatty Acids 8
NutrientPer 100gUnitPer Serving% DV
Saturated Fat SR3.3g
Monounsaturated Fat SR0.64g
Polyunsaturated Fat SR0.75g
Trans Fat SR0.02g
Cholesterol SR0mg
Omega-3 EPA SR0g
Omega-3 DPA SR0g
Omega-3 DHA SR0g
Other 3
NutrientPer 100gUnitPer Serving% DV
Caffeine SR0mg
Theobromine SR0mg
Alcohol SR0g

Nutrient Density Score

The NRF9.3 score measures overall nutritional quality per 100 kcal. It rewards 9 nutrients to encourage (protein, fiber, vitamins A, C, E, calcium, iron, magnesium, potassium) and penalizes 3 to limit (saturated fat, added sugars, sodium). Higher is better; negative scores indicate the food is high in limit nutrients relative to its beneficial content.

25
NRF9.3 Score
Moderate · per 100 kcal
Poor (<0) Moderate Good Excellent (100+)

NRF9.3 index: Fulgoni et al. (2009), J Nutr 139(8). DVs based on FDA 2020 reference values.

Nutrient Interactions in This Food

Nutrients in this food that enhance or compete with each other during absorption.

✔ Synergies — nutrients that help each other

Vitamin B6 + Magnesium●●

Vitamin B6 may enhance intracellular magnesium accumulation. Combined supplementation has shown greater benefits for stress and anxiety than magnesium alone.

Pouteau et al., PLoS One, 2018

Vitamin B6 + Folate●●

Vitamin B6 is a cofactor in folate-dependent one-carbon metabolism. Together with B12, these three nutrients regulate homocysteine levels.

Selhub, J Nutr Health Aging, 2002

⚠ Antagonisms — nutrients that compete

Zinc vs Copper●●●

High zinc intake induces metallothionein in enterocytes, which traps copper and blocks its absorption. Prolonged high-dose zinc can cause copper deficiency.

Prasad et al., JAMA, 1978; Fosmire, Am J Clin Nutr, 1990

Zinc vs Iron●●

Zinc and non-heme iron compete for the same intestinal transporter (DMT1). High doses of one can reduce absorption of the other when taken simultaneously.

Rossander-Hulten et al., Am J Clin Nutr, 1991

Fiber vs Iron●●

Phytates in high-fibre foods (whole grains, legumes) bind non-heme iron and reduce its bioavailability. Soaking, sprouting, and fermentation reduce phytate content.

Hurrell & Egli, Int J Vitam Nutr Res, 2010

Fiber vs Zinc●●

Phytates in fibre-rich foods chelate zinc, reducing its bioavailability by up to 50% in high-phytate diets. This is a major concern in plant-based diets.

Sandstrom, Food Nutr Res, 1997

Potassium vs Sodium●●

High potassium intake promotes renal sodium excretion and attenuates the blood pressure–raising effect of sodium. A higher K:Na ratio is associated with lower cardiovascular risk.

Aburto et al., BMJ, 2013

Fatty Acid Profile

Breakdown of fat types per 100g. A healthy fat profile favours unsaturated fats (mono + poly) and a balanced omega-3 to omega-6 ratio.

3.3g
Saturated
0.64g
Monounsaturated
0.75g
Polyunsaturated

How Cooking Changes Nutrients

Estimated percentage of each nutrient retained after cooking, based on USDA retention factors for the “Cereal” food category. Values of 100% mean no loss; lower values indicate nutrients lost to heat, water, or oxidation.

Source: USDA Table of Nutrient Retention Factors, Release 6 (2007). Retention values are category-level averages — actual retention depends on cooking time, temperature, and water volume.

USDA Retention Factors

Glycemic & Insulin Response

The Glycemic Index (GI) measures how quickly a food raises blood sugar on a 0–100 scale. The Insulin Index (II) measures the insulin response directly, which can differ from GI — notably, dairy and high-protein foods often trigger a higher insulin response than their GI suggests. White bread = 100 for both scales.

70
Glycemic Index
High GI
18
Glycemic Load
Medium GL (per 50g)
GI Scale 70
0 Low <55 Med High ≥70 100

GI data matched from: “Breakfast cereal (estimated from category)” · ●● low confidence

69
Insulin Index
High Insulin Response
Insulin Index Scale 69
0 Low ≤30 Mod ≤60 High ≤100 120
GI Model ●● Estimated via GI-based regression (R²=0.78)

Source: International Tables of Glycemic Index (Sydney University, 2021) · Holt et al. 1997; Bao et al. 2016; Bell 2014

Environmental Impact

Environmental footprint per kilogram of food produced. Data represents the global average for the “Wheat & Rye (Bread)” category.

1.6
kg CO₂e / kg
Low Impact
3.5
m² land / kg
Land Use
648
L water / kg
Water Use
12.2
g SO₂e / kg
Acidification
How this compares (GHG emissions)
Potatoes (0.5)Chicken (9.9)Beef (99.5)
Greenhouse Gas Emissions1.6 kg CO₂e / kg
Land Use3.5 m² / kg
Water Use648 L / kg
Eutrophication7.2 g PO₄e / kg
Acidification12.2 g SO₂e / kg
⚠️ Important context about this data
  • Global averages: These figures are production-weighted averages from a meta-analysis of ~38,700 farms across 119 countries (Poore & Nemecek, 2018). Actual impact varies enormously by farming method, geography, and supply chain.
  • System boundary: Cradle-to-retail only — does not include consumer transport, home cooking energy, or food waste.
  • Soil carbon not included: This data does not account for soil carbon sequestration. Some argue that well-managed regenerative grazing partially offsets ruminant emissions; however, full lifecycle accounting — including methane, land-use change, and the opportunity cost of using land for grazing vs. reforestation — typically makes the net footprint of ruminant meat higher, not lower. This is especially relevant in temperate grassland regions like Ireland.
  • Not gospel: This data is informational and illustrative. It is useful for understanding relative magnitudes, but should not be treated as precise measurements for any individual product or farm.

Source: Poore & Nemecek (2018), Science 360(6392). Meta-analysis of ~38,700 farms, 119 countries, 46 product categories.

Global Supply: Cereals

Top 10 countries by per capita supply of the “Cereals” food group (kcal/capita/day, 2023). This is food group–level data from FAO Food Balance Sheets, not specific to this individual food.

1.
1962
2.
1927
3.
1888
4.
1876
5.
1862
6.
1829
7.
1774
8.
1756
9.
1738
10.
1679

Global Supply Trend (1961–2023)

+8%
1961: 1030 kcal2023: 1108 kcal

Source: FAO Food Balance Sheets (2023). Supply = production + imports − exports − waste, converted to kcal/capita/day.

Frequently Asked Questions

How many calories are in Cereals ready-to-eat, QUAKER, CAP'N CRUNCH?

Cereals ready-to-eat, QUAKER, CAP'N CRUNCH contains 398 kcal per 100 grams, making it a calorie-dense food. The energy comes from 4.4g of protein (4% of calories), 5.1g of fat (12%), and 85.5g of carbohydrates (86%). Carbohydrates are the primary energy source.

What is Cereals ready-to-eat, QUAKER, CAP'N CRUNCH most nutritious for?

The standout nutrient in Cereals ready-to-eat, QUAKER, CAP'N CRUNCH is Folate, providing 1,555 µg per 100g (389% of the Daily Value). It is also a notable source of Iron (243% DV). Our database tracks 54 individual nutrients for this food, allowing detailed comparison across vitamins, minerals, amino acids, and fatty acids.

Is Cereals ready-to-eat, QUAKER, CAP'N CRUNCH high in protein?

Cereals ready-to-eat, QUAKER, CAP'N CRUNCH contains 4.4g of protein per 100 grams. While not a high-protein food, it can contribute to daily protein needs as part of a varied diet.

How much fiber is in Cereals ready-to-eat, QUAKER, CAP'N CRUNCH?

Cereals ready-to-eat, QUAKER, CAP'N CRUNCH contains 2.5g of fiber per 100 grams, which is a small amount. To increase fiber intake, consider pairing with high-fiber foods such as legumes, whole grains, or vegetables.

What is the glycemic index of Cereals ready-to-eat, QUAKER, CAP'N CRUNCH?

Cereals ready-to-eat, QUAKER, CAP'N CRUNCH has a glycemic index of 70, which is classified as high (≥70). High-GI foods cause a rapid spike in blood sugar. Pairing with protein, fat, or fiber can help moderate the glycemic response. The glycemic load, which accounts for typical serving size, provides additional context for real-world blood sugar impact.

What is the insulin index of Cereals ready-to-eat, QUAKER, CAP'N CRUNCH?

Cereals ready-to-eat, QUAKER, CAP'N CRUNCH has a high insulin response (II: 69) (estimated from macronutrient composition) on the insulin index scale (white bread = 100). Foods with high insulin scores stimulate significant insulin release, which may be relevant for blood sugar management. Note that the insulin index can differ substantially from the glycemic index — dairy products and high-protein foods often have higher insulin responses than their GI would suggest.