Skip to main content

Chives, raw

Vegetables Per 100 g · Per 100g serving
Data sources: 45 AFCD 42 SR Legacy

Chives, raw is a vegetable, providing just 28.7 calories per 100g. It is an excellent source of Vitamin K1, providing 212.7 µg (177% of the Daily Value) per 100g serving. This vegetable is a useful source of fiber, virtually fat-free. Vegetables provide essential vitamins, minerals, and dietary fiber with relatively few calories. They are a cornerstone of virtually every dietary guideline worldwide. Our database tracks 87 nutrients for this food, plus insulin index, environmental footprint data.

28.7
Calories
kcal
3.3
Protein
g
0.73
Fat
g
4.3
Carbs
g
4.7
Fiber
g

Top Nutrients

☀️
Vitamin K1
213 µg
177% DV
☀️
Vitamin A (RAE)
383 µg
43% DV
💎
Iron
2.8 mg
35% DV

Data for 87 of 150 tracked nutrients

Nutrient Fingerprint

How this food scores across key nutrient categories, as a percentage of the daily recommended value per 100 g. Based on USDA DRIs for adults.

Complete Nutrient Profile

Macronutrients 10
NutrientPer 100gUnitPer Serving% DV
Water AFCD89.6g
2%
Calories AFCD28.7kcal
Energy (kJ) SR126kj
Protein SR3.3g
6%
Total Fat SR0.73g
Carbohydrate SR4.3g
3%
Fiber AFCD4.7g
12%
Total Sugars SR1.9g
Starch AFCD0g
Ash AFCD0.90g
Minerals 10
NutrientPer 100gUnitPer Serving% DV
Calcium AFCD90.0mg
9%
Iron AFCD2.8mg
35%
Magnesium AFCD12.0mg
3%
Phosphorus AFCD58.0mg
8%
Potassium AFCD210mg
6%
Sodium AFCD7.0mg
0%
Zinc AFCD0.40mg
4%
Copper SR0.16mg
17%
Manganese SR0.37mg
16%
Selenium AFCD0.90µg
2%
Vitamins 26
NutrientPer 100gUnitPer Serving% DV
Vitamin A (RAE) AFCD383µg
43%
Vitamin A (IU) SR218IU
Retinol AFCD0µg
Beta-Carotene AFCD2,230µg
Alpha-Carotene AFCD30.0µg
Beta-Cryptoxanthin AFCD110µg
Lycopene SR0µg
Lutein + Zeaxanthin SR323µg
Vitamin C AFCD29.0mg
32%
Vitamin D SR0µg
Vitamin D (IU) AFCD0IU
Vitamin D2 AFCD0µg
Vitamin D3 AFCD0µg
Vitamin E AFCD0.20mg
1%
Vitamin K1 SR213µg
177%
Thiamin (B1) AFCD0.06mg
5%
Riboflavin (B2) AFCD0.21mg
16%
Niacin (B3) AFCD0.70mg
4%
Pantothenic Acid (B5) SR0.32mg
6%
Vitamin B6 AFCD0.14mg
11%
Folate AFCD105µg
26%
Folic Acid SR0µg
Folate (food) AFCD105µg
Folate (DFE) AFCD105µg
Vitamin B12 AFCD0µg
Choline SR5.2mg
1%
Fatty Acids 10
NutrientPer 100gUnitPer Serving% DV
Saturated Fat AFCD0g
Monounsaturated Fat AFCD0g
Polyunsaturated Fat AFCD0g
Trans Fat AFCD0g
Cholesterol AFCD0mg
Phytosterols SR9.0mg
Omega-3 ALA AFCD0g
Omega-3 EPA AFCD0g
Omega-3 DPA AFCD0g
Omega-3 DHA AFCD0g
Individual Fatty Acids 10
NutrientPer 100gUnitPer Serving% DV
Butyric Acid (4:0) SR0g
Caproic Acid (6:0) SR0g
Caprylic Acid (8:0) SR0g
Capric Acid (10:0) SR0g
Lauric Acid (12:0) SR0g
Myristic Acid (14:0) SR0.03g
Palmitic Acid (16:0) SR0.10g
Stearic Acid (18:0) SR0.009g
Linoleic Acid (18:2) AFCD0g
Linolenic Acid (18:3) SR0.01g
Amino Acids 17
NutrientPer 100gUnitPer Serving% DV
Tryptophan AFCD0.02g
Threonine SR0.13g
Isoleucine SR0.14g
Leucine SR0.20g
Lysine SR0.16g
Methionine SR0.04g
Phenylalanine SR0.10g
Tyrosine SR0.10g
Valine SR0.14g
Arginine SR0.24g
Histidine SR0.06g
Alanine SR0.15g
Aspartic Acid SR0.30g
Glutamic Acid SR0.68g
Glycine SR0.16g
Proline SR0.22g
Serine SR0.15g
Phytochemicals 1
NutrientPer 100gUnitPer Serving% DV
Oxalic Acid AFCD0mg
Other 3
NutrientPer 100gUnitPer Serving% DV
Caffeine AFCD0mg
Theobromine SR0mg
Alcohol AFCD0g

Nutrient Density Score

The NRF9.3 score measures overall nutritional quality per 100 kcal. It rewards 9 nutrients to encourage (protein, fiber, vitamins A, C, E, calcium, iron, magnesium, potassium) and penalizes 3 to limit (saturated fat, added sugars, sodium). Higher is better; negative scores indicate the food is high in limit nutrients relative to its beneficial content.

389
NRF9.3 Score
Excellent · per 100 kcal
Poor (<0) Moderate Good Excellent (100+)

NRF9.3 index: Fulgoni et al. (2009), J Nutr 139(8). DVs based on FDA 2020 reference values.

Nutrient Interactions in This Food

Nutrients in this food that enhance or compete with each other during absorption.

✔ Synergies — nutrients that help each other

Vitamin C + Iron●●●

Vitamin C dramatically enhances non-heme iron absorption by reducing Fe³⁺ to Fe²⁺ in the gut. Adding 75 mg vitamin C to a meal can increase iron absorption 3–4 fold.

Hallberg et al., Am J Clin Nutr, 1989

Dietary Fat + Vitamin A●●●

Vitamin A is fat-soluble and requires dietary fat for absorption. Adding fat to a meal significantly increases beta-carotene and retinol absorption.

Ribaya-Mercado et al., Am J Clin Nutr, 2007

Dietary Fat + Vitamin K●●●

Vitamin K is fat-soluble. Absorption increases significantly when consumed with dietary fat, particularly for phylloquinone (K1) from plant sources.

Gijsbers et al., Br J Nutr, 1996

Vitamin K + Calcium●●

Vitamin K activates osteocalcin and matrix GLA protein, which direct calcium into bones and away from soft tissues (arteries). Works synergistically with vitamin D.

Kidd, Altern Med Rev, 2010

Protein + Calcium●●

Moderate protein intake enhances calcium absorption and supports bone health. The acid-ash hypothesis suggesting protein harms bones has been largely disproven.

Kerstetter et al., J Clin Endocrinol Metab, 2005

⚠ Antagonisms — nutrients that compete

Calcium vs Iron●●●

Calcium inhibits both heme and non-heme iron absorption when consumed in the same meal. The effect is dose-dependent, with significant inhibition at 300+ mg calcium.

Hallberg et al., Am J Clin Nutr, 1991

Fiber vs Iron●●

Phytates in high-fibre foods (whole grains, legumes) bind non-heme iron and reduce its bioavailability. Soaking, sprouting, and fermentation reduce phytate content.

Hurrell & Egli, Int J Vitam Nutr Res, 2010

Fiber vs Calcium●●

Oxalates (in spinach, rhubarb) and phytates (in bran) can bind calcium, reducing absorption. However, the net effect of high-fibre diets on calcium status is modest.

Weaver et al., Am J Clin Nutr, 1999

Manganese vs Iron●●

Manganese and iron share the DMT1 transporter and compete for absorption. High iron status reduces manganese absorption and vice versa.

Erikson et al., Pharmacol Ther, 2007

Vitamin C vs Copper●●

High-dose vitamin C (>1,500 mg/day) may reduce copper absorption by reducing Cu²⁺ to Cu⁺, though the clinical significance at normal intakes is minimal.

Harris, Am J Clin Nutr, 2003

Amino Acid Profile

Essential amino acid composition compared to the WHO/FAO adult reference pattern. The Amino Acid Score indicates protein quality — 100 means all essential amino acid requirements are met.

50
Amino Acid Score
Moderate
Met + Cys
Limiting Amino Acid
17
Amino Acids Tracked

Tip: The limiting amino acid is Met + Cys. Pair with grains, nuts, and seeds for a complete amino acid profile.

All Amino Acids (17)
Amino Acidg / 100gmg / g protein
Tryptophan0.025.2
Threonine0.1339.1
Isoleucine0.1442.5
Leucine0.2059.6
Lysine0.1649.8
Methionine0.0411.0
Phenylalanine0.1032.1
Tyrosine0.1029.1
Valine0.1444.3
Arginine0.2472.5
Histidine0.0617.4
Alanine0.1545.3
Aspartic Acid0.3092.7
Glutamic Acid0.68207.0
Glycine0.1649.5
Proline0.2266.1
Serine0.1545.3

How Cooking Changes Nutrients

Estimated percentage of each nutrient retained after cooking, based on USDA retention factors for the “Other Vegetables” food category. Values of 100% mean no loss; lower values indicate nutrients lost to heat, water, or oxidation.

Key insights
Folate loses up to 31% when boiled (drained). Boiled (water used) retains 85%.
Choline loses up to 10% when fried. Boiled (drained) retains 100%.

Source: USDA Table of Nutrient Retention Factors, Release 6 (2007). Retention values are category-level averages — actual retention depends on cooking time, temperature, and water volume.

USDA Retention Factors

Insulin Response

The Insulin Index (II) measures the actual insulin response to food on a scale where white bread = 100. Unlike the Glycemic Index (which only measures blood sugar), the II captures the full hormonal response — including the effect of protein and fat on insulin secretion. This is why high-protein foods like meat and dairy can have significant insulin scores despite having low or zero GI values.

55
Insulin Index
Moderate Insulin Response
Insulin Index Scale 55
0 Low ≤30 Mod ≤60 High ≤100 120
Macro Model ●● Estimated from macronutrient composition (R²=0.49)

Source: Holt et al. 1997; Bao et al. 2016; Bell 2014

Environmental Impact

Environmental footprint per kilogram of food produced. Data represents the global average for the “Onions & Leeks” category.

0.50
kg CO₂e / kg
Very Low Impact
0.37
m² land / kg
Land Use
14.0
L water / kg
Water Use
2.8
g SO₂e / kg
Acidification
How this compares (GHG emissions)
Potatoes (0.5)Chicken (9.9)Beef (99.5)
Greenhouse Gas Emissions0.50 kg CO₂e / kg
Land Use0.37 m² / kg
Water Use14.0 L / kg
Eutrophication3.2 g PO₄e / kg
Acidification2.8 g SO₂e / kg
⚠️ Important context about this data
  • Global averages: These figures are production-weighted averages from a meta-analysis of ~38,700 farms across 119 countries (Poore & Nemecek, 2018). Actual impact varies enormously by farming method, geography, and supply chain.
  • System boundary: Cradle-to-retail only — does not include consumer transport, home cooking energy, or food waste.
  • Soil carbon not included: This data does not account for soil carbon sequestration. Some argue that well-managed regenerative grazing partially offsets ruminant emissions; however, full lifecycle accounting — including methane, land-use change, and the opportunity cost of using land for grazing vs. reforestation — typically makes the net footprint of ruminant meat higher, not lower. This is especially relevant in temperate grassland regions like Ireland.
  • Not gospel: This data is informational and illustrative. It is useful for understanding relative magnitudes, but should not be treated as precise measurements for any individual product or farm.

Source: Poore & Nemecek (2018), Science 360(6392). Meta-analysis of ~38,700 farms, 119 countries, 46 product categories.

Global Supply: Vegetables

Top 10 countries by per capita supply of the “Vegetables” food group (kcal/capita/day, 2023). This is food group–level data from FAO Food Balance Sheets, not specific to this individual food.

1.
China; mainland
310
2.
China
306
3.
Albania
258
4.
North Macedonia
221
5.
Guyana
209
6.
Kazakhstan
204
7.
Oman
192
8.
Uzbekistan
190
9.
Tajikistan
186
10.
Bosnia and Herzegovina
183

Global Supply Trend (1961–2023)

+76%
1961: 38 kcal2023: 67 kcal

Source: FAO Food Balance Sheets (2023). Supply = production + imports − exports − waste, converted to kcal/capita/day.

Frequently Asked Questions

How many calories are in Chives, raw?

Chives, raw contains 28.7 kcal per 100 grams, making it a low-calorie food. The energy comes from 3.3g of protein (46% of calories), 0.73g of fat (23%), and 4.3g of carbohydrates (61%). Carbohydrates are the primary energy source.

What is Chives, raw most nutritious for?

The standout nutrient in Chives, raw is Vitamin K1, providing 213 µg per 100g (177% of the Daily Value). It is also a notable source of Vitamin A (RAE) (43% DV). Our database tracks 87 individual nutrients for this food, allowing detailed comparison across vitamins, minerals, amino acids, and fatty acids.

Is Chives, raw high in protein?

Chives, raw contains 3.3g of protein per 100 grams. While not a high-protein food, it can contribute to daily protein needs as part of a varied diet.

How much fiber is in Chives, raw?

Chives, raw contains 4.7g of fiber per 100 grams — a moderate amount. This contributes to the recommended daily intake of 25-38g. Pairing with other fiber-rich foods like vegetables, legumes, or whole grains can help meet daily targets.

What is the insulin index of Chives, raw?

Chives, raw has a moderate insulin response (II: 55) (estimated from macronutrient composition) on the insulin index scale (white bread = 100). This is a typical insulin response for most mixed foods. Note that the insulin index can differ substantially from the glycemic index — dairy products and high-protein foods often have higher insulin responses than their GI would suggest.