Skip to main content

Edamame, frozen, prepared

Vegetables Per 100 g · Per 100g serving
Contains: 🫘 Soy

Edamame, frozen, prepared is a vegetable at 121 calories per 100g. It is an excellent source of Folate, providing 311.0 µg (78% of the Daily Value) per 100g serving. This vegetable is a moderate protein source, a useful source of fiber. Vegetables provide essential vitamins, minerals, and dietary fiber with relatively few calories. They are a cornerstone of virtually every dietary guideline worldwide. Our database tracks 97 nutrients for this food, plus insulin index, environmental footprint data.

121
Calories
kcal
11.9
Protein
g
5.2
Fat
g
8.9
Carbs
g
5.2
Fiber
g

Top Nutrients

☀️
Folate
311 µg
78% DV
💎
Manganese
1.0 mg
44% DV
💎
Copper
0.34 mg
38% DV

Data for 97 of 150 tracked nutrients

Nutrient Fingerprint

How this food scores across key nutrient categories, as a percentage of the daily recommended value per 100 g. Based on USDA DRIs for adults.

Complete Nutrient Profile

Macronutrients 10
NutrientPer 100gUnitPer Serving% DV
Water SR72.8g
2%
Calories SR121kcal
Energy (kJ) SR507kj
Protein SR11.9g
21%
Total Fat SR5.2g
Carbohydrate SR8.9g
7%
Fiber SR5.2g
14%
Total Sugars SR2.2g
Starch SR1.5g
Ash SR1.2g
Minerals 10
NutrientPer 100gUnitPer Serving% DV
Calcium SR63.0mg
6%
Iron SR2.3mg
28%
Magnesium SR64.0mg
16%
Phosphorus SR169mg
24%
Potassium SR436mg
13%
Sodium SR6.0mg
0%
Zinc SR1.4mg
12%
Copper SR0.34mg
38%
Manganese SR1.0mg
44%
Selenium SR0.80µg
2%
Vitamins 34
NutrientPer 100gUnitPer Serving% DV
Vitamin A (RAE) SR298µg
33%
Vitamin A (IU) SR15.0IU
Retinol SR0µg
Beta-Carotene SR175µg
Alpha-Carotene SR0µg
Beta-Cryptoxanthin SR8.0µg
Lycopene SR0µg
Lutein + Zeaxanthin SR1,619µg
Vitamin C SR6.1mg
7%
Vitamin D SR0µg
Vitamin D (IU) SR0IU
Vitamin E SR0.68mg
4%
Beta-Tocopherol SR0.06mg
Gamma-Tocopherol SR5.9mg
Delta-Tocopherol SR3.6mg
Alpha-Tocotrienol SR0.02mg
Beta-Tocotrienol SR0mg
Gamma-Tocotrienol SR0mg
Delta-Tocotrienol SR0mg
Vitamin K1 SR26.7µg
22%
Vitamin K1 (dihydro) SR0µg
Vitamin K2 (MK-4) SR0µg
Thiamin (B1) SR0.20mg
17%
Riboflavin (B2) SR0.15mg
12%
Niacin (B3) SR0.92mg
6%
Pantothenic Acid (B5) SR0.40mg
8%
Vitamin B6 SR0.10mg
8%
Folate SR311µg
78%
Folic Acid SR0µg
Folate (food) SR311µg
Folate (DFE) SR311µg
Vitamin B12 SR0µg
Choline SR56.3mg
10%
Betaine SR4.5mg
Fatty Acids 9
NutrientPer 100gUnitPer Serving% DV
Saturated Fat SR0.62g
Monounsaturated Fat SR1.3g
Polyunsaturated Fat SR2.2g
Trans Fat SR0.009g
Cholesterol SR0mg
Omega-3 ALA SR0.36g
22%
Omega-3 EPA SR0.003g
Omega-3 DPA SR0g
Omega-3 DHA SR0g
Individual Fatty Acids 12
NutrientPer 100gUnitPer Serving% DV
Butyric Acid (4:0) SR0g
Caproic Acid (6:0) SR0g
Caprylic Acid (8:0) SR0g
Capric Acid (10:0) SR0g
Lauric Acid (12:0) SR0g
Myristic Acid (14:0) SR0.004g
Palmitic Acid (16:0) SR0.44g
Stearic Acid (18:0) SR0.14g
Linoleic Acid (18:2) SR1.8g
10%
Omega-6 LA SR1.8g
Omega-6 GLA SR0g
Linolenic Acid (18:3) SR0.36g
Amino Acids 19
NutrientPer 100gUnitPer Serving% DV
Tryptophan SR0.13g
Threonine SR0.33g
Isoleucine SR0.30g
Leucine SR0.74g
Lysine SR0.74g
Methionine SR0.14g
Cystine SR0.12g
Phenylalanine SR0.49g
Tyrosine SR0.34g
Valine SR0.32g
Arginine SR0.72g
Histidine SR0.27g
Alanine SR0.45g
Aspartic Acid SR1.3g
Glutamic Acid SR2.0g
Glycine SR0.43g
Proline SR0.69g
Serine SR0.67g
Hydroxyproline SR0g
Other 3
NutrientPer 100gUnitPer Serving% DV
Caffeine SR0mg
Theobromine SR0mg
Alcohol SR0g

Nutrient Density Score

The NRF9.3 score measures overall nutritional quality per 100 kcal. It rewards 9 nutrients to encourage (protein, fiber, vitamins A, C, E, calcium, iron, magnesium, potassium) and penalizes 3 to limit (saturated fat, added sugars, sodium). Higher is better; negative scores indicate the food is high in limit nutrients relative to its beneficial content.

104
NRF9.3 Score
Excellent · per 100 kcal
Poor (<0) Moderate Good Excellent (100+)

NRF9.3 index: Fulgoni et al. (2009), J Nutr 139(8). DVs based on FDA 2020 reference values.

Nutrient Interactions in This Food

Nutrients in this food that enhance or compete with each other during absorption.

✔ Synergies — nutrients that help each other

Vitamin C + Iron●●●

Vitamin C dramatically enhances non-heme iron absorption by reducing Fe³⁺ to Fe²⁺ in the gut. Adding 75 mg vitamin C to a meal can increase iron absorption 3–4 fold.

Hallberg et al., Am J Clin Nutr, 1989

Dietary Fat + Vitamin A●●●

Vitamin A is fat-soluble and requires dietary fat for absorption. Adding fat to a meal significantly increases beta-carotene and retinol absorption.

Ribaya-Mercado et al., Am J Clin Nutr, 2007

Dietary Fat + Vitamin K●●●

Vitamin K is fat-soluble. Absorption increases significantly when consumed with dietary fat, particularly for phylloquinone (K1) from plant sources.

Gijsbers et al., Br J Nutr, 1996

Vitamin K + Calcium●●

Vitamin K activates osteocalcin and matrix GLA protein, which direct calcium into bones and away from soft tissues (arteries). Works synergistically with vitamin D.

Kidd, Altern Med Rev, 2010

Vitamin B6 + Magnesium●●

Vitamin B6 may enhance intracellular magnesium accumulation. Combined supplementation has shown greater benefits for stress and anxiety than magnesium alone.

Pouteau et al., PLoS One, 2018

⚠ Antagonisms — nutrients that compete

Calcium vs Iron●●●

Calcium inhibits both heme and non-heme iron absorption when consumed in the same meal. The effect is dose-dependent, with significant inhibition at 300+ mg calcium.

Hallberg et al., Am J Clin Nutr, 1991

Zinc vs Copper●●●

High zinc intake induces metallothionein in enterocytes, which traps copper and blocks its absorption. Prolonged high-dose zinc can cause copper deficiency.

Prasad et al., JAMA, 1978; Fosmire, Am J Clin Nutr, 1990

Zinc vs Iron●●

Zinc and non-heme iron compete for the same intestinal transporter (DMT1). High doses of one can reduce absorption of the other when taken simultaneously.

Rossander-Hulten et al., Am J Clin Nutr, 1991

Calcium vs Magnesium●●

Very high calcium intake can reduce magnesium absorption by competing for shared intestinal transport pathways. A calcium:magnesium ratio above 2.6:1 may impair magnesium status.

Rosanoff et al., Nutr Rev, 2012

Fiber vs Iron●●

Phytates in high-fibre foods (whole grains, legumes) bind non-heme iron and reduce its bioavailability. Soaking, sprouting, and fermentation reduce phytate content.

Hurrell & Egli, Int J Vitam Nutr Res, 2010

Amino Acid Profile

Essential amino acid composition compared to the WHO/FAO adult reference pattern. The Amino Acid Score indicates protein quality — 100 means all essential amino acid requirements are met.

70
Amino Acid Score
Moderate
Valine
Limiting Amino Acid
18
Amino Acids Tracked

Tip: The limiting amino acid is Valine. Pair with dairy, meat, and soy for a complete amino acid profile.

All Amino Acids (18)
Amino Acidg / 100gmg / g protein
Tryptophan0.1310.6
Threonine0.3327.8
Isoleucine0.3025.2
Leucine0.7462.6
Lysine0.7462.6
Methionine0.1411.8
Cystine0.1210.4
Phenylalanine0.4941.0
Tyrosine0.3428.2
Valine0.3227.2
Arginine0.7260.8
Histidine0.2722.4
Alanine0.4537.4
Aspartic Acid1.3113.2
Glutamic Acid2.0169.6
Glycine0.4336.4
Proline0.6957.6
Serine0.6755.8

Fatty Acid Profile

Breakdown of fat types per 100g. A healthy fat profile favours unsaturated fats (mono + poly) and a balanced omega-3 to omega-6 ratio.

0.62g
Saturated
1.3g
Monounsaturated
2.2g
Polyunsaturated
1:5.0
Omega-3 : Omega-6 Ratio
Omega-6 dominant — ideal range is 1:1 to 1:4
Omega Fatty Acids
EPA (20:5 n-3)0.003 g
ALA (18:3 n-3)0.36 g
Linoleic acid (18:2 n-6)1.8 g

How Cooking Changes Nutrients

Estimated percentage of each nutrient retained after cooking, based on USDA retention factors for the “Other Vegetables” food category. Values of 100% mean no loss; lower values indicate nutrients lost to heat, water, or oxidation.

Key insights
Folate loses up to 31% when boiled (drained). Boiled (water used) retains 85%.
Choline loses up to 10% when fried. Boiled (drained) retains 100%.

Source: USDA Table of Nutrient Retention Factors, Release 6 (2007). Retention values are category-level averages — actual retention depends on cooking time, temperature, and water volume.

USDA Retention Factors

Insulin Response

The Insulin Index (II) measures the actual insulin response to food on a scale where white bread = 100. Unlike the Glycemic Index (which only measures blood sugar), the II captures the full hormonal response — including the effect of protein and fat on insulin secretion. This is why high-protein foods like meat and dairy can have significant insulin scores despite having low or zero GI values.

37
Insulin Index
Moderate Insulin Response
Insulin Index Scale 37
0 Low ≤30 Mod ≤60 High ≤100 120
Macro Model ●● Estimated from macronutrient composition (R²=0.49)

Source: Holt et al. 1997; Bao et al. 2016; Bell 2014

Environmental Impact

Environmental footprint per kilogram of food produced. Data represents the global average for the “Soybeans” category.

3.2
kg CO₂e / kg
Moderate Impact
3.5
m² land / kg
Land Use
170
L water / kg
Water Use
12.8
g SO₂e / kg
Acidification
How this compares (GHG emissions)
Potatoes (0.5)Chicken (9.9)Beef (99.5)
Greenhouse Gas Emissions3.2 kg CO₂e / kg
Land Use3.5 m² / kg
Water Use170 L / kg
Eutrophication10.1 g PO₄e / kg
Acidification12.8 g SO₂e / kg
⚠️ Important context about this data
  • Global averages: These figures are production-weighted averages from a meta-analysis of ~38,700 farms across 119 countries (Poore & Nemecek, 2018). Actual impact varies enormously by farming method, geography, and supply chain.
  • System boundary: Cradle-to-retail only — does not include consumer transport, home cooking energy, or food waste.
  • Soil carbon not included: This data does not account for soil carbon sequestration. Some argue that well-managed regenerative grazing partially offsets ruminant emissions; however, full lifecycle accounting — including methane, land-use change, and the opportunity cost of using land for grazing vs. reforestation — typically makes the net footprint of ruminant meat higher, not lower. This is especially relevant in temperate grassland regions like Ireland.
  • Not gospel: This data is informational and illustrative. It is useful for understanding relative magnitudes, but should not be treated as precise measurements for any individual product or farm.

Source: Poore & Nemecek (2018), Science 360(6392). Meta-analysis of ~38,700 farms, 119 countries, 46 product categories.

Global Supply: Vegetables

Top 10 countries by per capita supply of the “Vegetables” food group (kcal/capita/day, 2023). This is food group–level data from FAO Food Balance Sheets, not specific to this individual food.

1.
China; mainland
310
2.
China
306
3.
Albania
258
4.
North Macedonia
221
5.
Guyana
209
6.
Kazakhstan
204
7.
Oman
192
8.
Uzbekistan
190
9.
Tajikistan
186
10.
Bosnia and Herzegovina
183

Global Supply Trend (1961–2023)

+76%
1961: 38 kcal2023: 67 kcal

Source: FAO Food Balance Sheets (2023). Supply = production + imports − exports − waste, converted to kcal/capita/day.

Frequently Asked Questions

How many calories are in Edamame, frozen, prepared?

Edamame, frozen, prepared contains 121 kcal per 100 grams, making it a moderate-calorie food. The energy comes from 11.9g of protein (39% of calories), 5.2g of fat (39%), and 8.9g of carbohydrates (29%). Protein is the primary energy source.

What is Edamame, frozen, prepared most nutritious for?

The standout nutrient in Edamame, frozen, prepared is Folate, providing 311 µg per 100g (78% of the Daily Value). It is also a notable source of Manganese (44% DV). Our database tracks 97 individual nutrients for this food, allowing detailed comparison across vitamins, minerals, amino acids, and fatty acids.

Is Edamame, frozen, prepared high in protein?

Edamame, frozen, prepared provides 11.9g of protein per 100 grams — a moderate amount. Protein contributes 39% of its calories.

How much fiber is in Edamame, frozen, prepared?

Edamame, frozen, prepared contains 5.2g of fiber per 100 grams — a moderate amount. This contributes to the recommended daily intake of 25-38g. Pairing with other fiber-rich foods like vegetables, legumes, or whole grains can help meet daily targets.

What is the insulin index of Edamame, frozen, prepared?

Edamame, frozen, prepared has a moderate insulin response (II: 37) (estimated from macronutrient composition) on the insulin index scale (white bread = 100). This is a typical insulin response for most mixed foods. Note that the insulin index can differ substantially from the glycemic index — dairy products and high-protein foods often have higher insulin responses than their GI would suggest.