Skip to main content

Milk, buttermilk, dried

Dairy Per 100 g · Per 100g serving
Contains: 🥛 Milk

Milk, buttermilk, dried is a dairy/egg product, containing 387 calories per 100g. It is an excellent source of Vitamin B12, Phosphorus and Riboflavin (B2), providing 159%, 133% and 122% of the Daily Value respectively. This dairy/egg product is high in protein. Dairy products and eggs provide high-quality protein, calcium, and essential vitamins. They are significant dietary sources of vitamin B12, riboflavin, and phosphorus. Our database tracks 82 nutrients for this food, plus insulin index, environmental footprint data.

387
Calories
kcal
34.3
Protein
g
5.8
Fat
g
49.0
Carbs
g
0
Fiber
g

Top Nutrients

☀️
Vitamin B12
3.8 µg
159% DV
💎
Phosphorus
933 mg
133% DV
☀️
Riboflavin (B2)
1.6 mg
122% DV

Data for 82 of 150 tracked nutrients

Nutrient Fingerprint

How this food scores across key nutrient categories, as a percentage of the daily recommended value per 100 g. Based on USDA DRIs for adults.

Complete Nutrient Profile

Macronutrients 9
NutrientPer 100gUnitPer Serving% DV
Water SR3.0g
0%
Calories SR387kcal
Energy (kJ) SR1,619kj
Protein SR34.3g
61%
Total Fat SR5.8g
Carbohydrate SR49.0g
38%
Fiber SR0g
Total Sugars SR49.0g
Ash SR8.0g
Minerals 10
NutrientPer 100gUnitPer Serving% DV
Calcium SR1,184mg
118%
Iron SR0.30mg
4%
Magnesium SR110mg
28%
Phosphorus SR933mg
133%
Potassium SR1,592mg
47%
Sodium SR517mg
34%
Zinc SR4.0mg
36%
Copper SR0.11mg
12%
Manganese SR0.02mg
1%
Selenium SR20.3µg
37%
Vitamins 25
NutrientPer 100gUnitPer Serving% DV
Vitamin A (RAE) SR175µg
19%
Vitamin A (IU) SR49.0IU
Retinol SR48.0µg
Beta-Carotene SR9.0µg
Alpha-Carotene SR0µg
Beta-Cryptoxanthin SR0µg
Lycopene SR0µg
Lutein + Zeaxanthin SR0µg
Vitamin C SR5.7mg
6%
Vitamin D SR0.50µg
3%
Vitamin D (IU) SR20.0IU
Vitamin D3 SR0.50µg
Vitamin E SR0.10mg
1%
Vitamin K1 SR0.40µg
0%
Thiamin (B1) SR0.39mg
33%
Riboflavin (B2) SR1.6mg
122%
Niacin (B3) SR0.88mg
6%
Pantothenic Acid (B5) SR3.2mg
63%
Vitamin B6 SR0.34mg
26%
Folate SR47.0µg
12%
Folic Acid SR0µg
Folate (food) SR47.0µg
Folate (DFE) SR47.0µg
Vitamin B12 SR3.8µg
159%
Choline SR119mg
22%
Fatty Acids 7
NutrientPer 100gUnitPer Serving% DV
Saturated Fat SR3.6g
Monounsaturated Fat SR1.7g
Polyunsaturated Fat SR0.21g
Cholesterol SR69.0mg
Omega-3 EPA SR0g
Omega-3 DPA SR0g
Omega-3 DHA SR0g
Individual Fatty Acids 10
NutrientPer 100gUnitPer Serving% DV
Butyric Acid (4:0) SR0.19g
Caproic Acid (6:0) SR0.11g
Caprylic Acid (8:0) SR0.07g
Capric Acid (10:0) SR0.14g
Lauric Acid (12:0) SR0.16g
Myristic Acid (14:0) SR0.58g
Palmitic Acid (16:0) SR1.5g
Stearic Acid (18:0) SR0.70g
Linoleic Acid (18:2) SR0.13g
1%
Linolenic Acid (18:3) SR0.08g
Amino Acids 18
NutrientPer 100gUnitPer Serving% DV
Tryptophan SR0.48g
Threonine SR1.5g
Isoleucine SR2.1g
Leucine SR3.4g
Lysine SR2.7g
Methionine SR0.86g
Cystine SR0.32g
Phenylalanine SR1.7g
Tyrosine SR1.7g
Valine SR2.3g
Arginine SR1.2g
Histidine SR0.93g
Alanine SR1.2g
Aspartic Acid SR2.6g
Glutamic Acid SR7.2g
Glycine SR0.73g
Proline SR3.3g
Serine SR1.9g
Other 3
NutrientPer 100gUnitPer Serving% DV
Caffeine SR0mg
Theobromine SR0mg
Alcohol SR0g

Nutrient Density Score

The NRF9.3 score measures overall nutritional quality per 100 kcal. It rewards 9 nutrients to encourage (protein, fiber, vitamins A, C, E, calcium, iron, magnesium, potassium) and penalizes 3 to limit (saturated fat, added sugars, sodium). Higher is better; negative scores indicate the food is high in limit nutrients relative to its beneficial content.

54
NRF9.3 Score
Good · per 100 kcal
Poor (<0) Moderate Good Excellent (100+)

NRF9.3 index: Fulgoni et al. (2009), J Nutr 139(8). DVs based on FDA 2020 reference values.

Nutrient Interactions in This Food

Nutrients in this food that enhance or compete with each other during absorption.

✔ Synergies — nutrients that help each other

Dietary Fat + Vitamin A●●●

Vitamin A is fat-soluble and requires dietary fat for absorption. Adding fat to a meal significantly increases beta-carotene and retinol absorption.

Ribaya-Mercado et al., Am J Clin Nutr, 2007

Vitamin B12 + Folate●●

Vitamin B12 and folate are metabolically interdependent. B12 is needed to convert methyltetrahydrofolate back to tetrahydrofolate, enabling folate to participate in DNA synthesis.

Green et al., Nat Rev Dis Primers, 2017

Vitamin B6 + Magnesium●●

Vitamin B6 may enhance intracellular magnesium accumulation. Combined supplementation has shown greater benefits for stress and anxiety than magnesium alone.

Pouteau et al., PLoS One, 2018

Vitamin C + Selenium●●

Vitamin C supports selenium's antioxidant function by maintaining the glutathione system in its reduced state.

Rayman, Lancet, 2012

Protein + Calcium●●

Moderate protein intake enhances calcium absorption and supports bone health. The acid-ash hypothesis suggesting protein harms bones has been largely disproven.

Kerstetter et al., J Clin Endocrinol Metab, 2005

⚠ Antagonisms — nutrients that compete

Zinc vs Copper●●●

High zinc intake induces metallothionein in enterocytes, which traps copper and blocks its absorption. Prolonged high-dose zinc can cause copper deficiency.

Prasad et al., JAMA, 1978; Fosmire, Am J Clin Nutr, 1990

Calcium vs Magnesium●●

Very high calcium intake can reduce magnesium absorption by competing for shared intestinal transport pathways. A calcium:magnesium ratio above 2.6:1 may impair magnesium status.

Rosanoff et al., Nutr Rev, 2012

Potassium vs Sodium●●

High potassium intake promotes renal sodium excretion and attenuates the blood pressure–raising effect of sodium. A higher K:Na ratio is associated with lower cardiovascular risk.

Aburto et al., BMJ, 2013

Calcium vs Zinc●●

High calcium intake may modestly reduce zinc absorption, though the effect is smaller than calcium's impact on iron. Phytate amplifies this interaction.

Wood & Zheng, Am J Clin Nutr, 1997

Folate vs Vitamin B12●●

High folate intake can mask vitamin B12 deficiency by correcting the megaloblastic anaemia while allowing neurological damage to progress undetected.

Mills et al., Am J Clin Nutr, 2003

Amino Acid Profile

Essential amino acid composition compared to the WHO/FAO adult reference pattern. The Amino Acid Score indicates protein quality — 100 means all essential amino acid requirements are met.

156
Amino Acid Score
Complete
Met + Cys
Lowest Scoring
18
Amino Acids Tracked

✓ Complete protein — all essential amino acids meet or exceed WHO reference levels.

All Amino Acids (18)
Amino Acidg / 100gmg / g protein
Tryptophan0.4814.1
Threonine1.545.1
Isoleucine2.160.5
Leucine3.498.0
Lysine2.779.3
Methionine0.8625.1
Cystine0.329.2
Phenylalanine1.748.3
Tyrosine1.748.3
Valine2.366.9
Arginine1.236.2
Histidine0.9327.1
Alanine1.234.5
Aspartic Acid2.675.9
Glutamic Acid7.2209.4
Glycine0.7321.2
Proline3.396.9
Serine1.954.4

Fatty Acid Profile

Breakdown of fat types per 100g. A healthy fat profile favours unsaturated fats (mono + poly) and a balanced omega-3 to omega-6 ratio.

3.6g
Saturated
1.7g
Monounsaturated
0.21g
Polyunsaturated
Omega Fatty Acids
Linoleic acid (18:2 n-6)0.13 g

How Cooking Changes Nutrients

Estimated percentage of each nutrient retained after cooking, based on USDA retention factors for the “Dried Fruits” food category. Values of 100% mean no loss; lower values indicate nutrients lost to heat, water, or oxidation.

Key insights
Vitamin C loses up to 49% when dried. Baked retains 80%.
Folate loses up to 50% when sautéed. Dried retains 61%.

Source: USDA Table of Nutrient Retention Factors, Release 6 (2007). Retention values are category-level averages — actual retention depends on cooking time, temperature, and water volume.

USDA Retention Factors

Insulin Response

The Insulin Index (II) measures the actual insulin response to food on a scale where white bread = 100. Unlike the Glycemic Index (which only measures blood sugar), the II captures the full hormonal response — including the effect of protein and fat on insulin secretion. This is why high-protein foods like meat and dairy can have significant insulin scores despite having low or zero GI values.

69
Insulin Index
High Insulin Response
Insulin Index Scale 69
0 Low ≤30 Mod ≤60 High ≤100 120
Macro Model ●● Estimated from macronutrient composition (R²=0.49)

Source: Holt et al. 1997; Bao et al. 2016; Bell 2014

Environmental Impact

Environmental footprint per kilogram of food produced. Data represents the global average for the “Milk” category.

3.1
kg CO₂e / kg
Moderate Impact
8.9
m² land / kg
Land Use
628
L water / kg
Water Use
27.2
g SO₂e / kg
Acidification
How this compares (GHG emissions)
Potatoes (0.5)Chicken (9.9)Beef (99.5)
Greenhouse Gas Emissions3.1 kg CO₂e / kg
Land Use8.9 m² / kg
Water Use628 L / kg
Eutrophication10.7 g PO₄e / kg
Acidification27.2 g SO₂e / kg
⚠️ Important context about this data
  • Global averages: These figures are production-weighted averages from a meta-analysis of ~38,700 farms across 119 countries (Poore & Nemecek, 2018). Actual impact varies enormously by farming method, geography, and supply chain.
  • System boundary: Cradle-to-retail only — does not include consumer transport, home cooking energy, or food waste.
  • Soil carbon not included: This data does not account for soil carbon sequestration. Some argue that well-managed regenerative grazing partially offsets ruminant emissions; however, full lifecycle accounting — including methane, land-use change, and the opportunity cost of using land for grazing vs. reforestation — typically makes the net footprint of ruminant meat higher, not lower. This is especially relevant in temperate grassland regions like Ireland.
  • Not gospel: This data is informational and illustrative. It is useful for understanding relative magnitudes, but should not be treated as precise measurements for any individual product or farm.

Source: Poore & Nemecek (2018), Science 360(6392). Meta-analysis of ~38,700 farms, 119 countries, 46 product categories.

Global Supply: Milk

Top 10 countries by per capita supply of the “Milk” food group (kcal/capita/day, 2023). This is food group–level data from FAO Food Balance Sheets, not specific to this individual food.

1.
Estonia
632
2.
Montenegro
607
3.
Netherlands (Kingdom of the)
596
4.
Albania
572
5.
Belgium
543
6.
Turkmenistan
539
7.
Finland
533
8.
Uzbekistan
532
9.
Denmark
530
10.
Germany
528

Global Supply Trend (1961–2023)

+25%
1961: 142 kcal2023: 177 kcal

Source: FAO Food Balance Sheets (2023). Supply = production + imports − exports − waste, converted to kcal/capita/day.

Frequently Asked Questions

How many calories are in Milk, buttermilk, dried?

Milk, buttermilk, dried contains 387 kcal per 100 grams, making it a calorie-dense food. The energy comes from 34.3g of protein (35% of calories), 5.8g of fat (13%), and 49.0g of carbohydrates (51%). Carbohydrates are the primary energy source.

What is Milk, buttermilk, dried most nutritious for?

The standout nutrient in Milk, buttermilk, dried is Vitamin B12, providing 3.8 µg per 100g (159% of the Daily Value). It is also a notable source of Phosphorus (133% DV). Our database tracks 82 individual nutrients for this food, allowing detailed comparison across vitamins, minerals, amino acids, and fatty acids.

Is Milk, buttermilk, dried high in protein?

With 34.3g per 100 grams, Milk, buttermilk, dried is a high-protein food. Protein accounts for 35% of its total calories, making it suitable for diets focused on protein intake.

How much fiber is in Milk, buttermilk, dried?

Milk, buttermilk, dried contains no dietary fiber. This is typical for animal-derived food. Pair with plant-based foods to ensure adequate fiber intake.

What is the insulin index of Milk, buttermilk, dried?

Milk, buttermilk, dried has a high insulin response (II: 69) (estimated from macronutrient composition) on the insulin index scale (white bread = 100). Foods with high insulin scores stimulate significant insulin release, which may be relevant for blood sugar management. Note that the insulin index can differ substantially from the glycemic index — dairy products and high-protein foods often have higher insulin responses than their GI would suggest.