Pie fillings, blueberry, canned
Pie fillings, blueberry, canned is a sweet/confection at 181 calories per 100g. It is a good source of Carbohydrate, providing 34% of the Daily Value per 100g. This sweet/confection is virtually fat-free. Sweets and confections are primarily energy-dense foods. Some varieties, such as dark chocolate, contain notable amounts of minerals and bioactive compounds. Our database tracks 64 nutrients for this food, plus insulin index, environmental footprint data.
Top Nutrients
Data for 64 of 150 tracked nutrients
Nutrient Fingerprint
How this food scores across key nutrient categories, as a percentage of the daily recommended value per 100 g. Based on USDA DRIs for adults.
Complete Nutrient Profile
Macronutrients 9
| Nutrient | Per 100g | Unit | Per Serving | % DV |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Water SR | 54.7 | g | — | 2% |
| Calories SR | 181 | kcal | — | — |
| Energy (kJ) SR | 757 | kj | — | — |
| Protein SR | 0.41 | g | — | 1% |
| Total Fat SR | 0.20 | g | — | — |
| Carbohydrate SR | 44.4 | g | — | 34% |
| Fiber SR | 2.6 | g | — | 7% |
| Total Sugars SR | 37.8 | g | — | — |
| Ash SR | 0.35 | g | — | — |
Minerals 11
| Nutrient | Per 100g | Unit | Per Serving | % DV |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium SR | 27.0 | mg | — | 3% |
| Iron SR | 0.80 | mg | — | 10% |
| Magnesium SR | 10.0 | mg | — | 2% |
| Phosphorus SR | 12.0 | mg | — | 2% |
| Potassium SR | 115 | mg | — | 3% |
| Sodium SR | 12.0 | mg | — | 1% |
| Zinc SR | 0.10 | mg | — | 1% |
| Copper SR | 0.11 | mg | — | 12% |
| Manganese SR | 0.21 | mg | — | 9% |
| Selenium SR | 0.40 | µg | — | 1% |
| Fluoride SR | 4.4 | µg | — | 0% |
Vitamins 24
| Nutrient | Per 100g | Unit | Per Serving | % DV |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin A (RAE) SR | 22.0 | µg | — | 2% |
| Vitamin A (IU) SR | 1.0 | IU | — | — |
| Retinol SR | 0 | µg | — | — |
| Beta-Carotene SR | 13.0 | µg | — | — |
| Alpha-Carotene SR | 0 | µg | — | — |
| Beta-Cryptoxanthin SR | 0 | µg | — | — |
| Lycopene SR | 0 | µg | — | — |
| Lutein + Zeaxanthin SR | 33.0 | µg | — | — |
| Vitamin C SR | 0.70 | mg | — | 1% |
| Vitamin D SR | 0 | µg | — | — |
| Vitamin D (IU) SR | 0 | IU | — | — |
| Vitamin E SR | 0.23 | mg | — | 2% |
| Vitamin K1 SR | 3.9 | µg | — | 3% |
| Thiamin (B1) SR | 0.02 | mg | — | 2% |
| Riboflavin (B2) SR | 0.03 | mg | — | 3% |
| Niacin (B3) SR | 0.09 | mg | — | 1% |
| Pantothenic Acid (B5) SR | 0.09 | mg | — | 2% |
| Vitamin B6 SR | 0.03 | mg | — | 2% |
| Folate SR | 1.0 | µg | — | 0% |
| Folic Acid SR | 0 | µg | — | — |
| Folate (food) SR | 1.0 | µg | — | — |
| Folate (DFE) SR | 1.0 | µg | — | — |
| Vitamin B12 SR | 0 | µg | — | — |
| Choline SR | 3.8 | mg | — | 1% |
Fatty Acids 7
| Nutrient | Per 100g | Unit | Per Serving | % DV |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Saturated Fat SR | 0 | g | — | — |
| Monounsaturated Fat SR | 0 | g | — | — |
| Polyunsaturated Fat SR | 0 | g | — | — |
| Cholesterol SR | 0 | mg | — | — |
| Omega-3 EPA SR | 0 | g | — | — |
| Omega-3 DPA SR | 0 | g | — | — |
| Omega-3 DHA SR | 0 | g | — | — |
Individual Fatty Acids 10
| Nutrient | Per 100g | Unit | Per Serving | % DV |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Butyric Acid (4:0) SR | 0 | g | — | — |
| Caproic Acid (6:0) SR | 0 | g | — | — |
| Caprylic Acid (8:0) SR | 0 | g | — | — |
| Capric Acid (10:0) SR | 0 | g | — | — |
| Lauric Acid (12:0) SR | 0 | g | — | — |
| Myristic Acid (14:0) SR | 0 | g | — | — |
| Palmitic Acid (16:0) SR | 0 | g | — | — |
| Stearic Acid (18:0) SR | 0 | g | — | — |
| Linoleic Acid (18:2) SR | 0 | g | — | — |
| Linolenic Acid (18:3) SR | 0 | g | — | — |
Nutrient Density Score
The NRF9.3 score measures overall nutritional quality per 100 kcal. It rewards 9 nutrients to encourage (protein, fiber, vitamins A, C, E, calcium, iron, magnesium, potassium) and penalizes 3 to limit (saturated fat, added sugars, sodium). Higher is better; negative scores indicate the food is high in limit nutrients relative to its beneficial content.
NRF9.3 index: Fulgoni et al. (2009), J Nutr 139(8). DVs based on FDA 2020 reference values.
Nutrient Interactions in This Food
Nutrients in this food that enhance or compete with each other during absorption.
⚠ Antagonisms — nutrients that compete
Phytates in high-fibre foods (whole grains, legumes) bind non-heme iron and reduce its bioavailability. Soaking, sprouting, and fermentation reduce phytate content.
Hurrell & Egli, Int J Vitam Nutr Res, 2010
Manganese and iron share the DMT1 transporter and compete for absorption. High iron status reduces manganese absorption and vice versa.
Erikson et al., Pharmacol Ther, 2007
Insulin Response
The Insulin Index (II) measures the actual insulin response to food on a scale where white bread = 100. Unlike the Glycemic Index (which only measures blood sugar), the II captures the full hormonal response — including the effect of protein and fat on insulin secretion. This is why high-protein foods like meat and dairy can have significant insulin scores despite having low or zero GI values.
Source: Holt et al. 1997; Bao et al. 2016; Bell 2014
Environmental Impact
Environmental footprint per kilogram of food produced. Data represents the global average for the “Berries & Grapes” category.
- Global averages: These figures are production-weighted averages from a meta-analysis of ~38,700 farms across 119 countries (Poore & Nemecek, 2018). Actual impact varies enormously by farming method, geography, and supply chain.
- System boundary: Cradle-to-retail only — does not include consumer transport, home cooking energy, or food waste.
- Soil carbon not included: This data does not account for soil carbon sequestration. Some argue that well-managed regenerative grazing partially offsets ruminant emissions; however, full lifecycle accounting — including methane, land-use change, and the opportunity cost of using land for grazing vs. reforestation — typically makes the net footprint of ruminant meat higher, not lower. This is especially relevant in temperate grassland regions like Ireland.
- Not gospel: This data is informational and illustrative. It is useful for understanding relative magnitudes, but should not be treated as precise measurements for any individual product or farm.
Source: Poore & Nemecek (2018), Science 360(6392). Meta-analysis of ~38,700 farms, 119 countries, 46 product categories.
Global Supply: Sugar & Sweeteners
Top 10 countries by per capita supply of the “Sugar & Sweeteners” food group (kcal/capita/day, 2023). This is food group–level data from FAO Food Balance Sheets, not specific to this individual food.
Global Supply Trend (1961–2023)
+26%Source: FAO Food Balance Sheets (2023). Supply = production + imports − exports − waste, converted to kcal/capita/day.
Related Foods in Sweets
Frequently Asked Questions
How many calories are in Pie fillings, blueberry, canned?
Pie fillings, blueberry, canned contains 181 kcal per 100 grams, making it a moderate-calorie food. The energy comes from 0.41g of protein (1% of calories), 0.20g of fat (1%), and 44.4g of carbohydrates (98%). Carbohydrates are the primary energy source.
What is Pie fillings, blueberry, canned most nutritious for?
The standout nutrient in Pie fillings, blueberry, canned is Carbohydrate, providing 44.4 g per 100g (34% of the Daily Value). It is also a notable source of Copper (12% DV). Our database tracks 64 individual nutrients for this food, allowing detailed comparison across vitamins, minerals, amino acids, and fatty acids.
Is Pie fillings, blueberry, canned high in protein?
At 0.41g per 100 grams, Pie fillings, blueberry, canned is not a significant source of protein. Pair with protein-rich foods like legumes, meat, fish, or dairy to meet daily protein needs.
How much fiber is in Pie fillings, blueberry, canned?
Pie fillings, blueberry, canned contains 2.6g of fiber per 100 grams, which is a small amount. To increase fiber intake, consider pairing with high-fiber foods such as legumes, whole grains, or vegetables.
What is the insulin index of Pie fillings, blueberry, canned?
Pie fillings, blueberry, canned has a high insulin response (II: 69) (estimated from macronutrient composition) on the insulin index scale (white bread = 100). Foods with high insulin scores stimulate significant insulin release, which may be relevant for blood sugar management. Note that the insulin index can differ substantially from the glycemic index — dairy products and high-protein foods often have higher insulin responses than their GI would suggest.