Skip to main content

Candies, M&M MARS Pretzel Chocolate Candies

Sweets Per 100 g · Per 100g serving

Candies, M&M MARS Pretzel Chocolate Candies is a sweet/confection, containing 447 calories per 100g. It is an excellent source of Carbohydrate, providing 72.94 g (56% of the Daily Value) per 100g serving. Sweets and confections are primarily energy-dense foods. Some varieties, such as dark chocolate, contain notable amounts of minerals and bioactive compounds. Our database tracks 74 nutrients for this food, plus glycemic index, environmental footprint data.

447
Calories
kcal
5.0
Protein
g
15.0
Fat
g
72.9
Carbs
g
2.5
Fiber
g

Top Nutrients

💪
Carbohydrate
72.9 g
56% DV
💎
Sodium
475 mg
32% DV
💎
Copper
0.27 mg
30% DV

Data for 74 of 150 tracked nutrients

Nutrient Fingerprint

How this food scores across key nutrient categories, as a percentage of the daily recommended value per 100 g. Based on USDA DRIs for adults.

Complete Nutrient Profile

Macronutrients 9
NutrientPer 100gUnitPer Serving% DV
Water SR4.8g
0%
Calories SR447kcal
Energy (kJ) SR1,869kj
Protein SR5.0g
9%
Total Fat SR15.0g
Carbohydrate SR72.9g
56%
Fiber SR2.5g
7%
Total Sugars SR50.0g
Ash SR2.2g
Minerals 11
NutrientPer 100gUnitPer Serving% DV
Calcium SR50.0mg
5%
Iron SR0.90mg
11%
Magnesium SR39.0mg
10%
Phosphorus SR135mg
19%
Potassium SR253mg
7%
Sodium SR475mg
32%
Zinc SR1.2mg
11%
Copper SR0.27mg
30%
Manganese SR0.30mg
13%
Selenium SR3.3µg
6%
Fluoride SR2.1µg
0%
Vitamins 33
NutrientPer 100gUnitPer Serving% DV
Vitamin A (RAE) SR116µg
13%
Vitamin A (IU) SR34.0IU
Retinol SR34.0µg
Beta-Carotene SR3.0µg
Alpha-Carotene SR0µg
Beta-Cryptoxanthin SR0µg
Lycopene SR0µg
Lutein + Zeaxanthin SR4.0µg
Vitamin C SR0mg
Vitamin D SR0µg
Vitamin D (IU) SR0IU
Vitamin D3 SR0µg
Vitamin E SR0.37mg
2%
Beta-Tocopherol SR0mg
Gamma-Tocopherol SR0.37mg
Delta-Tocopherol SR0mg
Alpha-Tocotrienol SR0mg
Beta-Tocotrienol SR0mg
Gamma-Tocotrienol SR0mg
Delta-Tocotrienol SR0mg
Vitamin K1 SR4.7µg
4%
Vitamin K2 (MK-4) SR0.10µg
Thiamin (B1) SR0.08mg
7%
Riboflavin (B2) SR0.20mg
16%
Niacin (B3) SR0.43mg
3%
Pantothenic Acid (B5) SR0.31mg
6%
Vitamin B6 SR0.03mg
2%
Folate SR15.0µg
4%
Folic Acid SR6.0µg
Folate (food) SR9.0µg
Folate (DFE) SR19.0µg
Vitamin B12 SR0.45µg
19%
Choline SR29.3mg
5%
Fatty Acids 8
NutrientPer 100gUnitPer Serving% DV
Saturated Fat SR9.0g
Monounsaturated Fat SR3.3g
Polyunsaturated Fat SR1.0g
Trans Fat SR0g
Cholesterol SR13.0mg
Omega-3 EPA SR0g
Omega-3 DPA SR0g
Omega-3 DHA SR0g
Individual Fatty Acids 10
NutrientPer 100gUnitPer Serving% DV
Butyric Acid (4:0) SR0.16g
Caproic Acid (6:0) SR0.05g
Caprylic Acid (8:0) SR0.08g
Capric Acid (10:0) SR0.15g
Lauric Acid (12:0) SR0.54g
Myristic Acid (14:0) SR0.69g
Palmitic Acid (16:0) SR3.8g
Stearic Acid (18:0) SR3.4g
Linoleic Acid (18:2) SR0.91g
5%
Linolenic Acid (18:3) SR0.10g
Other 3
NutrientPer 100gUnitPer Serving% DV
Caffeine SR11.0mg
Theobromine SR126mg
Alcohol SR0g

Nutrient Density Score

The NRF9.3 score measures overall nutritional quality per 100 kcal. It rewards 9 nutrients to encourage (protein, fiber, vitamins A, C, E, calcium, iron, magnesium, potassium) and penalizes 3 to limit (saturated fat, added sugars, sodium). Higher is better; negative scores indicate the food is high in limit nutrients relative to its beneficial content.

-2
NRF9.3 Score
Poor · per 100 kcal
Poor (<0) Moderate Good Excellent (100+)

NRF9.3 index: Fulgoni et al. (2009), J Nutr 139(8). DVs based on FDA 2020 reference values.

Nutrient Interactions in This Food

Nutrients in this food that enhance or compete with each other during absorption.

✔ Synergies — nutrients that help each other

Dietary Fat + Vitamin A●●●

Vitamin A is fat-soluble and requires dietary fat for absorption. Adding fat to a meal significantly increases beta-carotene and retinol absorption.

Ribaya-Mercado et al., Am J Clin Nutr, 2007

Protein + Calcium●●

Moderate protein intake enhances calcium absorption and supports bone health. The acid-ash hypothesis suggesting protein harms bones has been largely disproven.

Kerstetter et al., J Clin Endocrinol Metab, 2005

⚠ Antagonisms — nutrients that compete

Calcium vs Iron●●●

Calcium inhibits both heme and non-heme iron absorption when consumed in the same meal. The effect is dose-dependent, with significant inhibition at 300+ mg calcium.

Hallberg et al., Am J Clin Nutr, 1991

Zinc vs Copper●●●

High zinc intake induces metallothionein in enterocytes, which traps copper and blocks its absorption. Prolonged high-dose zinc can cause copper deficiency.

Prasad et al., JAMA, 1978; Fosmire, Am J Clin Nutr, 1990

Zinc vs Iron●●

Zinc and non-heme iron compete for the same intestinal transporter (DMT1). High doses of one can reduce absorption of the other when taken simultaneously.

Rossander-Hulten et al., Am J Clin Nutr, 1991

Calcium vs Magnesium●●

Very high calcium intake can reduce magnesium absorption by competing for shared intestinal transport pathways. A calcium:magnesium ratio above 2.6:1 may impair magnesium status.

Rosanoff et al., Nutr Rev, 2012

Fiber vs Iron●●

Phytates in high-fibre foods (whole grains, legumes) bind non-heme iron and reduce its bioavailability. Soaking, sprouting, and fermentation reduce phytate content.

Hurrell & Egli, Int J Vitam Nutr Res, 2010

Fatty Acid Profile

Breakdown of fat types per 100g. A healthy fat profile favours unsaturated fats (mono + poly) and a balanced omega-3 to omega-6 ratio.

9.0g
Saturated
3.3g
Monounsaturated
1.0g
Polyunsaturated
Omega Fatty Acids
Linoleic acid (18:2 n-6)0.91 g

Glycemic Impact

The Glycemic Index (GI) measures how quickly a food raises blood sugar on a 0–100 scale. Glycemic Load (GL) accounts for typical serving size. Low GI < 55, Medium 56–69, High ≥ 70.

83
Glycemic Index
High GI
16
Glycemic Load
Medium GL (per 30g)
GI Scale 83
0 Low <55 Med High ≥70 100

GI data matched from: “Pretzels” · ●●● high confidence

Source: International Tables of Glycemic Index (Sydney University, 2021)

Environmental Impact

Environmental footprint per kilogram of food produced. Data represents the global average for the “Cane Sugar” category.

3.2
kg CO₂e / kg
Moderate Impact
2.0
m² land / kg
Land Use
620
L water / kg
Water Use
5.2
g SO₂e / kg
Acidification
How this compares (GHG emissions)
Potatoes (0.5)Chicken (9.9)Beef (99.5)
Greenhouse Gas Emissions3.2 kg CO₂e / kg
Land Use2.0 m² / kg
Water Use620 L / kg
Eutrophication17.1 g PO₄e / kg
Acidification5.2 g SO₂e / kg
⚠️ Important context about this data
  • Global averages: These figures are production-weighted averages from a meta-analysis of ~38,700 farms across 119 countries (Poore & Nemecek, 2018). Actual impact varies enormously by farming method, geography, and supply chain.
  • System boundary: Cradle-to-retail only — does not include consumer transport, home cooking energy, or food waste.
  • Soil carbon not included: This data does not account for soil carbon sequestration. Some argue that well-managed regenerative grazing partially offsets ruminant emissions; however, full lifecycle accounting — including methane, land-use change, and the opportunity cost of using land for grazing vs. reforestation — typically makes the net footprint of ruminant meat higher, not lower. This is especially relevant in temperate grassland regions like Ireland.
  • Not gospel: This data is informational and illustrative. It is useful for understanding relative magnitudes, but should not be treated as precise measurements for any individual product or farm.

Source: Poore & Nemecek (2018), Science 360(6392). Meta-analysis of ~38,700 farms, 119 countries, 46 product categories.

Global Supply: Sugar & Sweeteners

Top 10 countries by per capita supply of the “Sugar & Sweeteners” food group (kcal/capita/day, 2023). This is food group–level data from FAO Food Balance Sheets, not specific to this individual food.

1.
Guatemala
594
2.
United States of America
569
3.
Belgium
564
4.
Poland
555
5.
Tuvalu
528
6.
Colombia
520
7.
New Zealand
499
8.
Belgium-Luxembourg
493
9.
Hungary
493
10.
Republic of Korea
489

Global Supply Trend (1961–2023)

+26%
1961: 230 kcal2023: 289 kcal

Source: FAO Food Balance Sheets (2023). Supply = production + imports − exports − waste, converted to kcal/capita/day.

Frequently Asked Questions

How many calories are in Candies, M&M MARS Pretzel Chocolate Candies?

Candies, M&M MARS Pretzel Chocolate Candies contains 447 kcal per 100 grams, making it a calorie-dense food. The energy comes from 5.0g of protein (4% of calories), 15.0g of fat (30%), and 72.9g of carbohydrates (65%). Carbohydrates are the primary energy source.

What is Candies, M&M MARS Pretzel Chocolate Candies most nutritious for?

The standout nutrient in Candies, M&M MARS Pretzel Chocolate Candies is Carbohydrate, providing 72.9 g per 100g (56% of the Daily Value). It is also a notable source of Sodium (32% DV). Our database tracks 74 individual nutrients for this food, allowing detailed comparison across vitamins, minerals, amino acids, and fatty acids.

Is Candies, M&M MARS Pretzel Chocolate Candies high in protein?

Candies, M&M MARS Pretzel Chocolate Candies contains 5.0g of protein per 100 grams. While not a high-protein food, it can contribute to daily protein needs as part of a varied diet.

How much fiber is in Candies, M&M MARS Pretzel Chocolate Candies?

Candies, M&M MARS Pretzel Chocolate Candies contains 2.5g of fiber per 100 grams, which is a small amount. To increase fiber intake, consider pairing with high-fiber foods such as legumes, whole grains, or vegetables.

What is the glycemic index of Candies, M&M MARS Pretzel Chocolate Candies?

Candies, M&M MARS Pretzel Chocolate Candies has a glycemic index of 83, which is classified as high (≥70). High-GI foods cause a rapid spike in blood sugar. Pairing with protein, fat, or fiber can help moderate the glycemic response. The glycemic load, which accounts for typical serving size, provides additional context for real-world blood sugar impact.