Skip to main content

Sorghum flour, whole-grain

Grains Per 100 g · Per 100g serving
Data sources: 45 AFCD 45 SR Legacy

Sorghum flour, whole-grain is a grain, containing 350 calories per 100g. It is an excellent source of Manganese and Carbohydrate, providing 55% and 51% of the Daily Value respectively. This grain is rich in dietary fiber. Grains are a primary source of carbohydrates, B vitamins, and minerals. Whole grains retain the bran and germ, providing substantially more fiber and micronutrients than refined grains. Our database tracks 90 nutrients for this food, plus insulin index, environmental footprint data.

350
Calories
kcal
8.2
Protein
g
3.6
Fat
g
65.8
Carbs
g
8.6
Fiber
g

Top Nutrients

💎
Manganese
1.3 mg
55% DV
💪
Carbohydrate
65.8 g
51% DV
💎
Phosphorus
273 mg
39% DV

Data for 90 of 150 tracked nutrients

Nutrient Fingerprint

How this food scores across key nutrient categories, as a percentage of the daily recommended value per 100 g. Based on USDA DRIs for adults.

Complete Nutrient Profile

Macronutrients 10
NutrientPer 100gUnitPer Serving% DV
Water AFCD12.2g
0%
Calories AFCD350kcal
Energy (kJ) SR1,503kj
Protein AFCD8.2g
15%
Total Fat AFCD3.6g
Carbohydrate AFCD65.8g
51%
Fiber AFCD8.6g
23%
Total Sugars SR1.9g
Starch AFCD64.7g
Ash AFCD1.3g
Minerals 10
NutrientPer 100gUnitPer Serving% DV
Calcium AFCD10.0mg
1%
Iron AFCD2.2mg
28%
Magnesium AFCD124mg
31%
Phosphorus AFCD273mg
39%
Potassium AFCD363mg
11%
Sodium AFCD1.0mg
0%
Zinc AFCD1.4mg
12%
Copper SR0.25mg
28%
Manganese SR1.3mg
55%
Selenium AFCD15.5µg
28%
Vitamins 29
NutrientPer 100gUnitPer Serving% DV
Vitamin A (RAE) AFCD0µg
Vitamin A (IU) SR0IU
Retinol AFCD0µg
Beta-Carotene AFCD0µg
Vitamin C AFCD0mg
Vitamin D (IU) AFCD0IU
Vitamin D2 AFCD0µg
Vitamin D3 AFCD0µg
Vitamin E AFCD0.40mg
3%
Beta-Tocopherol SR0.02mg
Gamma-Tocopherol SR1.9mg
Delta-Tocopherol SR0.03mg
Alpha-Tocotrienol SR0.11mg
Beta-Tocotrienol SR0mg
Gamma-Tocotrienol SR0.04mg
Delta-Tocotrienol SR0.01mg
Vitamin K1 SR6.4µg
5%
Vitamin K1 (dihydro) SR0.20µg
Vitamin K2 (MK-4) SR0µg
Thiamin (B1) AFCD0.40mg
33%
Riboflavin (B2) AFCD0.03mg
2%
Niacin (B3) AFCD4.0mg
25%
Pantothenic Acid (B5) SR0.54mg
11%
Vitamin B6 AFCD0.10mg
8%
Folate AFCD20.0µg
5%
Folic Acid SR0µg
Folate (food) AFCD20.0µg
Folate (DFE) AFCD20.0µg
Vitamin B12 AFCD0µg
Fatty Acids 9
NutrientPer 100gUnitPer Serving% DV
Saturated Fat AFCD0.36g
Monounsaturated Fat AFCD0.86g
Polyunsaturated Fat AFCD1.3g
Trans Fat AFCD0g
Cholesterol AFCD0mg
Omega-3 ALA AFCD0.05g
3%
Omega-3 EPA AFCD0g
Omega-3 DPA AFCD0g
Omega-3 DHA AFCD0g
Individual Fatty Acids 12
NutrientPer 100gUnitPer Serving% DV
Butyric Acid (4:0) SR0.007g
Caproic Acid (6:0) SR0g
Caprylic Acid (8:0) SR0g
Capric Acid (10:0) SR0.007g
Lauric Acid (12:0) SR0.001g
Myristic Acid (14:0) SR0.002g
Palmitic Acid (16:0) SR0.45g
Stearic Acid (18:0) SR0.04g
Linoleic Acid (18:2) AFCD1.2g
7%
Omega-6 LA SR1.3g
Omega-6 GLA SR0g
Linolenic Acid (18:3) SR0.06g
Amino Acids 18
NutrientPer 100gUnitPer Serving% DV
Tryptophan AFCD0.10g
Threonine SR0.31g
Isoleucine SR0.31g
Leucine SR1.1g
Lysine SR0.17g
Methionine SR0.14g
Cystine SR0.17g
Phenylalanine SR0.44g
Tyrosine SR0.23g
Valine SR0.39g
Arginine SR0.33g
Histidine SR0.17g
Alanine SR0.76g
Aspartic Acid SR0.56g
Glutamic Acid SR1.7g
Glycine SR0.31g
Proline SR0.65g
Serine SR0.41g
Other 2
NutrientPer 100gUnitPer Serving% DV
Caffeine AFCD0mg
Alcohol AFCD0g

Nutrient Density Score

The NRF9.3 score measures overall nutritional quality per 100 kcal. It rewards 9 nutrients to encourage (protein, fiber, vitamins A, C, E, calcium, iron, magnesium, potassium) and penalizes 3 to limit (saturated fat, added sugars, sodium). Higher is better; negative scores indicate the food is high in limit nutrients relative to its beneficial content.

28
NRF9.3 Score
Moderate · per 100 kcal
Poor (<0) Moderate Good Excellent (100+)

NRF9.3 index: Fulgoni et al. (2009), J Nutr 139(8). DVs based on FDA 2020 reference values.

Nutrient Interactions in This Food

Nutrients in this food that enhance or compete with each other during absorption.

✔ Synergies — nutrients that help each other

Dietary Fat + Vitamin K●●●

Vitamin K is fat-soluble. Absorption increases significantly when consumed with dietary fat, particularly for phylloquinone (K1) from plant sources.

Gijsbers et al., Br J Nutr, 1996

Vitamin B6 + Magnesium●●

Vitamin B6 may enhance intracellular magnesium accumulation. Combined supplementation has shown greater benefits for stress and anxiety than magnesium alone.

Pouteau et al., PLoS One, 2018

Vitamin B6 + Folate●●

Vitamin B6 is a cofactor in folate-dependent one-carbon metabolism. Together with B12, these three nutrients regulate homocysteine levels.

Selhub, J Nutr Health Aging, 2002

⚠ Antagonisms — nutrients that compete

Zinc vs Copper●●●

High zinc intake induces metallothionein in enterocytes, which traps copper and blocks its absorption. Prolonged high-dose zinc can cause copper deficiency.

Prasad et al., JAMA, 1978; Fosmire, Am J Clin Nutr, 1990

Zinc vs Iron●●

Zinc and non-heme iron compete for the same intestinal transporter (DMT1). High doses of one can reduce absorption of the other when taken simultaneously.

Rossander-Hulten et al., Am J Clin Nutr, 1991

Fiber vs Iron●●

Phytates in high-fibre foods (whole grains, legumes) bind non-heme iron and reduce its bioavailability. Soaking, sprouting, and fermentation reduce phytate content.

Hurrell & Egli, Int J Vitam Nutr Res, 2010

Fiber vs Zinc●●

Phytates in fibre-rich foods chelate zinc, reducing its bioavailability by up to 50% in high-phytate diets. This is a major concern in plant-based diets.

Sandstrom, Food Nutr Res, 1997

Manganese vs Iron●●

Manganese and iron share the DMT1 transporter and compete for absorption. High iron status reduces manganese absorption and vice versa.

Erikson et al., Pharmacol Ther, 2007

Amino Acid Profile

Essential amino acid composition compared to the WHO/FAO adult reference pattern. The Amino Acid Score indicates protein quality — 100 means all essential amino acid requirements are met.

47
Amino Acid Score
Low
Lysine
Limiting Amino Acid
18
Amino Acids Tracked

Tip: The limiting amino acid is Lysine. Pair with legumes, dairy, and soy for a complete amino acid profile.

All Amino Acids (18)
Amino Acidg / 100gmg / g protein
Tryptophan0.1012.6
Threonine0.3138.0
Isoleucine0.3137.7
Leucine1.1132.3
Lysine0.1721.2
Methionine0.1417.7
Cystine0.1720.1
Phenylalanine0.4453.8
Tyrosine0.2327.4
Valine0.3947.2
Arginine0.3340.2
Histidine0.1720.4
Alanine0.7692.4
Aspartic Acid0.5667.8
Glutamic Acid1.7212.3
Glycine0.3138.2
Proline0.6579.4
Serine0.4150.1

Fatty Acid Profile

Breakdown of fat types per 100g. A healthy fat profile favours unsaturated fats (mono + poly) and a balanced omega-3 to omega-6 ratio.

0.36g
Saturated
0.86g
Monounsaturated
1.3g
Polyunsaturated
1:26.6
Omega-3 : Omega-6 Ratio
Omega-6 dominant — ideal range is 1:1 to 1:4
Omega Fatty Acids
ALA (18:3 n-3)0.05 g
Linoleic acid (18:2 n-6)1.3 g

How Cooking Changes Nutrients

Estimated percentage of each nutrient retained after cooking, based on USDA retention factors for the “Flour & Meal” food category. Values of 100% mean no loss; lower values indicate nutrients lost to heat, water, or oxidation.

Key insights
Folate loses up to 35% when sautéed. Toasted retains 85%.
Vitamin B6 loses up to 10% when steamed. Toasted retains 100%.

Source: USDA Table of Nutrient Retention Factors, Release 6 (2007). Retention values are category-level averages — actual retention depends on cooking time, temperature, and water volume.

USDA Retention Factors

Insulin Response

The Insulin Index (II) measures the actual insulin response to food on a scale where white bread = 100. Unlike the Glycemic Index (which only measures blood sugar), the II captures the full hormonal response — including the effect of protein and fat on insulin secretion. This is why high-protein foods like meat and dairy can have significant insulin scores despite having low or zero GI values.

58
Insulin Index
Moderate Insulin Response
Insulin Index Scale 58
0 Low ≤30 Mod ≤60 High ≤100 120
Macro Model ●● Estimated from macronutrient composition (R²=0.49)

Source: Holt et al. 1997; Bao et al. 2016; Bell 2014

Environmental Impact

Environmental footprint per kilogram of food produced. Data represents the global average for the “Maize (Meal)” category.

1.7
kg CO₂e / kg
Low Impact
2.9
m² land / kg
Land Use
216
L water / kg
Water Use
6.9
g SO₂e / kg
Acidification
How this compares (GHG emissions)
Potatoes (0.5)Chicken (9.9)Beef (99.5)
Greenhouse Gas Emissions1.7 kg CO₂e / kg
Land Use2.9 m² / kg
Water Use216 L / kg
Eutrophication4.0 g PO₄e / kg
Acidification6.9 g SO₂e / kg
⚠️ Important context about this data
  • Global averages: These figures are production-weighted averages from a meta-analysis of ~38,700 farms across 119 countries (Poore & Nemecek, 2018). Actual impact varies enormously by farming method, geography, and supply chain.
  • System boundary: Cradle-to-retail only — does not include consumer transport, home cooking energy, or food waste.
  • Soil carbon not included: This data does not account for soil carbon sequestration. Some argue that well-managed regenerative grazing partially offsets ruminant emissions; however, full lifecycle accounting — including methane, land-use change, and the opportunity cost of using land for grazing vs. reforestation — typically makes the net footprint of ruminant meat higher, not lower. This is especially relevant in temperate grassland regions like Ireland.
  • Not gospel: This data is informational and illustrative. It is useful for understanding relative magnitudes, but should not be treated as precise measurements for any individual product or farm.

Source: Poore & Nemecek (2018), Science 360(6392). Meta-analysis of ~38,700 farms, 119 countries, 46 product categories.

Global Supply: Cereals

Top 10 countries by per capita supply of the “Cereals” food group (kcal/capita/day, 2023). This is food group–level data from FAO Food Balance Sheets, not specific to this individual food.

1.
Egypt
1962
2.
Bhutan
1927
3.
Serbia
1888
4.
Morocco
1876
5.
Mali
1862
6.
Ethiopia
1829
7.
Philippines
1774
8.
Bangladesh
1756
9.
Myanmar
1738
10.
Nepal
1679

Global Supply Trend (1961–2023)

+8%
1961: 1030 kcal2023: 1108 kcal

Source: FAO Food Balance Sheets (2023). Supply = production + imports − exports − waste, converted to kcal/capita/day.

Frequently Asked Questions

How many calories are in Sorghum flour, whole-grain?

Sorghum flour, whole-grain contains 350 kcal per 100 grams, making it a calorie-dense food. The energy comes from 8.2g of protein (9% of calories), 3.6g of fat (9%), and 65.8g of carbohydrates (75%). Carbohydrates are the primary energy source.

What is Sorghum flour, whole-grain most nutritious for?

The standout nutrient in Sorghum flour, whole-grain is Manganese, providing 1.3 mg per 100g (55% of the Daily Value). It is also a notable source of Carbohydrate (51% DV). Our database tracks 90 individual nutrients for this food, allowing detailed comparison across vitamins, minerals, amino acids, and fatty acids.

Is Sorghum flour, whole-grain high in protein?

Sorghum flour, whole-grain contains 8.2g of protein per 100 grams. While not a high-protein food, it can contribute to daily protein needs as part of a varied diet.

How much fiber is in Sorghum flour, whole-grain?

Yes, Sorghum flour, whole-grain is rich in dietary fiber with 8.6g per 100 grams. The daily recommended intake is 25-38g, so a serving contributes meaningfully toward that goal. Dietary fiber supports digestive health and is associated with reduced risk of cardiovascular disease.

What is the insulin index of Sorghum flour, whole-grain?

Sorghum flour, whole-grain has a moderate insulin response (II: 58) (estimated from macronutrient composition) on the insulin index scale (white bread = 100). This is a typical insulin response for most mixed foods. Note that the insulin index can differ substantially from the glycemic index — dairy products and high-protein foods often have higher insulin responses than their GI would suggest.