Skip to main content

Barley, pearled, raw

Grains Per 100 g · Per 100g serving
Data sources: 73 AFCD 15 SR Legacy
Also available: Cooked

Barley, pearled, raw is a grain, containing 340 calories per 100g. It provides useful amounts of Manganese and Carbohydrate, contributing 48% and 47% of the Daily Value per 100g. This grain is rich in dietary fiber. Grains are a primary source of carbohydrates, B vitamins, and minerals. Whole grains retain the bran and germ, providing substantially more fiber and micronutrients than refined grains. Our database tracks 88 nutrients for this food, plus glycemic index, insulin index, environmental footprint data.

340
Calories
kcal
9.9
Protein
g
1.2
Fat
g
60.6
Carbs
g
13.1
Fiber
g

Top Nutrients

💎
Manganese
1.1 mg
48% DV
💪
Carbohydrate
60.6 g
47% DV
💎
Copper
0.40 mg
44% DV

Data for 88 of 150 tracked nutrients

Nutrient Fingerprint

How this food scores across key nutrient categories, as a percentage of the daily recommended value per 100 g. Based on USDA DRIs for adults.

Complete Nutrient Profile

Macronutrients 10
NutrientPer 100gUnitPer Serving% DV
Water AFCD9.8g
0%
Calories AFCD340kcal
Energy (kJ) SR1,473kj
Protein AFCD9.9g
18%
Total Fat SR1.2g
Carbohydrate AFCD60.6g
47%
Fiber AFCD13.1g
34%
Total Sugars AFCD1.0g
Starch AFCD59.6g
Ash AFCD1.2g
Minerals 11
NutrientPer 100gUnitPer Serving% DV
Calcium AFCD28.0mg
3%
Iron AFCD2.2mg
28%
Magnesium AFCD95.0mg
24%
Phosphorus AFCD192mg
27%
Potassium AFCD350mg
10%
Sodium AFCD10.0mg
1%
Zinc AFCD1.2mg
11%
Copper AFCD0.40mg
44%
Manganese AFCD1.1mg
48%
Selenium AFCD17.0µg
31%
Fluoride AFCD0µg
Vitamins 27
NutrientPer 100gUnitPer Serving% DV
Vitamin A (RAE) AFCD0µg
Vitamin A (IU) SR1.0IU
Retinol AFCD0µg
Beta-Carotene AFCD0µg
Alpha-Carotene AFCD0µg
Beta-Cryptoxanthin AFCD0µg
Lycopene SR0µg
Lutein + Zeaxanthin SR160µg
Vitamin C AFCD0mg
Vitamin D SR0µg
Vitamin D (IU) AFCD0IU
Vitamin D2 AFCD0µg
Vitamin D3 AFCD0µg
Vitamin E AFCD0.70mg
5%
Vitamin K1 SR2.2µg
2%
Thiamin (B1) AFCD0.17mg
14%
Riboflavin (B2) AFCD0.02mg
2%
Niacin (B3) AFCD6.6mg
41%
Pantothenic Acid (B5) AFCD0.19mg
4%
Vitamin B6 AFCD0.20mg
15%
Biotin (B7) AFCD12.0µg
40%
Folate AFCD23.0µg
6%
Folic Acid SR0µg
Folate (food) AFCD23.0µg
Folate (DFE) AFCD23.0µg
Vitamin B12 AFCD0µg
Choline SR37.8mg
7%
Fatty Acids 9
NutrientPer 100gUnitPer Serving% DV
Saturated Fat AFCD0.50g
Monounsaturated Fat AFCD0.36g
Polyunsaturated Fat AFCD1.4g
Trans Fat AFCD0g
Cholesterol AFCD0mg
Omega-3 ALA AFCD0.08g
5%
Omega-3 EPA AFCD0g
Omega-3 DPA AFCD0g
Omega-3 DHA AFCD0g
Individual Fatty Acids 10
NutrientPer 100gUnitPer Serving% DV
Butyric Acid (4:0) SR0g
Caproic Acid (6:0) SR0g
Caprylic Acid (8:0) AFCD0.01g
Capric Acid (10:0) AFCD0.45g
Lauric Acid (12:0) AFCD0.04g
Myristic Acid (14:0) AFCD0g
Palmitic Acid (16:0) SR0.21g
Stearic Acid (18:0) SR0.008g
Linoleic Acid (18:2) AFCD1.3g
8%
Linolenic Acid (18:3) SR0.06g
Amino Acids 18
NutrientPer 100gUnitPer Serving% DV
Tryptophan AFCD0.13g
Threonine AFCD0.53g
Isoleucine AFCD0.44g
Leucine AFCD0.81g
Lysine AFCD0.41g
Methionine AFCD0.19g
Cystine AFCD0.27g
Phenylalanine AFCD0.59g
Tyrosine AFCD0.37g
Valine AFCD0.65g
Arginine AFCD0.60g
Histidine AFCD0.29g
Alanine AFCD0.47g
Aspartic Acid AFCD0.68g
Glutamic Acid AFCD2.7g
Glycine AFCD0.46g
Proline AFCD1.1g
Serine AFCD0.54g
Other 3
NutrientPer 100gUnitPer Serving% DV
Caffeine AFCD0mg
Theobromine SR0mg
Alcohol AFCD0g

Nutrient Density Score

The NRF9.3 score measures overall nutritional quality per 100 kcal. It rewards 9 nutrients to encourage (protein, fiber, vitamins A, C, E, calcium, iron, magnesium, potassium) and penalizes 3 to limit (saturated fat, added sugars, sodium). Higher is better; negative scores indicate the food is high in limit nutrients relative to its beneficial content.

33
NRF9.3 Score
Moderate · per 100 kcal
Poor (<0) Moderate Good Excellent (100+)

NRF9.3 index: Fulgoni et al. (2009), J Nutr 139(8). DVs based on FDA 2020 reference values.

Nutrient Interactions in This Food

Nutrients in this food that enhance or compete with each other during absorption.

✔ Synergies — nutrients that help each other

Vitamin B6 + Magnesium●●

Vitamin B6 may enhance intracellular magnesium accumulation. Combined supplementation has shown greater benefits for stress and anxiety than magnesium alone.

Pouteau et al., PLoS One, 2018

Vitamin B6 + Folate●●

Vitamin B6 is a cofactor in folate-dependent one-carbon metabolism. Together with B12, these three nutrients regulate homocysteine levels.

Selhub, J Nutr Health Aging, 2002

⚠ Antagonisms — nutrients that compete

Zinc vs Copper●●●

High zinc intake induces metallothionein in enterocytes, which traps copper and blocks its absorption. Prolonged high-dose zinc can cause copper deficiency.

Prasad et al., JAMA, 1978; Fosmire, Am J Clin Nutr, 1990

Zinc vs Iron●●

Zinc and non-heme iron compete for the same intestinal transporter (DMT1). High doses of one can reduce absorption of the other when taken simultaneously.

Rossander-Hulten et al., Am J Clin Nutr, 1991

Fiber vs Iron●●

Phytates in high-fibre foods (whole grains, legumes) bind non-heme iron and reduce its bioavailability. Soaking, sprouting, and fermentation reduce phytate content.

Hurrell & Egli, Int J Vitam Nutr Res, 2010

Fiber vs Zinc●●

Phytates in fibre-rich foods chelate zinc, reducing its bioavailability by up to 50% in high-phytate diets. This is a major concern in plant-based diets.

Sandstrom, Food Nutr Res, 1997

Manganese vs Iron●●

Manganese and iron share the DMT1 transporter and compete for absorption. High iron status reduces manganese absorption and vice versa.

Erikson et al., Pharmacol Ther, 2007

Amino Acid Profile

Essential amino acid composition compared to the WHO/FAO adult reference pattern. The Amino Acid Score indicates protein quality — 100 means all essential amino acid requirements are met.

92
Amino Acid Score
Good
Lysine
Limiting Amino Acid
18
Amino Acids Tracked

Tip: The limiting amino acid is Lysine. Pair with legumes, dairy, and soy for a complete amino acid profile.

All Amino Acids (18)
Amino Acidg / 100gmg / g protein
Tryptophan0.1313.3
Threonine0.5353.5
Isoleucine0.4444.7
Leucine0.8182.1
Lysine0.4141.5
Methionine0.1919.6
Cystine0.2727.6
Phenylalanine0.5959.7
Tyrosine0.3737.8
Valine0.6565.9
Arginine0.6060.5
Histidine0.2929.0
Alanine0.4747.5
Aspartic Acid0.6869.0
Glutamic Acid2.7272.0
Glycine0.4646.5
Proline1.1115.6
Serine0.5454.2

Fatty Acid Profile

Breakdown of fat types per 100g. A healthy fat profile favours unsaturated fats (mono + poly) and a balanced omega-3 to omega-6 ratio.

0.50g
Saturated
0.36g
Monounsaturated
1.4g
Polyunsaturated
1:16.1
Omega-3 : Omega-6 Ratio
Omega-6 dominant — ideal range is 1:1 to 1:4
Omega Fatty Acids
ALA (18:3 n-3)0.08 g
Linoleic acid (18:2 n-6)1.3 g

How Cooking Changes Nutrients

Estimated percentage of each nutrient retained after cooking, based on USDA retention factors for the “Other Vegetables” food category. Values of 100% mean no loss; lower values indicate nutrients lost to heat, water, or oxidation.

Key insights
Folate loses up to 31% when boiled (drained). Boiled (water used) retains 85%.
Choline loses up to 10% when fried. Boiled (drained) retains 100%.

Source: USDA Table of Nutrient Retention Factors, Release 6 (2007). Retention values are category-level averages — actual retention depends on cooking time, temperature, and water volume.

USDA Retention Factors

Glycemic & Insulin Response

The Glycemic Index (GI) measures how quickly a food raises blood sugar on a 0–100 scale. The Insulin Index (II) measures the insulin response directly, which can differ from GI — notably, dairy and high-protein foods often trigger a higher insulin response than their GI suggests. White bread = 100 for both scales.

28
Glycemic Index
Low GI
12
Glycemic Load
Medium GL (per 150g)
GI Scale 28
0 Low <55 Med High ≥70 100

GI data matched from: “Barley, pearled, boiled” · ●●● high confidence

26
Insulin Index
Low Insulin Response
Insulin Index Scale 26
0 Low ≤30 Mod ≤60 High ≤100 120
GI Model ●● Estimated via GI-based regression (R²=0.78)

Source: International Tables of Glycemic Index (Sydney University, 2021) · Holt et al. 1997; Bao et al. 2016; Bell 2014

Environmental Impact

Environmental footprint per kilogram of food produced. Data represents the global average for the “Maize (Meal)” category.

1.7
kg CO₂e / kg
Low Impact
2.9
m² land / kg
Land Use
216
L water / kg
Water Use
6.9
g SO₂e / kg
Acidification
How this compares (GHG emissions)
Potatoes (0.5)Chicken (9.9)Beef (99.5)
Greenhouse Gas Emissions1.7 kg CO₂e / kg
Land Use2.9 m² / kg
Water Use216 L / kg
Eutrophication4.0 g PO₄e / kg
Acidification6.9 g SO₂e / kg
⚠️ Important context about this data
  • Global averages: These figures are production-weighted averages from a meta-analysis of ~38,700 farms across 119 countries (Poore & Nemecek, 2018). Actual impact varies enormously by farming method, geography, and supply chain.
  • System boundary: Cradle-to-retail only — does not include consumer transport, home cooking energy, or food waste.
  • Soil carbon not included: This data does not account for soil carbon sequestration. Some argue that well-managed regenerative grazing partially offsets ruminant emissions; however, full lifecycle accounting — including methane, land-use change, and the opportunity cost of using land for grazing vs. reforestation — typically makes the net footprint of ruminant meat higher, not lower. This is especially relevant in temperate grassland regions like Ireland.
  • Not gospel: This data is informational and illustrative. It is useful for understanding relative magnitudes, but should not be treated as precise measurements for any individual product or farm.

Source: Poore & Nemecek (2018), Science 360(6392). Meta-analysis of ~38,700 farms, 119 countries, 46 product categories.

Global Supply: Cereals

Top 10 countries by per capita supply of the “Cereals” food group (kcal/capita/day, 2023). This is food group–level data from FAO Food Balance Sheets, not specific to this individual food.

1.
Egypt
1962
2.
Bhutan
1927
3.
Serbia
1888
4.
Morocco
1876
5.
Mali
1862
6.
Ethiopia
1829
7.
Philippines
1774
8.
Bangladesh
1756
9.
Myanmar
1738
10.
Nepal
1679

Global Supply Trend (1961–2023)

+8%
1961: 1030 kcal2023: 1108 kcal

Source: FAO Food Balance Sheets (2023). Supply = production + imports − exports − waste, converted to kcal/capita/day.

Frequently Asked Questions

How many calories are in Barley, pearled, raw?

Barley, pearled, raw contains 340 kcal per 100 grams, making it a calorie-dense food. The energy comes from 9.9g of protein (12% of calories), 1.2g of fat (3%), and 60.6g of carbohydrates (71%). Carbohydrates are the primary energy source.

What is Barley, pearled, raw most nutritious for?

The standout nutrient in Barley, pearled, raw is Manganese, providing 1.1 mg per 100g (48% of the Daily Value). It is also a notable source of Carbohydrate (47% DV). Our database tracks 88 individual nutrients for this food, allowing detailed comparison across vitamins, minerals, amino acids, and fatty acids.

Is Barley, pearled, raw high in protein?

Barley, pearled, raw contains 9.9g of protein per 100 grams. While not a high-protein food, it can contribute to daily protein needs as part of a varied diet.

How much fiber is in Barley, pearled, raw?

Yes, Barley, pearled, raw is rich in dietary fiber with 13.1g per 100 grams. The daily recommended intake is 25-38g, so a serving contributes meaningfully toward that goal. Dietary fiber supports digestive health and is associated with reduced risk of cardiovascular disease.

What is the glycemic index of Barley, pearled, raw?

Barley, pearled, raw has a glycemic index of 28, which is classified as low (≤55). Low-GI foods cause a slower, more gradual rise in blood sugar levels, which may be beneficial for blood sugar management. The glycemic load, which accounts for typical serving size, provides additional context for real-world blood sugar impact.

What is the insulin index of Barley, pearled, raw?

Barley, pearled, raw has a low insulin response (II: 26) (estimated from macronutrient composition) on the insulin index scale (white bread = 100). This means it triggers relatively little insulin secretion, which may be relevant for those managing insulin sensitivity or following low-insulin dietary strategies. Note that the insulin index can differ substantially from the glycemic index — dairy products and high-protein foods often have higher insulin responses than their GI would suggest.