Skip to main content

Spices, oregano, dried

Spices Per 100 g · Per 100g serving
Data sources: 45 AFCD 49 SR Legacy

Spices, oregano, dried is a herb/spice at 262 calories per 100g. It is an excellent source of Vitamin K1, Iron and Manganese, providing 518%, 460% and 217% of the Daily Value respectively. This herb/spice is rich in dietary fiber. Herbs and spices contain concentrated bioactive compounds and micronutrients. While consumed in small quantities, many provide meaningful amounts of antioxidants and phytochemicals. Our database tracks 94 nutrients for this food, plus insulin index, polyphenol profile, environmental footprint data.

262
Calories
kcal
9.0
Protein
g
4.3
Fat
g
68.9
Carbs
g
42.5
Fiber
g

Top Nutrients

☀️
Vitamin K1
622 µg
518% DV
💎
Iron
36.8 mg
460% DV
💎
Manganese
5.0 mg
217% DV

Data for 94 of 150 tracked nutrients

Nutrient Fingerprint

How this food scores across key nutrient categories, as a percentage of the daily recommended value per 100 g. Based on USDA DRIs for adults.

Complete Nutrient Profile

Macronutrients 10
NutrientPer 100gUnitPer Serving% DV
Water AFCD9.9g
0%
Calories AFCD262kcal
Energy (kJ) SR1,107kj
Protein AFCD9.0g
16%
Total Fat AFCD4.3g
Carbohydrate SR68.9g
53%
Fiber AFCD42.5g
112%
Total Sugars AFCD4.1g
Starch AFCD22.3g
Ash AFCD7.9g
Minerals 10
NutrientPer 100gUnitPer Serving% DV
Calcium AFCD1,597mg
160%
Iron AFCD36.8mg
460%
Magnesium AFCD270mg
68%
Phosphorus AFCD148mg
21%
Potassium AFCD1,260mg
37%
Sodium AFCD25.0mg
2%
Zinc AFCD2.7mg
24%
Copper SR0.63mg
70%
Manganese SR5.0mg
217%
Selenium AFCD4.5µg
8%
Vitamins 31
NutrientPer 100gUnitPer Serving% DV
Vitamin A (RAE) AFCD168µg
19%
Vitamin A (IU) SR85.0IU
Retinol AFCD0µg
Beta-Carotene AFCD1,007µg
Alpha-Carotene SR20.0µg
Beta-Cryptoxanthin SR7.0µg
Lycopene SR0µg
Lutein + Zeaxanthin SR1,895µg
Vitamin C AFCD2.0mg
2%
Vitamin D SR0µg
Vitamin D (IU) AFCD0IU
Vitamin D2 AFCD0µg
Vitamin D3 AFCD0µg
Vitamin E AFCD18.3mg
122%
Beta-Tocopherol SR0mg
Gamma-Tocopherol SR24.4mg
Delta-Tocopherol SR0.92mg
Vitamin K1 SR622µg
518%
Vitamin K2 (MK-4) SR0µg
Thiamin (B1) AFCD0.18mg
15%
Riboflavin (B2) AFCD0.53mg
41%
Niacin (B3) AFCD4.6mg
29%
Pantothenic Acid (B5) SR0.92mg
18%
Vitamin B6 AFCD1.0mg
80%
Folate AFCD237µg
59%
Folic Acid SR0µg
Folate (food) AFCD237µg
Folate (DFE) AFCD237µg
Vitamin B12 AFCD0µg
Choline SR32.3mg
6%
Betaine SR9.8mg
Fatty Acids 10
NutrientPer 100gUnitPer Serving% DV
Saturated Fat AFCD1.5g
Monounsaturated Fat AFCD0.67g
Polyunsaturated Fat AFCD1.3g
Trans Fat AFCD0g
Cholesterol AFCD0mg
Phytosterols SR203mg
Omega-3 ALA AFCD0.58g
36%
Omega-3 EPA AFCD0g
Omega-3 DPA AFCD0g
Omega-3 DHA AFCD0g
Individual Fatty Acids 11
NutrientPer 100gUnitPer Serving% DV
Butyric Acid (4:0) SR0g
Caproic Acid (6:0) SR0g
Caprylic Acid (8:0) SR0g
Capric Acid (10:0) SR0.004g
Lauric Acid (12:0) SR0.25g
Myristic Acid (14:0) SR0.004g
Palmitic Acid (16:0) SR0.79g
Stearic Acid (18:0) SR0.51g
Linoleic Acid (18:2) AFCD0.70g
4%
Omega-6 GLA SR0g
Linolenic Acid (18:3) SR0.62g
Amino Acids 19
NutrientPer 100gUnitPer Serving% DV
Tryptophan AFCD0.20g
Threonine SR0.32g
Isoleucine SR0.44g
Leucine SR0.78g
Lysine SR0.50g
Methionine SR0.13g
Cystine SR0.11g
Phenylalanine SR0.45g
Tyrosine SR0.30g
Valine SR0.58g
Arginine SR0.45g
Histidine SR0.14g
Alanine SR0.50g
Aspartic Acid SR1.0g
Glutamic Acid SR0.97g
Glycine SR0.52g
Proline SR1.7g
Serine SR0.31g
Hydroxyproline SR0g
Other 3
NutrientPer 100gUnitPer Serving% DV
Caffeine AFCD0mg
Theobromine SR0mg
Alcohol AFCD0g

Nutrient Density Score

The NRF9.3 score measures overall nutritional quality per 100 kcal. It rewards 9 nutrients to encourage (protein, fiber, vitamins A, C, E, calcium, iron, magnesium, potassium) and penalizes 3 to limit (saturated fat, added sugars, sodium). Higher is better; negative scores indicate the food is high in limit nutrients relative to its beneficial content.

276
NRF9.3 Score
Excellent · per 100 kcal
Poor (<0) Moderate Good Excellent (100+)

NRF9.3 index: Fulgoni et al. (2009), J Nutr 139(8). DVs based on FDA 2020 reference values.

Nutrient Interactions in This Food

Nutrients in this food that enhance or compete with each other during absorption.

✔ Synergies — nutrients that help each other

Dietary Fat + Vitamin A●●●

Vitamin A is fat-soluble and requires dietary fat for absorption. Adding fat to a meal significantly increases beta-carotene and retinol absorption.

Ribaya-Mercado et al., Am J Clin Nutr, 2007

Dietary Fat + Vitamin E●●●

Vitamin E is fat-soluble and absorbed alongside dietary fats via micelle formation in the small intestine. Low-fat diets reduce vitamin E absorption.

Traber, Free Radic Biol Med, 2007

Dietary Fat + Vitamin K●●●

Vitamin K is fat-soluble. Absorption increases significantly when consumed with dietary fat, particularly for phylloquinone (K1) from plant sources.

Gijsbers et al., Br J Nutr, 1996

Vitamin K + Calcium●●

Vitamin K activates osteocalcin and matrix GLA protein, which direct calcium into bones and away from soft tissues (arteries). Works synergistically with vitamin D.

Kidd, Altern Med Rev, 2010

Selenium + Vitamin E●●

Selenium (via glutathione peroxidase) and vitamin E work as complementary antioxidants. Selenium reduces peroxides while vitamin E prevents lipid peroxidation in membranes.

Combs, Br J Nutr, 2001

⚠ Antagonisms — nutrients that compete

Calcium vs Iron●●●

Calcium inhibits both heme and non-heme iron absorption when consumed in the same meal. The effect is dose-dependent, with significant inhibition at 300+ mg calcium.

Hallberg et al., Am J Clin Nutr, 1991

Zinc vs Copper●●●

High zinc intake induces metallothionein in enterocytes, which traps copper and blocks its absorption. Prolonged high-dose zinc can cause copper deficiency.

Prasad et al., JAMA, 1978; Fosmire, Am J Clin Nutr, 1990

Zinc vs Iron●●

Zinc and non-heme iron compete for the same intestinal transporter (DMT1). High doses of one can reduce absorption of the other when taken simultaneously.

Rossander-Hulten et al., Am J Clin Nutr, 1991

Calcium vs Magnesium●●

Very high calcium intake can reduce magnesium absorption by competing for shared intestinal transport pathways. A calcium:magnesium ratio above 2.6:1 may impair magnesium status.

Rosanoff et al., Nutr Rev, 2012

Fiber vs Iron●●

Phytates in high-fibre foods (whole grains, legumes) bind non-heme iron and reduce its bioavailability. Soaking, sprouting, and fermentation reduce phytate content.

Hurrell & Egli, Int J Vitam Nutr Res, 2010

Amino Acid Profile

Essential amino acid composition compared to the WHO/FAO adult reference pattern. The Amino Acid Score indicates protein quality — 100 means all essential amino acid requirements are met.

107
Amino Acid Score
Complete
Histidine
Lowest Scoring
18
Amino Acids Tracked

✓ Complete protein — all essential amino acids meet or exceed WHO reference levels.

All Amino Acids (18)
Amino Acidg / 100gmg / g protein
Tryptophan0.2022.6
Threonine0.3235.8
Isoleucine0.4449.0
Leucine0.7886.7
Lysine0.5055.6
Methionine0.1314.1
Cystine0.1112.2
Phenylalanine0.4549.9
Tyrosine0.3033.0
Valine0.5865.0
Arginine0.4549.9
Histidine0.1416.0
Alanine0.5055.6
Aspartic Acid1.0112.1
Glutamic Acid0.97108.3
Glycine0.5257.4
Proline1.7190.2
Serine0.3134.9

Fatty Acid Profile

Breakdown of fat types per 100g. A healthy fat profile favours unsaturated fats (mono + poly) and a balanced omega-3 to omega-6 ratio.

1.5g
Saturated
0.67g
Monounsaturated
1.3g
Polyunsaturated
1:1.2
Omega-3 : Omega-6 Ratio
Omega-6 dominant — ideal range is 1:1 to 1:4
Omega Fatty Acids
ALA (18:3 n-3)0.58 g
Linoleic acid (18:2 n-6)0.70 g

Insulin Response

The Insulin Index (II) measures the actual insulin response to food on a scale where white bread = 100. Unlike the Glycemic Index (which only measures blood sugar), the II captures the full hormonal response — including the effect of protein and fat on insulin secretion. This is why high-protein foods like meat and dairy can have significant insulin scores despite having low or zero GI values.

76
Insulin Index
High Insulin Response
Insulin Index Scale 76
0 Low ≤30 Mod ≤60 High ≤100 120
Macro Model ●● Estimated from macronutrient composition (R²=0.49)

Source: Holt et al. 1997; Bao et al. 2016; Bell 2014

Polyphenols & Bioactive Compounds

Polyphenols are plant-derived compounds with antioxidant properties. Higher intake is associated with reduced cardiovascular risk and improved gut health.

2319
Total Polyphenols
mg per 100g · Very_High
2
Polyphenol Classes
identified in this food
Flavonoids1273 mg55%
Phenolic Acids1046 mg45%

Processing Impact on Polyphenols

How common cooking methods affect polyphenol content in herbs & spices. Retention % is relative to the raw/unprocessed food.

Best Method
Drying
88% retained
Most Loss
Boiling
82% retained
☀️
Drying88%
Air-drying concentrates polyphenols on a per-weight basis; some t≈2041 mg
🍳
Stir-frying88%
Brief heat exposure with oil; used in small amounts, minimal degr≈2041 mg
🫕
Boiling82%
Used in small quantities; water extraction releases some bound ph≈1902 mg

Health Associations

Research-backed associations for the polyphenol classes found in this food. Evidence strength rated from systematic reviews and meta-analyses.

💜
↓ Cardiovascular disease riskModerate
Flavonoids: Meta-analyses of prospective cohorts show 10-20% lower CVD risk with higher flav
💜
↓ Blood pressureModerate
Flavonoids: RCTs show modest systolic BP reductions (2-5 mmHg) with flavanol-rich cocoa and
🔵
↑ Antioxidant capacityStrong
Phenolic Acids: Chlorogenic acid (coffee) and ferulic acid (grains) show consistent antioxidant
🔵
↑ Glucose metabolismModerate
Phenolic Acids: Chlorogenic acid may slow glucose absorption and improve insulin sensitivity
⚠ Most evidence is from observational studies and in vitro research. Randomized controlled trials are limited. Individual responses vary based on gut microbiome, genetics, and overall diet. Associations do not prove causation.

Polyphenol data matched from: “Mexican oregano, dried” · ●●● high confidence

Source: Phenol-Explorer 3.6 (INRA, 2023) · Retention: Rothwell 2013, Palermo 2014 · Health: Del Bo' 2019, Grosso 2017

Environmental Impact

Environmental footprint per kilogram of food produced. Data represents the global average for the “Other Vegetables” category.

0.53
kg CO₂e / kg
Very Low Impact
0.37
m² land / kg
Land Use
103
L water / kg
Water Use
3.2
g SO₂e / kg
Acidification
How this compares (GHG emissions)
Potatoes (0.5)Chicken (9.9)Beef (99.5)
Greenhouse Gas Emissions0.53 kg CO₂e / kg
Land Use0.37 m² / kg
Water Use103 L / kg
Eutrophication4.9 g PO₄e / kg
Acidification3.2 g SO₂e / kg
⚠️ Important context about this data
  • Global averages: These figures are production-weighted averages from a meta-analysis of ~38,700 farms across 119 countries (Poore & Nemecek, 2018). Actual impact varies enormously by farming method, geography, and supply chain.
  • System boundary: Cradle-to-retail only — does not include consumer transport, home cooking energy, or food waste.
  • Soil carbon not included: This data does not account for soil carbon sequestration. Some argue that well-managed regenerative grazing partially offsets ruminant emissions; however, full lifecycle accounting — including methane, land-use change, and the opportunity cost of using land for grazing vs. reforestation — typically makes the net footprint of ruminant meat higher, not lower. This is especially relevant in temperate grassland regions like Ireland.
  • Not gospel: This data is informational and illustrative. It is useful for understanding relative magnitudes, but should not be treated as precise measurements for any individual product or farm.

Source: Poore & Nemecek (2018), Science 360(6392). Meta-analysis of ~38,700 farms, 119 countries, 46 product categories.

Global Supply: Spices

Top 10 countries by per capita supply of the “Spices” food group (kcal/capita/day, 2023). This is food group–level data from FAO Food Balance Sheets, not specific to this individual food.

1.
Guyana
107
2.
Bosnia and Herzegovina
67
3.
Jamaica
63
4.
Saint Vincent and the Grenadines
59
5.
Dominica
58
6.
Türkiye
58
7.
Bhutan
58
8.
Benin
57
9.
Thailand
55
10.
Bangladesh
54

Global Supply Trend (1961–2023)

+117%
1961: 6 kcal2023: 13 kcal

Source: FAO Food Balance Sheets (2023). Supply = production + imports − exports − waste, converted to kcal/capita/day.

Frequently Asked Questions

How many calories are in Spices, oregano, dried?

Spices, oregano, dried contains 262 kcal per 100 grams, making it a calorie-dense food. The energy comes from 9.0g of protein (14% of calories), 4.3g of fat (15%), and 68.9g of carbohydrates (105%). Carbohydrates are the primary energy source.

What is Spices, oregano, dried most nutritious for?

The standout nutrient in Spices, oregano, dried is Vitamin K1, providing 622 µg per 100g (518% of the Daily Value). It is also a notable source of Iron (460% DV). Our database tracks 94 individual nutrients for this food, allowing detailed comparison across vitamins, minerals, amino acids, and fatty acids.

Is Spices, oregano, dried high in protein?

Spices, oregano, dried contains 9.0g of protein per 100 grams. While not a high-protein food, it can contribute to daily protein needs as part of a varied diet.

How much fiber is in Spices, oregano, dried?

Yes, Spices, oregano, dried is rich in dietary fiber with 42.5g per 100 grams. The daily recommended intake is 25-38g, so a serving contributes meaningfully toward that goal. Dietary fiber supports digestive health and is associated with reduced risk of cardiovascular disease.

Does Spices, oregano, dried contain polyphenols?

Yes, Spices, oregano, dried contains approximately 2,319 mg of polyphenols per 100g, primarily from the very high class. Polyphenols are bioactive plant compounds associated with antioxidant properties. Their retention can vary with cooking and processing methods — see the processing impact section above for details.

What is the insulin index of Spices, oregano, dried?

Spices, oregano, dried has a high insulin response (II: 76) (estimated from macronutrient composition) on the insulin index scale (white bread = 100). Foods with high insulin scores stimulate significant insulin release, which may be relevant for blood sugar management. Note that the insulin index can differ substantially from the glycemic index — dairy products and high-protein foods often have higher insulin responses than their GI would suggest.