Skip to main content

Tomato products, canned, paste, without salt added (Includes foods for USDA's Food Distribution Program)

Vegetables Per 100 g · Per 100g serving
Data sources: 18 Foundation 34 AFCD 41 SR Legacy

Tomato products, canned, paste, without salt added (Includes foods for USDA's Food Distribution Program) is a vegetable at 88.5 calories per 100g. It is an excellent source of Vitamin B6, providing 2.03 mg (156% of the Daily Value) per 100g serving. This vegetable is a useful source of fiber, virtually fat-free. Vegetables provide essential vitamins, minerals, and dietary fiber with relatively few calories. They are a cornerstone of virtually every dietary guideline worldwide. Our database tracks 93 nutrients for this food, plus insulin index, environmental footprint data.

88.5
Calories
kcal
4.2
Protein
g
0.73
Fat
g
20.2
Carbs
g
4.7
Fiber
g

Top Nutrients

☀️
Vitamin B6
2.0 mg
156% DV
💎
Iron
3.2 mg
40% DV
💎
Copper
0.29 mg
33% DV

Data for 93 of 150 tracked nutrients

Nutrient Fingerprint

How this food scores across key nutrient categories, as a percentage of the daily recommended value per 100 g. Based on USDA DRIs for adults.

Complete Nutrient Profile

Macronutrients 11
NutrientPer 100gUnitPer Serving% DV
Water Foundation71.9g
2%
Calories Foundation88.5kcal
Energy (kJ) SR343kj
Protein Foundation4.2g
8%
Total Fat Foundation0.73g
Carbohydrate Foundation20.2g
16%
Fiber Foundation4.7g
12%
Total Sugars Foundation11.7g
Total Sugars AFCD9.9g
Starch AFCD0.50g
Ash Foundation2.9g
Minerals 10
NutrientPer 100gUnitPer Serving% DV
Calcium Foundation36.9mg
4%
Iron Foundation3.2mg
40%
Magnesium Foundation49.6mg
12%
Phosphorus Foundation91.2mg
13%
Potassium Foundation972mg
29%
Sodium Foundation61.1mg
4%
Zinc Foundation0.51mg
5%
Copper Foundation0.29mg
33%
Manganese Foundation0.33mg
14%
Selenium AFCD0.90µg
2%
Vitamins 31
NutrientPer 100gUnitPer Serving% DV
Vitamin A (RAE) AFCD220µg
24%
Vitamin A (IU) SR76.0IU
Retinol AFCD0µg
Beta-Carotene AFCD1,320µg
Alpha-Carotene AFCD0µg
Beta-Cryptoxanthin AFCD0µg
Lycopene SR28,764µg
Lutein + Zeaxanthin SR0µg
Vitamin C Foundation18.4mg
20%
Vitamin D SR0µg
Vitamin D (IU) AFCD0IU
Vitamin D2 AFCD0µg
Vitamin D3 AFCD0µg
Vitamin E AFCD3.4mg
23%
Beta-Tocopherol SR0mg
Gamma-Tocopherol SR0.52mg
Delta-Tocopherol SR0mg
Vitamin K1 SR11.4µg
10%
Vitamin K2 (MK-4) SR0µg
Thiamin (B1) AFCD0.12mg
10%
Riboflavin (B2) AFCD0.08mg
6%
Niacin (B3) AFCD2.8mg
18%
Pantothenic Acid (B5) SR0.14mg
3%
Vitamin B6 AFCD2.0mg
156%
Folate AFCD12.0µg
3%
Folic Acid SR0µg
Folate (food) AFCD12.0µg
Folate (DFE) AFCD12.0µg
Vitamin B12 AFCD0µg
Choline SR38.5mg
7%
Betaine SR0.40mg
Fatty Acids 9
NutrientPer 100gUnitPer Serving% DV
Saturated Fat AFCD0g
Monounsaturated Fat AFCD0g
Polyunsaturated Fat AFCD0g
Trans Fat AFCD0g
Cholesterol AFCD0mg
Omega-3 ALA AFCD0g
Omega-3 EPA AFCD0g
Omega-3 DPA AFCD0g
Omega-3 DHA AFCD0g
Individual Fatty Acids 10
NutrientPer 100gUnitPer Serving% DV
Butyric Acid (4:0) SR0g
Caproic Acid (6:0) SR0g
Caprylic Acid (8:0) SR0g
Capric Acid (10:0) SR0g
Lauric Acid (12:0) SR0g
Myristic Acid (14:0) SR0.001g
Palmitic Acid (16:0) SR0.08g
Stearic Acid (18:0) SR0.02g
Linoleic Acid (18:2) AFCD0g
Linolenic Acid (18:3) SR0.007g
Amino Acids 18
NutrientPer 100gUnitPer Serving% DV
Tryptophan AFCD0.02g
Threonine SR0.13g
Isoleucine SR0.09g
Leucine SR0.12g
Lysine SR0.13g
Methionine SR0.03g
Cystine SR0.05g
Phenylalanine SR0.13g
Tyrosine SR0.07g
Valine SR0.09g
Arginine SR0.10g
Histidine SR0.07g
Alanine SR0.13g
Aspartic Acid SR0.66g
Glutamic Acid SR2.1g
Glycine SR0.10g
Proline SR0.07g
Serine SR0.13g
Phytochemicals 1
NutrientPer 100gUnitPer Serving% DV
Oxalic Acid AFCD0mg
Other 3
NutrientPer 100gUnitPer Serving% DV
Caffeine AFCD0mg
Theobromine SR0mg
Alcohol AFCD0g

Nutrient Density Score

The NRF9.3 score measures overall nutritional quality per 100 kcal. It rewards 9 nutrients to encourage (protein, fiber, vitamins A, C, E, calcium, iron, magnesium, potassium) and penalizes 3 to limit (saturated fat, added sugars, sodium). Higher is better; negative scores indicate the food is high in limit nutrients relative to its beneficial content.

135
NRF9.3 Score
Excellent · per 100 kcal
Poor (<0) Moderate Good Excellent (100+)

NRF9.3 index: Fulgoni et al. (2009), J Nutr 139(8). DVs based on FDA 2020 reference values.

Nutrient Interactions in This Food

Nutrients in this food that enhance or compete with each other during absorption.

✔ Synergies — nutrients that help each other

Vitamin C + Iron●●●

Vitamin C dramatically enhances non-heme iron absorption by reducing Fe³⁺ to Fe²⁺ in the gut. Adding 75 mg vitamin C to a meal can increase iron absorption 3–4 fold.

Hallberg et al., Am J Clin Nutr, 1989

Dietary Fat + Vitamin A●●●

Vitamin A is fat-soluble and requires dietary fat for absorption. Adding fat to a meal significantly increases beta-carotene and retinol absorption.

Ribaya-Mercado et al., Am J Clin Nutr, 2007

Dietary Fat + Vitamin E●●●

Vitamin E is fat-soluble and absorbed alongside dietary fats via micelle formation in the small intestine. Low-fat diets reduce vitamin E absorption.

Traber, Free Radic Biol Med, 2007

Dietary Fat + Vitamin K●●●

Vitamin K is fat-soluble. Absorption increases significantly when consumed with dietary fat, particularly for phylloquinone (K1) from plant sources.

Gijsbers et al., Br J Nutr, 1996

Vitamin C + Vitamin E●●

Vitamin C regenerates oxidised vitamin E (tocopheroxyl radical) back to its active form, extending its antioxidant function in cell membranes.

Niki, Free Radic Biol Med, 2014

⚠ Antagonisms — nutrients that compete

Fiber vs Iron●●

Phytates in high-fibre foods (whole grains, legumes) bind non-heme iron and reduce its bioavailability. Soaking, sprouting, and fermentation reduce phytate content.

Hurrell & Egli, Int J Vitam Nutr Res, 2010

Manganese vs Iron●●

Manganese and iron share the DMT1 transporter and compete for absorption. High iron status reduces manganese absorption and vice versa.

Erikson et al., Pharmacol Ther, 2007

Vitamin C vs Copper●●

High-dose vitamin C (>1,500 mg/day) may reduce copper absorption by reducing Cu²⁺ to Cu⁺, though the clinical significance at normal intakes is minimal.

Harris, Am J Clin Nutr, 2003

Amino Acid Profile

Essential amino acid composition compared to the WHO/FAO adult reference pattern. The Amino Acid Score indicates protein quality — 100 means all essential amino acid requirements are met.

50
Amino Acid Score
Moderate
Leucine
Limiting Amino Acid
18
Amino Acids Tracked

Tip: The limiting amino acid is Leucine. Pair with dairy, eggs, and meat for a complete amino acid profile.

All Amino Acids (18)
Amino Acidg / 100gmg / g protein
Tryptophan0.024.5
Threonine0.1331.4
Isoleucine0.0921.0
Leucine0.1229.3
Lysine0.1331.6
Methionine0.036.4
Cystine0.0510.9
Phenylalanine0.1330.7
Tyrosine0.0715.6
Valine0.0920.8
Arginine0.1024.1
Histidine0.0716.8
Alanine0.1331.4
Aspartic Acid0.66156.1
Glutamic Acid2.1498.3
Glycine0.1022.4
Proline0.0717.7
Serine0.1329.8

How Cooking Changes Nutrients

Estimated percentage of each nutrient retained after cooking, based on USDA retention factors for the “Tomatoes” food category. Values of 100% mean no loss; lower values indicate nutrients lost to heat, water, or oxidation.

Source: USDA Table of Nutrient Retention Factors, Release 6 (2007). Retention values are category-level averages — actual retention depends on cooking time, temperature, and water volume.

USDA Retention Factors

Insulin Response

The Insulin Index (II) measures the actual insulin response to food on a scale where white bread = 100. Unlike the Glycemic Index (which only measures blood sugar), the II captures the full hormonal response — including the effect of protein and fat on insulin secretion. This is why high-protein foods like meat and dairy can have significant insulin scores despite having low or zero GI values.

69
Insulin Index
High Insulin Response
Insulin Index Scale 69
0 Low ≤30 Mod ≤60 High ≤100 120
Macro Model ●● Estimated from macronutrient composition (R²=0.49)

Source: Holt et al. 1997; Bao et al. 2016; Bell 2014

Environmental Impact

Environmental footprint per kilogram of food produced. Data represents the global average for the “Tomatoes” category.

2.1
kg CO₂e / kg
Low Impact
0.80
m² land / kg
Land Use
370
L water / kg
Water Use
7.2
g SO₂e / kg
Acidification
How this compares (GHG emissions)
Potatoes (0.5)Chicken (9.9)Beef (99.5)
Greenhouse Gas Emissions2.1 kg CO₂e / kg
Land Use0.80 m² / kg
Water Use370 L / kg
Eutrophication7.5 g PO₄e / kg
Acidification7.2 g SO₂e / kg
⚠️ Important context about this data
  • Global averages: These figures are production-weighted averages from a meta-analysis of ~38,700 farms across 119 countries (Poore & Nemecek, 2018). Actual impact varies enormously by farming method, geography, and supply chain.
  • System boundary: Cradle-to-retail only — does not include consumer transport, home cooking energy, or food waste.
  • Soil carbon not included: This data does not account for soil carbon sequestration. Some argue that well-managed regenerative grazing partially offsets ruminant emissions; however, full lifecycle accounting — including methane, land-use change, and the opportunity cost of using land for grazing vs. reforestation — typically makes the net footprint of ruminant meat higher, not lower. This is especially relevant in temperate grassland regions like Ireland.
  • Not gospel: This data is informational and illustrative. It is useful for understanding relative magnitudes, but should not be treated as precise measurements for any individual product or farm.

Source: Poore & Nemecek (2018), Science 360(6392). Meta-analysis of ~38,700 farms, 119 countries, 46 product categories.

Global Supply: Vegetables

Top 10 countries by per capita supply of the “Vegetables” food group (kcal/capita/day, 2023). This is food group–level data from FAO Food Balance Sheets, not specific to this individual food.

1.
China; mainland
310
2.
China
306
3.
Albania
258
4.
North Macedonia
221
5.
Guyana
209
6.
Kazakhstan
204
7.
Oman
192
8.
Uzbekistan
190
9.
Tajikistan
186
10.
Bosnia and Herzegovina
183

Global Supply Trend (1961–2023)

+76%
1961: 38 kcal2023: 67 kcal

Source: FAO Food Balance Sheets (2023). Supply = production + imports − exports − waste, converted to kcal/capita/day.

Frequently Asked Questions

How many calories are in Tomato products, canned, paste, without salt added (Includes foods for USDA's Food Distribution Program)?

Tomato products, canned, paste, without salt added (Includes foods for USDA's Food Distribution Program) contains 88.5 kcal per 100 grams, making it a moderate-calorie food. The energy comes from 4.2g of protein (19% of calories), 0.73g of fat (7%), and 20.2g of carbohydrates (91%). Carbohydrates are the primary energy source.

What is Tomato products, canned, paste, without salt added (Includes foods for USDA's Food Distribution Program) most nutritious for?

The standout nutrient in Tomato products, canned, paste, without salt added (Includes foods for USDA's Food Distribution Program) is Vitamin B6, providing 2.0 mg per 100g (156% of the Daily Value). It is also a notable source of Iron (40% DV). Our database tracks 93 individual nutrients for this food, allowing detailed comparison across vitamins, minerals, amino acids, and fatty acids.

Is Tomato products, canned, paste, without salt added (Includes foods for USDA's Food Distribution Program) high in protein?

Tomato products, canned, paste, without salt added (Includes foods for USDA's Food Distribution Program) contains 4.2g of protein per 100 grams. While not a high-protein food, it can contribute to daily protein needs as part of a varied diet.

How much fiber is in Tomato products, canned, paste, without salt added (Includes foods for USDA's Food Distribution Program)?

Tomato products, canned, paste, without salt added (Includes foods for USDA's Food Distribution Program) contains 4.7g of fiber per 100 grams — a moderate amount. This contributes to the recommended daily intake of 25-38g. Pairing with other fiber-rich foods like vegetables, legumes, or whole grains can help meet daily targets.

What is the insulin index of Tomato products, canned, paste, without salt added (Includes foods for USDA's Food Distribution Program)?

Tomato products, canned, paste, without salt added (Includes foods for USDA's Food Distribution Program) has a high insulin response (II: 69) (estimated from macronutrient composition) on the insulin index scale (white bread = 100). Foods with high insulin scores stimulate significant insulin release, which may be relevant for blood sugar management. Note that the insulin index can differ substantially from the glycemic index — dairy products and high-protein foods often have higher insulin responses than their GI would suggest.