Skip to main content

Tomatoes, red, ripe, cooked, stewed

Vegetables Per 100 g · Per 100g serving
Also available: Stewed, Canned Cooked

Tomatoes, red, ripe, cooked, stewed is a vegetable at 79.0 calories per 100g. It is a good source of Sodium, providing 30% of the Daily Value per 100g. Vegetables provide essential vitamins, minerals, and dietary fiber with relatively few calories. They are a cornerstone of virtually every dietary guideline worldwide. Our database tracks 61 nutrients for this food, plus insulin index, environmental footprint data.

79.0
Calories
kcal
2.0
Protein
g
2.7
Fat
g
13.1
Carbs
g
1.7
Fiber
g

Top Nutrients

💎
Sodium
455 mg
30% DV
☀️
Vitamin C
18.2 mg
20% DV
💎
Iron
1.1 mg
13% DV

Data for 61 of 150 tracked nutrients

Nutrient Fingerprint

How this food scores across key nutrient categories, as a percentage of the daily recommended value per 100 g. Based on USDA DRIs for adults.

Complete Nutrient Profile

Macronutrients 8
NutrientPer 100gUnitPer Serving% DV
Water SR80.6g
2%
Calories SR79.0kcal
Energy (kJ) SR331kj
Protein SR2.0g
4%
Total Fat SR2.7g
Carbohydrate SR13.1g
10%
Fiber SR1.7g
4%
Ash SR1.7g
Minerals 10
NutrientPer 100gUnitPer Serving% DV
Calcium SR26.0mg
3%
Iron SR1.1mg
13%
Magnesium SR15.0mg
4%
Phosphorus SR38.0mg
5%
Potassium SR247mg
7%
Sodium SR455mg
30%
Zinc SR0.18mg
2%
Copper SR0.10mg
11%
Manganese SR0.19mg
8%
Selenium SR1.2µg
2%
Vitamins 16
NutrientPer 100gUnitPer Serving% DV
Vitamin A (RAE) SR33.0µg
4%
Vitamin A (IU) SR666IU
Retinol SR0µg
Vitamin C SR18.2mg
20%
Vitamin D SR0µg
Vitamin D (IU) SR0IU
Thiamin (B1) SR0.11mg
9%
Riboflavin (B2) SR0.08mg
6%
Niacin (B3) SR1.1mg
7%
Pantothenic Acid (B5) SR0.26mg
5%
Vitamin B6 SR0.09mg
7%
Folate SR11.0µg
3%
Folic Acid SR0µg
Folate (food) SR11.0µg
Folate (DFE) SR11.0µg
Vitamin B12 SR0µg
Fatty Acids 8
NutrientPer 100gUnitPer Serving% DV
Saturated Fat SR0.52g
Monounsaturated Fat SR1.0g
Polyunsaturated Fat SR0.88g
Trans Fat SR0g
Cholesterol SR0mg
Omega-3 EPA SR0g
Omega-3 DPA SR0g
Omega-3 DHA SR0g
Amino Acids 18
NutrientPer 100gUnitPer Serving% DV
Tryptophan SR0.02g
Threonine SR0.05g
Isoleucine SR0.06g
Leucine SR0.11g
Lysine SR0.06g
Methionine SR0.02g
Cystine SR0.03g
Phenylalanine SR0.07g
Tyrosine SR0.04g
Valine SR0.07g
Arginine SR0.07g
Histidine SR0.04g
Alanine SR0.06g
Aspartic Acid SR0.17g
Glutamic Acid SR0.64g
Glycine SR0.06g
Proline SR0.13g
Serine SR0.08g
Other 1
NutrientPer 100gUnitPer Serving% DV
Alcohol SR0g

Nutrient Density Score

The NRF9.3 score measures overall nutritional quality per 100 kcal. It rewards 9 nutrients to encourage (protein, fiber, vitamins A, C, E, calcium, iron, magnesium, potassium) and penalizes 3 to limit (saturated fat, added sugars, sodium). Higher is better; negative scores indicate the food is high in limit nutrients relative to its beneficial content.

36
NRF9.3 Score
Moderate · per 100 kcal
Poor (<0) Moderate Good Excellent (100+)

NRF9.3 index: Fulgoni et al. (2009), J Nutr 139(8). DVs based on FDA 2020 reference values.

Nutrient Interactions in This Food

Nutrients in this food that enhance or compete with each other during absorption.

✔ Synergies — nutrients that help each other

Vitamin C + Iron●●●

Vitamin C dramatically enhances non-heme iron absorption by reducing Fe³⁺ to Fe²⁺ in the gut. Adding 75 mg vitamin C to a meal can increase iron absorption 3–4 fold.

Hallberg et al., Am J Clin Nutr, 1989

⚠ Antagonisms — nutrients that compete

Potassium vs Sodium●●

High potassium intake promotes renal sodium excretion and attenuates the blood pressure–raising effect of sodium. A higher K:Na ratio is associated with lower cardiovascular risk.

Aburto et al., BMJ, 2013

Manganese vs Iron●●

Manganese and iron share the DMT1 transporter and compete for absorption. High iron status reduces manganese absorption and vice versa.

Erikson et al., Pharmacol Ther, 2007

Vitamin C vs Copper●●

High-dose vitamin C (>1,500 mg/day) may reduce copper absorption by reducing Cu²⁺ to Cu⁺, though the clinical significance at normal intakes is minimal.

Harris, Am J Clin Nutr, 2003

Amino Acid Profile

Essential amino acid composition compared to the WHO/FAO adult reference pattern. The Amino Acid Score indicates protein quality — 100 means all essential amino acid requirements are met.

70
Amino Acid Score
Moderate
Lysine
Limiting Amino Acid
18
Amino Acids Tracked

Tip: The limiting amino acid is Lysine. Pair with legumes, dairy, and soy for a complete amino acid profile.

All Amino Acids (18)
Amino Acidg / 100gmg / g protein
Tryptophan0.029.7
Threonine0.0527.6
Isoleucine0.0632.7
Leucine0.1154.1
Lysine0.0631.6
Methionine0.0212.2
Cystine0.0314.8
Phenylalanine0.0738.3
Tyrosine0.0420.9
Valine0.0738.3
Arginine0.0734.2
Histidine0.0418.4
Alanine0.0632.1
Aspartic Acid0.1788.8
Glutamic Acid0.64328.1
Glycine0.0632.1
Proline0.1366.3
Serine0.0839.3

Fatty Acid Profile

Breakdown of fat types per 100g. A healthy fat profile favours unsaturated fats (mono + poly) and a balanced omega-3 to omega-6 ratio.

0.52g
Saturated
1.0g
Monounsaturated
0.88g
Polyunsaturated

How Cooking Changes Nutrients

Estimated percentage of each nutrient retained after cooking, based on USDA retention factors for the “Tomatoes” food category. Values of 100% mean no loss; lower values indicate nutrients lost to heat, water, or oxidation.

Source: USDA Table of Nutrient Retention Factors, Release 6 (2007). Retention values are category-level averages — actual retention depends on cooking time, temperature, and water volume.

USDA Retention Factors

Insulin Response

The Insulin Index (II) measures the actual insulin response to food on a scale where white bread = 100. Unlike the Glycemic Index (which only measures blood sugar), the II captures the full hormonal response — including the effect of protein and fat on insulin secretion. This is why high-protein foods like meat and dairy can have significant insulin scores despite having low or zero GI values.

41
Insulin Index
Moderate Insulin Response
Insulin Index Scale 41
0 Low ≤30 Mod ≤60 High ≤100 120
Measured ●●● Clinically measured (Holt 1997, Bell 2014)

Source: Holt et al. 1997; Bao et al. 2016; Bell 2014

Environmental Impact

Environmental footprint per kilogram of food produced. Data represents the global average for the “Other Vegetables” category.

0.53
kg CO₂e / kg
Very Low Impact
0.37
m² land / kg
Land Use
103
L water / kg
Water Use
3.2
g SO₂e / kg
Acidification
How this compares (GHG emissions)
Potatoes (0.5)Chicken (9.9)Beef (99.5)
Greenhouse Gas Emissions0.53 kg CO₂e / kg
Land Use0.37 m² / kg
Water Use103 L / kg
Eutrophication4.9 g PO₄e / kg
Acidification3.2 g SO₂e / kg
⚠️ Important context about this data
  • Global averages: These figures are production-weighted averages from a meta-analysis of ~38,700 farms across 119 countries (Poore & Nemecek, 2018). Actual impact varies enormously by farming method, geography, and supply chain.
  • System boundary: Cradle-to-retail only — does not include consumer transport, home cooking energy, or food waste.
  • Soil carbon not included: This data does not account for soil carbon sequestration. Some argue that well-managed regenerative grazing partially offsets ruminant emissions; however, full lifecycle accounting — including methane, land-use change, and the opportunity cost of using land for grazing vs. reforestation — typically makes the net footprint of ruminant meat higher, not lower. This is especially relevant in temperate grassland regions like Ireland.
  • Not gospel: This data is informational and illustrative. It is useful for understanding relative magnitudes, but should not be treated as precise measurements for any individual product or farm.

Source: Poore & Nemecek (2018), Science 360(6392). Meta-analysis of ~38,700 farms, 119 countries, 46 product categories.

Global Supply: Vegetables

Top 10 countries by per capita supply of the “Vegetables” food group (kcal/capita/day, 2023). This is food group–level data from FAO Food Balance Sheets, not specific to this individual food.

1.
310
2.
306
3.
258
4.
221
5.
209
6.
204
7.
192
8.
190
9.
186
10.
183

Global Supply Trend (1961–2023)

+76%
1961: 38 kcal2023: 67 kcal

Source: FAO Food Balance Sheets (2023). Supply = production + imports − exports − waste, converted to kcal/capita/day.

Frequently Asked Questions

How many calories are in Tomatoes, red, ripe, cooked, stewed?

Tomatoes, red, ripe, cooked, stewed contains 79.0 kcal per 100 grams, making it a low-calorie food. The energy comes from 2.0g of protein (10% of calories), 2.7g of fat (31%), and 13.1g of carbohydrates (66%). Carbohydrates are the primary energy source.

What is Tomatoes, red, ripe, cooked, stewed most nutritious for?

The standout nutrient in Tomatoes, red, ripe, cooked, stewed is Sodium, providing 455 mg per 100g (30% of the Daily Value). It is also a notable source of Vitamin C (20% DV). Our database tracks 61 individual nutrients for this food, allowing detailed comparison across vitamins, minerals, amino acids, and fatty acids.

Is Tomatoes, red, ripe, cooked, stewed high in protein?

At 2.0g per 100 grams, Tomatoes, red, ripe, cooked, stewed is not a significant source of protein. Pair with protein-rich foods like legumes, meat, fish, or dairy to meet daily protein needs.

How much fiber is in Tomatoes, red, ripe, cooked, stewed?

Tomatoes, red, ripe, cooked, stewed contains 1.7g of fiber per 100 grams, which is a small amount. To increase fiber intake, consider pairing with high-fiber foods such as legumes, whole grains, or vegetables.

What is the insulin index of Tomatoes, red, ripe, cooked, stewed?

Tomatoes, red, ripe, cooked, stewed has a moderate insulin response (II: 41) (clinically measured) on the insulin index scale (white bread = 100). This is a typical insulin response for most mixed foods. Note that the insulin index can differ substantially from the glycemic index — dairy products and high-protein foods often have higher insulin responses than their GI would suggest.