Skip to main content

Candies, MARS SNACKFOOD US, M&M's Peanut Butter Chocolate Candies

Sweets Per 100 g · Per 100g serving
Contains: 🥛 Milk 🥜 Peanuts

Candies, MARS SNACKFOOD US, M&M's Peanut Butter Chocolate Candies is a sweet/confection, with a high energy density of 529 kcal per 100g. It is an excellent source of Copper, providing 0.452 mg (50% of the Daily Value) per 100g serving. This sweet/confection is a moderate protein source, a useful source of fiber. Sweets and confections are primarily energy-dense foods. Some varieties, such as dark chocolate, contain notable amounts of minerals and bioactive compounds. Our database tracks 64 nutrients for this food, plus environmental footprint data.

529
Calories
kcal
10.2
Protein
g
29.3
Fat
g
56.9
Carbs
g
4.0
Fiber
g

Top Nutrients

💎
Copper
0.45 mg
50% DV
💪
Carbohydrate
56.9 g
44% DV
💎
Manganese
0.96 mg
42% DV

Data for 64 of 150 tracked nutrients

Nutrient Fingerprint

How this food scores across key nutrient categories, as a percentage of the daily recommended value per 100 g. Based on USDA DRIs for adults.

Complete Nutrient Profile

Macronutrients 9
NutrientPer 100gUnitPer Serving% DV
Water SR2.0g
0%
Calories SR529kcal
Energy (kJ) SR2,214kj
Protein SR10.2g
18%
Total Fat SR29.3g
Carbohydrate SR56.9g
44%
Fiber SR4.0g
10%
Total Sugars SR47.1g
Ash SR1.8g
Minerals 10
NutrientPer 100gUnitPer Serving% DV
Calcium SR88.0mg
9%
Iron SR1.1mg
13%
Magnesium SR81.0mg
20%
Phosphorus SR191mg
27%
Potassium SR330mg
10%
Sodium SR213mg
14%
Zinc SR1.5mg
14%
Copper SR0.45mg
50%
Manganese SR0.96mg
42%
Selenium SR2.8µg
5%
Vitamins 24
NutrientPer 100gUnitPer Serving% DV
Vitamin A (RAE) SR92.0µg
10%
Vitamin A (IU) SR28.0IU
Retinol SR28.0µg
Beta-Carotene SR0µg
Alpha-Carotene SR0µg
Beta-Cryptoxanthin SR0µg
Lycopene SR0µg
Lutein + Zeaxanthin SR0µg
Vitamin C SR0.50mg
1%
Vitamin D SR0µg
Vitamin D (IU) SR0IU
Vitamin E SR1.3mg
8%
Vitamin K1 SR5.9µg
5%
Thiamin (B1) SR0.15mg
13%
Riboflavin (B2) SR0.07mg
6%
Niacin (B3) SR4.3mg
27%
Pantothenic Acid (B5) SR0.60mg
12%
Vitamin B6 SR0.10mg
7%
Folate SR45.0µg
11%
Folic Acid SR0µg
Folate (food) SR45.0µg
Folate (DFE) SR45.0µg
Vitamin B12 SR0.19µg
8%
Choline SR37.5mg
7%
Fatty Acids 8
NutrientPer 100gUnitPer Serving% DV
Saturated Fat SR18.5g
Monounsaturated Fat SR4.4g
Polyunsaturated Fat SR0.54g
Trans Fat SR0.21g
Cholesterol SR7.0mg
Omega-3 EPA SR0g
Omega-3 DPA SR0g
Omega-3 DHA SR0g
Individual Fatty Acids 10
NutrientPer 100gUnitPer Serving% DV
Butyric Acid (4:0) SR0.15g
Caproic Acid (6:0) SR0.10g
Caprylic Acid (8:0) SR0.63g
Capric Acid (10:0) SR0.54g
Lauric Acid (12:0) SR6.6g
Myristic Acid (14:0) SR2.5g
Palmitic Acid (16:0) SR3.0g
Stearic Acid (18:0) SR4.9g
Linoleic Acid (18:2) SR0.52g
3%
Linolenic Acid (18:3) SR0.03g
Other 3
NutrientPer 100gUnitPer Serving% DV
Caffeine SR6.0mg
Theobromine SR63.0mg
Alcohol SR0g

Nutrient Density Score

The NRF9.3 score measures overall nutritional quality per 100 kcal. It rewards 9 nutrients to encourage (protein, fiber, vitamins A, C, E, calcium, iron, magnesium, potassium) and penalizes 3 to limit (saturated fat, added sugars, sodium). Higher is better; negative scores indicate the food is high in limit nutrients relative to its beneficial content.

-2
NRF9.3 Score
Poor · per 100 kcal
Poor (<0) Moderate Good Excellent (100+)

NRF9.3 index: Fulgoni et al. (2009), J Nutr 139(8). DVs based on FDA 2020 reference values.

Nutrient Interactions in This Food

Nutrients in this food that enhance or compete with each other during absorption.

✔ Synergies — nutrients that help each other

Dietary Fat + Vitamin A●●●

Vitamin A is fat-soluble and requires dietary fat for absorption. Adding fat to a meal significantly increases beta-carotene and retinol absorption.

Ribaya-Mercado et al., Am J Clin Nutr, 2007

Dietary Fat + Vitamin E●●●

Vitamin E is fat-soluble and absorbed alongside dietary fats via micelle formation in the small intestine. Low-fat diets reduce vitamin E absorption.

Traber, Free Radic Biol Med, 2007

Vitamin B12 + Folate●●

Vitamin B12 and folate are metabolically interdependent. B12 is needed to convert methyltetrahydrofolate back to tetrahydrofolate, enabling folate to participate in DNA synthesis.

Green et al., Nat Rev Dis Primers, 2017

Selenium + Vitamin E●●

Selenium (via glutathione peroxidase) and vitamin E work as complementary antioxidants. Selenium reduces peroxides while vitamin E prevents lipid peroxidation in membranes.

Combs, Br J Nutr, 2001

Vitamin B6 + Magnesium●●

Vitamin B6 may enhance intracellular magnesium accumulation. Combined supplementation has shown greater benefits for stress and anxiety than magnesium alone.

Pouteau et al., PLoS One, 2018

⚠ Antagonisms — nutrients that compete

Calcium vs Iron●●●

Calcium inhibits both heme and non-heme iron absorption when consumed in the same meal. The effect is dose-dependent, with significant inhibition at 300+ mg calcium.

Hallberg et al., Am J Clin Nutr, 1991

Zinc vs Copper●●●

High zinc intake induces metallothionein in enterocytes, which traps copper and blocks its absorption. Prolonged high-dose zinc can cause copper deficiency.

Prasad et al., JAMA, 1978; Fosmire, Am J Clin Nutr, 1990

Zinc vs Iron●●

Zinc and non-heme iron compete for the same intestinal transporter (DMT1). High doses of one can reduce absorption of the other when taken simultaneously.

Rossander-Hulten et al., Am J Clin Nutr, 1991

Calcium vs Magnesium●●

Very high calcium intake can reduce magnesium absorption by competing for shared intestinal transport pathways. A calcium:magnesium ratio above 2.6:1 may impair magnesium status.

Rosanoff et al., Nutr Rev, 2012

Fiber vs Iron●●

Phytates in high-fibre foods (whole grains, legumes) bind non-heme iron and reduce its bioavailability. Soaking, sprouting, and fermentation reduce phytate content.

Hurrell & Egli, Int J Vitam Nutr Res, 2010

Fatty Acid Profile

Breakdown of fat types per 100g. A healthy fat profile favours unsaturated fats (mono + poly) and a balanced omega-3 to omega-6 ratio.

18.5g
Saturated
4.4g
Monounsaturated
0.54g
Polyunsaturated
Omega Fatty Acids
Linoleic acid (18:2 n-6)0.52 g
⚠ Trans fat: 0.21 g per 100g. WHO recommends less than 1% of total energy from trans fats.

Environmental Impact

Environmental footprint per kilogram of food produced. Data represents the global average for the “Cane Sugar” category.

3.2
kg CO₂e / kg
Moderate Impact
2.0
m² land / kg
Land Use
620
L water / kg
Water Use
5.2
g SO₂e / kg
Acidification
How this compares (GHG emissions)
Potatoes (0.5)Chicken (9.9)Beef (99.5)
Greenhouse Gas Emissions3.2 kg CO₂e / kg
Land Use2.0 m² / kg
Water Use620 L / kg
Eutrophication17.1 g PO₄e / kg
Acidification5.2 g SO₂e / kg
⚠️ Important context about this data
  • Global averages: These figures are production-weighted averages from a meta-analysis of ~38,700 farms across 119 countries (Poore & Nemecek, 2018). Actual impact varies enormously by farming method, geography, and supply chain.
  • System boundary: Cradle-to-retail only — does not include consumer transport, home cooking energy, or food waste.
  • Soil carbon not included: This data does not account for soil carbon sequestration. Some argue that well-managed regenerative grazing partially offsets ruminant emissions; however, full lifecycle accounting — including methane, land-use change, and the opportunity cost of using land for grazing vs. reforestation — typically makes the net footprint of ruminant meat higher, not lower. This is especially relevant in temperate grassland regions like Ireland.
  • Not gospel: This data is informational and illustrative. It is useful for understanding relative magnitudes, but should not be treated as precise measurements for any individual product or farm.

Source: Poore & Nemecek (2018), Science 360(6392). Meta-analysis of ~38,700 farms, 119 countries, 46 product categories.

Global Supply: Sugar & Sweeteners

Top 10 countries by per capita supply of the “Sugar & Sweeteners” food group (kcal/capita/day, 2023). This is food group–level data from FAO Food Balance Sheets, not specific to this individual food.

1.
Guatemala
594
2.
United States of America
569
3.
Belgium
564
4.
Poland
555
5.
Tuvalu
528
6.
Colombia
520
7.
New Zealand
499
8.
Belgium-Luxembourg
493
9.
Hungary
493
10.
Republic of Korea
489

Global Supply Trend (1961–2023)

+26%
1961: 230 kcal2023: 289 kcal

Source: FAO Food Balance Sheets (2023). Supply = production + imports − exports − waste, converted to kcal/capita/day.

Frequently Asked Questions

How many calories are in Candies, MARS SNACKFOOD US, M&M's Peanut Butter Chocolate Candies?

Candies, MARS SNACKFOOD US, M&M's Peanut Butter Chocolate Candies contains 529 kcal per 100 grams, making it a very calorie-dense food. The energy comes from 10.2g of protein (8% of calories), 29.3g of fat (50%), and 56.9g of carbohydrates (43%). Fat is the primary energy source.

What is Candies, MARS SNACKFOOD US, M&M's Peanut Butter Chocolate Candies most nutritious for?

The standout nutrient in Candies, MARS SNACKFOOD US, M&M's Peanut Butter Chocolate Candies is Copper, providing 0.45 mg per 100g (50% of the Daily Value). It is also a notable source of Carbohydrate (44% DV). Our database tracks 64 individual nutrients for this food, allowing detailed comparison across vitamins, minerals, amino acids, and fatty acids.

Is Candies, MARS SNACKFOOD US, M&M's Peanut Butter Chocolate Candies high in protein?

Candies, MARS SNACKFOOD US, M&M's Peanut Butter Chocolate Candies provides 10.2g of protein per 100 grams — a moderate amount. Protein contributes 8% of its calories.

How much fiber is in Candies, MARS SNACKFOOD US, M&M's Peanut Butter Chocolate Candies?

Candies, MARS SNACKFOOD US, M&M's Peanut Butter Chocolate Candies contains 4.0g of fiber per 100 grams — a moderate amount. This contributes to the recommended daily intake of 25-38g. Pairing with other fiber-rich foods like vegetables, legumes, or whole grains can help meet daily targets.