Skip to main content

Candies, HERSHEYS, PAYDAY Bar

Sweets Per 100 g · Per 100g serving

Candies, HERSHEYS, PAYDAY Bar is a sweet/confection, containing 490 calories per 100g. It provides useful amounts of Niacin (B3) and Carbohydrate, contributing 45% and 41% of the Daily Value per 100g. This sweet/confection is a moderate protein source, a useful source of fiber. Sweets and confections are primarily energy-dense foods. Some varieties, such as dark chocolate, contain notable amounts of minerals and bioactive compounds. Our database tracks 97 nutrients for this food, plus insulin index, environmental footprint data.

490
Calories
kcal
13.4
Protein
g
25.0
Fat
g
52.9
Carbs
g
3.8
Fiber
g

Top Nutrients

☀️
Niacin (B3)
7.2 mg
45% DV
💪
Carbohydrate
52.9 g
41% DV
💎
Manganese
0.91 mg
40% DV

Data for 97 of 150 tracked nutrients

Nutrient Fingerprint

How this food scores across key nutrient categories, as a percentage of the daily recommended value per 100 g. Based on USDA DRIs for adults.

Complete Nutrient Profile

Macronutrients 10
NutrientPer 100gUnitPer Serving% DV
Water SR7.0g—
0%
Calories SR490kcal——
Energy (kJ) SR2,051kj——
Protein SR13.4g—
24%
Total Fat SR25.0g——
Carbohydrate SR52.9g—
41%
Fiber SR3.8g—
10%
Total Sugars SR40.3g——
Starch SR2.2g——
Ash SR1.7g——
Minerals 11
NutrientPer 100gUnitPer Serving% DV
Calcium SR94.0mg—
9%
Iron SR1.9mg—
24%
Magnesium SR90.0mg—
22%
Phosphorus SR197mg—
28%
Potassium SR725mg—
21%
Sodium SR231mg—
15%
Zinc SR1.6mg—
14%
Copper SR0.33mg—
36%
Manganese SR0.91mg—
40%
Selenium SR5.1µg—
9%
Fluoride SR0.10µg—
0%
Vitamins 35
NutrientPer 100gUnitPer Serving% DV
Vitamin A (RAE) SR1.0µg—
0%
Vitamin A (IU) SR0IU——
Retinol SR0µg——
Beta-Carotene SR0µg——
Alpha-Carotene SR0µg——
Beta-Cryptoxanthin SR0µg——
Lycopene SR0µg——
Lutein + Zeaxanthin SR0µg——
Vitamin C SR0mg——
Vitamin D SR0µg——
Vitamin D (IU) SR0IU——
Vitamin D3 SR0µg——
Vitamin E SR2.5mg—
16%
Beta-Tocopherol SR0.18mg——
Gamma-Tocopherol SR3.1mg——
Delta-Tocopherol SR0.30mg——
Alpha-Tocotrienol SR0.03mg——
Beta-Tocotrienol SR0mg——
Gamma-Tocotrienol SR0.02mg——
Delta-Tocotrienol SR0mg——
Vitamin K1 SR0µg——
Vitamin K1 (dihydro) SR0µg——
Vitamin K2 (MK-4) SR0µg——
Thiamin (B1) SR0.08mg—
7%
Riboflavin (B2) SR0.12mg—
9%
Niacin (B3) SR7.2mg—
45%
Pantothenic Acid (B5) SR0.52mg—
10%
Vitamin B6 SR0.23mg—
18%
Folate SR51.0µg—
13%
Folic Acid SR0µg——
Folate (food) SR51.0µg——
Folate (DFE) SR51.0µg——
Vitamin B12 SR0.02µg—
1%
Choline SR35.6mg—
6%
Betaine SR0.30mg——
Fatty Acids 9
NutrientPer 100gUnitPer Serving% DV
Saturated Fat SR4.8g——
Monounsaturated Fat SR12.5g——
Polyunsaturated Fat SR4.7g——
Trans Fat SR0g——
Cholesterol SR0mg——
Phytosterols SR0mg——
Omega-3 EPA SR0.02g——
Omega-3 DPA SR0g——
Omega-3 DHA SR0g——
Individual Fatty Acids 10
NutrientPer 100gUnitPer Serving% DV
Butyric Acid (4:0) SR0g——
Caproic Acid (6:0) SR0g——
Caprylic Acid (8:0) SR0g——
Capric Acid (10:0) SR0g——
Lauric Acid (12:0) SR0g——
Myristic Acid (14:0) SR0.01g——
Palmitic Acid (16:0) SR2.5g——
Stearic Acid (18:0) SR0.74g——
Linoleic Acid (18:2) SR4.6g—
27%
Linolenic Acid (18:3) SR0.02g——
Amino Acids 19
NutrientPer 100gUnitPer Serving% DV
Tryptophan SR0.13g——
Threonine SR0.46g——
Isoleucine SR0.49g——
Leucine SR0.88g——
Lysine SR0.52g——
Methionine SR0.17g——
Cystine SR0.17g——
Phenylalanine SR0.69g——
Tyrosine SR0.54g——
Valine SR0.56g——
Arginine SR1.5g——
Histidine SR0.34g——
Alanine SR0.53g——
Aspartic Acid SR1.6g——
Glutamic Acid SR2.8g——
Glycine SR0.77g——
Proline SR0.61g——
Serine SR0.66g——
Hydroxyproline SR0g——
Other 3
NutrientPer 100gUnitPer Serving% DV
Caffeine SR0mg——
Theobromine SR0mg——
Alcohol SR0g——

Nutrient Density Score

The NRF9.3 score measures overall nutritional quality per 100 kcal. It rewards 9 nutrients to encourage (protein, fiber, vitamins A, C, E, calcium, iron, magnesium, potassium) and penalizes 3 to limit (saturated fat, added sugars, sodium). Higher is better; negative scores indicate the food is high in limit nutrients relative to its beneficial content.

16
NRF9.3 Score
Moderate · per 100 kcal
Poor (<0) Moderate Good Excellent (100+)

NRF9.3 index: Fulgoni et al. (2009), J Nutr 139(8). DVs based on FDA 2020 reference values.

Nutrient Interactions in This Food

Nutrients in this food that enhance or compete with each other during absorption.

✔ Synergies — nutrients that help each other

Dietary Fat + Vitamin E●●●

Vitamin E is fat-soluble and absorbed alongside dietary fats via micelle formation in the small intestine. Low-fat diets reduce vitamin E absorption.

Traber, Free Radic Biol Med, 2007

Selenium + Vitamin E●●●

Selenium (via glutathione peroxidase) and vitamin E work as complementary antioxidants. Selenium reduces peroxides while vitamin E prevents lipid peroxidation in membranes.

Combs, Br J Nutr, 2001

Vitamin B6 + Magnesium●●●

Vitamin B6 may enhance intracellular magnesium accumulation. Combined supplementation has shown greater benefits for stress and anxiety than magnesium alone.

Pouteau et al., PLoS One, 2018

Protein + Calcium●●●

Moderate protein intake enhances calcium absorption and supports bone health. The acid-ash hypothesis suggesting protein harms bones has been largely disproven.

Kerstetter et al., J Clin Endocrinol Metab, 2005

Vitamin B6 + Folate●●●

Vitamin B6 is a cofactor in folate-dependent one-carbon metabolism. Together with B12, these three nutrients regulate homocysteine levels.

Selhub, J Nutr Health Aging, 2002

⚠ Antagonisms — nutrients that compete

Calcium vs Iron●●●

Calcium inhibits both heme and non-heme iron absorption when consumed in the same meal. The effect is dose-dependent, with significant inhibition at 300+ mg calcium.

Hallberg et al., Am J Clin Nutr, 1991

Zinc vs Copper●●●

High zinc intake induces metallothionein in enterocytes, which traps copper and blocks its absorption. Prolonged high-dose zinc can cause copper deficiency.

Prasad et al., JAMA, 1978; Fosmire, Am J Clin Nutr, 1990

Zinc vs Iron●●●

Zinc and non-heme iron compete for the same intestinal transporter (DMT1). High doses of one can reduce absorption of the other when taken simultaneously.

Rossander-Hulten et al., Am J Clin Nutr, 1991

Calcium vs Magnesium●●●

Very high calcium intake can reduce magnesium absorption by competing for shared intestinal transport pathways. A calcium:magnesium ratio above 2.6:1 may impair magnesium status.

Rosanoff et al., Nutr Rev, 2012

Fiber vs Iron●●●

Phytates in high-fibre foods (whole grains, legumes) bind non-heme iron and reduce its bioavailability. Soaking, sprouting, and fermentation reduce phytate content.

Hurrell & Egli, Int J Vitam Nutr Res, 2010

Amino Acid Profile

Essential amino acid composition compared to the WHO/FAO adult reference pattern. The Amino Acid Score indicates protein quality — 100 means all essential amino acid requirements are met.

85
Amino Acid Score
Good
Lysine
Limiting Amino Acid
18
Amino Acids Tracked

Tip: The limiting amino acid is Lysine. Pair with legumes, dairy, and soy for a complete amino acid profile.

All Amino Acids (18)
Amino Acidg / 100gmg / g protein
Tryptophan0.139.9
Threonine0.4634.0
Isoleucine0.4936.2
Leucine0.8865.4
Lysine0.5238.3
Methionine0.1712.4
Cystine0.1712.5
Phenylalanine0.6951.1
Tyrosine0.5439.8
Valine0.5642.0
Arginine1.5112.4
Histidine0.3425.1
Alanine0.5339.2
Aspartic Acid1.6119.1
Glutamic Acid2.8204.9
Glycine0.7757.0
Proline0.6145.2
Serine0.6649.0

Fatty Acid Profile

Breakdown of fat types per 100g. A healthy fat profile favours unsaturated fats (mono + poly) and a balanced omega-3 to omega-6 ratio.

4.8g
Saturated
12.5g
Monounsaturated
4.7g
Polyunsaturated
1:201.5
Omega-3 : Omega-6 Ratio
Omega-6 dominant — ideal range is 1:1 to 1:4
Omega Fatty Acids
EPA (20:5 n-3)0.02 g
Linoleic acid (18:2 n-6)4.6 g

Insulin Response

The Insulin Index (II) measures the actual insulin response to food on a scale where white bread = 100. Unlike the Glycemic Index (which only measures blood sugar), the II captures the full hormonal response — including the effect of protein and fat on insulin secretion. This is why high-protein foods like meat and dairy can have significant insulin scores despite having low or zero GI values.

39
Insulin Index
Moderate Insulin Response
Insulin Index Scale 39
0 Low ≤30 Mod ≤60 High ≤100 120
Macro Model ●●● Estimated from macronutrient composition (R²=0.49)

Source: Holt et al. 1997; Bao et al. 2016; Bell 2014

Environmental Impact

Environmental footprint per kilogram of food produced. Data represents the global average for the “Cane Sugar” category.

3.2
kg CO₂e / kg
Moderate Impact
2.0
m² land / kg
Land Use
620
L water / kg
Water Use
5.2
g SO₂e / kg
Acidification
How this compares (GHG emissions)
Potatoes (0.5)Chicken (9.9)Beef (99.5)
Greenhouse Gas Emissions3.2 kg CO₂e / kg
Land Use2.0 m² / kg
Water Use620 L / kg
Eutrophication17.1 g PO₄e / kg
Acidification5.2 g SO₂e / kg
⚠️ Important context about this data
  • Global averages: These figures are production-weighted averages from a meta-analysis of ~38,700 farms across 119 countries (Poore & Nemecek, 2018). Actual impact varies enormously by farming method, geography, and supply chain.
  • System boundary: Cradle-to-retail only — does not include consumer transport, home cooking energy, or food waste.
  • Soil carbon not included: This data does not account for soil carbon sequestration. Some argue that well-managed regenerative grazing partially offsets ruminant emissions; however, full lifecycle accounting — including methane, land-use change, and the opportunity cost of using land for grazing vs. reforestation — typically makes the net footprint of ruminant meat higher, not lower. This is especially relevant in temperate grassland regions like Ireland.
  • Not gospel: This data is informational and illustrative. It is useful for understanding relative magnitudes, but should not be treated as precise measurements for any individual product or farm.

Source: Poore & Nemecek (2018), Science 360(6392). Meta-analysis of ~38,700 farms, 119 countries, 46 product categories.

Global Supply: Sugar & Sweeteners

Top 10 countries by per capita supply of the “Sugar & Sweeteners” food group (kcal/capita/day, 2023). This is food group–level data from FAO Food Balance Sheets, not specific to this individual food.

1.
Guatemala
594
2.
United States of America
569
3.
Belgium
564
4.
Poland
555
5.
Tuvalu
528
6.
Colombia
520
7.
New Zealand
499
8.
Belgium-Luxembourg
493
9.
Hungary
493
10.
Republic of Korea
489

Global Supply Trend (1961–2023)

+26%
1961: 230 kcal2023: 289 kcal

Source: FAO Food Balance Sheets (2023). Supply = production + imports − exports − waste, converted to kcal/capita/day.

Frequently Asked Questions

How many calories are in Candies, HERSHEYS, PAYDAY Bar?

Candies, HERSHEYS, PAYDAY Bar contains 490 kcal per 100 grams, making it a calorie-dense food. The energy comes from 13.4g of protein (11% of calories), 25.0g of fat (46%), and 52.9g of carbohydrates (43%). Fat is the primary energy source.

What is Candies, HERSHEYS, PAYDAY Bar most nutritious for?

The standout nutrient in Candies, HERSHEYS, PAYDAY Bar is Niacin (B3), providing 7.2 mg per 100g (45% of the Daily Value). It is also a notable source of Carbohydrate (41% DV). Our database tracks 97 individual nutrients for this food, allowing detailed comparison across vitamins, minerals, amino acids, and fatty acids.

Is Candies, HERSHEYS, PAYDAY Bar high in protein?

Candies, HERSHEYS, PAYDAY Bar provides 13.4g of protein per 100 grams — a moderate amount. Protein contributes 11% of its calories.

How much fiber is in Candies, HERSHEYS, PAYDAY Bar?

Candies, HERSHEYS, PAYDAY Bar contains 3.8g of fiber per 100 grams — a moderate amount. This contributes to the recommended daily intake of 25-38g. Pairing with other fiber-rich foods like vegetables, legumes, or whole grains can help meet daily targets.

What is the insulin index of Candies, HERSHEYS, PAYDAY Bar?

Candies, HERSHEYS, PAYDAY Bar has a moderate insulin response (II: 39) (estimated from macronutrient composition) on the insulin index scale (white bread = 100). This is a typical insulin response for most mixed foods. Note that the insulin index can differ substantially from the glycemic index — dairy products and high-protein foods often have higher insulin responses than their GI would suggest.